Treatment of Candida infections with fluconazole in adult liver transplant recipients: Is TDM-guided dosing adaptation helpful?

BACKGROUND: Fluconazole represents a common antifungal option for the treatment of Candida infections in liver transplant recipients. Although adequate antifungal exposure is known to correlate with favorable outcomes in patients with invasive candidiasis, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of fluconazole is currently not recommended. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study including adult liver transplant recipients receiving fluconazole for invasive candidiasis and undergoing TDM. We assessed the correlation between clinical variables, fluconazole trough plasma levels (Cmin ), and outcome. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients (74% males; median age 57 years) were included. Abdominal candidiasis was the most frequent infection (56%). Median duration of fluconazole therapy was 17 days (IQR 9-21). Fluconazole median Cmin was 11.0 mg/L (range 2.4-30.6 mg/L). Five (19%) patients required TDM-guided fluconazole dose increase. All-cause in hospital mortality was 33%. Fluconazole Cmin >11 mg/L significantly correlated with clinical success (OR 8.78, 95% CI 1.13-67.8, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Our study identified decreased fluconazole Cmin as a factor associated with negative outcomes in liver transplant recipients with Candida infection. TDM of fluconazole may be advisable in this patient population.

Population Pharmacokinetics of High-Dose Continuous-Infusion Meropenem and Considerations for Use in the Treatment of Infections Due to KPC-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae.

We assessed the population pharmacokinetics of high-dose continuous-infusion (HDCI) meropenem in a cohort of patients with Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) infections. Monte Carlo simulations were used to define the permissible HDCI meropenem regimens that could be safely considered for the treatment of KPC-Kp infections due to meropenem-resistant strains. Permissible doses were arbitrarily defined as those associated with a ≤10% to 15% likelihood of meropenem steady-state concentrations (Css) of >100 mg/liter. Probabilities of target attainment (PTA) of four incremental pharmacodynamic determinants for meropenem efficacy (100% T>1×MIC, 100% T>2×MIC, 100% T>3×MIC, and 100% T>4×MIC, where "T>MIC" represents the time during which the plasma concentration of this time-dependent antibacterial agent is maintained above the MIC for the pathogen) in relation to different classes of renal function were calculated. The cumulative fractions of response (CFR) for the permissible HDCI meropenem regimens were calculated against the MIC distribution of the KPC-Kp clinical isolates that were collected routinely at our University Hospital between 2013 and 2016 (n = 169). Ninety-seven meropenem Css were included in the analysis. The final model included creatinine clearance (CrCL) as a covariate and explained 94% of the population variability. Monte Carlo simulations based on licensed dosages of up to 6 g/day predicted an acceptable PTA (>80%) of 100% T>1×MIC against KPC-Kp with a meropenem MIC of ≤32 mg/liter in patients with a CrCL level of <130 ml/min. Dosages of 8 g/day were needed for achieving the same target in patients with CrCL at levels of 130 to 200 ml/min. In dealing with pathogens with a meropenem MIC of 64 mg/liter, HDCI regimens using meropenem at higher than licensed levels should be considered. In these cases, real-time therapeutic drug monitoring could be a useful adjunct for optimized care. The predicted CFR were >75% in all of the classes of renal function.

Might isoniazid plasma exposure be a valuable predictor of drug-related hepatotoxicity risk among adult patients with TB?

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship between isoniazid plasma exposure and the likelihood of elevation of ALT (≥51 IU/L) among adult patients with TB. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted in patients who underwent periodic monitoring of hepatic function and in whom pharmacokinetic data were collected. Monte Carlo simulation was performed with the intent of identifying the probability of achieving an AUC24 greater than the identified threshold of hepatotoxicity with different dosing regimens (2.5, 5.0 and 7.5 mg/kg/day). RESULTS: Forty-one out of 185 evaluable patients (22.2%) had an ALT elevation. A mild correlation between isoniazid AUC0-24 and ALT increase was observed (Spearman's ρ = 0.34, P < 0.001). Patients with ALT ≥51 IU/L showed significantly higher isoniazid exposure than those with ALT <51 IU/L (mean AUC24 of 58.33 versus 31.28 mg·h/L, P < 0.001). The probabilities of ALT elevation were 0.82 and 0.12 for isoniazid AUC24 ≥55.0 and <55.0 mg·h/L, respectively. Use of a logistic regression model estimated a likelihood of developing hepatotoxicity of 0.5 and 0.9 when in the presence of an isoniazid AUC24 of 53.7 and 70.0 mg·h/L, respectively. Simulation showed that the standard isoniazid 5 mg/kg daily dose gave a probability of ALT increase of 0.46 for slow acetylators and 0.03 for rapid acetylators. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma isoniazid exposure might be a valuable predictor of drug-related hepatotoxicity. Early assessment of isoniazid exposure at the beginning of treatment might allow prompt dosage reduction among those patients who are experiencing drug overexposure, thus containing the risk of hepatotoxicity occurrence.

A 1 year retrospective audit of quality indicators of clinical pharmacological advice for personalized linezolid dosing: one stone for two birds?

AIM: This study explored the clinical and economic impact of clinical pharmacological advice (CPA) (based on therapeutic drug monitoring [TDM] results, and on patients' characteristics and co-medications) on personalized linezolid therapy in a tertiary care hospital. METHODS: A 1 year retrospective analysis of quality indicators of CPA (clinicians' adherence rate to CPA, pre-post rate of linezolid trough concentrations within the desired range and cost balance analysis) was conducted. RESULTS: Five hundred and forty-four CPAs were provided to clinicians during 2014 for personalizing linezolid therapy in 168 patients. Clinicians' adherence to CPAs was very high (94.7%). The pre-post rate of linezolid Cmin distribution showed a favourable impact of CPA on patient care (pre-post ratio of Cmin within the desired range + 23.4%, pre, 51.2% vs. post, 74.6%). Overall, linezolid dosage was mainly reduced (56.9% of cases), whereas dose augmentation was needed only in a minority of cases (7.7%). Cost balance analysis showed that overall 1258 standard doses of linezolid (unitary dose 600 mg) were spared for treating 168 patients with a personalized dosage for a median duration of 11 days (range 3-128 days) with a cost saving of 60038.05 €. CONCLUSION: Active computerized advice elaborated by the clinical pharmacologist on the basis of TDM results and of patient's pathophysiological data and co-medications may be cost-effective for personalizing linezolid treatment.

Polytherapy and the risk of potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs) among elderly and very elderly patients in three different settings (hospital, community, long-term care facilities) of the Friuli Venezia Giulia region, Italy: are the very elderly at higher risk of PIPs?

PURPOSE: The aim of this point-prevalence study was to assess the occurrence of polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy and the risk of potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs) among elderly and very elderly patients in different health-care settings of the Friuli-Venezia Giulia region in the North-East of Italy. METHODS: Prescription pattern of elderly (65-79 years) and very elderly (>79 years) patients in three different health-care settings [hospitals, general practitioners, and long-term care facilities (LTCFs)] was assessed in March 2014, and PIPs were assessed according to the Beers criteria. Other situations at potentially high risk were checked. RESULTS: A total of 1582 patients (hospital, n = 528; outpatients, n = 527; nursing homes, n = 527) were included. Very elderly were more represented in hospitals (60.4%) and LTCFs (77.1%) than among general practitioners (37.6%). Polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy rates ranged 57.7-73.7% and 9.7-15.6%, respectively. The most frequently prescribed drugs were the proton pump inhibitors, whereas the most common PIPs resulted the benzodiazepines. Multinomial regression analysis showed that female sex, age > 79 years, hyperpolypharmacy, and chronic kidney disease were associated with the risk of having ≥2 PIPs. Two situations at high risk of PIPs not contemplated by the Beers criteria were recurrent in the study population and concerned the statins and metformin. CONCLUSIONS: Polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy among elderly and very elderly are strictly associated with the risk of multiple PIPs. The findings offer the opportunity to remark that improvement of the knowledge of safe drug use is generally needed in aging societies and may become of utmost relevance among health-care workers operating in LTCFs. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of continuous-infusion meropenem in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients.

This study explored the pharmacokinetics and the pharmacodynamics of continuous-infusion meropenem in a population of pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) patients who underwent therapeutic drug monitoring. The relationship between meropenem clearance (CLM) and estimated creatinine clearance (CLCR) was assessed by nonlinear regression. A Monte Carlo simulation was performed to investigate the predictive performance of five dosing regimens (15 to 90 mg/kg of body weight/day) for the empirical treatment of severe Gram-negative-related infections in relation to four different categories of renal function. The optimal target was defined as a probability of target attainment (PTA) of ≥90% at steady-state concentration-to-MIC ratios (C SS/MIC) of ≥1 and ≥4 for MICs of up to 8 mg/liter. A total of 21 patients with 44 meropenem C SS were included. A good relationship between CLM and estimated CLCR was observed (r (2) = 0.733). Simulations showed that at an MIC of 2 mg/liter, the administration of continuous-infusion meropenem at doses of 15, 30, 45, and 60 mg/kg/day may achieve a PTA of ≥90% at a C SS/MIC ratio of ≥4 in the CLCR categories of 40 to <80, 80 to <120, 120 to <200, and 200 to <300 ml/min/1.73 m(2), respectively. At an MIC of 8 mg/liter, doses of up to 90 mg/kg/day by continuous infusion may achieve optimal PTA only in the CLCR categories of 40 to <80 and 80 to <120 ml/min/1.73 m(2). Continuous-infusion meropenem at dosages up to 90 mg/kg/day might be effective for optimal treatment of severe Gram-negative-related infections in pediatric HSCT patients, even when caused by carbapenem-resistant pathogens with an MIC of up to 8 mg/liter.

Does Critical Illness Change Levofloxacin Pharmacokinetics?

Levofloxacin is commonly used in critically ill patients for which existing data suggest nonstandard dosing regimens should be used. The objective of this study was to compare the population pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin in critically ill and in non-critically ill patients. Adult patients with a clinical indication for levofloxacin were eligible for participation in this prospective pharmacokinetic study. Patients were given 500 mg or 750 mg daily by intravenous administration with up to 11 blood samples taken on day 1 or 2 of therapy. Plasma samples were analyzed and population pharmacokinetic analysis was undertaken using Pmetrics. Thirty-five patients (18 critically ill) were included. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) age, weight, and Cockcroft-Gault creatinine clearance for the critically ill and for the non-critically ill patients were 60.3 (16.4) and 72.0 (11.6) years, 78.5 (14.8) and 70.9 (15.8) kg, and 71.9 (65.8) and 68.2 (30.1) ml/min, respectively. A two-compartment linear model best described the data. Increasing creatinine clearance was the only covariate associated with increasing drug clearance. The presence of critical illness did not significantly affect any pharmacokinetic parameter. The mean (SD) parameter estimates were as follows: clearance, 8.66 (3.85) liters/h; volume of the central compartment (Vc), 41.5 (24.5) liters; intercompartmental clearance constants from central to peripheral, 2.58 (3.51) liters/h; and peripheral to central compartments, 0.90 (0.58) liters/h. Monte Carlo dosing simulations demonstrated that achievement of therapeutic exposures was dependent on renal function, pathogen, and MIC. Critical illness appears to have no independent effect on levofloxacin pharmacokinetics that cannot be explained by altered renal function.

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic evaluation of linezolid in hospitalized paediatric patients: a step toward dose optimization by means of therapeutic drug monitoring and Monte Carlo simulation.

OBJECTIVES: To report on linezolid exposure in a paediatric population who routinely underwent therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for dosage optimization and to assess the factors affecting interpatient variability. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of patients whose plasma C(min) and Cmax levels were measured during linezolid treatment. Adequate exposure was defined as a C(min) of 2-7 mg/L and/or an estimated AUC24 of 160-300 mg · h/L. Patients were divided into two subgroups (Group 1, 2-11 years; Group 2, 12-18 years). Monte Carlo simulation was performed to investigate whether or not the currently recommended dosages might enable a high probability of target attainment (PTA) of two thresholds for linezolid efficacy (AUC24/MIC ≥ 80 or ≥ 100). Data on demographic characteristics, disease, microbiology and haematochemical parameters and outcomes were collected. RESULTS: A total of 23 patients were included. Standard dosages were suboptimal in 50.0% and 44.4% of patients in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively. Among those who underwent multiple instances of TDM, the dosages were increased in 33.3% of cases in both groups, and decreased in 6.6% and 9.5% of cases in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively. Co-treatment with phenobarbital, proton pump inhibitors and amiodarone accounted for most of the variability in C(min) (adjusted R(2) of 0.692). Simulations showed a PTA of ≥ 90% with the current dosing regimens in both groups only for pathogens with an MIC ≤ 1 mg/L. CONCLUSIONS: Higher dosages of linezolid may be needed, especially in Group 1 when in the presence of pathogens with an MIC >1 mg/L. The role of TDM should be encouraged for optimization of linezolid exposure in the paediatric setting in the presence of infections caused by pathogens with borderline susceptibility and/or for patients co-treated with drugs that may alter linezolid exposure.

Stability of generic meropenem solutions for administration by continuous infusion at normal and elevated temperatures.

Administration by continuous infusion may represent an effective tool for the treatment of multidrug-resistant gram-negative related infections with meropenem. Currently, no data on chemical stability of generic bioequivalent versions of meropenem over time are available. Triplicate samples of 5 mg/mL solutions of a generic meropenem formulation, Hospira, were evaluated for chemical stability at increasing temperatures (25°C, 30°C, 35°C, and 40°C) by means of a high-performance liquid chromatography technique over 4 separate days. Degradation of generic meropenem was both time and temperature dependent, and the aqueous solutions were stable for up to 8 hours in the temperature range between 25°C and 35°C, and for up to 5 hours at 40°C. Continuous infusion of generic meropenem Hospira may be applied in clinical settings with ambient temperature below 35°C, provided that the 5 mg/mL aqueous solution is reconstituted at most after 6-8 hours.

Antifungal prophylaxis with posaconazole in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: dose intensification coupled with avoidance of proton pump inhibitors is beneficial in shortening time to effective concentrations.

This study aimed to assess the influence of dose frequency and the presence or absence of cotreatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) on the time to a target trough concentration (Cmin) of >700 ng/ml with posaconazole in the first 8 days of antifungal prophylaxis in hematological patients. This was a retrospective, observational study performed with 42 adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia who underwent posaconazole prophylaxis with 200 mg every 8 h (q8h) or 200 mg q6h after receiving induction chemotherapy and who had at least three subsequent therapeutic drug monitoring assessments during the first 8 days of treatment. The cohort was split into four groups (group 1, 200 mg q8h without PPI; group 2, 200 mg q8h with PPI; group 3, 200 mg q6h without PPI; group 4, 200 mg q6h with PPI). Rapid attainment of the target Cmin was obtained only in group 3 (P < 0.01) (median Cmin on day 4 of 935.5 ng/ml [interquartile range, 760.0 to 1,270.0 ng/ml] in group 3, versus 567.0 ng/ml [346 to 906 ng/ml] in group 1, 420.0 ng/ml [326.2 to 527.2 ng/ml] in group 2, and 514.0 ng/ml [403.7 to 564.7 ng/ml] in group 4). A linear accumulation of posaconazole over time was observed among patients in groups 1 and 3, regardless of the total daily dosage, differently from what occurred among those receiving PPI cotreatment (groups 2 and 4). Dose intensification (200 mg q6h) coupled with avoidance of PPI coadministration may represent a very powerful strategy to rapidly achieve effective concentrations with posaconazole in neutropenic hematological patients.

A multicenter, real-world experience with recombinant FXIII for the treatment of patients with FXIII deficiency: from pharmacokinetics to clinical practice. The Italian FXIII Study.

BACKGROUND: Congenital factor XIII (FXIII) deficiency is a rare coagulation disorder characterized by muscular or mucocutaneous bleeding with life-threatening intracranial hemorrhages (ICHs), especially in cases with severe disease. The best treatment is the use of prophylactic plasma-derived or recombinant FXIII (rFXIII). Few data on the use of rFXIII in the real-world scenario are available. The main goal of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of catridecacog (NovoThirteen®) in a population of patients with FXIII deficiency. Other objectives were to compare the different pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of each patient and to use them to create a tailored prophylaxis regimen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We collected and analyzed all pharmacokinetic and clinical data in our registry of the patients with congenital FXIII deficiency treated with rFXIII at eleven Italian hemophilia centers. Data were collected from January 2019 to December 2020. RESULTS: Overall, data on 20 patients with FXIII deficiency were collected, 16 of whom presented with severe disease. Pharmacokinetics was assessed in 18 cases before starting prophylaxis. Prophylaxis was subsequently started in these patients using a wide range of dosages (25.0-80.0 IU/kg; mean 33.8 IU/kg) and infusion intervals (3.0-8.0 weeks). During a mean follow up of 47 months, two minor bleeds and one ICH in a severe patient who had remained under on-demand treatment were reported. DISCUSSION: Efficacy and safety of rFXIII were proven in all patients. The dosage and infusion timing for the treated patients sometimes differed to those reported in the MENTOR pivotal studies, thus underlying the importance of tailored management in a real-world scenario.

Dosing nomograms for attaining optimum concentrations of meropenem by continuous infusion in critically ill patients with severe gram-negative infections: a pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics-based approach.

The worrisome increase in Gram-negative bacteria with borderline susceptibility to carbapenems and of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae has significantly undermined their efficacy. Continuous infusion may be the best way to maximize the time-dependent activity of meropenem. The aim of this study was to create dosing nomograms in relation to different creatinine clearance (CL(Cr)) estimates for use in daily clinical practice to target the steady-state concentrations (C(ss)s) of meropenem during continuous infusion at 8 to 16 mg/liter (after the administration of an initial loading dose of 1 to 2 g over 30 min). The correlation between meropenem clearance (CL(m)) and CL(Cr) was retrospectively assessed in a cohort of critically ill patients (group 1, n = 67) to create a formula for dosage calculation to target C(ss). The performance of this formula was validated in a similar cohort (group 2, n = 56) by comparison of the observed and the predicted C(ss)s. A significant relationship between CL(m) and CL(Cr) was observed in group 1 (r = 0.72, P < 0.001). The application of the formula to meropenem dosing in group 2, infusion rate (g/24 h) = [0.078 × CL(Cr) (ml/min) + 2.85] × target C(ss) × (24/1,000), led to a significant correlation between the observed and the predicted C(ss)s (r = 0.92, P < 0.001). Dosing nomograms based on CL(Cr) were created to target the meropenem C(ss) at 8, 12, and 16 mg/liter in critically ill patients. These nomograms could be helpful in improving the treatment of severe Gram-negative infections with meropenem, especially in the presence of borderline susceptible pathogens or even of carbapenemase producers and/or of pathophysiological conditions which may enhance meropenem clearance.

Successful long-term treatment of cerebral nocardiosis with unexpectedly low doses of linezolid in an immunocompromised patient receiving complex polytherapy.

Cerebral nocardiosis is a severe infection that carries the highest mortality rate among all bacterial cerebral abscesses. We report on a case in an immunocompromised patient which was successfully treated with unexpectedly low doses of linezolid. Therapeutic drug monitoring was very helpful in highlighting issues of poor compliance and of drug-drug interactions.

Therapeutic drug monitoring may improve safety outcomes of long-term treatment with linezolid in adult patients.

OBJECTIVES: Prolonged treatment with linezolid may cause toxicity. The purpose of this study was to define pharmacodynamic thresholds for improving safety outcomes of linezolid. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of patients who had trough (C(min)) and peak (C(max)) plasma levels measured during prolonged linezolid treatment. Dosage adjustments were performed when C(min) ≥10 mg/L and/or AUC24 ≥400 mg/L ·â€Šh. Patients were divided into two subgroups according to the absence or presence of co-treatment with rifampicin (the linezolid group and the linezolid + rifampicin group, respectively). Data on demographic characteristics, disease, microbiology and haematochemical parameters were collected and outcomes in relation to drug exposure were compared between groups. RESULTS: A total of 45 patients were included. Dosage adjustments were needed in 40% versus 0% of patients in the linezolid group (n = 35) versus the linezolid + rifampicin group (n = 10), respectively. Patients in the linezolid group had either significantly higher C(min) [3.71 mg/L (1.43-6.38) versus 1.37 mg/L (0.67-2.55), P < 0.001] or AUC24 [212.77 mg/L ·â€Šh (166.67-278.42) versus 123.33 mg/L ·â€Šh (97.36-187.94), P < 0.001]. Thrombocytopenia appeared in 51.4% versus 0% of cases in the linezolid group versus the linezolid + rifampicin group, respectively. In 33.3% of those patients who were experiencing thrombocytopenia, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-guided dosage reductions allowed recovery from toxicity and prosecution of therapy with good outcome. A logistic regression model for thrombocytopenia estimated a probability of 50% in the presence of C(min) of 6.53 mg/L and/or of AUC24 of 280.74 mg/L ·â€Šh. CONCLUSIONS: Maintenance over time of C(min) between 2 and 7 mg/L and/or of AUC24 between 160 and 300 mg/L ·â€Šh may be helpful in improving safety outcomes while retaining appropriate efficacy in adult patients receiving prolonged linezolid treatment.

TDM-guided therapy with daptomycin and meropenem in a morbidly obese, critically ill patient.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a case of severe cellulitis, successfully treated with high-dose daptomycin plus continuous infusion meropenem, in a patient with morbid obesity and renal failure, in whom drug exposure over time was optimized by means of real-time therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). CASE SUMMARY: A 63-year-old man with morbid obesity (body mass index 81.6 kg/m²) and renal failure was admitted to the emergency department because of severe cellulitis. The patient had an admission Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis score of 9, and broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy with daptomycin and meropenem was started. Because of rapidly changing renal function, dosage adjustments were guided by an intensive program of TDM (daptomycin ranging from 1200 mg every 48 hours over 30 minutes to 1200 mg every 36 hours over 30 minutes; meropenem ranging from 0.25 g every 8 hours over 6 hours to 500 mg every 4 hours by continuous infusion). Clinical response was observed within 72 hours. However, a sudden increase of serum creatine kinase (SCK) raised questions about the need for discontinuation of daptomycin. The drug concentrations were not toxic; therefore, we decided to continue therapy. Significant clinical improvement, with SCK normalization, was observed within a few days. Antimicrobial therapy was switched on day 29 to amoxicillin/clavulanate plus levofloxacin, and then discontinued at discharge on day 53. DISCUSSION: High-dose daptomycin plus continuous infusion meropenem may ensure adequate empiric antimicrobial coverage in patients with possible early necrotizing fasciitis. However, in patients with morbid obesity and changing renal function, significant challenges may arise because of the hydrophilic nature of these drugs and the inaccuracy of standard methods of estimating renal function. CONCLUSIONS: Real-time TDM may represent an invaluable approach in optimizing drug exposure with high-dose daptomycin plus continuous infusion meropenem in patients with severe cellulitis, morbid obesity, and changing renal function.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of linezolid: a retrospective monocentric analysis.

The objective of the present retrospective observational study carried out in patients receiving a standard dosage of linezolid and undergoing routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) was to assess the interindividual variability in plasma exposure, to identify the prevalence of attainment of optimal pharmacodynamics, and to define if an intensive program of TDM may be warranted in some categories of patients. Linezolid plasma concentrations (trough [C(min)] and peak [C(max)] levels) were analyzed by means of a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method, and daily drug exposure was estimated (daily area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC(24)]). The final database included 280 C(min) and 223 C(max) measurements performed in 92 patients who were treated with the fixed 600-mg dose every 12 h (q12h) intravenously (n = 58) or orally (n = 34). A wide variability was observed (median values [interquartile range]: 3.80 mg/liter [1.75 to 7.53 mg/liter] for C(min), 14.70 mg/liter [10.57 to 19.64] for C(max), and 196.08 mg·h/liter [144.02 to 312.10 mg·h/liter] for estimated AUC(24)). Linezolid C(min) was linearly correlated with estimated AUC(24) (r(2) = 0.85). Optimal pharmacodynamic target attainment (defined as C(min) of ≥2 mg/liter and/or AUC(24)/MIC(90) ratio of >80) was obtained in about 60 to 70% of cases, but potential overexposure (defined as C(min) of ≥10 mg/liter and/or AUC(24) of ≥400 mg·h/liter) was documented in about 12% of cases. A significantly higher proportion of cases with potential overexposure received cotreatment with omeprazole, amiodarone, or amlodipine. Our study suggests that the application of TDM might be especially worthwhile in about 30% of cases with the intent of avoiding either the risk of dose-dependent toxicity or that of treatment failure.

Pharmacokinetic interaction between everolimus and antifungal triazoles in a liver transplant patient.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the management of a pharmacokinetic interaction between azole antifungals (fluconazole and voriconazole) and everolimus in a patient who underwent an orthotopic liver transplant. CASE SUMMARY: A 65-year-old male who received an orthotopic liver transplant experienced an iatrogenic retroperitoneal duodenal perforation on postoperative day 55. His condition was subsequently complicated by severe sepsis and acute renal failure. Intravenous fluconazole 400 mg, followed by 100 mg every 24 hours according to impaired renal function, was immediately started; to avoid further nephrotoxicity, immunosuppressant therapy was switched from cyclosporine plus mycophenolate mofetil to oral everolimus 0.75 mg every 12 hours. Satisfactory steady-state minimum concentration (C(min)) of everolimus was achieved (approximately 5 ng/mL). On day 72 posttransplant, because of invasive aspergillosis, antifungal therapy was switched to intravenous voriconazole 400 mg every 12 hours on the first day, followed by 200 mg every 12 hours; to prevent drug toxicity, the everolimus dosage was promptly lowered to 0.25 mg every 24 hours. At that time, the everolimus C(min) averaged approximately 3 ng/mL. The concentration/dose ratio of everolimus (ie, C(min) reached at steady-state for each milligram per kilogram of drug administered) was markedly lower during fluconazole versus voriconazole cotreatment (mean +/- SD, 3.49 +/- 0.29 vs 11.05 +/- 0.81 ng/mL per mg/kg/daily; p < 0.001). Despite intensive care, the patient's condition continued to deteriorate and he died on day 84 posttransplant. DISCUSSION: Both azole antifungals were considered probable causative agents of an interaction with everolimus according to the Drug Interaction Probability Scale. The interaction is due to the inhibition of CYP3A4-mediated everolimus clearance. Of note, prompt reduction of the everolimus dosage since the first azole coadministration, coupled with intensive therapeutic drug monitoring, represented a useful strategy to prevent drug overexposure. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that during everolimus-azole cotreatment, a dose reduction of everolimus is needed to avoid overexposure. According to the different inhibitory potency of CYP3A4 activity, the reduction should be lower during fluconazole than during voriconazole cotreatment.