Real-World Reductions in Healthcare Resource Utilization over 6 Months in Patients with Substance Use Disorders Treated with a Prescription Digital Therapeutic.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Substance use disorders (SUDs) affect approximately 40.3 million people in the USA, yet only approximately 19% receive evidence-based treatment each year. reSET® is a prescription digital therapeutic (PDT) and the only FDA-authorized treatment for patients with cocaine, cannabis, and stimulant use disorders. This study evaluated real-world healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and associated costs 6 months after initiation of reSET in patients with SUD. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of HealthVerity PrivateSource20 data compared the 6-month incidence of all-cause hospital facility encounters and clinician services in patients treated with reSET (re-SET cohort) before (pre-index period) and after (post-index period) reSET initiation (index). Incidence was compared using incidence rate ratios (IRR). HCRU-related costs were also assessed. RESULTS: The sample included 101 patients (median age 37 years, 50.5% female, 54.5% Medicaid-insured). A statistically significant decrease of 50% was observed in overall hospital encounters from pre-index to post-index (IRR 0.50; 95% CI 0.37-0.67; P < 0.001), which included inpatient stays (56% decrease; IRR 0.44; 95% CI 0.26-0.76; P = 0.003), partial hospitalizations (57% decrease; IRR 0.43; 95% CI 0.21-0.88; P = 0.021), and emergency department visits (45% decrease; IRR 0.55; 95% CI 0.38-0.80; P < 0.004). Additionally, some clinician services declined significantly including pathology and laboratory services: other (54% decrease; IRR 0.46; 95% CI 0.28-0.76; P = 0.003); pathology and laboratory services: drug assays prior to opioid medication prescription (37% decrease; IRR 0.63; 95% CI 0.41-0.96; P = 0.031); and alcohol and drug abuse: medication services (46% decrease; IRR 0.54; 95% CI 0.41-0.70; P < 0.001). Reductions in facility-encounters drove 6-month reSET per-patient cost reductions of $3591 post-index compared to pre-index. CONCLUSIONS: Use of reSET by patients with SUD is associated with durable reductions in HCRU and lower healthcare costs over 6 months compared to the 6 months before PDT treatment, after adjusting for covariates, providing an economic benefit to the healthcare system.

Reduced Healthcare Resource Utilization in Patients with Opioid Use Disorder in the 12 Months After Initiation of a Prescription Digital Therapeutic.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: reSET-O, an FDA-authorized prescription digital therapeutic (PDT) delivering cognitive behavioral therapy and contingency management to patients with opioid u®se disorder (OUD), may help improve clinical outcomes. One-year differences in healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs post-PDT initiation were evaluated. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of healthcare claims data compared all-cause HCRU (across hospital facility encounters [sum of inpatient stays, treat-and-release emergency department [ED] visits, partial hospitalizations, and hospital outpatient department visits] and clinician services [procedure categories]) after PDT initiation (index) between reSET-O patients and controls. Overall and Medicaid-specific differences in HCRU, costs, and buprenorphine adherence were evaluated. FINDINGS: Cohorts included 901 reSET-O patients (median age 36 years, 62.4% female, 73.9% Medicaid) and 978 controls (median age 38 years, 51.1% female, 65.4% Medicaid). Compared to the control group, the reSET-O group experienced 12% fewer total unique hospital encounters (non-significant), driven by 28% fewer inpatient stays (IRR 0.72; 95% CI 0.55-0.96; P = 0.02), 56% fewer hospital readmissions [IRR 0.44; 95% CI 0.20-0.93; P = 0.033]), and 7% fewer ED visits (IRR 0.93; 95% CI 0.79-1.09; P = 0.386). Total clinician services increased by 1391 events versus controls. Differences were greater among the Medicaid patients. Adjustment for concomitant baseline substance use and mental health disorders resulted in similar HCRU incidence rate ratios. Changes in all-cause HCRU drove per-patient per-year cost differences of - $2791 versus controls (- $3832 versus Medicaid controls). Adjusted mean medication possession ratio was 0.848 (SE 0.0118) at 12 months for reSET-O patients, which was significantly higher than controls (0.761 [SE 0.0108]; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Use of reSET-O is associated with significant and durable real-world reductions in ED and inpatient (including readmissions) utilization, reduced net costs, and increased clinician services and buprenorphine adherence. Differences in costs versus controls were greatest among Medicaid patients. INFOGRAPHIC.

Inequality in provider continuity for children by Australian general practitioners.

BACKGROUND: There is little published on provider continuity in Australian general practice and none on its effect on inequality of care for children. METHOD: Questionnaire administered to parents of the ACT Kindergarten Health Screen asking the name of their child's usual GP and practice address between 2001 and 2008. RESULTS: Parents of 30,789 children named 433 GPs and 141 practices. In each year, an average of 77% of parents could name both the GP and the practice, an average of 11% of parents could name only the practice, and an average of 12% of parents could name neither. In each year, 25% of parents could not name a usual GP for children of Aboriginal or Torres Straight Islander descent, or children born outside of Australia, compared to 10% of all other children (p = < 0.0001). The frequency of GPs displaying continuity of care varied over time with 19% of GPs being present in the ACT in only one year and 39% of GPs being present in every year over the eight years of study. GPs displayed two different forms of transience either by working in more than one practice in each year (5% of GPs), or by not being present in the ACT region from one year to the next (15% of GPs). Fewer parents nominated transient GPs as their child's GP compared to choosing GPs who displayed continuity (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Many GPs (39%) were reported to provide continuity of care for in the ACT region and some GPs (20%) displayed transient care. Indigenous children or children born outside of Australia had less equity of access to a nominated GP than all other children. Such inequity might disappear if voluntary registration of children was adopted in Australian general practice.

Perindopril-based blood pressure-lowering therapy reduces amino-terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide in individuals with cerebrovascular disease.

OBJECTIVE: The plasma amino-terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level predicted congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, and ischaemic stroke in participants of the Perindopril Protection Against Recurrent Stroke Study (PROGRESS), a placebo-controlled study of the effects of blood pressure lowering on cardiovascular events among individuals with cerebrovascular disease. Active treatment comprised a flexible regimen based on perindopril, with the addition of indapamide at the discretion of treating physicians. Active treatment reduced cardiovascular events, and we therefore investigated whether active treatment modified NT-proBNP and other cardiovascular risk factors. METHODS: We measured NT-proBNP and other cardiovascular risk factors at randomization and after 13 months of therapy in a subset of 357 PROGRESS participants. RESULTS: Baseline systolic and pulse pressures were higher in individuals with elevated baseline NT-proBNP levels. In comparison with placebo, active treatment reduced the blood pressure and NT-proBNP levels, and increased renin levels. Reduction of NT-proBNP levels by active treatment was most evident in individuals with baseline NT-proBNP levels in the highest quarter (> 26 pmol/l), with a median reduction of 16 pmol/l (interquartile range 0-51 pmol/l, P = 0.004), corresponding to a median decrease of 39% (interquartile range 0-69%). Active treatment reduced blood pressure similarly for individuals in each of the four quarters of baseline NT-proBNP. Active therapy had no effect on plasma lipid, C-reactive protein, homocysteine, or soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 levels. CONCLUSION: We conclude that plasma NT-proBNP level, in addition to predicting cardiovascular risk, may provide a measure of risk reduction by blood pressure-lowering therapy.

Acute phase results from STORM, a multicountry observational study of bipolar disorder treatment and outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: This prospective observational study examined the outcomes associated with the treatment of bipolar mania in clinical practice settings in a diverse range of countries: Bosnia, Slovenia, Slovakia, Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Turkey. Particular emphasis was placed on investigating outcomes associated with treatment regimens including and excluding the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In- and outpatients initiating or changing oral medication for the treatment of bipolar mania were grouped into two treatment cohorts: (1) olanzapine (N=569), and (2) non-olanzapine (N=325). Clinical outcome measures included change in Clinical Global Impressions-Bipolar Version Severity of Illness scale (CGI-BP), Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and Hamilton Depression Rating scale- 5 item (HAMD-5) scores, and response and remission rates. Outcomes were analysed by conventional linear or logistic regression, adjusted for potential confounders, using last observation carried forward (LOCF) at endpoint, and a marginal structural model (MSM) approach to account for treatment switching. Results from the 12-week acute phase are presented. RESULTS: Clinical improvements were observed in both cohorts. While no marked differences were apparent between the groups in adjusted mean baseline to LOCF endpoint change, longitudinal analysis of these variables using MSM averaged over all visits indicated greater improvements in the olanzapine versus non-olanzapine cohort in CGI-BP Overall (-0.26, p<0.001), CGI-BP Mania (-0.19, p<0.001), CGI-BP Depression (-0.10, p=0.003), CGI Psychosis (-0.14, p=0.001), YMRS (-1.70, p<0.001), and HAMD-5 (-0.40, p<0.001) scores. CONCLUSIONS: Inclusion of olanzapine after initiating or switching treatment for bipolar mania appeared to be beneficial during treatment in terms of symptom improvement.

Prediction of myocardial infarction by N-terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, C-reactive protein, and renin in subjects with cerebrovascular disease.

BACKGROUND: B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), C-reactive protein (CRP), and renin are elevated in persons at risk for cardiovascular disease. However, data that directly compare these markers in the prediction of myocardial infarction (MI) are limited. METHODS AND RESULTS: N-terminal-proBNP (NT-proBNP), CRP, and renin were measured in baseline blood samples from a nested case-control study of the 6105 participants of the Perindopril Protection Against Recurrent Stroke Study (PROGRESS), a placebo-controlled study of a perindopril-based blood pressure-lowering regimen among individuals with previous stroke or transient ischemic attack. Each of 206 subjects who experienced MI, either fatal or nonfatal, during a mean follow-up of 3.9 years was matched to 1 to 3 control subjects. Most MI cases (67%) occurred in subjects without a history of coronary heart disease. NT-proBNP, CRP, and renin each predicted MI; the odds ratio for subjects in the highest compared with the lowest quarter was 2.2 (95% CI, 1.3 to 3.6) for NT-proBNP, 2.2 (95% CI, 1.3 to 3.6) for CRP, and 1.7 (95% CI, 1.1 to 2.8) for renin. NT-proBNP and renin, but not CRP, remained predictors of MI after adjustment for all other predictors, including LDL and HDL cholesterol levels. Individuals with both NT-proBNP and renin in their highest quarters had 4.5 times the risk of MI compared with subjects with both biological markers in their lowest quarters. CONCLUSIONS: NT-proBNP and renin, but not CRP, are independent predictors of MI risk after stroke or transient ischemic attack, providing information additional to that provided by classic risk factors, and may enable more effective targeting of MI prevention strategies.

Soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide in predicting ischemic stroke in patients with cerebrovascular disease.

BACKGROUND: Patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack are at high risk of another stroke, and there is need for improved strategies to predict recurrent stroke. OBJECTIVE: To assess the prognostic value of levels of soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (sVCAM-1), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), C-reactive protein, homocysteine, renin, and lipids and lipoprotein particle concentration and size in patients with previous stroke or transient ischemic attack. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A nested case-control study of participants of the Perindopril Protection Against Recurrent Stroke Study was performed. The Perindopril Protection Against Recurrent Stroke Study was a placebo-controlled trial of a perindopril erbumine-based, blood pressure-lowering regimen that reduced ischemic stroke risk by 24% among individuals with previous stroke or transient ischemic attack. Each of 252 patients who experienced ischemic stroke during a mean follow-up of 3.9 years was matched to 1 to 3 control patients. Matching variables were age, sex, treatment allocated, region, and most recent qualifying event at randomization. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Risk of ischemic stroke predicted by baseline levels of sVCAM-1, NT-proBNP, C-reactive protein, homocysteine, renin, and lipids and lipoprotein particle concentration and size. RESULTS: Levels of sVCAM-1 and NT-proBNP predicted recurrent ischemic stroke. The odds ratio for patients in the highest, as compared with the lowest, quarter was 2.24 (95% confidence interval, 1.35-3.73) for sVCAM-1 level and 1.62 (95% confidence interval, 0.98-2.69) for NT-proBNP level, after adjustment for matching and other risk factors. Patients in the highest quarters for both sVCAM-1 and NT-proBNP levels had 3.6 times the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke compared with patients in the lowest quarters for both biologic markers. Level of sVCAM-1 was similarly predictive of ischemic stroke in patients allocated to placebo and perindopril-based therapy. Baseline plasma levels of C-reactive protein, homocysteine, renin, and lipids and lipoprotein particle concentration and size did not predict recurrent ischemic stroke risk. CONCLUSION: Measurement of sVCAM-1 and NT-proBNP levels provides prognostic information for recurrent ischemic stroke beyond traditional risk factors.

Once-daily duloxetine 60 mg in the treatment of major depressive disorder: multicenter, double-blind, randomized, paroxetine-controlled, non-inferiority trial in China, Korea, Taiwan and Brazil.

The aim of the present paper was to compare the efficacy and safety of duloxetine with paroxetine in the acute treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). In a randomized, double-blind trial of 8 weeks active treatment, patients with non-psychotic MDD were randomized to duloxetine 60 mg (n = 238) or paroxetine 20 mg (n = 240) once daily. Efficacy was primarily measured on change in the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD(17)) using a non-inferiority test with a margin of 2.2. Secondary efficacy measures included the HAMD(17) subscales, Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety, Clinical Global Impressions-Severity, Patient Global Impressions-Improvement, Somatic Symptoms Inventory and Visual Analog Scales (VAS) for pain. Safety measures included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE), vital signs, weight, laboratory analyses and electrocardiograms. Non-inferiority of duloxetine to paroxetine was demonstrated because the upper bound of the confidence interval for mean difference in HAMD(17) change (0.71) was less than the non-inferiority margin. Secondary efficacy end-points did not differ significantly between treatments with the exception of VAS back pain, where the pooled mean was lower in the duloxetine group (17.1) compared with the paroxetine group (20.3, P = 0.048). No significant differences were observed in the number of early discontinuations and overall TEAE. However, significantly greater proportions of patients in the duloxetine group experienced nausea and palpitations. No clinically relevant changes in laboratory values, vital signs, weight or electrocardiograms were observed with either treatment. The present study verifies the utility of duloxetine as an efficacious and safe treatment for both emotional and physical symptoms of MDD in this predominantly Asian patient sample.

Low-density lipoprotein particles and risk of intracerebral haemorrhage in subjects with cerebrovascular disease.

BACKGROUND: Only limited data are available for risk factors for intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) in subjects with established cerebrovascular disease. DESIGN: We performed a nested case-control study of participants of the Perindopril Protection Against Recurrent Stroke Study (PROGRESS). This was a randomized, placebo-controlled trial that established the beneficial effects of blood pressure lowering in 6105 patients with cerebrovascular disease. METHODS: Each of 41 subjects who experienced ICH during a mean follow-up of 3.9 years was matched to 1-3 control subjects. Lipoprotein particles and other plasma markers were measured in baseline blood samples from PROGRESS participants. RESULTS: In comparison with control subjects, ICH cases had increased mean low-density lipoprotein (LDL) diameter (P=0.04) and increased large LDL particle concentration (P=0.03). The odds ratio (adjusted for regression dilution bias) for ICH risk with 10 mmHg increase in systolic blood pressure (SBP) was 1.45 (95% confidence interval: 1.01-2.09, P=0.05), with a 1 nm increase in mean LDL diameter it was 2.15 (95% confidence interval: 0.97-4.77, P=0.06), and with 100 nmol/l increase in large LDL particle concentration it was 1.18 (95% confidence interval: 0.98-1.43, P=0.08). Plasma levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (sVCAM-1), homocysteine, amino-terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and renin were not associated with ICH risk. CONCLUSION: SBP predicted ICH risk in subjects with cerebrovascular disease, whereas CRP, sVCAM-1, homocysteine, NT-proBNP, and renin did not predict ICH risk. The trends for prediction of ICH risk by mean LDL particle diameter and large LDL particle concentration are hypothesis generating and require confirmation in larger studies.

Plasma lipids predict myocardial infarction, but not stroke, in patients with established cerebrovascular disease.

AIMS: To evaluate the role of plasma lipids in recurrent vascular events, including stroke, among individuals with established cerebrovascular disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: Plasma total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides were measured at baseline among individuals participating in the Perindopril Protection Against Recurrent Stroke (PROGRESS) study, a randomized clinical trial of blood pressure lowering among patients with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack. A series of nested case-control studies were used to investigate the association between each of these lipid variables and the risk of subsequent haemorrhagic stroke, ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and heart failure. A total of 895 patients were selected as cases (83 haemorrhagic stroke, 472 ischaemic stroke, 206 MI, and 258 heart failure) and each was matched with one to three controls. After adjustment for other major cardiovascular risk factors, none of the lipid variables was associated with the risk of either stroke subtype. There were significant positive and negative associations for total cholesterol and HDL, respectively, with the risk of MI; the odds ratio comparing the highest and lowest thirds of each of these lipid variables was 2.00 (95% CI: 1.30-3.09) for total cholesterol and 0.58 (95% CI: 0.37-0.90) for HDL. HDL was inversely associated with the risk of heart failure; however, this result was of borderline statistical significance (P=0.05). CONCLUSION: Lipid variables are associated with the risk of MI, but not recurrent stroke, in patients with established cerebrovascular disease.

Prediction of heart failure by amino terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and C-reactive protein in subjects with cerebrovascular disease.

B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and C-reactive protein (CRP) are elevated in persons at risk for congestive heart failure (CHF). However, limited data are available directly comparing BNP-related peptides and CRP in persons at risk of CHF. To evaluate amino terminal-pro-BNP (NT-proBNP) and CRP, separately and together, for assessment of risk of CHF, we performed a nested case-control study of the 6105 participants of the Perindopril pROtection aGainst REcurrent Stroke Study (PROGRESS), a placebo-controlled study of a perindopril-based blood pressure-lowering regimen among individuals with previous stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). Each of 258 subjects who developed CHF resulting in death, hospitalization, or withdrawal of randomized therapy during a mean follow-up of 3.9 years was matched to 1 to 3 control subjects. NT-proBNP and CRP predicted CHF; the odds ratio for subjects in the highest compared with the lowest quarter was 4.5 (95% confidence interval, 2.7 to 7.5) for NT-proBNP and 2.9 (confidence interval, 1.9 to 4.7) for CRP, and each remained a predictor of CHF after adjustment for all other predictors. Screening for both markers provided better prognostic information than screening for either alone. Elevation of NT-proBNP above 50 pmol/L and CRP above 0.84 mg/L predicted CHF with sensitivity of 64% and specificity of 66%. NT-proBNP and CRP predicted CHF in subjects receiving perindopril-based therapy. We conclude that NT-proBNP and CRP are independent predictors of CHF risk after stroke or TIA. Moreover, NT-proBNP and CRP may be markers of mechanisms of CHF pathogenesis distinct from those responsive to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-based therapy.

The ACE gene I/D polymorphism is not associated with the blood pressure and cardiovascular benefits of ACE inhibition.

The insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene might have consequences for the risks of vascular diseases. We examined the ACE genotype and the effects of a perindopril-based blood pressure-lowering regimen on macrovascular events, dementia, and cognitive decline among hypertensive and nonhypertensive patients with a history of cerebrovascular disease. ACE I/D genotypes were measured in 5688 of 6105 individuals with previous stroke or transient ischemic attack who participated in the PROGRESS trial. The DD genotype was significantly (P<0.0001) less frequent in Asian subjects (Chinese and Japanese, 14.7%) than in non-Asian subjects (32.0%). Controlling for racial background, there were no associations between ACE genotypes and cerebrovascular disease history or cardiovascular risk factors, including baseline blood pressure. The ACE genotype was not associated with the long-term risks of stroke, cardiac events, mortality, dementia, or cognitive decline; neither did the ACE genotype predict the blood pressure reduction associated with the use of the ACE inhibitor perindopril. Similarly, there was no evidence that the ACE genotype modified the relative benefits of ACE inhibitor-based therapy over placebo. This study provides no evidence that in patients with cerebrovascular disease, knowledge of ACE genotype is useful for predicting either the risk of disease or the benefits of perindopril-based blood pressure-lowering treatment.