Evolving trend in the management of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia in Italy: A retrospective, single center, observational study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The effective reduction of LDL-C in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) is crucial to reduce their increased cardiovascular risk. Diagnostic and therapeutic (PCSK9 inhibitors) tools to manage HeFH improved in recent years. However, the impact of these progresses in ameliorating the contemporary real-world care of these patients remains to be determined. Aim of this study was to assess the evolution of treatments and LDL-C control in a cohort of HeFH patients in Italy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Four hundred six clinically diagnosed HeFH followed in a single, tertiary lipid centre were included in this survey. Data on lipid levels and medications were collected at baseline and during a median 3-year follow-up. At baseline, 19.8% of patients were receiving conventional high-potency lipid lowering therapies (LLT) and this percentage increased up to 50.8% at last visit. The knowledge of results of molecular diagnosis was associated with a significant increase in treatment intensity and LDL-C lowering. Nevertheless, the new LDL-C target (<70 mg/dl) was achieved only in 3.6% of HeFH patients under conventional LLTs and this proportion remained low (2.9%) also in those exposed to maximal conventional LLT. In 51 patients prescribed with PCSK9 inhibitors, 64.6% and 62.1% reached LDL-C<70 mg/dl at 3- and 12-month follow-up, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although treatments of HeFH improved over time, LDL-C target achievement with conventional LLT remains poor, mainly among women. The use of molecular diagnosis and even more the prescription of PCSK9i may improve LDL-C control in these patients.

Clinical Implications of Monogenic Versus Polygenic Hypercholesterolemia: Long-Term Response to Treatment, Coronary Atherosclerosis Burden, and Cardiovascular Events.

Background Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) may arise from deleterious monogenic variants in FH-causing genes as well as from a polygenic cause. We evaluated the relationships between monogenic FH and polygenic hypercholesterolemia in influencing the long-term response to therapy and the risk of atherosclerosis. Methods and Results A cohort of 370 patients with clinically diagnosed FH were screened for monogenic mutations and a low-density lipoprotein-rising genetic risk score >0.69 to identify polygenic cause. Medical records were reviewed to estimate the response to lipid-lowering therapies and the occurrence of major atherosclerotic cardiovascular events during a median follow-up of 31.0 months. A subgroup of patients (n=119) also underwent coronary computed tomographic angiography for the evaluation of coronary artery calcium score and severity of coronary stenosis as compared with 135 controls. Two hundred nine (56.5%) patients with hypercholesterolemia were classified as monogenic (FH/M+), 89 (24.1%) as polygenic, and 72 (19.5%) genetically undefined (FH/M-). The response to lipid-lowering therapy was poorest in monogenic, whereas it was comparable in patients with polygenic hypercholesterolemia and genetically undetermined. Mean coronary artery calcium score and the prevalence of coronary artery calcium >100 units were significantly higher in FH/M+ as compared with both FH/M- and controls. Finally, after adjustments for confounders, we observed a 5-fold higher risk of incident major atherosclerotic cardiovascular events in FH/M+ (hazard ratio, 4.8; 95% CI, 1.06-21.36; Padj=0.041). Conclusions Monogenic cause of FH is associated with lower response to conventional cholesterol-lowering therapies as well as with increased burden of coronary atherosclerosis and risk of atherosclerotic-related events. Genetic testing for hypercholesterolemia is helpful in providing important prognostic information.

Refinement of pathogenicity classification of variants associated with familial hypercholesterolemia: Implications for clinical diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: The lack of functional evidence for most variants detected during the molecular screening of patients with clinical familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) makes the definitive diagnosis difficult. METHODS: A total of 552 variants in LDLR, APOB, PCSK9 and LDLRAP1 genes found in 449 mutation-positive FH (FH/M+) patients were considered. Pathogenicity update was performed following the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines with additional specifications on copy number variants, functional studies, in silico prediction and co-segregation criteria for LDLR, APOB and PCSK9 genes. Pathogenicity of LDLRAP1 variants was updated by using ACMG criteria with no change to original scoring. RESULTS: After reclassification, the proportion of FH/M+ carriers of pathogenic (P) or likely pathogenic (LP) variants, and FH/M+ carriers of likely benign (LB) or benign (B) variants, was higher than that defined by standard criteria (81.5% vs. 79.7% and 7.1% vs. 2.7%). The refinement of pathogenicity classification also reduced the percentage of FH with variants of uncertain significance (VUS) (17.7% vs. 11.4%). After adjustment, the FH diagnosis by refined criteria best predicted LDL-C levels (Padj <0.001). Notably, FH with VUS variants had higher LDL-C than those with LB (all Padj ≤ 0.033), but similar to those with LP variants. CONCLUSION: Accurate variant interpretation best predicts the increase of LDL-C levels and shows its clinical utility in the molecular diagnosis of FH.