Risk of preoperative understaging of duodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms: a plea for caution in the treatment strategy.

PURPOSE: Pretreatment staging is the milestone for planning either surgical or endoscopic treatment in duodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms (dNENs). Herein, a series of surgically treated dNEN patients was evaluated to assess the concordance between the pre- and postsurgical staging. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of dNENs, who underwent surgical resection observed at eight Italian tertiary referral centers. The presurgical TNM stage, based on the radiological and functional imaging, was compared with the pathological TNM stage, after surgery. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2019, 109 patients were included. Sixty-six patients had G1, 26 a G2, 7 a G3 dNEN (Ki-67 not available in 10 patients). In 46/109 patients (42%) there was disagreement between the pre- and postsurgical staging, being it understaged in 42 patients (38%), overstaged in 4 (3%). As regards understaging, in 25 patients (22.9%), metastatic loco-regional nodes (N) resulted undetected at both radiological and functional imaging. Understaging due to the presence of distal micrometastases (M) was observed in 2 cases (1.8%). Underestimation of tumor extent (T) was observed in 12 patients (11%); in three cases the tumor was understaged both in T and N extent. CONCLUSIONS: Conventional imaging has a poor detection rate for loco-regional nodes and micrometastases in the presurgical setting of the dNENs. These results represent important advice when local conservative approaches, such as endoscopy or local surgical excision are considered and it represents a strong recommendation to include endoscopic ultrasound in the preoperative tools for a more accurate local staging.

The Long-Term Benefit of Liver Transplantation for Hepatic Metastases From Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Selection criteria and benefit of liver transplantation for hepatic metastases from neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) remain uncertain. Eighty-eight consecutive patients with metastatic NETs eligible for liver transplantation according to Milan-NET criteria were offered transplant (n = 42) versus nontransplant options (n = 46) depending on list dynamics, patient disposition, and age. Tumor burden between groups did not differ. Transplant patients were younger (40.5 vs. 55.5 years; p < 0.001). Long-term outcomes were compared after matching between groups made on multiple Cox models adjusted for propensity score built on logistic models. Survival benefit was the difference in mean survival between transplant versus nontransplant options. No patients were lost or died without recurrence. Median follow-up was 122 months. The transplant group showed a significant advantage over nontransplant strategies at 5 and 10 years in survival (97.2% and 88.8% vs. 50.9% and 22.4%, respectively; p < 0.001) and time-to-progression (13.1% and 13.1% vs. 83.5% and 89%; p < 0.001). After adjustment for propensity score, survival advantage of the transplant group was significant (hazard ratio = 7.4; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.4-23.0; p = 0.001). Adjusted transplant-related survival benefit was 6.82 months (95% CI: 1.10-12.54; p = 0.019) and 38.43 months (95% CI: 21.41-55.45; p < 0.001) at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Liver transplantation for metastatic NETs under restrictive criteria provides excellent long-term outcome. Transplant-related survival benefit increases over time and maximizes after 10 years.

Primary tumour resection may improve survival in functional well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours metastatic to the liver.

BACKGROUND: Functional well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (NET) with liver metastases represent a therapeutic challenge with few alternative options in guidelines. In these patients, the role of surgical resection of the primary tumour is controversial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From a regional registry collecting somatostatin analogue (SSA)-treated tumours from 1979 to 2005, a series of 139 patients presenting with symptomatic, liver-metastatic, well-differentiated NET (G1-G2, mitoses: ≤20, Ki-67: ≤20%) was prospectively collected and retrospectively analysed. Surgery on either the primary tumour or liver metastases was chosen: 1) when low perioperative risk was predictable; 2) in presence of an impending risk of obstruction, bleeding, or perforation; or 3) if liver metastases were suitable of curative or subtotal (>90%) tumour removal. Impact of the most relevant clinico-pathological parameters on survival was studied. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 127 months and median survival was 94 months, with 138 vs. 37 months in resected vs. non-resected primary NET (p < 0.001), respectively. In the univariate analysis, prolonged survival was significantly associated with primary tumour resection (p < 0.001), resection of liver metastases (p = 0.002), site of primary (carcinoid vs. pancreatic, p = 0.018), basal chromogranin-A (CgA) <200 ng/mL (p = 0.001), and absence of diarrhea (p = 0.012). Multivariate analysis showed that primary tumour resection was an independent positive prognostic factor (HR = 3.17; 95% CI: 1.77-5.69, p < 0.001), whereas diarrhea, basal CgA ≥200 ng/mL, and high tumour load were independent negative prognostic factors. Also, in 103 patients with non-resectable liver metastases, primary tumour resection was significantly associated with prolonged survival (median 137 vs. 32 months, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Primary tumour resection may improve survival in functional well-differentiated NET with liver metastases.

Pattern and management of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation.

A series of 132 patients who underwent liver transplantation for primary liver cancer was collected from three different Italian hospitals and studied for recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver replacement. Twenty-one patients (15.9%) had a neoplastic recurrence after an average follow-up period of 7.8 months after transplantation (range, 1-25 months); 15 (71%) occurred within the first 18 months after transplant and only two recurred later than 2 years. The sites of recurrence were grafted liver (19%), lung (19%), bone (14%), and other (5%). Eight patients (38%) had multiple organ involvement at the onset. After 1, 2, 3, and 4 years the overall survival rates were 62%, 43%, 29%, and 23%, respectively. The tumor factors related to early cancer recurrence after transplantation were diameter of nodules more than 3 cm (P < 0.05), tumor stage not meeting the "Milan criteria" (P < 0.03), and presence of peri-tumoral capsule (P < 0.05); the number of nodules, TNM stage, presence of vascular invasion, alpha-fetoprotein level more than 150 UI/l, pre-transplant chemoembolization and resectability of cancer deposits did not seem to be related to early recurrence. The prognosis differed in the 7 patients with resectable recurrences (57% 4-year survival) and the 14 patients with unresectable disease (14% 4-year survival) (P < 0.02). Better patient selection and new combined medical strategies could reduce the incidence of and mortality from liver cancer recurrence after transplantation. The role of surgical resection of recurrence should be further investigated.