Clinical predictors of candidemia in medical non-neutropenic, non-ICU patients. The CaMed score.

INTRODUCTION: Candida species are the leading cause of invasive fungal infections in hospitalised patients and are the fourth most common isolates recovered from patients with bloodstream infection. Few data exist on risk factors for candidemia in non-ICU patients. We performed a population-based case-control study to evaluate the main predictors for candidemia in non-ICU patients. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We included all non-neutropenic, non-critically ill and non-surgical adult patients with candidemia between January 2010 and June 2014. Patients with positive, non-candidal blood culture obtained at the same day (±2 days) were selected as controls. Cases and controls were matched according to hospital ward and clinical characteristics. Risk factors for candidemia were identified through a logistic regression. We included 56 candidemic and 512 bacteriemic non-candidemic patients. Most of candidemic patients (52) had received antibiotics prior to candidemia. Among them, the 30-day mortality rate was 34% (19/56). Multivariate analysis identified male sex, prior use of steroids, prior use of antibiotics, total parenteral nutrition and urinary catheterisation as independent predictors of candidemia. To develop the CaMed score, we rounded up weights of different risk factors as follows; total parenteral nutrition (+2), prior antibiotic therapy (+5), each of the other risk factors (+1). A score ≥ 7 identified patients at high risk of candidemia (P < 0.001; RR 29.805; CI 95% 10.652-83.397; sensitivity 79.2, specificity 82.6%, Youden index 0,62). CONCLUSIONS: Our set of easy independent predictors of candidemia in non-neutropenic, non-ICU, non-surgical patients provide a rationale for early initiation of antifungals and could reduce candidemia-related mortality.

Clinical efficacy of fosfomycin combinations against a variety of gram-positive cocci.

INTRODUCTION: Over recent years we have witnessed an increase in the resistance of microorganisms to the available antimicrobials and a decrease in the number of new antimicrobials. Fosfomycin is a safe and cheap broad-spectrum antibiotic which has shown very promising results in combination therapy, mainly against gram-negative microorganisms. Little is known, however, about its clinical efficacy against gram-positive microorganisms. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all patients with severe gram-positive infections who received fosfomycin as part of their treatment from 2011 to 2017. We also performed in vitro time-kill assays to study the behaviour of fosfomycin with different antimicrobials against two strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and two strains of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA). RESULTS: Seventy-five patients were treated with different fosfomycin combinations. Among them, 61 (81%) were successfully treated. Daptomycin plus fosfomycin was the most effective combination. Overall, the treatment with fosfomycin was safe, and side effects were minor. There was only one major side effect that resolved after discontinuation of therapy. Time-kill studies demonstrated increased activity of fosfomycin combinations, with daptomycin-fosfomycin being the most active combination against both MRSA and MSSA strains. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that antimicrobial combinations including fosfomycin are an alternative and effective approach for gram-positive infections.

The potential pathogenicity of chlorhexidine-sensitive Acanthamoeba strains isolated from contact lens cases from asymptomatic individuals in Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain.

Pathogenic strains of the genus Acanthamoeba are causative agents of a serious sight-threatening infection of the eye known as Acanthamoeba keratitis. The prevalence of this infection has risen in the past 20 years, mainly due to the increase in number of contact lens wearers. In this study, the prevalence of Acanthamoeba in a risk group constituted by asymptomatic contact lens wearers from Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain, was evaluated. Contact lenses and contact lens cases were analysed for the presence of Acanthamoeba isolates. The isolates' genotypes were also determined after rDNA sequencing. The pathogenic potential of the isolated strains was subsequently established using previously described molecular and biochemical assays, which allowed the selection of three strains with high pathogenic potential. Furthermore, the sensitivity of these isolates against two standard drugs, ciprofloxacin and chlorhexidine, was analysed. As the three selected strains were sensitive to chlorhexidine, its activity and IC(50) were evaluated. Chlorhexidine was found to be active against these strains and the obtained IC(50) values were compared to the concentrations of this drug present in contact lens maintenance solutions. It was observed that the measured IC(50) was higher than the concentration found in these maintenance solutions. Therefore, the ineffectiveness of chlorhexidine-containing contact lens maintenance solutions against potentially pathogenic strains of Acanthamoeba is demonstrated in this study.