Clinical and technical characteristics of intraoperative radiotherapy. Analysis of the ISIORT-Europe database.

BACKGROUND: A joint analysis of clinical data from centres within the European section of the International Society of Intraoperative Radiation Therapy (ISIORT-Europe) was undertaken in order to define the range of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) techniques and indications encompassed by its member institutions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 2007, the ISIORT-Europe centres were invited to record demographic, clinical and technical data relating to their IORT procedures in a joint online database. Retrospective data entry was possible. RESULTS: The survey encompassed 21 centres and data from 3754 IORT procedures performed between 1992 and 2011. The average annual number of patients treated per institution was 42, with three centres treating more than 100 patients per year. The most frequent tumour was breast cancer with 2395 cases (63.8 %), followed by rectal cancer (598 cases, 15.9 %), sarcoma (221 cases, 5.9 %), prostate cancer (108 cases, 2.9 %) and pancreatic cancer (80 cases, 2.1 %). Clinical details and IORT technical data from these five tumour types are reported. CONCLUSION: This is the first report on a large cohort of patients treated with IORT in Europe. It gives a picture of patient selection methods and treatment modalities, with emphasis on the main tumour types that are typically treated by this technique and may benefit from it.

Cisplatin-based chemoradiation plus cetuximab in locally advanced head and neck cancer: a phase II clinical study.

BACKGROUND: Intensification of chemoradiation for advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is unlikely due to toxicity. Cetuximab combined either with radiotherapy or with chemotherapy showed favourable toxic profile with positive results in both combinations. Therefore, cetuximab could intensify chemoradiation without worsening toxicity. We conducted a phase II study of chemoradiation and cetuximab. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had stage III-IV M0 HNSCC. Treatment consisted of three cycles of cisplatin (20 mg/m(2)/day × 5 days) and fluorouracil (200 mg/m(2)/day × 5 days) rapidly alternated to three split courses of radiotherapy up to 70 Gy and concurrent weekly cetuximab. The primary end point of the study was complete response (CR) rate. Secondary end points were toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Fourty-five patients were enrolled: median age was 56 years, 38 had stage IV disease and 40 nodal involvement. CR occurred in 32 patients (71%). PFS and OS was 21+ months and 32.6+, respectively. Acute grade 3-4 toxic effects were in the expected range, but grade 3 radiodermatitis occurred in 33 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of cetuximab, cisplatin, fluorouracil and radiotherapy leads to a very high proportion of CR and it is feasible with toxic effects similar to those expected by radiochemotherapy. The only unexpected toxicity was skin toxicity: grade 3 radiodermatitis occurred in 73% of the patients.

The role of interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) in stage I esophageal cancer: an AIRO (Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology) systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: This review aimed at examining efficacy of interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy-IRT) alone or combined with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in stage I esophageal cancer as exclusive treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic research using PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane library was performed. ClinicalTrials.gov was searched for ongoing or recently completed trials, and PROSPERO was searched for ongoing or recently completed systematic reviews. We analyzed only clinical study as full-text publication, reporting on patients with stage I esophageal cancer treated with IRT alone or in combination with other treatments (e.g., EBRT). Conference paper, survey, letter, editorial, book chapter, and review were excluded. Patients who underwent previous surgery were excluded. Time restriction (1990-2018) was applied for years of the publication. RESULTS: Twelve studies have been selected. The number of evaluated patients was 514; the median age was 69 years. In the IRT group, the median: local control (LC) was 77% (range 63%-100%), disease-free survival (DFS) was 68.4% (range 49%-86.3%), the overall survival (OS) was 60% (range 31%-84%), the cancer specific survival (CSS) was 80% (range 55-100%), and grade 3-4 toxicity range was 0%-26%. CONCLUSIONS: IRT alone or combined to EBRT is an effective and safe treatment option for patients with stage I esophageal cancer. Definitive radiation therapy could be an alternative to surgery in patients with superficial cancer.

Effects of fluconazole in the prophylaxis of oropharyngeal candidiasis in patients undergoing radiotherapy for head and neck tumour: results from a double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

Fluconazole is recommended in the prophylaxis of oropharyngeal candidiasis (OPC) in patients undergoing radiotherapy for head-neck tumours; however, the actual effectiveness of fluconazole in this setting remains unclear. Adult patients with cervico-cephalic carcinoma submitted to radical or adjuvant radiotherapy were randomized to 100 mg fluconazole (n = 138) or matched placebo (n = 132) oral suspension once daily from the sixth session of radiotherapy up to the end of treatment. The final analysis of the investigation showed a higher rate of the OPC outbreak-free survival in the fluconazole compared with placebo (P = 0.008 in the log-rank test). The mean time (95% CI) to OPC outbreak was 56 (53-59) days in the fluconazole group and 47 (43-51) days with placebo. The mean duration of radiotherapy was 43.5 and 39.9 days, respectively in the two groups (P = 0.027). Adverse effects were reported in 70.3% of patients in the fluconazole group and in 67.4% with placebo. The results showed prophylaxis with fluconazole given in irradiated patients with head-neck tumours significantly reduces the rate and the time to development of OPC compared with placebo.

Five-year update of a randomized trial of alternating radiotherapy and chemotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in treatment of unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

BACKGROUND: In 1992, we reported the first analysis of a randomized trial comparing alternating radiotherapy and chemotherapy with radiotherapy alone in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. The results of that 3-year analysis indicated that the combined treatment had superior efficacy. PURPOSE: After an additional 2 years of follow-up, we again compared the efficacy of the two treatment regimens, with attention paid to differences in overall survival, progression-free survival, and locoregional relapse-free survival. METHODS: One hundred fifty-seven patients with untreated, unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were randomly assigned to receive either chemotherapy (four courses of cisplatin [20 mg/m2] and fluorouracil [200 mg/m2], given daily for 5 consecutive days during weeks 1, 4, 7, and 10) plus radiotherapy (three courses of 20 Gy each, given in fractions of 2 Gy per day during weeks 2-3, 5-6, and 8-9) or radiotherapy alone (70 Gy total dose, given in fractions of 2 Gy per day, 5 days per week). Eighty patients received the combined therapy, and 77 were treated with radiotherapy alone. Responses, failures, and toxic effects associated with the two treatment regimens were compared. Overall survival, progression-free survival, and locoregional relapse-free survival were calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method; the logrank test was used to compare survival parameters between the two patient groups. Reported P values are two-sided. RESULTS: As reported previously, toxic effects associated with the combined therapy included both chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-related effects; however, the incidence and severity of mucositis were nearly identical among patients in the two treatment arms. The combined treatment was associated with a statistically significant increase in the frequency of complete response (i.e., the disappearance of clinically detectable disease for at least 4 weeks) (43% for the combined-treatment group compared with 22% for the radiotherapy-only group; P = .037, chi-squared test). Five-year estimates of overall survival in the combined-treatment group compared with the radiotherapy-only group were 24% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 14%-40%) and 10% (95% CI = 4%-24%), respectively (P = .01, logrank test). The estimates of progression-free survival at 5 years in the combined-treatment group compared with the radiotherapy-only group were 21% (95% CI = 11%-37%) and 9% (95% CI = 3%-22%), respectively (P = .008, logrank test). Finally, the 5-year estimates of locoregional relapse-free survival were 64% (95% CI = 36%-84%) in the combined-treatment group and 32% (95% CI = 10%-65%) in the radiotherapy-only group (P = .038, logrank test). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The superiority of alternating chemotherapy and radiotherapy over radiotherapy alone in treating unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck seen at 3 years was confirmed at 5 years. However, additional trials must be conducted before considering the combined approach as standard therapy.

Quality indicators in the intensity modulated/image-guided radiotherapy era.

PURPOSE: To propose new Quality Indicators (QIs) for the Intensity Modulated(IMRT)/Image-Guided(IGRT) Radiotherapy techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two structure, 10 process and 2 outcome QIs were elaborated. A working group including Radiation Oncologist, Medical Physicist and Radiation Technologists was made up. A preliminary set of indicators was selected on the basis of evidenced critical issues; the criteria to identify more relevant and specific QIs for IMRT/IGRT were defined; structure, process and outcome QIs were defined. The elaborated indicators were tested in four Italian Radiotherapy Centers. RESULTS: Fourteen indicators were proposed. Seven indicators were completely new while a new standard is proposed for four indicators based on Validation Centers (VC) data. No change was reported for 3 indicators. The indicators were applied in the four VC. The VC considered were able to respect all indicators except indicator 2 for one Center. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: QIs may provide useful measures of workload and service performances.

In vivo cell kinetics in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas predicts local control and helps guide radiotherapy regimen.

PURPOSE: To determine whether pretherapy cell kinetics can predict local control for patients affected by head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HN-SCCs) to be treated by primary radiotherapy and, moreover, guide to a choice between conventional and accelerated radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1989 and 1993, 83 patients with stage II to IV HN-SCC entered the study. Multiple primary tumor biopsies were obtained 6 hours after in vivo infusion of bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd). In vivo S-phase fraction labeling index (LI), duration of S phase (Ts), and potential doubling time (Tpot) were obtained by analysis of multivariate flow-cytometric data. Between April 1989 and January 1991, 49 patients were treated by conventional radiotherapy (70 Gy in 35 fractions over 7 weeks), whereas, afterwards, 34 patients entered an accelerated radiotherapy regimen with the concomitant boost technique (75 Gy in 40 fractions over 6 weeks). RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed that, among patients treated by conventional radiotherapy, local control probability was affected by tumor stage (P = .02), Tpot (P < .001), and LI (P = .04). Similarly, among patients treated with accelerated radiotherapy, we found that local control probability was related to tumor stage (P = .03) and primary tumor site (P = .05). For the subgroup of patients with tumors characterized by fast growth (Tpot < or = 5 days), accelerated radiotherapy gave a better local control rate than conventional radiotherapy (P = .02). Cox multivariate analysis of the total number of patients showed that the only significant independent prognostic factors related to local control were tumor stage (P = .002) and Tpot (P = .004). Moreover, when the Cox analysis was restricted to the subgroup of patients treated with conventional radiotherapy, Tpot was the most significant factor to predict local outcome (P < .01). CONCLUSION: Pretreatment tumor Tpot appears to be an important independent prognostic factor for local control of HN-SCC treated by primary radiotherapy.

Sequential versus alternating chemotherapy and radiotherapy in stage III-IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a phase III study.

A cooperative randomized study was begun in August 1983 to compare a sequential program of induction chemotherapy followed by definitive treatment, arm A, with an alternation of chemotherapy and radiotherapy (three courses of 20 Gy in ten daily fractions), arm B. The same chemotherapy was used in both arms: 6 mg/m2, vinblastine, hour 0; 30 mg, bleomycin, hour 6; 200 mg, methotrexate, hours 24 to 26; 45 mg, leucovorin, hour 48. One hundred sixteen patients entered the study, 55 in arm A and 61 in arm B. The patients all had previously untreated squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Forty-five patients had stage III and 71 had stage IV disease. The two arms were fully comparable. As of April 1986, 116 patients were evaluable for survival, while 112 were evaluable for toxicity and 105 for response. Response analysis shows that there were 14 complete responses (CR) and 11 partial responses (PR), for an overall response rate (ORR) of 52% in arm A, and 30 CRs and seven PRs, for an ORR of 64.9% in arm B. The difference in terms of CR between the two arms was statistically significant (P less than .03). Progression-free survival (PFS) was also statistically different, with an advantage for arm B (P less than .05), but without differences in overall survival. Arm B correlates with a significant increase in mucositis compared with arm A (P less than .001).

Chemoradiotherapy as an alternative to radiotherapy alone in fast proliferating head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.

The aim of this pilot study was to explore the prognostic relevance of cell kinetics parameters on the local control of patients affected by head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HN-SCC), randomly assigned to receive either alternating chemoradiotherapy or partly accelerated radiotherapy. Between 1992 and 1995, 40 patients with HN-SCC at stages III and IV entered the study. Multiple primary tumor biopsies were obtained 6 h after in vivo infusion of bromodeoxyuridine, an analogue of thymidine that is incorporated in DNA-synthesizing cells. In vivo S-phase fraction labeling index (LI), duration of S-phase (TS), and potential doubling time (Tpot) were obtained by analysis of the flow cytometric content of bromodeoxyuridine and DNA. Twenty patients were treated by alternating chemotherapy and conventional radiotherapy (arm A), whereas 20 other matching patients received partly accelerated radiotherapy alone (arm B). Univariate local control analysis showed that LI, TS, and Tpot were not prognostically significant in either arm. However, local control probability at 2 years for fast growing tumors, characterized by a LI of 9%, was higher for patients treated with alternating chemoradiotherapy than it was for those treated with partly accelerated radiotherapy alone (68 versus 39%). Conversely, local control probabilities for slow proliferating tumors (LI, <9%) treated in the two arms were similar. These results suggest a potential role for alternating chemotherapy and radiotherapy in HN-SCC patients with fast growing tumors.

Impact of the treating institution on the survival of patients with head and neck cancer treated with concomitant alternating chemotherapy and radiation.

The aim of this study was to investigate the possible impact of the treating institution on the survival of patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck treated with radiotherapy alone or concomitant alternating chemotherapy and radiation. The National Institute for Cancer Research of Genoa (IST) was the coordinator of two multicentre randomised trials comparing an alternating chemotherapy and radiation approach to radiotherapy alone with standard fractionation (HN-8 trial: 157 patients) or accelerated fractionation (HN-9 trial: 136 patients) in patients with advanced squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. A single database of the two studies was created and a univariate analysis was performed. The Cox regression model, adjusted for the effect of other prognostic factors, was used to test the impact of the treating institution on survival. Three-year overall survival was 46% for patients treated with chemotherapy and radiation at the coordinating centre and 27% for those treated with the same approach at the affiliated centres (P=0.0001). No difference was detected between patients treated with radiation alone at the coordinating centre or outside (23% versus 21%: P=0.52). The hazard ratio of death for patients treated at the affiliated centres with concomitant alternating chemotherapy and radiation was 2.15 (95% Confidence Interval (C.I.) 1.45-3.18), while it was 1.003 (95% C.I. 0.65-1.55) for those treated with radiation alone. In our experience, the treating institution had a significant impact only on the prognosis of patients treated with the multidisciplinary approach. This finding has implications, both in terms of clinical research and clinical practice.

Locally advanced non-metastatic breast cancer: analysis of prognostic factors in 125 patients homogeneously treated with a combined modality approach.

125 stage III breast cancer patients, including 51 cases of inflammatory carcinoma, were treated with the following combined modality approach: three courses of primary 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide (FAC) chemotherapy followed by locoregional treatment and subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of three courses of FAC alternating with three courses of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF). Clinical response to primary FAC was 65% (complete 10%). Residual tumour mass in the mastectomy specimen was > 1 and < or = 1 cm in 82 and 18% of cases, respectively. Complete pathological response following primary chemotherapy was achieved in only 3.5% of cases. After primary FAC and local treatment, 97% of patients were disease-free. Overall survival (S) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 5 years were 56 and 34%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that age, receptor status and clinical and pathological response to primary chemotherapy did not appear to influence treatment outcome significantly, whereas stage, presence of inflammatory disease and number of involved nodes had a significant impact on both S and PFS.

Evidence of cell kinetics as predictive factor of response to radiotherapy alone or chemoradiotherapy in patients with advanced head and neck cancer.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the potential clinical relevance of cell kinetics parameters to the locoregional control (LRC) and overall survival of patients affected by head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HN-SCC) treated by conventional radiotherapy, partly accelerated radiotherapy, or alternating chemoradiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between January 1993 and June 1996,115 patients with HN-SCC at Stage III and IV entered the study. Multiple primary tumor biopsies were obtained 6 h after in vivo infusion of bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd), an analogue of thymidine that is incorporated in DNA-synthesizing cells. In vivo S-phase fraction labeling index (LI), duration of S-phase (Ts), and potential doubling time (Tpot) were obtained by analysis of the flow cytometric content of BrdUrd and DNA. Eighty-two patients were randomly assigned to receive either alternating chemoradiotherapy or partly accelerated radiotherapy, whereas 33 other matching patients received conventional radiotherapy. RESULTS: Univariate LRC analysis showed that LI value was a prognostically significant factor, independent of type of therapy. Multivariate analysis failed to show cell kinetics parameters as statistically significant factors affecting LRC probability and overall survival. However, subgroup analysis showed that LRC probability at 4 years for fast proliferating tumors characterized by a LI >/= 8% was significantly better for patients treated either with alternating chemoradiotherapy or partly accelerated radiotherapy than it was for those treated with conventional radiotherapy. Conversely, LRC probability for slow proliferating tumors (LI < 8%) treated with the three treatment modalities was similar. CONCLUSIONS: These results showed that, independent of type of treatment, pretreatment cell kinetics provided only a weak prognostic role of outcome in HN-SCC. However, this report raises the hypothesis that fast growing HN-SCC may be more likely to benefit from intensified therapy, as given in this series. Cell kinetics parameters studied by the in vivo BrdUrd/flow cytometry method might be considered predictive factors of response, providing information on which type of treatment may be selected according to tumor proliferation rate.

Total body irradiation in acute myeloid leukemia and chronic myelogenous leukemia: influence of dose and dose-rate on leukemia relapse.

From June 1981 to March 1987, 106 patients--59 with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and 47 with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML)--were treated with Cyclophosphamide 60 mg/kg X 2 d and total body irradiation (TBI-990 cGy/3fr/3d described dose) before allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Seventy-nine patients are evaluable for risk of relapse: 32 with chronic myelogenous leukemia (23 in first chronic phase, 9 in accelerated phase) and 47 with acute myeloid leukemia (38 in first complete remission, 9 in subsequent phases). Actual TBI doses delivered to these patients varied between 839 and 1250 cGy (mean 956 +/- 101)/3 fr/3d, with dose rates between 2.7 and 7.25 cGy/min (mean 4.2 +/- 1.8). Patients receiving high (greater than 990 cGy) and low (less than or equal to 990) dose and/or dose rate (greater than 4 cGy/min and less than or equal to 4, respectively) have been evaluated overall and stratified by type of leukemia and phase of disease. When the patients are considered altogether, high total dose is significantly correlated with decreased risk of relapse (p = 0.0005) as well as high dose rate (p = 0.03). When considering specific subgroups, the influence of total dose on relapse rate is evident both for "early" and "advanced" leukemias, while an impact of dose rate appears only for chronic myelogenous leukemia in 1st chronic phase. Pertinent radiobiological and clinical literature is reviewed, and a possible role of dose fractionation and dose rate in leukemic control rate is evidenced; in this TBI setting, total dose not less than 990 cGy/3fr/3d and dose rate not less than 4 cGy/min have to be guaranteed.

Postoperative radiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: feasibility of a biphasic accelerated treatment schedule.

PURPOSE: It has been suggested that postoperative tumor cell proliferation may influence the outcome of advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinomas treated by surgery and postoperative radiotherapy. This Phase I pilot study was undertaken to determine the feasibility of a biphasic accelerated radiotherapy regimen with early and late concomitant boost delivery for postoperative treatment of patients with advanced head and neck cancers. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From April 1993 to April 1994, 29 patients with advanced head and neck cancers were enrolled in this study after they underwent complete surgical resection. The basic radiation course delivered a median dose of 49 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks at 1.8-2 Gy/fraction. The concomitant boost was delivered to the high-risk areas as a second daily fraction during the first (1.4 Gy/fraction) and fifth weeks (1.6 Gy/fraction). The total dose to the high-risk areas was 64 Gy in 35 fractions over 5 weeks. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients (93%) completed the treatment without interruptions. Only two patients experienced severe acute toxicity requiring treatment breaks of 6 and 8 days, respectively. All patients developed confluent mucositis; in 69% of the cases it covered >50% of the treated surface. No patient developed Grade 5 (ulceration/bleeding) mucosal reaction. Mucositis required a median time of 7 weeks for complete healing (range 3-43). Two patients developed transient bone exposure. The median weight loss was 5.5% of pretreatment body weight (range 1.2-17.1%), and four patients required nutritional assistance with nasogastric feeding tube. CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that this biphasic acceleration regimen is feasible with acceptable acute toxicity.

Potential doubling time in head and neck tumors treated by primary radiotherapy: preliminary evidence for a prognostic significance in local control.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to determine preliminarily whether cell kinetic parameters evaluated using in vivo infusion of bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) and flow cytometry, play a role as prognostic factors of loco-regional control in squamous cell head and neck carcinoma treated with radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between April 1989 and December 1991, 42 patients with unresectable Stage II-IV squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, pharynx or larynx were given an infusion of BrdUrd solution prior to primary tumor biopsy sampling at 4-6 hr later. The simultaneous labeling S-phase fraction (LI) and duration (Ts) as well as the estimated potential doubling time (Tpot) were measured using flow cytometric analysis of BrdUrd and DNA content. Twenty-six patients received standard radiotherapy (70 Gy/35 fractions/7 weeks) whereas 15 patients were treated with the concomitant boost technique (75 Gy/40 fractions/6 weeks). RESULTS: A complete set of flow cytometric data was available for 31 patients. The median value of LI, Ts, and Tpot were 9%, 9 hr and 5 days, respectively. Univariate analysis among the patients treated homogeneously by standard radiotherapy, indicated that local control was affected by Tpot value (p = 0.02). When the same analysis was performed for the patients treated with either standard radiotherapy or concomitant boost regimen, we found a p = 0.04. Thus, patients with a tumor Tpot value < or = 5 days had a significantly lower three-year local control than patients with Tpot > 5 days. Log-rank test univariate analysis showed, in addition, that nodal status was the strongest prognostic factor of local control (p = 0.005). Age, tumor stage, tumor site, performance status, grading, radiotherapy regimen, DNA ploidy and LI value were, instead, not significantly related to loco-regional control. Finally, when comparing the type of radiotherapy for tumors with Tpot < or = 5 days, we found a trend toward a better local control after concomitant boost regimen, with respect to standard regimen (p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: The present preliminary results suggest that Tpot could play a role as additional prognostic factor influencing the disease outcome in head and neck carcinoma treated by radiotherapy.

Chemotherapy alternated with radiotherapy in the treatment of advanced head and neck carcinoma: predictive factors of outcome.

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of pretreatment and treatment-related factors on local-regional control and overall survival rates in advanced (III and IV stage) head and neck cancer patients treated with alternating chemoradiotherapy, a selected group of 115 patients who had PS < or = 1 and received a total dose of radiotherapy (RT) within +/- 5% of that planned, was analyzed. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients were planned to receive 4 cycles of chemotherapy (cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil) alternated with radiotherapy (60 Gy/30 fractions). However, mainly due to systemic toxicity, about 30% of the patients received less than 90% of the planned combined chemotherapy total dose (CCTD). Based on differences in treatment planning and delivery, patients were divided into two groups. For living patients, median follow-up is 34 months (range: 24-111 months). RESULTS: At multivariate analysis, RT technique (p = 0.008), N stage (p = 0.010) and CCTD (p = 0.027) were independent predictors of LRC. Compared to each favorable subset (RR = 1), the relative risks of LRC failure were 2.18 (95% CI: 1.21-3.91), 2.23 (95% CI: 1.11-4.50) and 2.23 (95% CI: 1.15-4.31) for patients without improved dose distribution and treatment delivery, with bilateral nodes or nodes greater than 6 cm, and with a CCTD lower than 90%, respectively. Regarding overall survival, only RT treatment was found to be an independent predictor (p = 0.037), with an RR of 1.61 (95% CI: 1.02-2.53) for patients without improved dose distribution and treatment delivery. CONCLUSION: Optimal delivery of RT dose is crucial in patients with advanced head and neck tumors, even if they receive chemotherapy as part of their treatment. This study also suggests that chemotherapy total dose may play a role in patient outcome, but this must be confirmed prospectively.

Total body irradiation correlates with chronic graft versus host disease and affects prognosis of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia receiving an HLA identical allogeneic bone marrow transplant.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether different procedure variables involved in the delivery of fractionated total body irradiation (TBI) impact on prognosis of patients affected by acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) receiving allogeneic bone marrow transplant (BMT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ninety-three consecutive patients with ALL receiving a human leukocyte antigen (HLA) identical allogeneic BMT between 1 August 1983 and 30 September 1995 were conditioned with the same protocol consisting of cyclophosphamide and fractionated TBI. The planned total dose of TBI was 12 Gy (2 Gy, twice a day for 3 days). Along the 12-year period, variations in delivering TBI schedule occurred with regard to used radiation source, instantaneous dose rate, technical setting, and actual total dose received by the patient. We tested these different TBI variables as well as factors related to patient, state of disease, and transplant-induced disease to investigate their influence on transplant-related mortality, leukemia relapse, and survival. RESULTS: At median follow-up of 7 years (range 3-15 years) the probabilities of leukemia-free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS) for the 93 patients were 60% and 41%, respectively. At univariate analysis, chronic graft versus host disease (cGvHd) (p = 0.0005), age (p = 0.01), and state of disease (p = 0.03) were factors affecting LFS whereas chronic GvHd (p = 0.0005), acute GvHd (p = 0.03), age (p = 0.0001), and GvHd prophylaxis (p = 0.01) were factors affecting overall survival. The occurrence of chronic GvHd was correlated with actually delivered TBI dose (p = 0.04). Combined stratification of prognostic factors showed that patients who received the planned total dose of TBI (12 Gy) and were affected by chronic GvHd had higher probabilities of LFS (p = 0.01) and OS (p = n.s.) than patients receiving less than 12 Gy and/or without occurrence of chronic GvHd. Moreover, TBI dose had a significant impact on LFS in patients transplanted in first remission (p = 0.05). At multivariate analysis, TBI dose was an independent factor affecting overall survival (p = 0.05) as well as chronic GvHd (p = 0.001) and age (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective analysis showed that different variables involved in TBI delivery may influence the occurrence of cGvHd and affect prognosis of patients with ALL receiving allogeneic BMT. The total dose of 12 Gy, administered in six fractions over 3 days, appears to be an effective and low toxic regimen for ALL patients transplanted in first remission.

Chemo-radiotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation in poor prognosis neuroblastoma.

In Genoa, 39 patients affected by disseminated neuroblastoma, one to twelve years old, were treated with intensive chemotherapy (Vincristine 4 mg/sqm c.i. over 5 days, Melphalan 140 mg/sqm), total body irradiation (TBI) (3.3 Gy for 3 days), and unpurged autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) since October 1984 until November 1987. Thirty-two patients were in complete response (first group) and 7 had residual disease (second group) after an intensive chemotherapeutic induction regimen. Actuarial overall survival at 38 months is 52% and disease free survival at 30 months is 28% for the first group. Actuarial overall survival at 25 months is instead 14% for the second group related treatment toxicity has not been too high (3 deaths).

Total body irradiation before allogeneic and autologous bone marrow transplantation: a ten year Genoa experience.

Since 1976 in Genoa, 291 TBI treatments were performed. Before allogeneic BMT, 1000 cGy/1 fx were prescribed in the first 22 patients, and then 990 cGy/3 fx/3 d in AML and CML, and the same or 1200 cGy/6 fx/3 d in ALL. Survival (S) and probability of remaining in remission (PRR) were 54% and 69% at 80 months in 80 AML; in 62 CML 45% and 60% at 60 months; in 69 ALL, 32% and 45% at 82 months. Differences in favour of higher doses and dose rates were observed and are presented. Before autologous BMT, 1000 cGy/1 fx were prescribed to AML and NHL, and 1200 cGy/3 fx/3 d to ALL patients. Disease free survival (DFS) was 71% and 13% at 82 months in 21 AML treated in first R and 9 ALL, respectively; 81% at 32 months in 11 NHL treated in R.