Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Br J Dermatol ; 190(6): 895-903, 2024 May 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38123140

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Concerns regarding contact allergies and intolerance reactions to dental materials are widespread among patients. Development of novel dental materials and less frequent amalgam use may alter sensitization profiles in patients with possible contact allergy. OBJECTIVES: To analyse current sensitization patterns to dental materials in patients with suspected contact allergy. METHODS: This retrospective, multicentre analysis from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) selected participants from 169 834 people tested in 2005-2019 and registered with (i) an affected area of 'mouth' (and 'lips'/'perioral'), (ii) with the dental material in question belonging to one of three groups (dental filling materials, oral implants or dentures or equivalents) and (iii) with patch-testing done in parallel with the German baseline series, (dental) metal series and dental technician series. RESULTS: A total of 2730 of 169 834 tested patients met the inclusion criteria. The patients were predominantly women (81.2%) aged ≥ 40 years (92.8%). The sensitization rates with confirmed allergic contact stomatitis in women (n = 444) were highest for metals (nickel 28.6%, palladium 21.4%, amalgam 10.9%), (meth)acrylates [2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) 4.8%] and the substances propolis (6.8%) and 'balsam of Peru' (11.4%). The most relevant acrylates were HEMA, 2-hydroxypropyl methacrylate, methyl methacrylate, ethylene glycol dimethacrylate and pentaerythritol triacrylate. Few men were diagnosed with allergic contact stomatitis (n = 68); sensitization rates in men were highest for propolis (14.9%) and amalgam (13.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Allergic contact stomatitis to dental materials is rare. Patch testing should not only focus on metals such as nickel, palladium, amalgam and gold, but also (meth)acrylates and the natural substances propolis and 'balsam of Peru'.


Assuntos
Amálgama Dentário , Materiais Dentários , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato , Testes do Emplastro , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/epidemiologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/imunologia , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Materiais Dentários/efeitos adversos , Amálgama Dentário/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Criança , Metacrilatos/efeitos adversos , Bálsamos/efeitos adversos , Implantes Dentários/efeitos adversos , Estomatite/epidemiologia , Estomatite/induzido quimicamente , Estomatite/imunologia , Estomatite/diagnóstico , Estomatite/etiologia , Própole/efeitos adversos , Dentaduras/efeitos adversos , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Alérgenos/imunologia , Pré-Escolar
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA