Evaluation and implications of mitral regurgitation using cMRI in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

OBJECTIVE: Mitral regurgitation (MR) represents an important feature in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) due to left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction and mitral valve systolic anterior motion (SAM). Mitral valve anatomical variants associated with HCM also contribute to the severity of MR. The aim of this study is to evaluate MR severity and its correlation with different parameters in patients with HCM using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: 130 patients with HCM underwent cMRI. Parameters assessed for the quantification of MR severity were mitral regurgitation volume (MRV) and mitral regurgitation fraction (MRF). cMRI was also used to characterize LV function, left atrium volume (LAV) index, filling pressures and structural abnormalities associated with HCM, all in correlation to MR. RESULTS: Patients with HCM had mild (26.9%), moderate (52.3%) or severe (20.7%) MR. Most relevant parameters related to MR severity were MRV and MRF; other parameters with strong correlation with MR were LAV index and E/E' ratio, both increasing with its severity. Patients with LVOT obstruction had more severe MR (70.3%), 79% of them due to SAM. LV ejection fraction (LVEF) increased proportionally with the severity of MR, while LV strain (LAS) was inversely correlated with it. Independent predictors for quantifying the severity of MR, after the adjustment for covariates, were MRV, MRF, SAM, LAV index and E/E'. CONCLUSIONS: cMRI can accurately assess MR in patients with HCM, especially by using novel indicators, MRV and MRF respectively, along with LAV index and E/E' ratio. Severe MR, due to SAM, is more frequent in the obstructive form of HCM (HOCM). Also, the severity of MR is significantly associated with significantly associated with MRV, MRF, LAV index and E/E' ratio.

Bunker probe: A plasma potential probe almost insensitive to its orientation with the magnetic field.

Due to their ability to suppress a large part of the electron current and thus measuring directly the plasma potential, ion sensitive probes have begun to be widely tested and used in fusion devices. For these probes to work, almost perfect alignment with the total magnetic field is necessary. This condition cannot always be fulfilled due to the curvature of magnetic fields, complex magnetic structure, or magnetic field reconnection. In this perspective, we have developed a plasma potential probe (named Bunker probe) based on the principle of the ion sensitive probe but almost insensitive to its orientation with the total magnetic field. Therefore it can be used to measure the plasma potential inside fusion devices, especially in regions with complex magnetic field topology. Experimental results are presented and compared with Ball-Pen probe measurements taken under identical conditions. We have observed that the floating potential of the Bunker probe is indeed little affected by its orientation with the magnetic field for angles ranging from 90° to 30°, in contrast to the Ball-Pen probe whose floating potential decreases towards that of a Langmuir probe if not properly aligned with the magnetic field.

Profile measurements of the electron temperature on the ASDEX Upgrade, COMPASS, and ISTTOK tokamak using Thomson scattering, triple, and ball-pen probes.

The ball-pen probe (BPP) technique is used successfully to make profile measurements of the electron temperature on the ASDEX Upgrade (Axially Symmetric Divertor Experiment), COMPASS (COMPact ASSembly), and ISTTOK (Instituto Superior Tecnico TOKamak) tokamak. The electron temperature is provided by a combination of the BPP potential (ΦBPP) and the floating potential (Vfl) of the Langmuir probe (LP), which is compared with the Thomson scattering diagnostic on ASDEX Upgrade and COMPASS. Excellent agreement between the two diagnostics is obtained for circular and diverted plasmas and different heating mechanisms (Ohmic, NBI, ECRH) in deuterium discharges with the same formula Te = (ΦBPP - Vfl)/2.2. The comparative measurements of the electron temperature using BPP/LP and triple probe (TP) techniques on the ISTTOK tokamak show good agreement of averaged values only inside the separatrix. It was also found that the TP provides the electron temperature with significantly higher standard deviation than BPP/LP. However, the resulting values of both techniques are well in the phase with the maximum of cross-correlation function being 0.8.