Assessing the Social Determinants of Health and Adverse Childhood Experiences in Patients Attending a Children's Hospital Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Program.

This study aimed to describe the social determinants of health (SDoH) for patients receiving multidisciplinary team care in a Cleft Palate-Craniofacial program, develop responsive and consistent processes to include trauma-informed psychosocial histories, promote discussions about additional "non-medical" factors influencing health and surgical outcomes, and demonstrate that these activities are feasible in the context of multidisciplinary patient-provider interactions.Single-site, cross-sectional study using a questionnaire.Participants were recruited from a provincial quaternary care Cleft Palate-Craniofacial program at British Columbia Children's Hospital in Vancouver, BC, Canada.290 families completed the questionnaire.34% of families experience significant barriers to accessing primary health care, 51% struggle financially, and 11% scored four or more on the Adverse Childhood Experiences scale. Furthermore, 47% reported not having adequate social support in their lives, and 5% reported not feeling resilient at the time of the survey.Patients with cleft and craniofacial anomalies have complex needs that extend beyond the surgical and medical care they receive. It is critical that all Cleft and Craniofacial teams incorporate social histories into their clinic workflow and be responsive to these additional needs. Discussions surrounding SDoH and adversity are welcomed by families; being involved in the care and decision-making plans is highly valued. Healthcare providers can and should ask about SDoH and advocate for universal access to responsive, site-based, social work support for their patients.

Experiences of Canadian Parents of Young Children With Cleft Lip and/or Palate.

PURPOSE: Prior literature has described the perspectives of parents of young children with clip lip and/or palate; however, few studies have described parents' experiences within a Canadian health care system. This study aims to better understand the experiences of parents of young children with cleft lip and/or palate seen at a Canadian tertiary care center and identify their care needs. DESIGN: In-depth semistructured interviews. SETTING: Pediatric tertiary care center. PARTICIPANTS: Parents of children younger than 7 years of age with cleft lip and/or palate. RESULTS: From 14 interviews, 4 themes were identified. The diagnosis theme was associated with reactions, timing, and search for information. Key concerns within the theme of physiology and function were around feeding and speech. The health care experience theme included burden of care, peripheral hospitals and services, the cleft lip and palate clinic, and clinicians. The psychosocial theme included parents' reactions to their child's pain, coping strategies, family interactions, and school/day care experiences. Parents felt care could be improved by having: access to good information and community speech therapists, shorter appointment wait times, a peer support network, and increased cleft knowledge within their child's school and peer groups. CONCLUSIONS: The experience of parents of children with cleft lip and/or palate is complex but can be organized into 4 themes. Clinics may consider suggestions offered by parents to improve care. Future work should address parents' needs and aim to create a parent-reported quality-of-life measure specific to parents of young children with cleft lip and/or palate.

Resident Exposure to Aesthetic Surgical and Nonsurgical Procedures During Canadian Residency Program Training.

North American residency programs are transitioning to competency-based medical education (CBME) to standardize training programs, and to ensure competency of residents upon graduation. At the centre of assessment in CBME are specific surgical procedures, or procedural competencies, that trainees must be able to perform. A study previously defined 31 procedural competencies for aesthetic surgery. In this transition period, understanding current educational trends in resident exposure to these aesthetic procedures is necessary. The aim of this study was to characterize aesthetic procedures performed by Canadian plastic surgery residents during training, as well as to describe resident performance confidence levels and degree of resident involvement during those procedures. Case logs were retrieved from all 10 English-language plastic surgery programs. All aesthetic procedures were identified, and coded according to previously defined core procedural competencies (CPCs) in the aesthetic domain of plastic surgery. Data extracted from each log included the procedure, training program, resident academic year, resident procedural role, and personal competence. From July 2004 to June 2014, 6113 aesthetic procedures were logged by 55 graduating residents. Breast augmentation, mastopexy, and abdominoplasty were the most commonly performed CPCs, and residents report high levels of competence and surgical role in these procedures. Facial procedures, in particular rhinoplasty, as well as nonsurgical CPCs are associated with low exposure and personal competence levels. Canadian plastic surgery residents are exposed to most of the core aesthetic procedural competencies, but the range of procedures performed is variable. With the implementation of CBME, consideration should be given to supplementation where gaps may exist in aesthetic case exposure.

Canadian Plastic Surgery Resident Operative Experience in Hand Surgery.

PURPOSE: Core procedural competencies (CPCs) in hand surgery have been previously described. However, it is unknown whether plastic surgery residents receive sufficient operative experience with these procedures. This study aimed to determine whether Canadian plastic surgery residents are receiving adequate exposure to CPCs in hand surgery during residency training. METHODS: Hand surgery case logs recorded by graduating plastic surgery residents at 10 Canadian English-speaking training programs between 2004 and 2014 were reviewed from 3 databases. For each CPC in hand surgery, perceived resident role and self-competence scores were collected and analyzed. Core procedural competencies encompass core essential procedural competencies (CEPCs) and nonessential procedural competencies. RESULTS: There were 55 graduating plastic surgery residents included in the study. A total of 14,909 procedures were logged for 42 CPCs, with an average of 271 procedures/resident. When grouped by subdomain within hand surgery, procedures with the most exposure were related to traumatic finger injuries (29%) and neuropathies (22%). The least common procedures were related to flap reconstructions (0.3%) and muscle release (0.1%). Many residents reported receiving no operative experience (range, 2% to 100%) or between 1 and 10 cases of CEPCs (range, 7% to 50%). Most graduating residents (58% to 72%) did not feel competent independently performing 60% of the most common procedures. There were weak to moderate correlations between role and self-competence, and between postgraduate year and self-competence. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, many plastic surgery residents graduate from training programs with little to no exposure for over half of the CEPCs in hand surgery. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Given the great diversity in hand surgery CPCs, it is difficult for residents to gain adequate operative experience during their residency in all of the CPCs.

Impact of Completing CLEFT-Q Scales That Ask About Appearance on Children and Young Adults: An International Study.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the impact of completing the CLEFT-Q appearance scales on patients with cleft lip and/or palate and to identify demographic and clinical characteristics and CLEFT-Q scores associated with reporting a negative impact. DESIGN: International cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Recruitment took place between October 2014 and November 2016 at 30 craniofacial clinics located in 12 countries. PATIENTS: Aged 8 to 29 years with cleft lip and/or palate. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Participants were asked 4 questions to evaluate the impact of completing the field test version of a patient-reported outcome measure (the CLEFT-Q) that included 154 items, of which 79 (51%) asked about appearance (of the face, nose, nostrils, teeth, lips, jaws, and cleft lip scar). RESULTS: The sample included 2056 participants. Most participants liked answering the CLEFT-Q (88%) and the appearance questions (82%). After completing the appearance scales, most participants (77%) did not feel upset or unhappy about how they look, and they felt the same (67%) or better (23%) about their appearance after completing the questionnaire. Demographic and clinical variables associated with feeling unhappy/upset or worse about how they look included country of residence, female gender, more severe cleft, anticipating future cleft-specific surgeries, and reporting lower (ie, worse) scores on CLEFT-Q appearance and health-related quality-of-life scales. CONCLUSION: Most participants liked completing the CLEFT-Q, but a small minority reported a negative impact. When used in clinical practice, CLEFT-Q scale scores should be examined as soon as possible after completion in order that the clinical team might identify patients who might require additional support.

Psychometric findings and normative values for the CLEFT-Q based on 2434 children and young adult patients with cleft lip and/or palate from 12 countries.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cleft lip and/or palate can undergo numerous procedures to improve appearance, speech, dentition and hearing. We developed a cleft-specific patient-reported outcome instrument to facilitate rigorous international measurement and benchmarking. METHODS: Data were collected from patients aged 8-29 years with cleft lip and/or palate at 30 hospitals in 12 countries between October 2014 and November 2016. Rasch measurement theory analysis was used to refine the scales and to examine reliability and validity. Normative CLEFT-Q values were computed for age, sex and cleft type. RESULTS: Analysis led to the refinement of an eating and drinking checklist and 12 scales measuring appearance (of the face, nose, nostrils, teeth, lips, jaws and cleft lip scar), health-related quality of life (psychological, social, school, speech distress) and speech function. All scales met the requirements of the Rasch model. Analysis to explore differential item functioning by age, sex and country provided evidence to support the use of a common scoring algorithm for each scale for international use. Lower (worse) scores on CLEFT-Q scales were associated with having a speech problem, being unhappy with facial appearance, and needing future cleft-related treatments, providing evidence of construct validity. Normative values for age, sex and cleft type showed poorer outcomes associated with older age, female sex and having a visible cleft. INTERPRETATION: The CLEFT-Q represents a rigorously developed instrument that can be used internationally to collect and compare evidence-based outcomes data from patients aged 8-29 years of age with cleft lip and/or palate.

Routine Postoperative Imaging Is Not Indicated in the Management of Mandibular Fractures.

PURPOSE: Prior literature has shown that routine postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans for mandibular fractures have no effect on outcomes and complications; however, past surveys have reported that most clinicians continue to order routine scans. We aimed to determine the current use of routine postoperative CT scans, evaluate what factors contribute to this practice, and identify differences in outcomes and complications among patients with either routine, indicated, or no postoperative CT scans. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of consecutive patients treated for a mandibular fracture at Vancouver General Hospital from January 1, 2007, to March 1, 2012. RESULTS: We included 167 patients in the study for analysis. No significant differences in outcomes or complications were found between patients who had an indicated postoperative CT scan (27%) and patients with no scans (64%). Only the treating surgeon had a statistically significant effect on whether a patient received a postoperative CT scan (P < .001), and those patients who had an indicated postoperative CT scan (9%) were more likely to have a decreased level of temporomandibular joint function (P = .002) and increased incidence of complications and secondary operations (P < .001 and P < .001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Routine postoperative CT scans were found to have no significant effect on outcomes and complications, and a clinician's individual practice was the most significant factor for whether a patient received a routine postoperative CT scan. Future work should aim at providing well-defined indications for postoperative imaging.

Lymphatic Malformation Architecture: Implications for Treatment With OK-432.

PURPOSE: Herein, the authors aim to describe their findings of novel architectural types of lymphatic malformations (LM) and explain the relationship between these architectures and OK-432 treatment outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of all patients diagnosed with a LM treated with OK-432 at the Vascular Anomalies Clinic at BC Children's Hospital from December 2002 to January 2012. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were included in the study. Sixty percent of lesions were present by 2 years of age with the majority located in the head and neck (59%). The average number of sclerotherapy procedures was 1.4 per patient. Treatment under fluoroscopic guidance revealed 3 new LM architectures: open-cell microcystic, closed-cell microcystic, and lymphatic channel. Response to treatment was complete or good for 14/19 macrocystic and for 1/2 mixed lesions. Open-cell microcystic LMs gave a complete or good response for 3/3, which was attributed to OK-432 freely communicating between cysts. Closed-cell microcystic LM had localized cysts that did not allow OK-432 to freely communicate and were associated with partial responses, 2/2. The lymphatic channel had a partial response. There were 2 minor complications and 1 instance of recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The identification of 3 new LM architectures expands the current accepted classification to include: open-cell microcystic, closed-cell microcystic, and lymphatic channels. The majority of complete responses to OK-432 were found with macrocystic lesions. Open-cell microcystic lesions respond better to OK-432 than closed-cell microcystic lesions, and lymphatic channels may respond to OK-432. These key architecture-response relationships have direct clinical implications for treatment with OK-432 sclerotherapy.

The cranial orbital buttress technique for nonsyndromic unicoronal and metopic craniosynostosis.

OBJECT Current craniosynostosis procedures can result in complications due to absorbable plates and screws or other specialized expensive hardware. The authors propose the cranial orbital buttress (COB) technique of frontoorbital remodeling for metopic and unicoronal synostoses, wherein no plates or screws are used. They hypothesize that, with this technique, aesthetically acceptable outcomes for unicoronal and metopic synostosis can be achieved. In this article, they present this technique and compare the results with current frontoorbital remodeling practices. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective chart review of cases in which patients with nonsyndromic unicoronal or metopic synostosis underwent cranio-orbital surgery at their institution from 1985 through 2009. Operative parameters, surgical variations, and complications were analyzed. The COB technique uses a 1-piece switch, hemiforeheads, or multiple pieces for forehead remodeling. The supraorbital bar is reconstructed in patients with metopic synostosis using a double wedge or greenstick fracture technique, and in patients with unicoronal synostosis a hinge procedure based on a 1.5-orbital osteotomy is used. The supraorbital bar is advanced and supported in place by bone graft(s) inserted at the lateral aspect(s) of the orbit(s) to form a buttress, with fixation done using absorbable sutures. RESULTS A total of 79 cases met the criteria for inclusion in the study. Twenty-nine patients had metopic synostosis, 3 had combined metopic and sagittal synostoses, and 47 had unicoronal synostosis. The patients' mean age at surgery was 11.4 ± 10.1 months and the mean operative time was 183.4 ± 41.0 minutes. The mean length of hospital stay was 3.7 ± 1.2 days. The mean blood loss was 150.0 ± 125.6 ml, and 33% of patients required a blood transfusion (mean volume 206.9 ± 102.3 ml). In metopic synostosis, hemiforeheads were used most often (24/29, 83%), and the supraorbital bar was remodeled using a bilateral intracranial orbital osteotomy followed by a double wedge modification (23/29, 79%) or a greenstick fracture (4/29 14%) for milder cases. Forehead remodeling for unicoronal synostosis was by a forehead switch (39/47, 83%) and the supraorbital bar was remodeled using a 1.5-orbital intracranial orbital osteotomy (34/47, 72%) such that the bar was advanced on the abnormal side and hinged at the midline of the normal orbit. Perioperative complications occurred in 19% of cases and included dural tears (16%), inconsequential subdural hematoma (1.3%), and nasal greenstick fracture (1.3%). The total reoperation rate was 7.6% (cranioplasties for irregular contours, 6.3%; scar revision, 1.3%). CONCLUSIONS The COB remodeling technique is simple and efficient, gives acceptable outcomes, and is less resource intensive than previous techniques reported in the literature.

Resident Exposure and Involvement in Core Procedural Competencies within Pediatric Plastic Surgery.

Introduction: The implementation of competency-based residency training in plastic surgery is underway. Key competencies in plastic surgery have been previously identified, however, within the domain of pediatrics, data suggest limited exposure throughout training for Canadian graduates. This study aims to identify the exposure and involvement of residents in core pediatric cases. Methods: We performed a retrospective, multicenter review of plastic surgery resident case logs (T-Res, POWER, New Innovations) across 10 Canadian, English-speaking training programs between 2004 and 2014. Case logs were coded according to the 8 core pediatric competencies previously identified by a modified Delphi technique. Results: A total of 3061 of 59 405 cases (5.2%) logged by 55 graduating residents were core pediatric procedures with an average of 55.6 ± 23.0 cases logged per resident. The top 3 most commonly logged procedures were cleft lip repair, cleft palate repair, and setback otoplasty. The number of cases per program varied widely with the most at 731 and least at 85 logged cases. Roles across procedures have wide variation and residents are most commonly identified as the assistant rather than surgeon or co-surgeon. Conclusion: These findings highlight variability both within and across residency programs with a paucity of exposure and involvement in pediatric plastic surgery cases. This may present a conflict between current recommendations for residency-specific procedural competencies and true clinical exposure. Further curriculum development and simulation may be of benefit.

Introduction: La formation des résidents fondée sur les compétences est en voie d'être adoptée en chirurgie plastique. Les compétences clés sont d'ailleurs déjà établies, mais dans le domaine de la pédiatrie, les données indiquent que les diplômés canadiens y sont peu exposés pendant leur formation. La présente étude vise à déterminer l'exposition et la participation des résidents aux cas fondamentaux en pédiatrie. Méthodologie: Les chercheurs ont procédé à une analyse multicentrique rétrospective des registres de cas des résidents en chirurgie plastique (T-Res, POWER, New Innovations) de dix programmes de formation anglophones canadiens entre 2004 et 2014. Ils ont codé ces registres en fonction des huit compétences pédiatriques fondamentales préalablement déterminées par une technique Delphi modifiée. Résultats: Au total, 3 061 des 59 405 cas enregistrés (5,2 %) par 55 résidents de dernière année étaient des interventions pédiatriques fondamentales, et chaque résident a enregistré une moyenne de 55,6 ± 23,0 cas. Les trois interventions les plus enregistrées étaient la réparation de la fissure labiale, la réparation de la fissure palatine et l'otoplastie. Le nombre de cas enregistrés variait énormément d'un programme à l'autre, le plus élevé étant de 731 et le plus bas, de 85. Les rôles au cours des interventions étaient très variables, et les résidents étaient davantage qualifiés d'assistants que de chirurgiens ou de cochirurgiens. Conclusion: Ces observations font ressortir la variabilité des pratiques à la fois au sein des programmes de résidence et entre eux et démontrent le peu d'exposition et de participation des résidents aux cas de chirurgie plastique pédiatrique. Elles peuvent révéler un conflit entre les recommandations actuelles en matière de compétences interventionnelles des résidents et la véritable exposition clinique. Il pourrait être utile de voir à l'élaboration plus poussée du programme et des simulations.

Who is in Your Waiting Room? Social Determinants of Health and Adverse Childhood Experiences in Pediatric Surgery Clinics.

BACKGROUND: Social determinants of health (SDoH) influence overall health, although little is known about the SDoH for pediatric patients requiring surgical services. This study aims to describe SDoH for pediatric surgical patients attending out-patient, community, and outreach clinics, as well as demonstrate the feasibility of identifying and addressing SDoH and Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) when appropriate. METHODS: A cross-sectional study using surveys evaluating SDoH that were distributed to families attending pediatric surgical clinics over a two-year period. The pilot survey used validated questions and was later refined to a shorter version with questions on: Barriers to care, Economic factors, Adversity, Resiliency and Social capital (BEARS). Data was analyzed with descriptive and inferential statistics. RESULTS: 851 families across 13 clinics participated. One third of families reported not having a primary health care provider or being unable to turn to them for additional support. One in four families were found to have a household income less than the Canadian after-tax low-income threshold (<$40,000 CAD). Two-thirds of families answered questions about ACEs, and those with more ACEs were more likely to report a low income. Forty percent of families rarely or only sometimes had adequate social support. CONCLUSION: This survey tool enabled discussions between families and care providers, which allowed clinicians to appropriately follow-up with families and refer them to social work for further support when indicated. Addressing concerns around SDoH within a busy surgical clinical is feasible and may positively affect long-term health outcomes and equitable resource allocation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Use of safety scalpels and other safety practices to reduce sharps injury in the operating room: what is the evidence?

BACKGROUND: The occupational hazard associated with percutaneous injury in the operating room (OR) has encouraged harm reduction through behaviour change and the use of safety-engineered surgical sharps. Some Canadian regulatory agencies have mandated the use of "safety scalpels." Our primary objective was to determine whether safety scalpels reduce the risk of percutaneous injury in the OR, while a secondary objective was to evaluate risk reduction associated with other safety practices. METHODS: We used evidence review methods described by the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation and conducted a systematic, English-language search of Ovid, MEDLINE and EMBASE using the following search terms: "safety-engineered scalpel," "mistake proofing device," "retractable/removable blade/scalpel," "pass tray," "hands free passing," "neutral zone," "sharpless surgery," "double/cutproof gloving" and "blunt suture needles." Included articles were scored according to level of evidence; quality; and whether they were supportive, opposed or neutral to the study question(s). RESULTS: Of 72 included citations, none was supportive of the use of safety scalpels. There was high-level/quality evidence (Cochrane reviews) in support of risk reduction through double-gloving and use of blunt suture needles, with additional evidence supporting a pass tray/neutral zone for sharps handling (4 of 5 articles supportive) and use of suturing adjuncts (1 article supportive). CONCLUSION: There is insufficient evidence to support regulated use of safety scalpels. Injury-reduction strategies should emphasize proven methods, including double-gloving, blunt suture needles and use of hands-free sharps transfer.

CONTEXTE: Les risques professionnels associés aux lésions percutanées subies à la salle d'opération ont favorisé la réduction des préjudices grâce à des changements de comportement et à l'utilisation d'aiguilles et de lames chirurgicales conçues en fonction de la sécurité. Certaines agences de réglementation du Canada ont imposé l'utilisation de « scalpels de sécurité ¼. Nous voulions déterminer principalement si les scalpels de sécurité réduisent le risque de lésions percutanées à la salle d'opération et, dans un deuxième temps, évaluer la réduction du risque associée à d'autres mesures de sécurité. MÉTHODES: Nous avons utilisé des méthodes d'examen des données probantes décrites par le Comité international de liaison sur la réanimation et procédé à une recherche systématique en anglais dans les bases de données Ovid, MEDLINE et EMBASE en utilisant les termes de recherche suivants : « safety-engineered scalpel ¼, « mistake proofing device ¼, « retractable/removable blade/scalpel ¼, « pass tray ¼, « hands free passing ¼, « neutral zone ¼, « sharpless surgery ¼, « double/cutproof gloving ¼ et « blunt suture needles ¼. Nous avons évalué les articles inclus en fonction du niveau de preuve, de la qualité et de la prise de position en faveur des questions à l'étude, contre celles ci ou neutre. RÉSULTANTS: Sur 72 citations incluses, aucune n'appuyait l'utilisation des scalpels de sécurité. Des éléments probants de haut niveau ou de grande qualité (examens Cochrane) appuyaient la réduction des risques par le port de doubles gants et l'utilisation d'aiguilles émoussées, et d'autres éléments de preuve appuyaient l'utilisation d'un plateau de transition ou d'une zone neutre pour la manipulation des aiguilles ou des lames (4 articles sur 5 en faveur) et l'utilisation de moyens auxiliaires de suture (1 article en faveur). CONCLUSIONS: Il n'y a pas suffisamment de preuves pour appuyer l'utilisation réglementée de scalpels de sécurité. Les stratégies de réduction des traumatismes devraient mettre l'accent sur les méthodes éprouvées, y compris le port de doubles gants, l'usage d'aiguilles émoussées et l'utilisation de moyens mains libres de transfert des aiguilles et des lames.

Bilateral temporomandibular joint dislocation with locked mandibular impaction.

Bilateral anterior temporomandibular joint dislocation is very rare, with only 2 reported cases published. In the present report, we describe a healthy 25-year-old man from Haida Gwaii, in British Columbia, Canada, who was transferred to our tertiary trauma center with life-threatening complications of a bilateral anterior temporomandibular joint dislocation with locked mandibular impaction.

Late Ankle Reconstruction in a Child with Remote Traumatic Medial Malleolus Loss: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes.

Aim: This article aims to describe a novel surgical technique for medial malleolar reconstruction in a young child. Background: Severe open ankle injuries that result in bone and soft tissue loss carry a high risk for complications, especially in children who are still growing. These injuries can cause abnormal growth patterns, degenerative diseases, and recurrent instability. Cases of medial malleolar reconstruction have been previously described but none in a child this young. Case description: We present a case of an 13-year-old girl who suffered an open injury to the medial distal tibia with traumatic loss of the medial malleolus at the age of 2 and later suffered a Salter-Harris II fracture to the ipsilateral distal fibula. She presented with varus alignment, a leg length discrepancy, premature asymmetrical growth arrest, chronic non-union of the distal fibula physeal fracture, and severe attenuation of the deltoid ligament. Her secondary deformities were managed with distal fibula osteotomy and fixation, distal tibial hemi-plafond corrective osteotomy, and medial malleolus reconstruction with iliac crest autograft. Her leg length discrepancy was corrected by epiphysiodesis of the contralateral distal femur and proximal tibia. At the 2-year follow-up, the alignment was well maintained, the graft was healing well, and the patient reported no pain and being able to walk and play sports without a brace. Conclusion: Surgical reconstruction of the medial malleolus with correction for abnormal angulation and leg length discrepancies is critical to promoting healthy growth patterns and quality of life for paediatric patients. This severe open ankle injury can be successfully managed by distal fibula osteotomy and fixation, distal tibial intra-articular osteotomy, and medial malleolus reconstruction with iliac crest autograft. Clinical significance: This novel technique is an effective method for the surgical management of paediatric traumatic medial malleolar bone loss in children who are skeletally immature and are at risk of complications due to further growth. How to cite this article: Ponton E, Bakkai A, Courtemanche DJ, et al. Late Ankle Reconstruction in a Child with Remote Traumatic Medial Malleolus Loss: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2022;17(2):131-135.

Split calvarial bone grafting in patients less than 1 year of age: technical note and use in craniofacial surgery for craniosynostosis.

PURPOSE: The material of choice for filling cranial defects is autologous split calvarial bone. Up to now, the thin calvarial bone and lack of diploic space in very young children has led surgeons to believe that harvesting of split calvarial grafts can generally not be done under the age of 2 years. We describe a simple technique for successful harvesting of split cranial vault bone in infants less than 1 year of age. METHODS: This procedure involves squeezing the bone to shear the outer from the inner table, followed by the use of thin sharp osteotomes. This technique has been used most often in fronto-orbital advancement operations for coronal and metopic synostosis. RESULTS: In this series of ten such patients, there was no resorption of the split calvarial grafts. CONCLUSIONS: Splitting of the cranial vault bone can be performed on infants as young as 9 months with good results.

FACE-Q Craniofacial Module: Part 1 validation of CLEFT-Q scales for use in children and young adults with facial conditions.

BACKGROUND: The CLEFT-Q includes 12 independently functioning scales that measure appearance (face, nose, nostrils, teeth, lips, jaws), health-related quality of life (psychological, social, school, speech distress), and speech function, and an eating/drinking checklist. Previous qualitative research revealed that the CLEFT-Q has content validity in noncleft craniofacial conditions. This study aimed to examine the psychometric performance of the CLEFT-Q in an international sample of patients with a broad range of facial conditions. METHODS: Data were collected between October 2016 and December 2019 from 2132 patients aged 8 to 29 years with noncleft facial conditions. Rasch measurement theory (RMT) analysis was used to examine Differential Item Function (DIF) by comparing the original CLEFT-Q sample and the new FACE-Q craniofacial sample. Reliability and validity of the scales in a combined cleft and craniofacial sample (n=4743) were examined. RESULTS: DIF was found for 23 CLEFT-Q items when the datasets for the two samples were compared. When items with DIF were split by sample, correlations between the original and split person locations showed that DIF had negligible impact on scale scoring (correlations ≥0.995). In the combined sample, RMT analysis led to the retention of original content for ten CLEFT-Q scales, modification of the Teeth scale, and the addition of an Eating/Drinking scale. Data obtained fit with the Rasch model for 11 scales (exception School, p=0.04). Person Separation Index and Cronbach alpha values met the criteria. CONCLUSION: The scales described in this study can be used to measure outcomes in children and young adults with cleft and noncleft craniofacial conditions.

FACE-Q craniofacial module: Part 2 Psychometric properties of newly developed scales for children and young adults with facial conditions.

BACKGROUND: The FACE-Q Craniofacial Module is a patient-reported outcome measure designed for patients aged 8 to 29 years with conditions associated with a facial difference. In part 1, we describe the psychometric findings for the original CLEFT-Q scales tested in patients with cleft and noncleft facial conditions. The aim of this study was to examine psychometric performance of new FACE-Q Craniofacial Module scales. METHODS: Data were collected between December 2016 and December 2019 from patients aged 8 to 29 years with conditions associated with a visible or functional facial difference. Rasch measurement theory (RMT) analysis was used to examine psychometric properties of each scale. Scores were transformed from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) for tests of construct validity. RESULTS: 1495 participants were recruited with a broad range of conditions (e.g., birthmarks, facial paralysis, craniosynostosis, craniofacial microsomia, etc.) RMT analysis resulted in the refinement of 7 appearance scales (Birthmark, Cheeks, Chin, Eyes, Forehead, Head Shape, Smile), two function scales (Breathing, Facial), and an Appearance Distress scale. Person separation index and Cronbach alpha values met criteria. Three checklists were also formed (Eye Function, and Eye and Face Adverse Effects). Significantly lower scores on eight of nine scales were reported by participants whose appearance or functional difference was rated as a major rather than minor or no difference. Higher appearance distress correlated with lower appearance scale scores. CONCLUSION: The FACE-Q Craniofacial Module scales can be used to collect and compare patient reported outcomes data in children and young adults with a facial condition.

Do Microsurgical Outcomes Differ Based on Which Specialty Does the Operation? A NSQIP Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Because plastic surgeons do not "own" a specific anatomic region, other surgical specialties have increasingly assumed procedures historically performed by plastic surgery. Decreased case volume is postulated to be associated with higher complication rates. Herein, we investigate whether volume and surgical specialty have an impact on microsurgical complications, specifically surgical site infection (SSI) and reoperation rates. METHODS: The 2005-2015 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program participant use file was queried by Current Procedural Terminology code for breast and head/neck microsurgeries. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to compare the outcomes between surgical specialties. A cumulative frequency variable was introduced to investigate the effect of case volume on complication rates. RESULTS: We captured 6,617 microsurgical cases. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that although the rate of SSI was lower in plastic surgery compared with otolaryngology for head and neck reconstructions (13.3% versus 10.5%) and compared with general surgery for breast reconstructions (5.4% versus 4.7%), there was no significant difference between specialties (P = 0.13; P = 0.96). Increased case volume is negatively correlated with complications. CONCLUSIONS: Plastic surgery is at risk given case cannibalization by other specialties. We conclude that surgical specialty does not affect the rates of SSI and reoperation. We demonstrate a correlation between lower volumes and increased complications, implying that, once a specialty has amassed critical case experience, complication rates may decrease, and outcomes can be equivalent or superior. Case breadth and volumes should be maintained to preserve skills, optimize outcomes, and maintain the specialty as it currently exists.

Variable Experience in Microsurgery and Flap-Based Procedures Among Canadian Plastic Surgery Residents.

TITLE: Variable experience in microsurgery and flap-based procedures among Canadian plastic surgery residents. OBJECTIVE: Plastic surgery residencies are transitioning toward a competency-based education model. It is not known whether trainees can realistically achieve proficiency in microsurgical techniques during their training. This study aims to define the operative experience in the core microsurgical flap procedures among Canadian plastic surgery residents. DESIGN: Microsurgical core procedural competencies (CPCs) have been described. A retrospective review was conducted, evaluating case logs recorded by graduating plastic surgery residents at 10 Canadian English-speaking training programs between 2004 and 2014. Perceived role and competence scores were also collected and analyzed. SETTING: University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. RESULTS: Among 27 microsurgical CPCs, 2082 procedures were logged and each resident performed an average of 37.9 (±21.7) procedures. Anterolateral thigh flaps, radial forearm-based flaps, and digit replants were the most common; however, 10.9% to 14.5% of residents did not have any operative experience with these flaps. Most residents reported zero operative experience with many of the CPCs (10.9%-100%). Co-Surgeon (50%) and First Assistant (30%) were the most common roles. None of the graduating residents reported feeling competent enough to independently perform 50% of the microsurgery CPCs. There was no difference in perceived roles when programs with ≥5 residents were compared against programs with fewer trainees. There were weak to moderate correlations between role and self-perceived competence, and between Post Graduate Year and self-perceived competence. CONCLUSIONS: There is wide variation in resident operative experience in microsurgical CPCs. Many residents graduate with little to no experience in many of the core procedures. Identifying areas of deficiency may help guide curriculum development in the new competency-based education model.