Reflective practice and social responsibility in family medicine: Effect of performing an international rotation in a developing country.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the perceived effect of an elective international health rotation on family medicine resident learning. DESIGN: Qualitative, collaborative study based on semistructured interviews. SETTING: Quebec. PARTICIPANTS: A sample of 12 family medicine residents and 9 rotation supervisors (N = 21). METHODS: Semistructured interviews of residents and rotation supervisors. MAIN FINDINGS: Residents and supervisors alike reported that their technical skills and relationship skills had benefited. All increased their knowledge of tropical pathologies and learned to expand their clinical examinations. They benefited from having very rich interactions in other care settings, working with vulnerable populations. The rotations had their greatest effect on relationship skills (communication, empathy, etc) and the ability to work with vulnerable patients. All of the participants were exposed to local therapies and local interpretations of disease symptoms and pathogenesis. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study will have a considerable effect on pedagogy. The residents' experiences of their international health rotations and what they learned in terms of medical skills and pedagogic approaches in working with patients are described. Using a collaborative approach with the rotation supervisors, the data were triangulated and the benefits of an international rotation on academic training were more accurately defined. The findings can now be used to enrich academic programs in social and preventive medicine and more adequately prepare future family physicians for work in various social and cultural settings.

[Not Available]. / Pratique réflexive et responsabilité sociale en médecine de famille: Les impacts de l'expérience des stages internationaux menés dans les pays en voie de développement.

OBJECTIF: Explorer les retombées perçues d'un stage électif en santé internationale dans le processus d'apprentissage des résidents en médecine de famille. TYPE D'ÉTUDE: Étude qualitative de type collaborative reposant sur des entrevues semi-dirigées. CONTEXTE: Québec. PARTICIPANTS: Un total de 12 résidents en médecine de famille et 9 superviseurs de stages internationaux (N = 21). MÉTHODES: Entrevues semi-dirigées menées auprès de résidents et de superviseurs de stages. PRINCIPALES OBSERVATIONS: Tous les participants ont tiré des avantages tant sur le plan technique que sur le plan relationnel. Sur le plan technique, ils ont renforcé leurs connaissances des pathologies tropicales; ils ont également appris à élargir leur examen clinique. Sur le plan relationnel, ils ont bénéficié d'une expérience riche du point de vue des interactions avec d'autres milieux de soins et avec des populations vivant majoritairement dans des conditions précaires. C'est au niveau des compétences relationnelles (communication, empathie, etc.) avec les patients vulnérables que l'impact du stage a été le plus bénéfique. Tous les participants ont en effet été confrontés à d'autres formes de thérapies locales et à d'autres interprétations de symptômes et d'étiologie des maladies. CONCLUSION: L'impact de cette étude au niveau des retombées pédagogiques est important puisque nous avons pu situer la façon dont les résidents vivaient un tel stage et ce qu'ils en retiraient en matière de compétences médicales et d'approche pédagogique dans la rencontre avec les patients. Une approche collaborative avec des superviseurs de stages nous a permis d'effectuer une triangulation des données et de mieux situer les apports d'un stage international dans la formation universitaire. Enfin, les résultats obtenus permettraient de soutenir et de renforcer les programmes académiques en médecine sociale et préventive et de mieux préparer les futurs médecins de famille à agir dans des contextes socioculturels pluriels.

The contribution of family medicine to community-orientated health services in Mali: A short report.

Family medicine has not received appropriate attention in the sub-Saharan African context. In particular, family medicine is rarely recognised as a medical speciality and most African countries are silent on the role of family medicine in their health systems. There is, however, an emerging interest in developing family medicine as a key component of primary healthcare. Postgraduate training in family medicine is progressing and many countries have already established specific training programmes. In addition, there have been attempts to define the importance of family medicine, which, we expect, this short report contributes to. Interviews were conducted with physicians, partners and beneficiaries of two international development projects funded by the Canadian government. The one project supports training of health professionals and the other education of healthy women and girls in the community. The objective was to document the strengthening of primary healthcare through the creation and adaptation of a new family and community medicine postgraduate medical programme (which includes both family and community medicine) emphasising field training, immersion in local communities and interdisciplinary collaboration. This article underlines the importance of family medicine in Mali by documenting how what is now termed family and community medicine can promote community-orientated health services. To do so, we use the examples of initiatives and actions done through two international health development projects.

[Maternal mortality audits in low-resource countries: analysis of 23 hospitals in Senegal and Mali (the QUARITE study)]. / Audits de décès maternels dans les pays à faibles ressources: analyse d'implantation dans 23 établissements de santé au Sénégal et au Mali (essai QUARITE).

BACKGROUND: In 1990, the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada joined the international movement for safe motherhood by adapting its ALARM programme to the needs of low-resource countries. The goal of the QUARITE (QUAlité des soins, gestion du RIsque et TEchniques obstétricales) trial is to evaluate the efficiency of the ALARM International programme in terms of maternal mortality reduction in 46 referral hospitals in Senegal and Mali. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the implementation of maternal death audits in the 23 hospitals that are part of the QUARITE trial's intervention group. METHOD: Ten follow-up indicators have been identified to evaluate the implementation of maternal death audits. This article describes and analyzes these follow-up indicators during a 5-month implementation period, from September 23, 2008, to January 30, 2009. Data was gathered during a supervision visit at the end of that period with a standardized follow-up questionnaire and checklist. Key participants were interviewed. The programme's documents (procedure manual, meeting and supervision minutes, and logbook) were analyzed. An implementation score (on a scale from 1 to 10) was calculated for each centre. RESULTS: The 23 centres we visited yielded a mean implementation score of 7.5 (minimum=4 and maximum=10). In each health structure, there is a multidisciplinary, functional subcommittee-maternal death audit committee whose members have been trained on the subject of maternal death audits. Overall, these subcommittees use the management tools but some of the forms are not well understood: thus, we must pinpoint the causes of this problem and eliminate them. Maternal death audit sessions had a slow start due to several factors: maternity personnel's workload, lack of confidence of local leaders, lack of cohesion within teams and lack of personnel availability. CONCLUSION: Data analysis indicates that the process of implementing maternal death audits is slow but real and that quarterly supervision makes it possible to eliminate difficulties and to reinforce the skills of audit subcommittee members.

Priorities, Barriers, and Facilitators towards International Guidelines for the Delivery of Supportive Clinical Care during an Ebola Outbreak: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

During the Ebola outbreak, mortality reduction was attributed to multiple improvements in supportive care delivered in Ebola treatment units (ETUs). We aimed to identify high-priority supportive care measures, as well as perceived barriers and facilitators to their implementation, for patients with Ebola Virus Disease (EVD). We conducted a cross-sectional survey of key stakeholders involved in the response to the 2014⁻2016 West African EVD outbreak. Out of 57 email invitations, 44 responses were received, and 29 respondents completed the survey. The respondents listed insufficient numbers of health workers (23/29, 79%), improper tools for the documentation of clinical data (n = 22/28, 79%), insufficient material resources (n = 22/29, 76%), and unadapted personal protective equipment (n = 20/28, 71%) as the main barriers to the provision of supportive care in ETUs. Facilitators to the provision of supportive care included team camaraderie (n in agreement = 25/28, 89%), ability to speak the local language (22/28, 79%), and having treatment protocols in place (22/28, 79%). This survey highlights a consensus across various stakeholders involved in the response to the 2014⁻2016 EVD outbreak on a limited number of high-priority supportive care interventions for clinical practice guidelines. Identified barriers and facilitators further inform the application of guidelines.

Barriers to supportive care during the Ebola virus disease outbreak in West Africa: Results of a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: During the 2013-2016 West Africa Ebola outbreak, supportive care was the only non-experimental treatment option for patients with Ebola virus disease (EVD). However, providing care that would otherwise be routine for most clinical settings in the context of a highly contagious and lethal pathogen is much more challenging. The objective of this study was to document and deepen understanding of barriers to provision of supportive care in Ebola treatment units (ETUs) as perceived by those involved in care delivery during the outbreak. METHODS: This qualitative study consisted of 29 in-depth semi-structured interviews with stakeholders (decision-makers, physicians, nurses) involved in patient care delivery during the outbreak. Analysis consisted of interview debriefing and team-based transcript coding in NVivo10 software using thematic analysis. FINDINGS: Participants emphasized three interconnected barriers to providing high-quality supportive care during the outbreak: 1) lack of material and human resources in ETUs; 2) ETU organizational structure limiting the provision of supportive clinical care; and 3) delayed and poorly coordinated policies limiting the effectiveness of global and national responses. Participants also noted the ethical complexities of defining and enacting best clinical practices in low-income countries. They noted tension between, on one hand, scaling up minimal care and investing in clinical care preparedness to a level sustainable in West Africa and, on the other, providing a higher level of supportive care, which in low-resource health systems would require important investments. CONCLUSION: Our findings identified potentially modifiable barriers to the delivery of supportive care to patients with EVD in West Africa. Addressing these in the inter-outbreak period will be useful to improve patient care and outcomes during inevitable future outbreaks. Promoting community trust and engagement through long-term capacity building of the healthcare workforce and infrastructure would increase both health system resilience and ability to handle other outbreaks of emerging diseases.

Strengthening Primary Care Through Family Medicine Around the World Collaborating Toward Promising Practices.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There is a limited evidentiary base on the development of family medicine in different contexts and countries. The lack of evidence impedes our ability to compare and characterize family medicine models and identify areas of success that have led to the effective provision of care. This paper offers a comparative compilation and analysis of the development of family medicine training programs in seven countries: Brazil, Canada, Ethiopia, Haiti, Indonesia, Kenya, and Mali. METHODS: Using qualitative case studies, this paper examines the process of developing family medicine programs, including enabling strategies and barriers, and shared lessons. An appreciative inquiry framework and complex adaptive systems thinking inform our qualitative study. RESULTS: Committed partnerships, the contribution of champions, health policy, and adaptability were identified as key enablers in all seven case studies. The case studies further reveal that some enablers were more salient in certain contexts as compared to others, and that it is the interaction of enablers that is crucial for understanding how and why initiatives succeeded. The barriers that emerged across the seven case studies include: (1) resistance from other medical specialties, (2) lack of resources and capabilities, (3) difficulty in sustaining support of champions, and (4) challenges in brokering effective partnerships. CONCLUSIONS: A key insight from this study is that the implementation of family medicine is nonlinear, dynamic, and complex. The findings of this comparative analysis offer insights and strategies that can inform the design and development of family medicine programs elsewhere.

QUARITE (quality of care, risk management and technology in obstetrics): a cluster-randomized trial of a multifaceted intervention to improve emergency obstetric care in Senegal and Mali.

BACKGROUND: Maternal and perinatal mortality are major problems for which progress in sub-Saharan Africa has been inadequate, even though childbirth services are available, even in the poorest countries. Reducing them is the aim of two of the main Millennium Development Goals. Many initiatives have been undertaken to remedy this situation, such as the Advances in Labour and Risk Management (ALARM) International Program, whose purpose is to improve the quality of obstetric services in low-income countries. However, few interventions have been evaluated, in this context, using rigorous methods for analyzing effectiveness in terms of health outcomes. The objective of this trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of the ALARM International Program (AIP) in reducing maternal mortality in referral hospitals in Senegal and Mali. Secondary goals include evaluation of the relationships between effectiveness and resource availability, service organization, medical practices, and satisfaction among health personnel. METHODS/DESIGN: This is an international, multi-centre, controlled cluster-randomized trial of a complex intervention. The intervention is based on the concept of evidence-based practice and on a combination of two approaches aimed at improving the performance of health personnel: 1) Educational outreach visits; and 2) the implementation of facility-based maternal death reviews. The unit of intervention is the public health facility equipped with a functional operating room. On the basis of consent provided by hospital authorities, 46 centres out of 49 eligible were selected in Mali and Senegal. Using randomization stratified by country and by level of care, 23 centres will be allocated to the intervention group and 23 to the control group. The intervention will last two years. It will be preceded by a pre-intervention one-year period for baseline data collection. A continuous clinical data collection system has been set up in all participating centres. This, along with the inventory of resources and the satisfaction surveys administered to the health personnel, will allow us to measure results before, during, and after the intervention. The overall rate of maternal mortality measured in hospitals during the post-intervention period (Year 4) is the primary outcome. The evaluation will also include cost-effectiveness.