Body weight loss and glycemic control on the outcomes of patients with NAFLD. The role of new antidiabetic agents.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is currently the most common cause of chronic liver disease worldwide affecting a third of adults and 12% of children in Western countries. In around 50-60%% of cases, NAFLD and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) coexist and act synergistically to increase the risk of adverse hepatic and extra-hepatic outcomes. T2DM is a strong risk factor for rapid progression of NAFLD to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which have become frequent indications of liver transplantation. The pathophysiology of NAFLD is complex and its relationship with T2DM is bidirectional, where lipotoxicity and insulin resistance (IR), act as the strongest pillars. To date, no pharmacological treatment has been approved for NAFLD. However, there is an intense research with numerous drugs focused on reversing inflammation and liver fibrosis through modulation of molecular targets without good results. It has been known for some time that weight reduction >10% is associated to histological improvement of NAFLD. Recently, glycemic control has been shown to induce similar results. Diet and physical exercise for weight reduction have limitations, so alternative methods (pharmacologic, endoscopic or surgical) may be required. Currently, new antidiabetic drugs inducing weight loss, have been recently approved for the treatment of obesity. Nevertheless, their therapeutic effects on NAFLD have not been extensively studied. We will review here, recently published data on the effects of weight loss and glycemic control on the histological and metabolic parameters of NAFLD and recent published data on therapeutic studies of NAFLD with new antidiabetic drugs.

Evaluation and Validation of a New Score to Measure the Severity of Small Bowel Angiodysplasia on Video Capsule Endoscopy.

INTRODUCTION: Angiodysplasias are responsible of 50% of small bowel bleeding. An endoscopic method that allows measuring its severity is not available. AIMS: The aim of the study was to validate a new endoscopic score with VCE to measure the severity of small bowel angiodysplasias (SBAD). METHODS: Four endoscopists independently reviewed VCE videos of 22 patients with SBAD. The score graded 3 variables: A - extent of lesions: E1, located in one half of the intestine and E2, in both halves; B - number of lesions: N1, <5; N2, 5-10; and N3, >10 lesions; C - probability of bleeding: P1, pale red spots; P2, bright red spots; P3, bleeding stigmata; and P4, active bleeding. Capsule Endoscopy Small Bowel Angiodysplasia Activity Index (CESBAI) was calculated as follows: E × 1 + N × 2 + P × 3. Interobserver variability was analyzed by Spearman's correlation and agreement Kappa statistic tests. RESULTS: The mean CESBAI scores by observers were O1= 11.6 ± 4.1; O2 = 11.3 ± 4.8; O3 = 11.1 ± 4.9; and O4 = 11.8 ± 4.2 (p > 0.05). Spearman's correlation values of CESBAI between every 2 observers were from 0.61 to 0.94 (p < 0.001) with a global correlation of 0.73 among all observers. Kappa values of CESBAI between every 2 observers ranged from 0.42 to 0.87 (p < 0.001) with a global agreement of 0.57 among all observers. All evaluators stated that the method was easy to use. CONCLUSIONS: CESBAI is a reliable and reproducible score. Nevertheless, these results must be validated in other studies with larger population before assessing its power for predicting bleeding recurrence.