[Causes and predictive factors of prolonged length of hospital stay after flexible ureteroscopy: Experience of a large volume institution]. / Causes et facteurs prédictifs d'une hospitalisation postopératoire prolongée après urétéroscopie souple : expérience d'un centre hospitalo-universitaire.

PURPOSE: To identify the causes of prolonged length of hospital stay (LOHS) of patients treated with flexible ureteroscopy (fURS). The secondary endpoint was to identify the predictors of complications. METHODS: A retrospective single-center cohort study was conducted between January 2011 and December 2015. All consecutive patients treated with a planned fURS, regardless of the indication, AND stayed hospitalized for at least one additional day compared to the traditional postoperative LOHS of our center (=1 day) were included. A multivariate analysis was performed to investigate predictive factors of prolonged LOHS. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy-two patients were included in the final analysis. The median duration of LOHS was two days [2-18]. Forty-seven percent of patients were discharged beyond day 1 and had no complication. Among them, 56% stayed for simple surveillance decided by the surgeon without any specific treatment introduced and 52% stayed for continuation of intravenous preoperative antibiotics. Of the remaining 144 patients who had a complication, 85.4% (123/144) had a minor complication (Clavien 1 or 2). In multivariate analysis, predictive factors of prolonged LOHS (discharge after day 1) were neurological comorbidities (paraplegia, spina bifida, multiple sclerosis) with an odds ratio of 4.39 [1.7; 11.4]. CONCLUSIONS: The causes of prolonged LOHS were mainly related to comorbidities. A number of patients stayed hospitalized without complications. The identification of predictive factors of complications and prolonged LOHS may allow better selection of patients eligible for outpatient surgery and select those for whom inpatient surgery is still recommended. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

[French ccAFU guidelines - update 2020-2022: prostate cancer]. / Recommandations françaises du Comité de cancérologie de l'AFU ­ actualisation 2020­2022 : cancer de la prostate.

OBJECTIVE: - The purpose of the guidelines national committee ccAFU was to propose updated french guidelines for prostate cancer. METHODS: - A Medline search was achieved between 2018 and 2020, as regards diagnosis, options of treatment and follow-up of prostate cancer (PCA), and to evaluate the different references specifying their levels of evidence. RESULTS: - The guidelines outline the genetics, epidemiology and diagnosis of prostate cancer, as well as the concepts of screening and early detection. MRI, the gold standard imaging test for localized cancer, is indicated before prostate biopsies are performed. The therapeutic methods are detailed and indicated according to the clinical situation. Active surveillance is a reference therapeutic option for low-risk tumours with a low evolutionary risk. Early salvage radiotherapy is indicated in case of biological recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) remains the backbone therapy in the metastatic stage. Docetaxel in combination with ADT improves overall first-line survival in synchronous metastatic prostate cancer. In this situation, the combination of ADT with abiraterone is also a standard of care regardless of tumor volume. Recent data indicate that ADT should be indicated with a new generation of hormone therapy (Apalutamide or Enzalutamide) in metastatic synchronous or metachronous patients, regardless of tumour volume. Local treatment of prostate cancer with radiotherapy improves survival in synchronous oligometastatic patients. Targeted treatment of metastases is being evaluated. In patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), new therapies that have emerged in recent years help to better control tumor progression and improve survival. CONCLUSION: - These updated french guidelines will contribute to increase the level of urological care for the diagnosis and treatment for prostate cancer.

[Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on surgical activity within academic urological departments in Paris]. / Impact de la pandémie de COVID-19 sur l'activité chirurgicale au sein des services d'urologie de l'Assistance Publique ­ Hôpitaux de Paris.

INTRODUCTION: As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic in France, all non-emergency surgical activity has been cancelled since March 12, 2020. In order to anticipate the reinstatement of delayed interventions, surgical activity reduction analysis is essential. The objective of this study was to evaluate the reduction of urological surgery in adult during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to 2019. MATERIAL: The data regarding urological procedures realized in the 8 academic urological departments of Parisians centres (AP-HP) were compared over two similar periods (14-29 March 2019 and 12-27 March 2020) using the centralized surgical planning software shared by these centres. Procedure title, type of surgery and outpatient ratio were collected. The interventions were sorted into 16 major families of urological interventions. RESULTS: Overall, a 55% decrease was observed concerning urological procedures over the same period between 2019 and 2020 (995 and 444 procedures respectively). Oncology activity and emergencies decreased by 31% and 44%. The number of kidney transplantations decreased from 39 to 3 (-92%). Functional, andrological and genital surgical procedures were the most impacted among the non-oncological procedures (-85%, -81% and -71%, respectively). Approximatively, 1033 hours of surgery have been delayed during this 16-day period. CONCLUSION: Lockdown and postponement of non-urgent scheduled urological procedures decisions has led to a drastic decrease in surgical activity in AP-HP. Isolated kidney transplantation has been stopped (national statement). Urologists must anticipate for lockdown exit in order to catch-up delayed surgeries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Comprehensive molecular classification of localized prostate adenocarcinoma reveals a tumour subtype predictive of non-aggressive disease.

Background: Management of localized prostate cancer (PCa) is a major clinical challenge since most of these cancers would not evolve but a majority of patients will still undergo a life-changing radical surgery. Molecular studies have shown that PCa can be classified according to their genomic alterations but none of the published PCa molecular classifications could identify a subtype corresponding to non-evolutive tumours. Materials and methods: Multi-omics molecular profiling was carried out on post-radical prostatectomy material from a cohort of 130 patients with localized PCa. We used unsupervised classification techniques to build a comprehensive classification of prostate tumours based on three molecular levels: DNA copy number, DNA methylation, and mRNA expression. Merged data from our cohort and The Cancer Genome Atlas cohort were used to characterize the resulting tumour subtypes. We measured subtype-associated risks of biochemical relapse using Cox regression models and survival data from five cohorts including the two aforementioned. Results: We describe three PCa molecular subtypes associated with specific molecular characteristics and different clinical outcomes. Particularly, one subtype was strongly associated with the absence of biochemical recurrence. We validated this finding on 746 samples from 5 distinct cohorts (P = 3.41 × 10-8, N = 746 tumour samples), and showed that our subtyping approach outperformed the most popular prognostic molecular signatures to accurately identify a subset of patients with a non-evolutive disease. We provide a set of 36 transcriptomic biomarkers to robustly identify this subtype of non-evolutive cases whose prevalence was estimated to 22% of all localized PCa tumours. Conclusion: At least 20% of patients with localized PCa can be accurately predicted to have a non-evolutive disease on the basis of their molecular subtype. Those patients should not undergo immediate surgery and rather be placed under active surveillance.

[Prognostic value of PD-1/PD-L1 expression in upper tract urothelial carcinoma]. / Intérêt pronostique de l'expression de PD-1/PD-L1 dans les tumeurs de la voie excrétrice urinaire supérieure.

Current literature supports the efficacy of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of urothelial carcinomas. While the prognostic value of PD-1 and PD-L1 levels has been comprehensively analyzed for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, less is known for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. In addition, available data on the prognostic value of PD-1 and/or PD-L1 level in the tumor and/or peritumoral microenvironment are heterogeneous and even sometimes contradictory. In this article, we compared the methodologies of the various available studies in order to highlight the factors that can explain these discordant results.

[French ccAFU guidelines - Update 2018-2020: Prostate cancer]. / Recommandations françaises du Comité de Cancérologie de l'AFU ­ Actualisation 2018­2020 : cancer de la prostate.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the guidelines national committee ccAFU was to propose updated French guidelines for prostate cancer. METHODS: A Medline search was achieved between 2016 and 2018, as regards diagnosis, options of treatment and follow-up of prostate cancer, and to evaluate the different references specifying their levels of evidence. RESULTS: Epidemiology, classification, staging systems, diagnostic evaluation of prostate cancer are reported. Disease management options are detailed. Recommandations are reported according to the different clinical situations. Active surveillance is a major option in low risk PCa. Radical prostatectomy remains a standard of care of localized PCa. The three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy is the technical standard. A dose of≥76Gy is recommended. Moderate hypofractionation provides short-term biochemical control comparable to conventional fractionation. In case of intermediate risk PCa, radiotherapy can be combined with short-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). In case of high-risk disease, long-term ADT remains the standard of care. ADT is the backbone therapy of metastatic disease. In men with metastases at first presentation, upfront chemotherapy combined with ADT should be considered as a standard. In this situation, the combination of ADT and abiraterone acetate also becomes a new standard. In case of metastatic castration-resistant PCa (mCRPC), new hormonal treatments and chemotherapy provide a better control of tumor progression and increase survival. CONCLUSION: These updated French guidelines will contribute to increase the level of urological care for the diagnosis and treatment for prostate cancer.

RETRACTED: Recommandations françaises du Comité de Cancérologie de l'AFU ­ Actualisation 2018­2020 : cancer de la prostate French ccAFU guidelines ­ Update 2018­2020: Prostate cancer / Recommandations françaises du Comité de Cancérologie de l'AFU ­ Actualisation 2018­2020 : cancer de la prostate.

This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy). Cet article est retiré de la publication à la demande des auteurs car ils ont apporté des modifications significatives sur des points scientifiques après la publication de la première version des recommandations. Le nouvel article est disponible à cette adresse: DOI:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.007. C'est cette nouvelle version qui doit être utilisée pour citer l'article. This article has been retracted at the request of the authors, as it is not based on the definitive version of the text because some scientific data has been corrected since the first issue was published. The replacement has been published at the DOI:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.007. That newer version of the text should be used when citing the article.

[Prevalence and diversity of management of prostate cancer patients classified as low risk using D'Amico group or Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) score: A French multicenter study]. / Prévalence et diversité de la prise en charge des patients atteints de cancer de la prostate classés à faible risque selon la classification de d'Amico ou le score de CAPRA : étude française multicentrique.

OBJECTIVES: Currently, the French High Authority for Health does not recommend mass screening for prostate cancer (PCa), due to the risk of over-treatment, notably of low risk patients. Our study is intended to reflect the therapeutic attitudes for the management of patients classified as low risk of progression in French clinical centers. METHODS: For all positive prostate biopsies performed during 2012 and 2013 in five French departments of urology, clinicopathological characteristics required to calculate the d'Amico risk group and the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) score were filled. Information on the first treatment of "low risk" patients was collected. RESULTS: A total of 1035 patients were included, with a median age at diagnosis of 66 years old. According to d'Amico and CAPRA classifications, 30.4% and 35.0% of patients were at low, 34.5% and 33.2% at intermediate, 35.1% and 31.8% at high risk. The diagnosis severity increased with age (P<0.0001). The main treatment for low risk patients was radical prostatectomy (41.6% and 42.0% for d'Amico and CAPRA, respectively), but active surveillance was the most frequent treatment if diagnosed after 75 years old. The management of low risk patients varied significantly between centers (P<0.0001), according to the therapeutic platforms available within the hospital. CONCLUSIONS: In absence of strong progression predictor, the management of low risk PCa remains based on center habits and local therapeutic platforms. New predictive markers, such as multiparametric MRI or molecular tests, are needed to guide rational management of low risk PCa. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

[PET/CT and biochemical recurrence of prostate adenocarcinoma: Added value of 68Ga-PSMA-11 when 18F-fluorocholine is non-contributive]. / TEP/TDM et récidive biologique d'adénocarcinome prostatique : apport du 68Ga-PSMA-11 lorsque la 18F-fluorocholine n'est pas contributive.

INTRODUCTION: Since April 201, we have introduced PET/CT using a ligand of prostate-specific membrane antigen labeled with gallium-68 (PSMA-11). We aimed to evaluate its positivity rate and impact in patients presenting biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer whose 18F-fluorocholine (FCH) PET/CT was non-contributive. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Patients were prospectively included between April and December 2016. PET/CT was performed 60min after injection of 2MBq/kg of body mass of 68Ga-PSMA-11. Three anatomical areas were considered: prostatic lodge, pelvic lymph nodes and distant locations. The impact of PSMA-11 PET/CT was assessed by comparing changes in therapeutic strategy decided during multidisciplinary meeting. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were included. The mean PSA serum level measured on the month of the PSMA-11 PET/CT was 2,8ng/mL. Twenty-five (76%) PSMA-11 PET/CT were positive, 7 (21%) negative and 1 (3%) equivocal. Of 11 patients whose FCH PET/CT showed equivocal foci, PSMA-11 PET/CT confirmed those foci in 5 cases. Follow-up was available for 18 patients (55%). PSMA-11 PET/CT results led to a change in management in 12 patients (67%). CONCLUSION: 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT is useful in detecting recurrence of prostate cancer, by identifying residual disease which was not detected on other imaging modalities and by changing management of 2 patients out of 3. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5.

[Correlation of genetic and cytogenetic alterations in pathological aggressiveness urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: Performance of BCA-1, a mini-array comparative genomic hybridisation-based test]. / Corrélation des altérations génétiques à l'agressivité anatomo-pathologique des carcinomes urothéliaux de la vessie : performance du test BCA-1.

INTRODUCTION: Urothelial carcinomas are the fourth leading cause of cancer in humans. Their incidence is increasing by more than 50% in 25 years. The superficial forms (70% cases) require a close active surveillance to identify frequent recurrences and progression to invasive stage. Our main goal was to identify prognostic molecular markers for bladder cancer that could be used alone or in combination in routine clinical practice. In this aim, we evaluated the capability of the BCA-oligo test based on a CGH array to correctly classify tumoral grade/stage. METHOD: Urinary DNA was extracted from 81 patients with superficial bladder cancer and has been hybridized on the BCA-oligo array. The results from the molecular analysis were correlated with the tumoral grade and stage. RESULTS: Several chromosomal alterations were significantly more frequent in tumors of higher grade and more advanced stage. A significant association was observed between a high grade and the presence of one of these alterations: loss on 6p, gain on 8q or 13q, loss or gain on 9q or 11q, with an odds ratio of 6.91 (95% CI=2.20-21.64; P=0.0009). Moreover, a significant association was found between a more advanced stage (pT1) and the presence of one of these alterations: loss on 6p, gain on 8q, loss or gain on 5p, with an odds ratio of 15.2 (95% CI=3.71-62.58; P=0.0002). CONCLUSION: Our results showed that molecular analyses of superficial bladder cancers based on urinary DNA and the BCA-oligo test could be used as prognostic factor for the tumor evolution, allowing then a more adapted clinical management.

International cancer seminars: a focus on kidney cancer.

Recent years have seen important advances in our understanding of the etiology, biology and genetics of kidney cancer. To summarize important achievements and identify prominent research questions that remain, a workshop was organized by IARC and the US NCI. A series of 'difficult questions' were formulated, which should be given future priority in the areas of population, genomic and clinical research.

[Evaluation of postoperative symptoms after Greenlight™ photovaporization of the prostate through a dedicated questionnaire]. / Évaluation précoce des troubles postopératoires après photovaporisation de la prostate Greenlight™ grâce à un questionnaire dédié.

AIMS: To evaluate postoperative symptoms after Greenlight™ photovaporisation of the prostate (PVP), through a dedicated questionnaire. METHODS: A retrospective study has been conducted between 2008 and 2014. The questionnaire had 5 sections about pain while voiding, hematuria, urgency, incontinence and urinary stream, and was filled at one-month postoperative. The main outcome criterion was pain while voiding. Descriptive statistical analyses were done to identify predictive factors for pain while voiding. RESULTS: Out of 169 patients, 22% had no pain while voiding, 37% had moderate pain, 30% acceptable pain and 11% intense pain. Patients with pain were significantly older, (P=0.012), had more urgency (P=0.01) and more often hematuria (P=0.0001). Only 7% of patients had no symptoms of urgency, and urgency was painful or bothering in 57% of cases. Hematuria was frequent, with clots in 21% of cases. Ninety three percent felt improvement of urinary stream. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic evaluation of symptoms through a dedicated questionnaire one month after PVP has shown that 41% of patients felt pain while voiding, 57% had urgency and 39% significant hematuria. These results should encourage a more accurate patient information and further studies to better understand postoperative healing after PVP.

[CCAFU french national guidelines 2016-2018 on prostate cancer]. / Recommandations en onco-urologie 2016-2018 du CCAFU : Cancer de la prostate.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the guidelines national committee CCAFU was to propose updated french guidelines for localized and metastatic prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS: A Medline search was achieved between 2013 and 2016, as regards diagnosis, options of treatment and follow-up of PCa, to evaluate different references with levels of evidence. RESULTS: Epidemiology, classification, staging systems, diagnostic evaluation are reported. Disease management options are detailed. Recommandations are reported according to the different clinical situations. Active surveillance is a major option in low risk PCa. Radical prostatectomy remains a standard of care of localized PCa. The three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy is the technical standard. A dose of > 74Gy is recommended. Moderate hypofractionation provides short-term biochemical control comparable to conventional fractionation. In case of intermediate risk PCa, radiotherapy can be combined with short-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). In case of high risk disease, long-term ADT remains the standard of care. ADT is the backbone therapy of metastatic disease. In men with metastases at first presentation, upfront chemotherapy combined with ADT should be considered as a new standard. In case of metastatic castration-resistant PCa (mCRPC), new hormonal treatments and chemotherapy provide a better control of tumor progression and increase survival. CONCLUSIONS: These updated french guidelines will contribute to increase the level of urological care for the diagnosis and treatment for prostate cancer. © 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

What risk of prostate cancer led urologist to recommend prostate biopsies?

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to estimate the risk of prostate cancer that led urologists to perform prostate biopsies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eight hundred and eight patients had prostate biopsies in 5 tertiary centres in 2010. Following data were collected: age, PSA, DRE, prostate volume, negative prior prostate biopsy and estimated life expectancy (> or <10 years). The risk of prostate cancer was calculated by validated nomogram of PCPT-CRC and SWOP-PRI and correlated with pathological biopsy results. RESULTS: In final analysis, 625 patients were included, 568 (90.9%) had a life expectancy greater than 10 years. Prostate cancer was found in 291 (46.6%) cases. These patients were older (66.7 ± 6.8 vs 64.3 ± 5.6 years, P < 0.001), had higher PSA values (10 ± 7.9 vs 7.7 ± 4.3 ng/mL, P < 0.0001) and the prostate volume decreased (43.8 ± 19.8 vs 51.3 ± 20.7 mL, P < 0.0001) compared with healthy subjects. Digital Rectal Examination was more frequently suspicious in the group of patients with prostate cancer (43.6% vs 18.9%, P < 0.0001). Risk of prostate cancer estimated was 50.6 ± 14% for PCPT-CRC without ATCD, 56.2 ± 12.8% with PCPT-CRC ATCD and 31.2 ± 17.3% for SWOP-PRI. The likelihood of high-risk prostate cancer was 22.4 ± 16.9% with the PCPT-CRC, and 14.8 ± 18.2% with SWOP-PRI. CONCLUSION: This study showed that urologists performed prostate biopsies when the risk of cancer was high.

[Carcinogenic pathways and natural history of upper tract urothelial carcinomas: state-of-the-art review for the yearly scientific report of the French National Association of Urology]. / Voies de carcinogenèse et histoire naturelle des tumeurs de la voie excrétrice supérieure: état de l'art pour le rapport annuel de l'Association française d'urologie.

OBJECTIVE: To describe natural history and carcinogenesis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). METHODS: A systematic review of the scientific literature was performed in the Medline database (Pubmed) using different associations of the following keywords: upper tract urothelial carcinoma; clonality; carcinogenesis; mutation; chromosomal instability; Lynch syndrome; genetic polymorphism. RESULTS: Local development of UTUC is characterized by a highly prevalent multifocality that might be explained by the overlap of "field change" and "intraluminal seeding and implantation" theories. UTUC and bladder tumors share common carcinogenesis mechanisms such as mutations of FGFR3 and TP53 defining two distinct pathways of pathogenesis. Epigenetic alterations corresponding to the hypermethylation of different promoters regulating genes expression and chromosomal instability such as chromosome 9 deletions are also involved in UTUC carcinogenesis. Furthermore, specific genetic risk factors fro UTUC including Lynch syndrome and different polymorphisms might explain an individual susceptibility for developing these tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Significant advances have been done in the field of basic research in UTUCs in recent years and have been of particular interest to provide better descriptions of their natural history. Despite these important findings however, some carcinogenic mechanisms remains not elucidated and unknown in the field of UTUC so far.

[The management of prostate cancer: a retrospective chart review in 808 French men undergoing biopsy]. / Prise en charge du cancer de la prostate: analyse rétrospective de 808 hommes biopsiés en France.

OBJECTIVE: We explored the characteristics of a sample of men who had undergone a biopsy in clinical practice in France and evaluated initial treatment choice in men with a positive biopsy. METHODS: This was a multi-centre, retrospective chart review including men who had undergone a biopsy in France. Clinical variables were collected using an electronic data capture system. RESULTS: Eight hundred and eight men were included; 632 men (78%) had an initial biopsy and 176 men (22%) had one or more repeat biopsy. The mean age was 64 years and 9% of men were 75 years or more. The mean (median) PSA was 11.6 (7.0) ng/mL; 25% of men had a PSA greater than 10 ng/mL. Twenty-eight percent of men had a suspicious DRE. A total of 52% of men had a positive initial and 26% a positive repeat biopsy. One hundred and eleven patients (34%) had low-risk PCa (stage T1c-2a, PSA<10 ng/mL, Gleason sum<7) and 195 (59%) were at intermediate/high risk of disease progression. The most common treatment was radical therapy (54% of patients), even in men with low-risk PCa (40% of patients). A total of 38% of low-risk patients chose active surveillance. CONCLUSIONS: The French biopsy sample appeared to be at a relatively high risk of having PCa at initial biopsy. Radical therapy was the most common treatment choice in men with a positive biopsy. In patients with low-risk PCa, radical therapy and active surveillance were used most often and to the same extent.

[Influence of plasmatic testosterone during natural history of prostate cancer: a review]. / Influence de la testostérone plasmatique au cours de l'histoire naturelle du cancer de la prostate : analyse de la littérature.

INTRODUCTION: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common disease in male patients and it has the particularity to be androgen dependent. The aim of the current study was to provide an overview about the interest of testosterone dosage during the management of PCa regardless of the stage of the disease. PATIENTS ET METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was done from the PubMed database by searching the following key words alone or in combination: prostate cancer; testosterone; risk; aggressiveness; hormonotherapy; active surveillance; prognosis; androgen; cardiovascular risk; biochemical recurrence. RESULTS: The level of plasmatic testosterone depends on the moment of the day with a peak between the end of the night and in the morning. We can test either the whole testosterone level, the free testosterone level or the bioavailable testosterone. The bioavailable testosterone is more representative of the presence of androgen in tissues but a specialized laboratory is mandatory. The testosterone plasmatic rate is potentially useful during several steps of the PCa management: in localized prostate cancer cases, men with low testosterone levels are more likely to have an aggressive disease and are therefore not good candidates for active surveillance. An extensive radical prostatectomy should be considered in case of young men since these patients are more likely to recur subsequently; in advanced prostate cancer cases, a testosterone level has to be less or equal to 0.2 ng/mL to guarantee an appropriate castration when a patient is undergoing an androgen deprivation treatment. A dissociation between the trend of PSA and testosterone levels can be the starting point of the castration-resistant period of the disease. CONCLUSION: The testosterone level can bring useful information regarding the profile of PCa and its ability to evolve during the whole natural history of the disease.

Cancer-specific survival after radical nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: proposal and multi-institutional validation of a post-operative nomogram.

BACKGROUND: Owing to the scarcity of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UUT-UC) it is often necessary for investigators to pool data. A patient-specific survival nomogram based on such data is needed to predict cancer-specific survival (CSS) post nephroureterectomy (NU). Herein, we propose and validate a nomogram to predict CSS post NU. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-one French institutions contributed data on 1120 patients treated with NU for UUT-UC. A total of 667 had full data for nomogram development. Study population was divided into the nomogram development cohort (397) and external validation cohort (270). Cox proportional hazards regression models were used for univariate and multivariate analyses and to build a nomogram. A reduced model selection was performed using a backward step-down selection process, and Harrell's concordance index (c-index) was used for quantifying the nomogram accuracy. Internal validation was performed by bootstrapping and the reduced nomogram model was calibrated. RESULTS: Of the 397 patients in the nomogram development cohort, 91 (22.9%) died during follow-up, of which 66 (72.5%) died as a consequence of UUT-UC. The actuarial CSS probability at 5 years was 0.76 (95% CI, 71.62-80.94). On multivariate analysis, T stage (P<0.0001), N status (P=0.014), grade (P=0.026), age (P=0.005) and location (P=0.022) were associated with CSS. The reduced nomogram model had an accuracy of 0.78. We propose a nomogram to predict 3 and 5-year CSS post NU for UUT-UC. CONCLUSION: We have devised and validated an accurate nomogram (78%), superior to any single clinical variable or current model, for predicting 5-year CSS post NU for UUT-UC.

[Salvage therapy with artificial urinary sphincter after Advance™ male sling failure for post-prostatectomy incontinence: a first clinical experience]. / Thérapie de sauvetage par implantation d'un sphincter artificiel urinaire après échec de bandelette Advance™ pour incontinence urinaire après prostatectomie : une expérience monocentrique.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical outcome following artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation after failure of Advance™ sub-urethral male sling for post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI). METHODS: A prospective evaluation was conducted about consecutive patients who received an AUS after failure of Advance™ therapy in one tertiary reference center. Evaluation included medical history, pad use and operative data (duration, cuff size, technical difficulties). Follow-up was scheduled at 1, 6, 12 months and yearly thereafter. Clinical outcome was evaluated by pad use, patient global impression of improvement (PGI-I) scale and assessment of side effects. Cure was defined as no pad usage. RESULTS: Twelve patients were included in this evaluation. Median follow-up was 20 months (12-43). No patient was lost to follow-up. Four patients had a history of radiation therapy and all patients had mild or moderate PPI with previous failed Advance™ surgery. Median (range) operative time was 47 minutes (40-60). No technical problem occurred during AUS implantation. Hospital stay duration and catheterization duration were respectively 2 days and 24 hours in all but one case. At last follow-up, 10/12 patients (83%) were cured and fully satisfied. Two were improved, wearing only one pad per day. Postoperative complications were noted in two cases (17%) (one case of cutaneous erosion and one case of superficial iliac wound infection). CONCLUSIONS: AUS implantation is feasible in patients who have undergone Advance™ male sling implantation. Mid-term results of this procedure are comparable to those obtained after first line AUS implantation.