RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is an inflammatory disease characterised by chronic and recurrent course. Its predominant symptom is skin pruritus. Therefore, many AD patients have recurrent skin infections and are susceptible to the colonisation of apparently healthy skin and nasal vestibule by Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus). Some S. aureus strains are capable of producing exotoxins. AIM: To assess the relation between the total IgE (tIgE) and asIgE targeted against SEA (SEA-sIgE) and SEB (SEB-sIgE), as indicators of the severity of the course of AD, and the presence of S. aureus on apparently healthy skin, in skin lesions and in the nasal vestibule. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The research was performed in a population of 134 AD patients (61 men and 73 women) aged 2-86 years. Three smears were collected for microbiological investigations: from the nasal vestibule, from the skin where lesions appeared at the moment of investigations and from the skin which was free from the eczema. On collection the material was cultured on solid and broth mediums. After incubation each medium was thoroughly analysed for the presence of S. aureus. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant correlation between healthy skin colonisation by S. aureus and increased SEA-sIgE. The same correlation was proved between healthy skin colonisation by S. aureus and increased SEB-sIgE. There was a statistically significant correlation between colonisation of the nasal vestibule by S. aureus and the SEA-sIgE and SEB-sIgE serum concentration. CONCLUSIONS: It seems that the colonisation of the lesioned skin, healthy skin and the anterior nares by S. aureus is related with higher tIgE serum concentration, which translates to more severe course of the disease. Significantly increased SEA-IgE and SEB-IgE concentrations were observed in the patients whose tIgE serum concentration was statistically higher.
RESUMO
Allergic diseases are the most common chronic conditions lasting throughout the patient's life. They not only cause significant deterioration in the quality of life of patients but also lead to significant absenteeism and reduced productivity, resulting in very high costs for society. Effective and safe treatment of allergic diseases is therefore one of the main challenges for public health and should be carried out by all the specialists in family medicine, internists and paediatricians in collaboration with allergists, otorhinolaryngologists and dermatologists. Antihistamines are most commonly used in the treatment of allergies. Several dozen drugs are available on the pharmaceutical market, and their generic forms are advertised widely as very effective drugs for the treatment of allergic diseases. What is the truth? What are the data from clinical trials and observational studies? Are all drugs equally effective and safe for the patient? According to a panel of experts representing various fields of medicine, inappropriate treatment of allergies can be very risky for patients, and seemingly equally acting medications may differ greatly. Therefore, a panel of experts gathered the latest data from the entire scientific literature and analysed the latest standards and recommendations prepared by scientific societies. This paper provides a summary of these studies and highlights the importance for the patient of the proper choice of drug to treat his allergies.