Obefazimod: A First-in-class Drug for the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis.

Biologic agents and oral small molecules are the mainstays of inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] management. However, an unmet clinical need remains for additional agents with novel mechanism of action which are effective, safe, and disease-modifying; this is due to the substantial proportion of patients who do not respond, lose response, or develop intolerance to currently marketed products. microRNAs [miRNAs] that play a role in the modulation of signal transduction pathways implicated in the development of IBD hold the potential to be used as therapeutic targets. Recently, a novel first-in-class compound, obefazimod, originally conceived as a human immunodeficiency virus [HIV] infection drug, has shown great promise in phase II induction trials for ulcerative colitis [UC] patients. Findings from the maintenance phases of trials showed that long-term obefazimod treatment provides continued improvement in clinical symptoms of disease, with a substantial proportion of patients in clinical remission, and an overall good safety profile. With a novel mechanism of action, obefazimod is an orally available small molecule with anti-inflammatory properties through the specific and selective upregulation of miR-124 expression. The aim of this paper is to critically review the available evidence related to pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and to discuss the potential clinical implications of this first-in-class oral small molecule.

Effectiveness Research in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Necessity and a Methodological Challenge.

Efficacy, safety and economic issues are the main factors influencing the use of inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]-related medications. The best level of evidence comes from randomised clinical trials. The benefit of the intervention observed in a clinical trial could be reduced once it is implemented in clinical practice: its real-life efficacy, known as effectiveness, could be questioned. That is why effectiveness research based on observational studies is required to obtain-long term data on natural history, including surgery or hospitalisation, and safety. Before starting these real-life studies, it is crucial to be aware of the inherent risks of bias and confounding, to develop a good study plan, and to select the optimal design. Even if the choice of the design is optimal and if the risks of bias and confounding are minimised, the implementation of robust statistical methodology is necessary to increase the validity of the results and allow their dissemination into clinical practice. The objective of this paper is to highlight some inherent methodological problems in effectiveness research and to review some statistical tools with a focus on IBD studies and trials.

Effectiveness of budesonide MMX (Cortiment) for the treatment of mild-to-moderate active ulcerative colitis: study protocol for a prospective multicentre observational cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: A study has been developed to assess the use and effectiveness of budesonide MMX for mild-to-moderate active ulcerative colitis (UC) in routine clinical practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A prospective, multicentre, observational, cohort study of 300 patients prescribed budesonide MMX for the treatment of mild-to-moderate active UC will be conducted in Europe, Israel and Canada. Patients will be treated with budesonide MMX9 mg daily for induction of remission for ≤8 weeks. Data on effectiveness, including patient-reported outcomes, tolerability and use will be recorded at the end of treatment and at ≥2 weeks after. The primary outcome (improvement ≥3 point in the clinical subscores of the UC Disease Activity Index score at the end of treatment) will be compared in: patients who receive budesonide MMX added to mesalazine >2 weeks after increased/optimised mesalazine dose for the treatment of flare (late add-on); patients who receive budesonide MMX added to mesalazine ≤2 weeks since mesalazine increased/optimised for the treatment of flare, or without mesalazine dose modification (early add-on); and patients who receive budesonide MMX as monotherapy for the treatment of flare (mono). Propensity scoring will be used to minimise bias and confounding inherent in observational studies. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: First ethical approval: Ethikkommission der Ärztekammer Hamburg (12/22/2015). The results will be published in full. DISCUSSION: Completion of primary data collection is expected in December 2017. Our results will provide further evidence on the effectiveness of budesonide MMX to support clinicians in their daily practice and inform therapeutic guidelines. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02586259.