Stereotactic body radiotherapy in oligometastatic cervical cancer (MITO-RT2/RAD study): a collaboration of MITO, AIRO GYN, and MaNGO groups.

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective, multicenter study analyzes the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiotherapy in a large cohort of patients with oligometastatic/persistent/recurrent cervical cancer. METHODS: A standardized data collection from several radiotherapy centers that treated patients by stereotactic body radiotherapy between March 2006 and February 2021 was set up. Clinical and stereotactic body radiotherapy parameters were collected. Objective response rate was defined as a composite of complete and partial response, while clinical benefit included objective response rate plus stable disease. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events scales were used to grade toxicities. The primary endpoints were the rate of complete response to stereotactic body radiotherapy, and the 2 year actuarial local control rate on a 'per lesion' basis. The secondary end points were progression-free survival and overall survival, as well as toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 83 patients with oligometastatic/persistent/recurrent cervical cancer bearing 125 lesions treated by stereotactic body radiotherapy at 15 different centers were selected for analysis. Of the sites of metastatic disease, lymph node metastases were most common (55.2%), followed by parenchyma lesions (44.8%). Median total dose was 35 Gy (range 10-60), in five fractions (range 1-10), with a median dose/fraction of 7 Gy (range 4-26). Complete, partial, and stable response were found in 73 (58.4%), 29 (23.2%), and 16 (12.8%) lesions, respectively, reaching 94.4% of the clinical benefit rate. Forty-six (55.4%) patients had a complete response. Patients achieving complete response on a 'per lesion' basis experienced a 2 year actuarial local control rate of 89.0% versus 22.1% in lesions not achieving complete response (p<0.001). The 2 year actuarial progression-free survival rate was 42.5% in patients with complete response versus 7.8% in patients with partial response or stable or progressive disease (p=0.001). The 2 year actuarial overall survival rate was 68.9% in patients with complete response versus 44.3% in patients with partial response or stable or progressive disease (p=0.015). Fifteen patients (18.1%) had mild acute toxicity, totaling 29 side events. Late toxicity was documented in four patients (4.8%) totaling seven adverse events. CONCLUSION: Our analysis confirmed the efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy in oligometastatic/persistent/recurrent cervical cancer patients. The low toxicity profile encourages the wider use of stereotactic body radiotherapy in this setting.

Dose coverage impacts local control in ultra-central lung oligometastases treated with stereotactic radiotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: The use of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) is controversial in Ultra-Central lung tumors, a subset of central lung tumors characterized by proximity to critical mediastinal structures. This is of interest in oligometastatic (≤3 metastases) patients, who can yield survival benefit from local treatments. The aim of our study is to assess the determinants of efficacy and toxicity in this setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical and dosimetric parameters were reviewed in a cohort of oligometastatic patients treated with SBRT for ultra-central tumors. Local control rate (LC) and toxicity were assessed. Statistical Analysis was carried out to assess the impact of those predictors on local recurrence and adverse events. RESULTS: One-hundred-nine consecutive patients were included. A median Biologic Effective Dose (BED) of 105 (75-132) Gy10 was prescribed. At a median follow-up of 17 (range 3-78) months, 2-year LC was 87%. Improved LC was correlated to Planning Treatment Volume (PTV) covered by 95% of the prescription dose (V95% PTV) > 85% (HR 0.15, 95%CI 0.05-0.49, p = 0.0017) and to Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) < 90 cm3 (HR 0.2, 95%CI 0.07-0.56, p = 0.0021). Overall and grade ≥ 3 toxicity incidence was 20% and 5%, respectively. Patients experiencing acute and late toxicities received significantly higher dose to 1 cm3 (D1cm3) of esophagus and lung volume receiving ≥5 Gy (V5Gy) (p = 0.016 and p = 0.013), and higher dose to 0.1 cm3 (D0.1cm3) of heart (p = 0.036), respectively. CONCLUSION: V95% PTV > 85% and GTV < 90 cm3 are independent predictors of LC. Dose to esophagus, lung and heart should be carefully assessed to minimize treatment-related toxicities.

A Large, Multicenter, Retrospective Study on Efficacy and Safety of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) in Oligometastatic Ovarian Cancer (MITO RT1 Study): A Collaboration of MITO, AIRO GYN, and MaNGO Groups.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have reported improvement of outcomes (progression-free survival, overall survival, and prolongation of androgen deprivation treatment-free survival) with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in non-small cell lung cancer and prostate cancer. The aim of this retrospective, multicenter study (MITO RT-01) was to define activity and safety of SBRT in a very large, real-world data set of patients with metastatic, persistent, and recurrent ovarian cancer (MPR-OC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The endpoints of the study were the rate of complete response (CR) to SBRT and the 24-month actuarial local control (LC) rate on "per-lesion" basis. The secondary endpoints were acute and late toxicities and the 24-month actuarial late toxicity-free survival. Objective response rate (ORR) included CR and partial response (PR). Clinical benefit (CB) included ORR and stable disease (SD). Toxicity was evaluated by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) scales, according to center policy. Logistic and Cox regression were used for the uni- and multivariate analysis of factors predicting clinical CR and actuarial outcomes. RESULTS: CR, PR, and SD were observed in 291 (65.2%), 106 (23.8%), and 33 (7.4%) lesions, giving a rate of CB of 96.4%. Patient aged ≤60 years, planning target volume (PTV) ≤18 cm3 , lymph node disease, and biologically effective dose α/ß10 > 70 Gy were associated with higher chance of CR in the multivariate analysis. With a median follow-up of 22 months (range, 3-120), the 24-month actuarial LC rate was 81.9%. Achievement of CR and total dose >25 Gy were associated with better LC rate in the multivariate analysis. Mild toxicity was experienced in 54 (20.7%) patients; of 63 side effects, 48 were grade 1, and 15 were grade 2. The 24-month late toxicity-free survival rate was 95.1%. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the activity and safety of SBRT in patients with MPR-OC and identifies clinical and treatment parameters able to predict CR and LC rate. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study aimed to define activity and safety of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in a very large, real life data set of patients with metastatic, persistent, recurrent ovarian cancer (MPR-OC). Patient age <60 years, PTV <18 cm3 , lymph node disease, and biologically effective dose α/ß10 >70 Gy were associated with higher chance of complete response (CR). Achievement of CR and total dose >25 Gy were associated with better local control (LC) rate. Mild toxicity was experienced in 20.7% of patients. In conclusion, this study confirms the activity and safety of SBRT in MPR-OC patients and identifies clinical and treatment parameters able to predict CR and LC rate.

Role of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for the Management of Oligometastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Kidney cancer has been increasing 1.7% annually. Renal cell carcinoma is the most common kidney cancer and it can metastasize. Our aim was to analyze patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy of renal cell carcinoma metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 58 patients (73 lesions) were treated from 2004 to 2016. Patients were candidates for analysis if a maximum of 3 metastases were diagnosed and the primary tumor was resected. Toxicity was classified according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3. RESULTS: All patients had renal cell carcinoma, in particular the clear cell type in 82.7%. A total of 39 metastases (53.4%) were located in the lungs and 19 (26%) were in the lymph nodes. Less common were metastases to bone (9.5% of cases), the liver (4.1%) and the adrenal gland (6.8%). Median followup was 16.1 months (range 3.5 to 157.1). The local control rate at 12 and 18 months was 90.2% and 90.2%, respectively. The progression-free survival rate at 12 and 18 months was 46.2% (95% CI 32.2-59) and 35% (95% CI 21.4-48.9), respectively. On univariate and multivariable analyses metachronous and single metastases predicted better progression-free survival. Systemic therapy before stereotactic body radiation therapy predicted improved local control in clear cell cases. CONCLUSIONS: Stereotactic body radiation therapy can be considered a safe approach and it provides effective local control of oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma. However, future prospective studies are necessary to evaluate the impact on survival and quality of life.

GUROPA survey: genito-urinary radiation oncology prescription attitudes.

AIMS: To investigate the role of Radiation Oncology in the management of genito-urinary (GU) cancer excluding prostate and penile cancer. METHODS: The questionnaire was focused on the evaluation of the degree of involvement of radiation oncologists in the work-up of bladder, renal cell carcinoma and testicular cancer (TC). RESULTS: Eighty-eight radiation oncologists completed the survey. The majority (85.4%) of participating radiation oncologists were senior consultants (> 5 years of experience). Sixty-four (73.6%) carried out a multidisciplinary tumor board discussion of GU cases, while 23 (26.4%) did not. Seventy-five percent of responders reported that, every year, visited < 50 GU patients (pts), 18.1% visited 50-100 pts and 6.9% visited > 100 pts. Bladder cancer, curative radiotherapy (RT) as part of trimodality approach was claimed to be adopted in less than 10 cases per year. Regarding renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients, primary tumor directed RT was adopted only in 8 cases (9.4%) in at least 10 pts per year. Palliative RT was more frequent in RCC (48.2%) in over than 10 pts per year. In case of TC, the prescription of RT was limited (< 10 patients per year) due to the low incidence of disease and recent shift to surveillance as a first option in stage I seminoma. CONCLUSIONS: Our survey showed that radiation oncologists are rarely involved in the decision making strategy of GU cancer, despite many clinical trials support RT use. These patients probably deserve a more uniform approach based on updated, detailed and evidence-based recommendations.

11C-Choline-Pet Guided Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Lymph Node Metastases in Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: aim is outcome of 11C-Choline-PET guided SBRT on lymph node metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: patients with 1 - 4 lymph node metastases detected by 11C-choline-PET were treated with SBRT. Toxicity, treated metastases control and Progression Free Survival were computed. RESULTS: twenty-six patients, 38 lymph node metastases were irradiated. No grade ≥ 2 toxicity. Median PSA-nadir after RT was 1.02 ng/mL. Post-treatment 11C-Choline-PET showed metabolic complete response in 17 metastases (44,7%), partial response in 9 metastases (38%). CONCLUSION: SBRT is effective and safe for lymph node metastases. PET is important in identification of gross tumor and evaluation of the response.

Cervical cancer response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: MRI assessment compared with surgery.

BACKGROUND: Imaging findings of residual cervical tumor after chemoradiotherapy can closely resemble those of post-irradiation inflammation. PURPOSE: To determine the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in evaluating residual disease after chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma (LACC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 41 patients with histopathologically proven LACC (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage ≥IB2) who underwent MRI before and after chemoradiotherapy. At each examination, a qualitative and semi-quantitative analysis of primary tumor, including tumor volume and signal intensity were assessed on T2-weighted (T2W) images. All patients had surgery after post-chemoradiotherapy MRI. MRI and histopathologic results were compared. RESULTS: All patients showed significant difference in tumor volume and signal intensity between pre- and post-chemoradiotherapy MRI (P < 0.0001). According to pathology, 27/41 (66%) patients had true negative and 2/41 (5%) had true positive post-chemoradiotherapy MRI. Eleven out of 41 (27%) patients showed inflammation with false positive post-chemoradiotherapy MRI and 1/41 (2%) had a false negative post-chemoradiotherapy MRI. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values of post-chemoradiotherapy MRI in predicting residual disease were 69%, 71%, 71%, 15%, and 96%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The differentiation of residual tumor from post-irradiation inflammation with early post- chemoradiotherapy MRI (within 28-60 days) is difficult with a high risk of false positive results. Combination of qualitative and semi-quantitative analysis does not improve the accuracy. Conversely, post-chemoradiotherapy MRI has a high negative predictive value with a low risk of false negative results. The role of conventional MRI combined with functional techniques should be evaluated.

Long-term analysis of gemcitabine-based chemoradiation after surgical resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy in terms of local control (LC) of 24 h infusion of gemcitabine plus radiotherapy after surgery for pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Weekly gemcitabine (100 mg/m(2)) was provided as a 24-hour infusion during the course of radiotherapy (50.4 Gy to the tumor, 39.6 Gy to the nodes). Patients subsequently received five cycles of gemcitabine monochemotherapy (1,000 mg/m(2) 1, 8, q21). The primary end point of the study was to achieve a 2-year LC rate of ≥80 % with type I and II errors of 5 and 20 %. The study was designed to accrue a maximum sample size of 35 patients. Secondary end points were toxicity evaluation, metastasis-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Data of 35 patients were available. Most of the patients (n = 27; 77.1 %) had duodeno-cephalo-pancreatectomy, 5 (14.3 %) distal pancreatectomy, and 3 (8.6 %) total pancreatectomy. The pathological stages were T1-T2 (n = 7; 20.0 %), T3-T4 (n = 28; 80.0 %), N0 (n = 17; 48.6 %), and N1 (n = 18; 51.4 %). Thirty patients (85.7 %) completed chemoradiation. Twenty-three patients (65.7 %) received further sequential chemotherapy. Acute toxicity was acceptable. No late toxicity occurred. The median follow-up period was 64 (range 24-118) months, and 2-year crude rate of LC was 83 (median not reached). Median MFS and OS were 26.5 and 22.5 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of LC met the main goal of the study. The regimen resulted in a high LC rate but failed to show a benefit in terms of OS or MFS, thus suggesting the need for a more intensified multimodal approach.

Automatic delineation for replanning in nasopharynx radiotherapy: what is the agreement among experts to be considered as benchmark?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Anatomic changes during head and neck radiotherapy require replanning. The primary aim of this study is the definition of the agreement among experts in the head and neck automatic delineation frame to use as benchmark. The secondary goal is to assess the reliability of automatic delineation for nasopharynx radiotherapy and time saving. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A computed tomography (CT) scan was acquired in 10 nasopharynx patients along intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment for replanning. Deformable registration with replanning autocontouring of the structures was performed using VelocityAI 2.3© software defining Structure Set A. The optimization of these contours was obtained through revision by a skilled operator, drawing Structure Set B. An ex novo Structure Set C was segmented on the replanning CT-scan by an expert delineation team. The mean Dice's Similarity Index (mDSI) was calculated between Structure Set A and B, A and C, and between B and C for each volume. All segmentation times for organs at risk (OARs) and clinical target volume (CTV) were recorded and compared. RESULTS: We validated the replanning autocontoured Structure Sets for 10 patients. For volumetric analysis we observed mDSI values of 0.87 for the OARs, 0.70 for nodes, 0.90 for CTV in the Structure Set A-B comparison and respectively of 0.74, 0.63 and 0.78 for the Structure Set A-C one, and 0.78, 0.78 and 0.85 for Structure Set B-C, which represents the existing expert based benchmark. We calculated a mean saved time in Structure Set B of 30 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Autocontouring procedures offer considerable segmentation time saving with acceptable reliability of the contours, even if an independent check procedure for their optimization is still required to increase their adherence to referential benchmark gold standard among experts, which stands at a 0.80 DSI value.

Re-irradiation for recurrent high grade glioma (HGG) patients: Results of a single arm prospective phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Standard of care for recurrent high grade glioma (HGG) is missing. Several treatment options have been investigated including re-irradiation (re-RT). Results are promising but provided by retrospective studies. We designed a single arm prospective phase II study aiming to evaluate efficacy, and toxicity of re-irradiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adults patients with good performance status, HGG diagnosis reclassified according to the new 2021 fifth edition WHO CNS classification, an interval time (IT) from previous RT ≥ 6 months were included. Outcome was evaluated by MRI imaging at 1 month, and every 3 months thereafter. Toxicities were evaluated in terms of radionecrosis occurrence, and neurocognitive status. RESULTS: Ninety recurrent HGG patients were treated, 11 oligodendroglioma grade 3, 18 astrocytoma grade 3 and 4, and 61 glioblastoma grade 4. The median age was 54 years, and majority had KPS 90-100. The median IT between first-RT and re-RT was 24 months. Re-surgery has been performed in 56.6%, and chemotherapy in 53.3%. The median follow up time was 64 months; median overall survival (OS) time,1,2,3-year OS rates were 17 months (95%CI 14-19), 66.7%±4.9, 32.6%±5.0, and 22.2 ± 4.7. Prognostic factors impacting on survival were age (p = 0.0154), IT between first RT and re-RT (p = 0.0051), glioma grade (p = 0.0090), and IDH status (p = 0.0001). Radionecrosis grade 2-3 occurred in 9 (10%) patients; neurocognitive functions remained stable until disease progression. CONCLUSION: Re-RT proved to be a safe and feasible treatment option with low toxicity. Younger patients with grade 3 IDH mutated gliomas, and a longer IT had the better outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02567539.

Impact of radiotherapy on pain relief and recalcification in plasma cell neoplasms: long-term experience.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of radiotherapy on pain relief and on recalcification in patients with osteolytic lesions due to plasma cell neoplasm. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Pain relief was evaluated according to a 0-10 verbal numerical rating scale (NRS) and recalcification was measured using radiological imaging. RESULTS: From 1996-2007, 52 patients were treated (Table 1). Median total dose was 38 Gy (range, 16-50 Gy). Pain be-fore radiotherapy was reported by 45 of 52 (86.5%) patients (Table 2) as being severe (8 ≤ NRS ≤ 10) in 5 (11%), moderate (5 ≤ NRS ≤ 7) in 27 (60%), and mild in 13 (29%). Pain relief was achieved in 41 of 45 patients (91%): complete relief was obtained in 21 (51.2%) and partial relief in 20 patients (48.8%); patients with severe pain experienced resolution and none present-ed an increase of pain. Drugs reduction/suspension was achieved in 7 of the 21 patients with complete response. Of 42 patients evaluable for recalcification (Table 3), 21 (50%) presented a radiological response, which was identified as complete in 16 (38%). CONCLUSION: Our data confirm the effectiveness of radiotherapy for pain relief, including a reduction in drug intake, and on recalcification, thus, supporting its use in a multidisciplinary approach.

Whole-brain radiotherapy combined with surgery or stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with brain oligometastases: long-term analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To verify whether the treatment of brain oligometastases with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) plus stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) or surgical resection results in different outcomes. METHODS: Files of patients affected by brain metastases submitted to surgical resection followed by WBRT (group A) or WBRT + SRT (group B) were retrospectively selected for this study. The two treatment groups were matched for the following potential prognostic factors: WBRT schedule, age, gender, performance status, tumor type, number of brain metastases, extra-cerebral metastases, and recursive partitioning analysis class (RPA). The outcomes of patients in both groups were evaluated in terms of toxicity, local control, and overall survival. RESULTS: Total of 97 patients were selected (56 male; 42 female) who were respectively submitted to surgical resection followed by WBRT (group A, n = 50 patients) or WBRT + SRT (Group B, n = 47 patients). Median follow-up was 95 months (range, 8-171 months). The 1-year local control rates were 46.0% and 69.0% respectively. No significant difference in local tumor control was observed between group A and B (p = 0.10). Median overall survival was 15 and 19 months in group A and B, respectively. One-year survival was 56.0% and 62%, respectively. No difference was observed in the two groups (p = 0.40). CONCLUSION: Surgery remains the main therapeutic approach in symptomatic patients; nevertheless, our data support the use of WBRT plus SRT in one or two brain metastases smaller than 3 cm.

Critical Re-Evaluation of a Failure Mode Effect Analysis in a Radiation Therapy Department After 10 Years.

PURPOSE: Failure mode effect analysis (FMEA) is a proactive methodology that allows one to analyze a process, regardless of whether an adverse event occurs. In our radiation therapy (RT) department, a first FMEA was performed in 2009. In this paper we critically re-evaluate the RT process after 10 years and present it in terms of a lesson learned. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A working group (WG), led by a qualified clinical risk engineer, which included radiation oncologists, physicists, a radiation therapist, and a nurse, evaluated the possible failure modes (FMs) of the RT process. For each FM, the estimated frequency of occurrence (O, range 1-4), the expected severity of the damage (S, range 1-5), and the detectability lack (D, range 1-4) were scored. A risk priority number (RPN) was obtained as RPN = OxSxD. The data were compared with the 2009 edition. RESULTS: In the 2020 analysis, 67 FMs were identified (27 in the 2009 series). The absolute risk values of the previous 3 highest FMs were generally reduced. The patient identification risk (highest value in the 2009 analysis) was reduced from 48.0 to 6.9, becoming the 51st RPN score, thanks to a patient barcode recognition within the bunker. The 2020 highest risk values regarded: (i-2020) the patient's inadequate recollection and reporting of his/her medical history (ie, anamnesis) during the first medical examination and (ii-2020) the incorrect interpretation of tumor and normal tissue in computed tomography images. The WG proposed corrective actions. CONCLUSIONS: In this single institution experience, the 10-year FMEA analysis showed a reduction in the previous higher RPN values thanks to the corrective actions taken. The new FMs and subsequent RPNs reveal the need for a continuous iterative improvement process.

Single-arm phase II study of conformal radiation therapy and temozolomide plus fractionated stereotactic conformal boost in high-grade gliomas: final report.

PURPOSE: To assess survival, local control and toxicity using fractionated stereotactic conformal radiotherapy (FSCRT) boost and temozolomide in high-grade gliomas (HGGs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients affected by HGG, with a CTV(1)(clinical target volume, representing tumor bed ± residual tumor + a margin of 5 mm) ≤ 8 cm were enrolled into this phase II study. Radiotherapy (RT, total dose 6,940 cGy) was administered using a combination of two different techniques: three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT, to achieve a dose of 5,040 or 5,940 cGy) and FSCRT boost (19 or 10 Gy) tailored by CTV(1)diameter (≤ 6 cm and > 6 cm, respectively). Temozolomide (75 mg/m(2)) was administered during the first 2 or 4 weeks of RT. After the end of RT, temozolomide (150-200 mg/m(2)) was administered for at least six cycles. The sample size of 41 patients was assessed by the single proportion-powered analysis. RESULTS: 41 patients (36 with glioblastoma multiforme [GBM] and five with anaplastic astrocytoma [AA]) were enrolled; RTOG neurological toxicities G1-2 and G3 were 12% and 3%, respectively. Two cases of radionecrosis were observed. At a median follow-up of 44 months (range 6-56 months), global and GBM median overall survival (OS) were 30 and 28 months. The 2-year survival rate was significantly better compared to the standard treatment (63% vs. 26.5%; p < 0.00001). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11 months, in GBM patients 10 months. CONCLUSION: FSCRT boost plus temozolomide is well tolerated and seems to increase survival compared to the standard treatment in patients with HGG.

Radiotherapy and concomitant temozolomide during the first and last weeks in high grade gliomas: long-term analysis of a phase II study.

We tested the efficacy and safety of temozolomide (TMZ) when given concomitantly to radiotherapy only in the first and last weeks of treatment to patients affected by high grade gliomas. Conformal radiotherapy (CTV1: tumor bed + residual tumor if present + 1.5 cm, 5,940 cGy, 180 cGy/day; CTV2: oedema, 3,960 cGy, 180 cGy/day) was associated with TMZ, 75 mg/m(2) x 5 days, the first and last weeks of radiotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy with TMZ (150 mg/mq daily x 5 days, q28 on the first cycle, 200 mg/mq daily x 5 days, q28 for the following cycles) was given, after chemoradiation, until disease progression or up to 6 cycles. From October 2000 to December 2003, 29 patients (25 GBL, 86.2%; 4 AA, 13.8%) were enrolled in this study. Twenty-two patients (75.8%) received a median 6 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy with TMZ (range 1-20). Hematological toxicity was absent during concomitant chemoradiation and mild in adjuvant therapy, while neurological toxicity (seizures) was observed only in one case. At a median follow-up of 66 months (range 3-96), median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8 months, with a 1- and 2-year PFS of 46.7 and 28.7%, respectively; median overall survival (OS) time was 21 months, with a 1- and 2-year OS of 69.2 and 42.3%, respectively. In our experience, TMZ proved to be effective even when given only during the first and the last week of radiotherapy, with lower hematological toxicity.

Treatment of Merkel cell carcinoma with radiotherapy and imiquimod (Aldara): a case report.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare skin tumor occurring mostly in older people. Postoperative radiotherapy is strongly recommended to improve local control. A case of a MCC treated by radiotherapy associated with imiquimod (Aldara) is presented. A possible physiopathological rationale for this concomitant treatment is also given. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We treated a diabetic 82-year-old man presenting with a MCC of the right zygomatic area. Despite surgery, postoperative ultrasonography showed a firm, painless residual mass of about 11 x 10 cm, fixed to the deep tissues. Parotid and zygomatic areas were treated along with the ipsilateral laterocervical lymph nodes. The total dose to the planning target volume was 50.4 Gy (1.8 Gy/day). Imiquimod was applied once a day to the zygomatic area with macroscopic infiltration and to the surrounding erythema. RESULTS: During the combination treatment, the patient showed acute G3 skin toxicity (RTOG) and a scab that resolved after a 3-week interruption of the radiotherapy and imiquimod treatment. When the scab was removed, the underlying skin appeared completely re-epithelialized. Imiquimod was suspended and treatment was continued only with irradiation. During this second phase of the treatment, the patient developed G2 dermatitis and G2 stomatitis. Clinical and instrumental re-evaluation showed a complete response 7 months after the end of radiotherapy, with very good local tropism. CONCLUSION: This case report suggests the possible effective use of immunomodulators, in this case imiquimod, combined with radiation therapy for cutaneous malignancies such as MCC. Skin tolerance should be an important issue to consider.

Reirradiation of Locally Recurrent Prostate Cancer With Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy.

PURPOSE: This study explores the efficacy and safety of reirradiation with modern radiation therapy techniques in patients previously irradiated for prostate cancer and affected by local relapse of disease. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients affected by previously irradiated prostate cancer were enrolled in this reirradiation study if they had a biochemical relapse and a 11C-choline positron emission tomography scan revealing the presence of a local recurrence of disease. Reirradiation consisted of a stereotactic treatment delivered by image guided radiation therapy-volumetric modulated arc therapy with flattening filter-free technology in 5 daily fractions. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients underwent reirradiation to the prostate, prostatic bed, or prostate and local recurrence. Re-treatment consisted of a median total dose of 25 Gy in 5 fractions. A biochemical response was observed in all cases. Acute toxicity was mainly genitourinary (GU) grade 1 to 2 (n = 13; 56.5%). One patient (4.3%) had grade 3 hematuria. A grade 1 GU late toxicity was registered in 4 patients (17.4%) and grade 3 in 1 patient (4.3%, urethral obstruction). Gastrointestinal toxicity was negligible. Regression analysis showed that only a short elapsed time in months from primary radiation therapy was significantly correlated with acute GU toxicity. After a median follow-up of 33 months (range, 5-58 months), the median biochemical recurrence-free survival was 19 months, and the 2-year biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) was 41.7%. Median local control was 30 months; the 2-year local control rate was 58.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Reirradiation of patients with prostate cancer who underwent previous radiation therapy is a valuable option that can be safely considered to delay the beginning of hormonal treatment.

Predictive Factors for Response and Survival in a Cohort of Oligometastatic Patients Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated patients, treatment, or disease characteristics that could predict response to stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and survival in a database of patients with oligometastatic disease from different solid tumors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients treated with SBRT for oligometastatic disease between 2014 and 2015 were included. Patients were defined as oligometastatic if they were affected by a maximum of 5 active lesions in 3 different sites. They had to be treated with SBRT with radical intent. RESULTS: The study included 358 patients. With a median follow-up of 31.83 months, local control at 6 and 24 months was 94.6% and 78.9%, respectively. Distant progression was recorded in 279 patients (77.9%). Progression-free survival at 6 and 24 months was 66.1% and 18.4%, respectively. At last follow-up, 195 patients (54.5%) were still alive in 59 cases with no evidence of disease. The median overall survival (OS) was 34.7 months (95% confidence interval, 29.66-43.83). OS at 6 and 24 months was 96.07% and 63.57%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, the presence of lung metastases (hazard ratio [HR], 0.50 [0.33-0.75]; P = .001) and nodal metastases (HR, 0.44 [0.24-0.78]; P = .005) was related to longer OS. Primary lung cancer (HR, 1.89 [1.14-3.13]; P = .013), increasing age (HR, 1.02 [1.01-1.04]; P = .002), and the presence of metastatic sites other than the irradiated ones (HR, 2.19 [1.39-3.43]; P = .001) were all independent predictors of shorter OS. Local response was associated with OS. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT for patients with oligometastatic disease is effective. Local response is strongly correlated with patients'' prognosis, also underlying its relevance in a metastatic setting.

Correction to: ONE SHOT - single shot radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: study protocol of a single arm, multicenter phase I/II trial.

Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported that one of the authors' names is spelled incorrectly. In this Correction the incorrect and correct author name are shown. The original publication of this article has been corrected.

ONE SHOT - single shot radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: study protocol of a single arm, multicenter phase I/II trial.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an emerging treatment alternative for patients with localized prostate cancer. Promising results in terms of disease control and toxicity have been reported with 4 to 5 SBRT fractions. However, question of how far can the number of fractions with SBRT be reduced is a challenging research matter. As already explored by some authors in the context of brachytherapy, monotherapy appears to be feasible with an acceptable toxicity profile and a promising outcome. The aim of this multicenter phase I/II prospective trialis to demonstrate early evidence of safety and efficacy of a single-fraction SBRT approach for the treatment of localized disease. METHODS: Patients with low- and intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer without significant tumor in the transitional zone will be treated with a single SBRT fraction of 19 Gy to the whole prostate gland with urethra-sparing (17 Gy). Intrafractional motion will be monitored with intraprostatic electromagnetic transponders. The primary endpoint of the phase I part of the study will be safety as assessed by CTCAE 4.03 grading scale, while biochemical relapse-free survival will be the endpoint for the phase II. The secondary endpoints include acute and late toxicity, quality of life, progression-free survival, and prostate-cancer specific survival. DISCUSSION: This is the first multicenter phase I/II trial assessing the efficacy and safety of a single-dose SBRT treatment for patients with localized prostate cancer. If positive, results of ONE SHOT may help to design subsequent phase III trials exploring the role of SBRT monotherapy in the exclusive radiotherapy treatment of localized disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03294889 ; Registered 27 September 2017.