Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Odontology ; 108(3): 450-461, 2020 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31641894

RESUMO

Halitosis (bad breath) can be a cause of anxiety, depression and psychosocial stress, with pathological changes in the oral microbiota playing an important role in its development. Despite its prevalence, studies on the microbiology of halitosis are rare in Nigeria. This study determines the presence of five putative periodontal pathogens viz: Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia and Treponema denticola on the tongue dorsa of halitosis and non-halitosis patients using a 16S rDNA-directed polymerase chain reaction assay. Furthermore, an association of these bacteria with oral malodour [as assessed by volatile sulphur compounds (VSC) measurements] with a portable sulphide monitor, the Halimeter (Interscan Corp, Chatsworth, California), was performed. The results showed that the prevalence of halitosis in this environment as defined by VSC level above 160 ppb is 14.9%. Halitosis is affected by gender with males having it more than the females. Males also tend to present more with self-reported complaints of halitosis than females. Age does not appear to contribute to the incidence of halitosis. Fusobacterium nucleatum, P. gingivalis, P. intermedia are responsible for increased production of VSCs in halitosis patients while A. actinomycetemcomitans and T. denticola appear to play no part in the production of VSCs. Evaluation of halitogenic bacteria and VSCs may potentially become a surrogate biomarker for monitoring halitosis. Targeted assessment of putative halitogenic bacteria may provide a rapid point-of-care diagnostic tool for halitosis.


Assuntos
Halitose , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Nigéria , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Porphyromonas gingivalis , Compostos de Enxofre , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Língua
2.
Trop Med Int Health ; 24(11): 1291-1300, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31465633

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the consequence of restricting antimalarial treatment to febrile children that test positive to a malaria rapid diagnostic test (MRDT) only in an area of intense malaria transmission. METHODS: Febrile children aged 3-59 months were screened with an MRDT at health facilities in south-west Nigeria. MRDT-positive children received artesunate-amodiaquine (ASAQ), while MRDT-negative children were treated based on the clinical diagnosis of non-malaria febrile illness. The primary endpoint was the risk of developing microscopy-positive malaria within 28 days post-treatment. RESULTS: 309 (60.5%) of 511 children were MRDT-positive while 202 (39.5%) were MRDT-negative at enrolment. 18.5% (50/275) of MRDT-positive children and 7.6% (14/184) of MRDT-negative children developed microscopy-positive malaria by day 28 post-treatment (ρ = 0.001). The risk of developing clinical malaria by day 28 post-treatment was higher among the MRDT-positive group than the MRDT-negative group (adjusted OR 2.74; 95% CI, 1.4, 5.4). A higher proportion of children who were MRDT-positive at enrolment were anaemic on day 28 compared with the MRDT-negative group (12.6% vs. 3.1%; ρ = 0.001). Children in the MRDT-negative group made more unscheduled visits because of febrile illness than those in MRDT-positive group (23.2% vs. 12.0%; ρ = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Restricting ACT treatment to MRDT-positive febrile children only did not result in significant adverse outcomes. However, the risk of re-infection within 28 days was significantly higher among MRDT-positive children despite ASAQ treatment. A longer-acting ACT may be needed as the first-line drug of choice for treating uncomplicated malaria in high-transmission settings to prevent frequent re-infections.


CONSÉQUENCES DE LA RESTRICTION DES ANTIPALUDIQUES AUX ENFANTS FÉBRILES POSITIFS AU TEST DE DIAGNOSTIC RAPIDE DANS LE SUD-OUEST DU NIGÉRIA: OBJECTIFS: Investiguer la conséquence de restreindre le traitement antipaludéen uniquement à des enfants fébriles avec un résultat positif à un test de diagnostic rapide (TDR) du paludisme dans une zone de forte transmission du paludisme. MÉTHODES: Les enfants fébriles âgés de 3 à 59 mois ont été dépistés avec un TDR du paludisme dans des établissements de santé du sud-ouest du Nigéria. Les enfants avec un TDR positif ont reçu de l'artésunate-amodiaquine (ASAQ), tandis que ceux avec un TDR négatif ont été traités sur la base du diagnostic clinique de maladie fébrile non liée au paludisme. Le critère d'évaluation principal était le risque de développer un paludisme positif au microscope dans les 28 jours suivant le traitement. RÉSULTATS: 309 (60,5%) des 511 enfants étaient positifs au TDR du paludisme tandis que 202 (39,5%) étaient négatifs au moment de leur inscription. 18,5% (50/275) des enfants TDR-positifs et 7,6% (14/184) des enfants TDR-négatifs ont développé un paludisme positif au microscope endéans le jour 28 après le traitement (ρ = 0,001). Le risque de développer un paludisme clinique endéans le 28è jour après le traitement était plus élevé dans le groupe TDR-positif que dans le groupe TDR-négatif (OR ajusté = 2,74; IC95%: 1,4 - 5,4). Une proportion plus élevée d'enfants TDR-positifs au moment de l'inscription étaient anémiques au 28è jour par rapport au groupe TDR-négatif (12,6% contre 3,1%; ρ = 0,001). Les enfants du groupe TDR-négatif ont effectué plus de visites non planifiées en raison d'une maladie fébrile que ceux du groupe TDR-positif (23,2% contre 12,0%; ρ = 0,001). CONCLUSION: Le fait de limiter le traitement de combinaison à l'artémisinine (TCA) aux seuls enfants fébriles présentant un résultat positif au TDR n'a pas eu d'effet indésirable significatif. Cependant, le risque de réinfection dans les 28 jours était significativement plus élevé chez les enfants TDR-positifs malgré le traitement par ASAQ. Un TCA à action prolongée pourrait être nécessaire en tant que médicament de choix en première ligne pour traiter le paludisme sans complications dans les régions à forte transmission afin de prévenir les réinfections fréquentes.


Assuntos
Amodiaquina/uso terapêutico , Antimaláricos/uso terapêutico , Artemisininas/uso terapêutico , Malária/diagnóstico , Malária/tratamento farmacológico , Amodiaquina/administração & dosagem , Amodiaquina/efeitos adversos , Antimaláricos/administração & dosagem , Antimaláricos/efeitos adversos , Artemisininas/administração & dosagem , Artemisininas/efeitos adversos , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Combinação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Febre/epidemiologia , Febre/terapia , Humanos , Malária/epidemiologia , Masculino , Técnicas Microbiológicas , Nigéria , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores Socioeconômicos
3.
Pan Afr Med J ; 30: 242, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30574261

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends testing of suspected malaria cases before treatment. Malaria rapid diagnostic test (mRDT) has been recommended for this purpose in endemic countries where microscopy is not accessible. However, its diagnostic performance remains a concern in clinical settings. We assessed diagnostic performance of RDT among febrile under-five children (U5) presenting at Oni Memorial Children's Hospital, Ibadan (OMCH). METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 370 febrile U5 attending OMCH February to May, 2016. We examined their finger prick blood samples for malaria parasitaemia using CareStartTM histidine rich protein II (HRP-2) RDT and microscopy. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV), false positive (FP), invalid rates (IR), likelihood ratio of positive and negative tests (LRP and LRN), were calculated. RESULTS: Mean age of the children was 28.17 ± 15.59 months. Malaria prevalence was 21.6% and 15.1% by mRDT and microscopy, respectively. Sensitivity of CareStartTM HRP-2 RDT was 94.6% (95% confidence interval (CI): 84.2-98.6), specificity: 91.4% (CI: 87.6-94.2), PPV: 66.3% (CI: 54.7-76.2), NPV: 98.9% (CI: 96.8-99.7), FPR 6.5%, IR 8.1%, LRP:10.6 and LRN:0.1. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic performance of CareStartTM used in the study met the ≥ 95% sensitivity at 100 parasites/µL recommended by WHO. This finding provides clinical evidence that testing before anti-malarial treatment as recommended by WHO will identify cases of malaria infection and reduce unnecessary use of drugs. Healthcare workers should be educated on diagnostic accuracy of mRDT and adhere to the WHO's test-treat strategy for anti-malaria therapy.


Assuntos
Antimaláricos/uso terapêutico , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/métodos , Malária/diagnóstico , Parasitemia/diagnóstico , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Reações Falso-Positivas , Feminino , Febre/etiologia , Humanos , Lactente , Malária/tratamento farmacológico , Malária/epidemiologia , Masculino , Microscopia/métodos , Nigéria/epidemiologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prevalência , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA