RESUMO
On 12 January 2010, a 7.0-magnitude earthquake devastated the island nation of Haiti, leading to the world's largest humanitarian effort in over 6 decades. The catastrophe caused massive destruction of homes and buildings and overwhelmed the Haitian health care system. The United States responded immediately with a massive relief effort, sending U.S. military forces and civilian volunteers to Haiti's aid and providing a tertiary care medical center aboard the USNS COMFORT hospital ship. The COMFORT offered sophisticated medical care to a geographically isolated population and helped to transfer resource-intensive patients from other treatment facilities. Working collaboratively with the surgical staff, ancillary services, and nursing staff, internists aboard the COMFORT were integral to supporting the mission of the hospital ship and provided high-level care to the casualties. This article provides the perspective of the U.S. Navy internists who participated in the initial response to the Haitian earthquake disaster onboard the COMFORT.
Assuntos
Desastres , Terremotos , Hospitais Militares/organização & administração , Medicina Interna/organização & administração , Medicina Naval/organização & administração , Navios , Cardiologia/organização & administração , Cuidados Críticos/organização & administração , Haiti , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/organização & administração , Nefrologia/organização & administraçãoRESUMO
In treating coronary artery disease, many factors influence the choice of bare metal stent (BMS) or drug-eluting stent (DES), including bleed risk and suitability for prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy. Atrial fibrillation (AF) further complicates this choice, due to common use of anticoagulation. We examined stent selection in the United States by AF status and across academic medical centers (AMCs) to explore how cardiologists are managing this complex choice. Using a 100% Medicare denominator file and associated claims (2008 to 2012), we identified patients over age 65 receiving inpatient coronary artery stents. We measured BMS and DES use in patients with AF and in patients without AF and assessed variation in stent choice across AMCs, adjusting for differences in age, gender, and race. We identified 898,788 stent episodes among elderly Medicare beneficiaries. BMS, as a percentage of total inpatient stent episodes, decreased from 2008 to 2012, in patients with AF (42% to 34%) and in patients without AF (32% to 23%). Across AMCs, adjusted stent choice varied substantially, but more so for patients with AF (2008 to 2012 median BMS 44% to 39%, annual interquartile ratios range 1.8 to 2.3) than patients without AF (2008 to 2012 median BMS 33% to 25%, annual interquartile ratios range 2.0 to 1.8). In conclusion, among stent recipients, patients with AF are more likely to receive BMS than patients without AF but treatment varies across systems, suggesting a lack of consensus. Studies of stent choice and outcomes among patients with AF are needed to guide care decisions and optimize outcomes.