MET immunolabelling is a useful predictive tool for MET gene amplification in glioblastoma.

AIMS: MET gene amplification is rare in glioblastoma (GBM) and represents a potential target for MET inhibitors. An immunohistochemical screening may be useful to identify MET amplification. The aim of our study was to establish how MET immunolabelling correlates with MET amplification. METHODS: Three cohorts including 108 GBM (cohort 1, prospective), 104 GBM (cohort 2, retrospective) and 52 GBM (cohort 3, prospective) were investigated for MET expression by immunohistochemistry. MET amplification was assessed by comparative genomic hybridization on microarray (CGH-array) in all cohorts and by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) in cohorts 2 and 3. Active form of MET was assessed using p-MET (Y1349) immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Diffuse MET amplification detectable by CGH-array was associated with diffuse, strong MET immunolabelling (four cases in cohort 1 and one case in cohort 2). Focal MET amplification detectable only by FISH was observed in small foci of strongly immunopositive cells in two GBM (cohort 2). In both cohorts, MET amplification was never detected in GBM devoid of strongly immunopositive cells. MET overexpression, observed in 23% of unamplified GBM, was associated with a predominant weak-to-moderate staining intensity and with necrosis (P < 0.005). p-MET was detected in all MET-amplified GBM and in perinecrotic areas of nonamplified GBM. A strong MET immunostaining intensity, at least focal and distant from necrosis, showed 100% sensitivity and 84% specificity for predicting MET amplification in cohort 3. CONCLUSIONS: MET amplification is characterized by strongly immunopositive cells. Only GBM showing strong MET immunostaining is appropriate for the assessment of MET amplification.

Meningeal SWI/SNF related, matrix-associated, actin-dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily B member 1 (SMARCB1)-deficient tumours: an emerging group of meningeal tumours.

AIMS: Bi-allelic inactivation of SWI/SNF related, matrix-associated, actin-dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily B member 1 (SMARCB1; also known as INI1) and loss of immunohistochemical expression of SMARCB1 define the group of SMARCB1-deficient tumours. Initially highlighted in malignant rhabdoid tumours, this inactivation has subsequently been observed in several intra and extracranial tumours. To date, primary meningeal SMARCB1-deficient tumours have not been described. We report two cases of meningeal SMARCB1-deficient tumours occurring in adults. METHODS: We performed immunohistochemical analyses, comparative genomic hybridization, fluorescence in situ hybridization and targeted next-generation sequencing. RESULTS: The first meningeal tumour was a solitary mass, composed of rhabdoid, adenoid, chordoid and sarcomatoid areas. The second case presented as multiple, bilateral, supra and infratentorial nodules, was composed of fusiform and ovoid cells embedded in a myxoid stroma. Tumour cells were positive for epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), vimentin and CD34 and negative for SMARCB1 and meningothelial, melanocytic, muscular, glial markers. In the first case, one allele of SMARCB1 was completely deleted, whereas in the second case, loss of expression of SMARCB1 was observed as a consequence of a homozygous deletion of SMARCB1. CONCLUSIONS: The phenotype and genotype of these two cases did not fit diagnostically with entities already known to be SMARCB1-deficient tumours. As both tumours shared common features, they are regarded as belonging to an emerging group of primary meningeal SMARCB1-deficient tumours, not described to date. To facilitate the identification and characterization of these tumours, we recommend SMARCB1 immunohistochemistry for primary meningeal tumours which are difficult to classify, especially if immunopositive for EMA and CD34.

Prognostic factors in 401 elderly women with metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer have a prognosis and outcome that may be dependent on a host of factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 401 female breast cancer patients who developed metastatic disease after the age of 70 years in order to define potential prognostic factors for specific survival at the time of first recurrence. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 60 months from the time of recurrence, the median specific survival was 21.0 months (95% CI 17.0-23.0). In multivariate analysis we demonstrated that negative hormonal receptor status (p = 0.002), presence of positive lymph nodes at initial cancer diagnosis (hazard ratio, HR = 1.37; 95% CI 1.07-1.75; p = 0.01), site of metastasis (p < 10(-4)) and metastasis-free interval (HR = 0.99; 95% CI 0.95-0.99; p = 0.008) constituted unfavorable independent prognostic factors able to predict specific survival from the time of metastatic occurrence. Age at initial diagnosis, Scarff-Bloom Richardson grade and adjuvant treatments were significant only in univariate analysis. CONCLUSION: These survival prognostic factors associated with the use of a specific geriatric questionnaire to assess frailty may assist physicians in evaluating the patient's survival potential and choose a tailored treatment to this cancer population.

Diagnostic value of immunohistochemistry for the detection of the BRAFV600E mutation in primary lung adenocarcinoma Caucasian patients.

BACKGROUND: Non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients with a BRAF(V600E) mutation benefit from targeted therapy. The usefulness of immunohistochemistry (IHC) as an alternative approach for the detection of BRAF(V600E) in NSCLC patients has not been evaluated until now. This study compared the specificity and sensitivity of IHC with other methods for the detection of BRAF(V600E) in primary lung adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: BRAF mutations were analysed by DNA sequencing of a Caucasian subpopulation of selected 450 of 1509 (30%) EGFR, KRAS, PI3KA, Her2 and EML4-ALK wild-type (wt) primary lung adenocarcinomas. Detection of the BRAF(V600E) mutation was carried out by IHC using the VE1 clone antibody and compared with the results of other molecular methodologies. RESULTS: Of 450 (9%) of tumours, 40 harboured a BRAF mutation, which corresponded to either a BRAF(V600E) or a non-BRAF(V600E) mutation in 21 of 450 (5%) and 19 of 450 (4%) cases, respectively. The IHC VE1 assay was positive in 19 of 21 (90%) BRAF(V600E)-mutated tumours and negative in all BRAF(nonV600E)-mutated tumours. CONCLUSION: IHC using the VE1 clone is a specific and sensitive method for the detection of BRAF(V600E) and may be an alternative to molecular biology for the detection of mutations in NSCLC.

Inflammatory cell distribution in colon mucosa as a new tool for diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome: A promising pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Currently, there are no histological criteria to diagnose irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Our aims were (i) to examine the distribution of inflammatory cells in the colon of healthy and IBS subjects and (ii) to find histological diagnosis criteria for IBS. METHODS: Colonic biopsies were taken from four distinct regions of the colon from 20 controls (HC) and 11 patients with IBS (4 with constipation (IBS-C) and 7 with diarrhea (IBS-D) and embedded in paraffin. Macrophages, mast cells, eosinophils, and T lymphocytes were immunostained and positive cells counted. KEY RESULTS: In both HC and IBS patients, global cellularity decreased from the cecum to the rectum (P < .01) which is attributed to reduced number of macrophages (P < .05) and eosinophils (P < .001) but not T cells. Mast cells were reduced in IBS (P < .05) but not in HC, particularly in IBS-D (P < .05). Results showed higher number of macrophages in the left colon of IBS subjects than HC (P < .05). CONCLUSION & INFERENCES: Here we report a decreasing gradient of immune cells from the cecum to the rectum of the human colon. Although global cellularity cannot be used to distinguish between IBS and HC, closer analysis of macrophages and mast cells may be useful markers to confirm IBS histologically and to differentiate between IBS-C and IBS-D when clinical presentation alternates between constipation and diarrhoea. This pilot study remains to be confirmed with greater number of patients.