Proof-of-principle pilot study of oropharyngeal air-pulse application in individuals with dysphagia after hemispheric stroke.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that oropharyngeal air-pulse application is associated with increased swallowing rates in individuals with dysphagia secondary to stroke. DESIGN: Case control. SETTING: Stroke rehabilitation hospital or home setting. PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sample of individuals (N=8) with new-onset dysphagia after stroke. INTERVENTIONS: Air-pulse trains were applied to the oropharynx of 8 subjects who presented with dysphagia after hemispheric stroke. Resting swallowing rates were determined for 5 experimental conditions: baseline without air-pulse mouthpiece, baseline with mouthpiece in situ, unilateral right oropharyngeal air-pulse, unilateral left oropharyngeal air-pulse, and bilateral oropharyngeal air-pulse application. Individual swallowing responses were analyzed using a 2-SD band method. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Swallowing rate (swallows/min). RESULTS: Swallowing rates associated with bilateral air-pulse application were greater than baseline in 4 of the 8 subjects. The 4 subjects who demonstrated this response to air-pulse application had greater baseline swallowing rates than did subjects whose swallowing rates were not altered in association with air-pulse application. CONCLUSIONS: Oropharyngeal air-pulse trains can be applied in individuals with swallowing impairment. Air-pulse application is associated with increased resting swallowing rates in some individuals with dysphagia secondary to hemispheric stroke. Further research should extend this proof-of-principle study by examining the efficacy of oropharyngeal air-pulse application in terms of improved swallowing and related outcomes in dysphagic stroke through a large randomized trial.

A Feasibility Study Involving Recruitment and Screening for Aphasia in Acute Stroke: Emerging Viability of the English Adaptation of the Language Screening Test (LASTen).

OBJECTIVES: We describe recruitment feasibility for language screening in acute stroke using the English adaptation the Language Screening Test (LASTen), originally developed in French. We also elucidate preliminary measurement properties of LASTen in patients with and without aphasia. DESIGN: Prospective eligibility tracking, recruitment, and screening for aphasia using the 2 parallel forms, LASTen-A and LASTen-B. SETTING: The Neurovascular Unit and the Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Stroke Unit of a tertiary care hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Stroke patients (N=12) with hyperacute to subacute stroke. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Numbers of eligible patients and recruitment viability, individual performance indicators for both LASTen versions (15 points each) in 12 patients grouped by aphasia status, and reliability of the 2 parallel forms. RESULTS: There were 25 eligible stroke patients over 1 month. All 12 recruited patients consented to testing. The patients ranged in age from 29 to 85 years, and 5 were women. Three patients had intracerebral hemorrhage, and 6 had aphasia (mild to severe). The median LASTen scores in patients with and without aphasia were 10 (interquartile range, 8) and 15 (interquartile range, 0), respectively. Five patients had discrepant scores across versions involving a 1-point difference. One patient with aphasia had a 5-point difference, demonstrating improvement on the second version. The Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.95 for parallel form reliability. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirmed that LASTen appears to function as designed. There was score heterogeneity for patients with aphasia and desired ceiling effects for those without aphasia, alongside excellent parallel form reliability. The findings provide the impetus for a large-scale diagnostic accuracy trial in acute stroke patients.