Evaluation of hemodynamic changes and patient-reported outcome measures in surgical therapy with or without intravenous sedation: a prospective controlled clinical study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether intravenous (IV) sedation would contribute to the stabilization of patients' hemodynamics during periodontal and oral surgical procedures, and to evaluate the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Periodontal or oral surgery patients were recruited and distributed into two groups: (1) sedation group (SG): intravenous sedation plus local anesthesia; (2) control group (CG): local anesthesia only. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP), heart rate (HR), and oxygen saturation (SaO2), were monitored at 15-min intervals from sitting in the dental chair (baseline) until the end of the treatment. In addition, a subjective assessment of PROMs was obtained through a post-operative questionnaire. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients (25 in SG and 24 in CG) were included. The highest SBP and DBP were significantly higher in CG compared to the SG (141.1 ± 18.4 and 133.6 ± 15.1, respectively in SBP; and 85.5 ± 11.0 and 82.9 ± 10.1, respectively in DBP), but no mean significant differences were found between groups (P value of 0.85 and 0.72 for systolic and diastolic BP, respectively). HR and SaO2 did not show statistical intra- and inter-group differences. The overall patient satisfaction score was significantly higher in the SG group compared to CG. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous moderate sedation seems to contribute to the stabilization of patient's hemodynamics, especially the systolic blood pressure, although small differences have been found. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Intravenous sedation seems to contribute to stabilize the hemodynamic values, and enhances the patient satisfaction after periodontal and oral surgical treatment in the dental office.

Digitally-Guided Lateral Sinus Floor Elevation with Simultaneous Implant Placement: Three Case Reports with Technical Considerations.

INTRODUCTION: A sinus floor elevation via lateral window (LSFE) is one of the most widely used bone augmentation procedures for implant therapy in the posterior area of the maxilla.  Locating and preparing a correct opening window on the lateral sinus wall is a key step of this procedure. Conventionally, the surgeon design and locate the window after the flap is reflected based upon the information obtained from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images or other diagnostic aids. Nevertheless, in spite of the advancements in CBCT imaging, clinicians may still experience hardship in situating and procuring meticulous access to the maxillary sinus by using CBCT alone. Therefore, in cases requiring a LSFE simultaneous to implant placement, a maxillary sinus surgical guide (MSSG) has been tested and reported to be the amiable method to be utilized as a conjunct, to prevent unpredictable consequences according to its application in implying both the direction for the implant and the location of the lateral window. CASE SERIES: This article presents 3 clinical cases with a fully digital approach to guide the opening of the lateral wall of the maxillary sinus, as well as the simultaneous placement of a single implant in an ideal 3D position. Based on the CBCT images and intraoral scan, a surgical guide was fabricated base on 3D software. During the surgery, this teeth-supported template can be placed intraorally, guiding sinus window opening preparation. CONCLUSION: This technique makes the sinus window opening procedure simple and predictable, reduces surgical time as well as the risk of complications, and allows the placement of the implant in the ideal 3D position.

Digitally Guided Lateral Sinus Floor Elevation With Simultaneous Implant Placement: 3 Case Reports With Technical Considerations.

A sinus floor elevation via lateral window (LSFE) is one of the most widely used bone augmentation procedures for implant therapy in the posterior area of the maxilla. Locating and preparing a correct opening window on the lateral sinus wall is a key step of this procedure. Conventionally, the surgeon designs and locates the window after the flap is reflected based on the information obtained from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images or other diagnostic aids. Nevertheless, in spite of the advancements in CBCT imaging, clinicians may still experience hardships in situating and procuring meticulous access to the maxillary sinus by using CBCT alone. Therefore, in cases requiring an LSFE simultaneous to implant placement, a maxillary sinus surgical guide has been tested and reported to be the amiable method to be utilized as a conjunct to prevent unpredictable consequences according to its application in implying both the direction for the implant and the location of the lateral window. This article presents 3 clinical cases with a fully digital approach to guide the opening of the lateral wall of the maxillary sinus as well as the simultaneous placement of a single implant in an ideal 3D position. Based on the CBCT images and intraoral scan, a surgical guide was fabricated based on 3D software. During surgery, this teeth-supported template can be placed intraorally, guiding sinus window opening preparation. This technique makes the sinus window opening procedure simple and predictable, reduces surgical time and the risk of complications, and allows the placement of the implant in the ideal 3D position.

Digital planning for two-implant-supported overdenture and bone reduction guide using cone-beam computed tomography: Simple features for predictable outcomes.

The two-implant-supported mandibular overdenture is considered a reliable treatment option to restore masticatory function. Digital planning has been shown to improve the precision and accuracy of the surgical procedure. The outcomes are indeed pertinent to the ideal three-dimentional positioning of the implant placement. Recently, the uses of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and intraoral scan have improved greatly the workflow of digital planning; however, the sophisticated technology caused confusion among clinicians. The purpose of this case series was to exhibit the efficacy of a bone-supported guide in applying simultaneous implant placement and bone reduction, solely based on CBCT data. The bone reduction can therefore be determined accordingly, by adding windows to the guide, allowing the clinician to decide the amount of bone reduction as well as the location for implant placement. This novel surgical guide would not only fit properly on the bone but also provide the benefits of less-invasive surgery and the opportunity to place implants parallel. The  digital workflow described not only simplifies the fabrication process but also yields predictable surgical outcomes.

Accidental ingestion of a dental object during a periodontal surgical procedure on an IV sedated patient: Case management.

INTRODUCTION: Foreign-body aspiration (FBA) and ingestion (FBI) are rare but serious events that occur in dental offices throughout the world every year. Such events can have significant medical, legal, and financial consequences for both the dental clinician and the patient. By presenting this case study, we aim to highlight the proper management and possible sequelae of such an event. METHODS AND RESULTS: A 72-year-old woman underwent a dental procedure with intravenous sedation. In the process of dental treatment, a dental bur was accidentally ingested. The patient was promptly referred to an urgent care clinic, where serial abdominal radiographs were taken over several days to track the course of the bur through the digestive system. The bur was successfully removed without complication. CONCLUSION: Prompt management and referral of dental FBA and FBI cases, followed by successful object retrieval, lead to uncomplicated resolution of the event. KEY POINTS: Why is this case new information? This case presents the proper management of the FBA and FBI, particularly for IV sedated patients who require immediate action to mitigate and prevent serious complications. What are the keys to the successful management of this case and how can the risk of FBA and FBI be mitigated? The use of throat packs or rubber dams helps prevent foreign body aspiration and ingestion. Attaching floss to appliances and objects when appliances are used intraorally. (Specifically, to implant guide pins and implant screwdrivers.) Thorough isolation of the oropharynx from the mouth using a barrier, such as a gauze pad or rubber dam, during bracket placement, orthodontic appliance adjustment, and screwing or cementing of implant crowns Short and extra short implants should be connected by ligature to the implant handpiece. What are the primary limitations to success in this case? Lack of a throat pack Failure to confirm connection of bur to handpiece Patient's anatomy (redundant colon) preventing natural expulsion of the bur.

Submerged vs non-submerged reconstructive approach for surgical treatment of peri-implantitis: Re-analysis of two prospective clinical studies.

AIM: This report stems from a homogeneous patient cohort from two similarly designed prospective controlled studies in the same center on surgical reconstructive treatment of peri-implantitis. The aim of this re-analysis study was exploring prognostic factors associated with surgical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Individual patient data of both studies were gathered. The initial study employed a submerged healing approach via primary wound closure with implant supra-structure removal and complete coverage of grafted sites. The second study employed a non-submerged healing protocol in which healing abutments were kept in place and the implant was not fully submerged. Both studies measured all outcomes at similar timepoints throughout 1 year, to include clinical and radiographic defect fill (DF and RDF), reduction of pocket depth (PDR) and bleeding on probing (BOP). Multi-level regression was used for statistical assessment of outcomes, relative to the impact of site-/local-, surgical- and patient-related variables. RESULTS: Overall, 59 implants (30 in submerged and 29 in the non-submerged group) were treated. A statistically significant higher DF (on average 0.9 mm higher), RDF (1.7 mm) and PDR (1.3 mm) were observed when a submerged reconstructive approach was performed, whereas BOP reduction was similar. After controlling for treatment (submerged/non-submerged), there were no other significant associations with patient- (age, gender, smoking, prior periodontitis etc.), or implant-related (previous prosthesis type, arch, KTW, etc.) factors. CONCLUSION: Within its limitations, we conclude that a submerged reconstructive approach for surgical management of peri-implantitis leads to significantly enhanced clinical and radiographic outcomes when compared to a non-submerged approach.