Wait time management strategies for total joint replacement surgery: sustainability and unintended consequences.

BACKGROUND: In Canada, long waiting times for core specialized services have consistently been identified as a key barrier to access. Governments and organizations have responded with strategies for better access management, notably for total joint replacement (TJR) of the hip and knee. While wait time management strategies (WTMS) are promising, the factors which influence their sustainable implementation at the organizational level are understudied. Consequently, this study examined organizational and systemic factors that made it possible to sustain waiting times for TJR within federally established limits and for at least 18 months or more. METHODS: The research design is a multiple case study of WTMS implementation. Five cases were selected across five Canadian provinces. Three success levels were pre-defined: 1) the WTMS maintained compliance with requirements for more than 18 months; 2) the WTMS met requirements for 18 months but could not sustain the level thereafter; 3) the WTMS never met requirements. For each case, we collected documents and interviewed key informants. We analyzed systemic and organizational factors, with particular attention to governance and leadership, culture, resources, methods, and tools. RESULTS: We found that successful organizations had specific characteristics: 1) management of the whole care continuum, 2) strong clinical leadership; 3) dedicated committees to coordinate and sustain strategy; 4) a culture based on trust and innovation. All strategies led to relatively similar unintended consequences. The main negative consequence was an initial increase in waiting times for TJR and the main positive consequence was operational enhancement of other areas of specialization based on the TJR model. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights important differences in factors which help to achieve and sustain waiting times. To be sustainable, a WTMS needs to generate greater synergies between contextual-level strategy (provincial or regional) and organizational objectives and constraints. Managers at the organizational level should be vigilant with regard to unintended consequences that a WTMS in one area can have for other areas of care. A more systemic approach to sustainability can help avoid or mitigate undesirable unintended consequences.

Sustainability: orthopaedic surgery wait time management strategies.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to examine Canadian organizational and systemic factors that made it possible to keep wait times within federally established limits for at least 18 months. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The research design is a multiple cases study. The paper selected three cases: Case 1 - staff were able to maintain compliance with requirements for more than 18 months; Case 2 - staff were able to meet requirements for 18 months, but unable to sustain this level; Case 3 - staff were never able to meet the requirements. For each case the authors interviewed persons involved in the strategies and collected documents. The paper analysed systemic and organizational-level factors; including governance and leadership, culture, resources, methods and tools. FINDINGS: Findings indicate that the hospital that was able to maintain compliance with the wait time requirements had specific characteristics: an exclusive mandate to do only hip and knee replacement surgery; motivated staff who were not distracted by other concerns; and a strong team spirit. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: The authors' research highlights an important gradient between three cases regarding the factors that sustain waiting times. The paper show that the hospital factory model seems attractive in a super-specialized surgery context. However, patients are selected for simple surgeries, without complications, and so this cannot be considered a unique model.

Criteria for referring patients with renal disease for nephrology consultation: a review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Referrals to nephrologists comprise not only patients with chronic kidney disease but also those with other nephrological conditions. There may be confusion about when to refer a patient to a nephrologist. We conducted a literature review to identify preexisting priority-setting, triage or referral criteria developed to guide referrals from primary care to a nephrologist. METHODS: Medline and Cochrane databases were searched (1997 to 2008) using search terms: referral, consultation, triage and a list of specified nephrological conditions. Abstracts were assessed by 2 reviewers using criteria to determine relevance. Citation and hand searches were done on papers selected for review; relevant Web sites were also consulted. Two reviewers read all selected papers to determine if they met the objectives. One reviewer abstracted relevant data from each retained reference and compiled the results into a report, which was reviewed by 3 practicing nephrologists. RESULTS: There were 18 retained papers, reports or Web sites; 4 of these were professional national guidelines. All but 1 reference cited serum creatinine or estimated glomerular filtration rate as a criterion for referral. Other referral criteria were proteinuria (8 sources), blood pressure (5 sources), electrolytes (3 sources) or hematuria (3 sources). There was inconsistency in referral recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: The differing advice identified in the literature results in confusion as to when patients should be referred to a nephrologist. Nephrologists, an already strained human resource, must prioritize requests for consultation using an undefined and no doubt inconsistent metric. Standardized, diagnosis-neutral criteria would benefit both primary care providers and nephrologists.

Follow-through after calling a nurse telephone advice line: a population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Nurse telephone advice (NTA) lines, a major initiative in primary health care reform, provide symptom triage and health information. Compliance studies utilizing database analysis are frequently limited to a defined population, such as children or Emergency Department (ED) users. OBJECTIVES: To explore caller characteristics associated with following NTA advice to go to the ED, see a health care professional or self-care for Calgary, Canada (population 1 million). METHODS: NTA data were linked with utilization data to assess ED and physician visits following a call. Four nurse advice categories were defined: go to ED, health care provider in 24 hours, health care provider in 72 hours if symptoms persist and self-care. Follow-through was defined based on health care utilization within specified time periods following the call. Logistic regression identified characteristics associated with follow-through of NTA nurse advice; characteristics included age, sex, neighbourhood income, health status, time of call and type of care protocol. RESULTS: Follow-through was highest for self-care advice (83.7%), followed by ED advice (52.3%) and then 24-hour advice (43.2%). Lower follow-through on ED or 24-hour advice was associated with age <4 years, and having lower income, and the opposite was true for self-care advice. Patients with a cardiac complaint had the highest odds of following ED advice. Patients with a gastrointestinal or obstetrics/gynaecology/genitourinary complaint were less likely to follow 24-hour advice. Patients with fever were less likely to follow self-care advice. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding characteristics associated with lower follow-through may help the NTA service to refine its approaches to clients.

Predictors of serious complications associated with lower gastrointestinal endoscopy in a major city-wide health region.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data regarding complications associated with colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy in usual clinical practice in Canada. OBJECTIVE: To determine the risk factors for lower gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy-associated complications in usual clinical practice. METHODS: All outpatient lower GI endoscopies performed in Winnipeg (Manitoba) between April 1, 2004 and March 31, 2006, were identified from the provincial physicians' claims database. All subsequent hospital admissions within 30 days that documented potential complications associated with lower GI endoscopies were identified from the electronic hospital discharges database and reviewed. Multivariate generalized estimating equation regression analysis was performed to determine independent factors (patient, endoscopist and procedure) associated with the risk of developing complications. RESULTS: There were 29,990 outpatient lower GI endoscopies performed in Winnipeg during the years studied. Seventy-seven (0.26%) procedures were associated with complications requiring hospitalization within 30 days of the index procedure. Stricture dilation (rate ratio [RR] 23.14; 95% CI 6.70 to 76.51), polypectomy (RR 5.93; 95% CI 3.66 to 9.62), increasing patient age (for each year increase in age, RR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.05) and performance of endoscopy by low-volume endoscopists (fewer than 200 procedures per year, RR 2.28; 95% CI 1.18 to 4.42) and family physicians (RR 2.23; 95% CI 1.39 to 3.58) were independently associated with complications. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study suggest that increasing patient age, complex procedures and performance of the index procedure by low-volume endoscopists are independent risk factors for lower GI endoscopy-associated complications in usual clinical practice. This suggests that it may be time to consider implementing minimum volume requirements for endoscopists performing non-screening lower GI endoscopies.

Mortality, cause of death and life expectancy of Chinese Canadians in Alberta.

OBJECTIVE: To describe mortality, cause of death and life expectancy among Chinese (both immigrant and Canadian-born) and other Canadians in the Province of Alberta. METHODS: A Chinese surname list was applied to the Alberta Health Insurance Plan and Vital Statistics Birth registry databases to define the Chinese population, and to the Vital Statistics Death registry to determine deaths among Chinese in Alberta from 1995 to 2003. Age- and sex-specific mortality, cause of death and life expectancy were calculated. RESULTS: Of nearly 3 million Alberta residents, about 4% were Chinese in 2003. The age-adjusted mortality for Chinese was 4.2 per 1000 and for non-Chinese 6.2 per 1000 population. Infant mortality was lower for Chinese (4.9/1000 live births) than non-Chinese (6.2/1000 live births). Life expectancy at birth was 6.3 years longer for Chinese males compared to non-Chinese males (83.3 versus 77.0), and 5.4 years longer for Chinese females compared to non-Chinese females (87.9 versus 82.5). Cancer, heart disease and stroke were the leading causes of death for both Chinese and non-Chinese Albertans. CONCLUSIONS: The Chinese ethnic population of Alberta had lower mortality and longer life expectancy than remaining Albertans, suggesting that the Chinese population has better health status than other Albertans. Reasons for the health gap between Chinese and non-Chinese populations should be further explored.

The Western Canada Waiting List Project: development of a priority referral score for hip and knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Recognizing the concerns about long waiting times to see some specialists in Canada, and the burden this places on both primary care and specialist clinicians, the Western Canada Waiting List (WCWL) undertook the Primary Care Project. The goal was to develop a valid, reliable, standardized prioritization tool for use by primary care providers in making referrals to specialists. WCWL is a 20-partner collaboration committed to addressing long waiting times to access scheduled health care services. METHODS: A previously developed prioritization tool for hip and knee replacement was adapted for use by family doctors, based on expert feedback from a clinical panel of primary care providers and from orthopaedic surgeons. Rater assessments of standardized paper cases were used to generate weights for criteria items in the Priority Referral Score (PRS). Intraclass correlations (ICCs) were calculated to assess reproducibility, and weights were estimated using a mixed-effects model. The weights and criteria items were modified following feedback of these results to the panel. The resulting PRS was reliability-tested with a different set of standardized case descriptions. RESULTS: One item was removed from the Hip and Knee Surgery tool and two items more pertinent to family medicine (mobility and medications) were added. The resulting eight-item PRS had a test-retest ICC of 0.84. The mean intrarater ICC was 0.79. CONCLUSIONS: An eight-item priority-setting tool has been developed to assist in queuing patients in order of urgency when they are referred to an orthopaedic surgeon for possible hip or knee arthroplasty. The tool had excellent inter- and intrarater reliability and was seen to have face validity by a panel of primary care providers who advised on the project.

Health care utilization for injury in cataract surgery patients.

BACKGROUND: Although visual impairment has been associated with falls, fractures, and other injuries, the relation between cataract surgery and injuries is unclear. This study assesses whether persons waiting for cataract surgery are at increased risk of requiring health care services for an injury compared with a control group, and, if so, whether the risk changes after cataract surgery. METHODS: This is a retrospective case-control study of first-eye cataract surgery recipients in Manitoba in fiscal 1999-2000. Health care administrative data and cataract waiting list registry data were the data sources. Cataract surgery recipients were matched 3:1 with controls on age, sex, and region. The outcome measure was a diagnosis of injury identified using International Classification of Diseases 9 (Clinical Modification) codes in the physician or hospital claims. Data were analyzed for 2 years before and after cataract surgery. A multivariate logistic regression adjusted for potential confounders, such as burden of illness, presence of diabetes, stroke or dementia, number of different medications, and use of psychoactive mediations. RESULTS: There were 3811 cases and 11,359 controls. Cases were found to be much more likely to have a history of stroke, diabetes, or dementia, and were more likely to have been prescribed multiple medications or a psychoactive drug. After adjustment for comorbidities and pharmaceutical use, cases had a significantly higher probability of an injury before surgery (0.2784 vs. 0.2538; chi2 = 5.01, p = 0.03). This decreased significantly after surgery to 0.2333 (chi2 = 18.05, p < 0.0001). After surgery, the adjusted probability of injury was lower among cases (0.2333) than controls (0.2385), though this was not significant. The adjusted odds ratio for having an injury was 1.032 (95% confidence interval 1.026, 1.039) per week of waiting. INTERPRETATION: Cataract patients have a significantly increased risk of injury compared with controls before surgery, but their risk decreases to that of controls following surgery. Given that cataract patients also bear a much heavier burden of illness, including conditions that are associated with a higher risk of falls and injuries, the imperative of performing cataract surgery without delay becomes even more pressing.

A systematic literature review of the evidence on benchmarks for cataract surgery waiting time.

BACKGROUND: This review offered critical input to the work of Canadian federal-provincial-territorial Deputy Ministers of Health on establishing evidence-based benchmarks for waiting times (WTs) for cataract surgery. The study purpose was to synthesize the evidence regarding the relations among patient characteristics, WT, and health outcomes for patients on waiting lists for cataract surgery. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted using the Cochrane methodology. RESULTS: Seventeen studies were considered. The studies varied in their quality, study design, sample characteristics, and outcome measures. Because of the heterogeneity in studies, a qualitative analysis was used. Key findings were: individuals with cataracts are at an increased risk of falls, hip fractures, and motor vehicle crashes, the absence of pre-existing eye disease, and better baseline visual acuity and visual function are associated with better outcomes, and average WTs of 6-12 months are associated with a decline in visual acuity in patients while waiting. INTERPRETATION: Although the evidence does not indicate a precise benchmark, it does support timely access to surgery for individuals undergoing cataract surgery. In December 2005, health ministers set a goal to provide cataract surgery within 16 weeks for patients at high risk.

Do administrative databases accurately measure waiting times for medical care? Evidence from general surgery.

We abstracted the records of patients from general surgeons' offices in Winnipeg to compare waiting times from charts (i.e., the gold standard) with waiting times using administrative data. The administrative data method relies on physicians' billing data to identify a visit to the surgeon preoperatively to mark the start of the waiting time. There was no difference between waiting times using patient records versus administrative data. The study supported the use of administrative data to monitor waiting times.

Variation in health services utilization among ethnic populations.

BACKGROUND: Although racial and ethnic disparities in health services utilization and outcomes have been extensively studied in several countries, this issue has received little attention in Canada. We therefore analyzed data from the 2001 Canadian Community Health Survey to compare the use of health services by members of visible minority groups and nonmembers (white people) in Canada. METHODS: Logistic regression was used to compare physician contacts and hospital admissions during the 12 months before the survey and recent cancer screening tests. Explanatory variables recorded from the survey included visible minority status, sociodemographic factors and health measures. RESULTS: Respondents included 7057 members of visible minorities and 114,255 white people for analysis. After adjustments for sociodemographic and health characteristics, we found that minority members were more likely than white people to have had contact with a general practitioner (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14-1.42), but not specialist physicians (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.93-1.10). Members of visible minorities were less likely to have been admitted to hospital (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.70- 0.98), tested for prostate-specific antigen (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.52-0.79), administered a mammogram (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.59-0.80) or given a Pap test (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.39-0.56). INTERPRETATION: Use of health services in Canada varies considerably by ethnicity according to type of service. Although there is no evidence that members of visible minorities use general physician and specialist services less often than white people, their utilization of hospital and cancer screening services is significantly less.

Can the quality of care in family practice be measured using administrative data?

OBJECTIVE: To explore the feasibility of using administrative data to develop process indicators for measuring quality in primary care. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: The Population Health Research Data Repository (Repository) housed at the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy which includes physician claims, hospital discharge abstracts, pharmaceutical use (Drug Program Information Network (DPIN)), and the Manitoba Immunization Monitoring Program (MIMS) for all residents of Manitoba, Canada who used the health care system during the 2001/02 fiscal year. Family physicians were identified from the Physician Resource Database. Indicators were developed based on a literature review and focus group validation. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Data files were extracted from administrative data available in the Repository. We extracted data based on the ICD-9-CM codes and ATC-class drugs prescribed and then linked them to the Physician Resource Database. Physician practices were defined by allocating patients to their most responsible physician. Every family physician in Manitoba that met the inclusion criteria (having either 5 or 10 eligible patients depending on the indicator) was 'scored' on each indicator. Physicians were then grouped according to the proportion of the patients allocated to their practice who received the recommended care for the specific indicator. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Using administrative health data we were able to develop and measure eight indicators of quality of care covering both preventive care services and chronic disease management. The number of eligible physicians and patients varied for each indicator as did the percent of patients with recommended care, per physician. For example, the childhood immunization indicator included 544 physicians who, on average, provided immunization for 65 percent of their patients. CONCLUSIONS: Quality of care provided by family physicians can be measured using administrative data. Despite the limitations addressed in this paper, this work establishes a practical methodology to measure quality of care provided by family physicians that can be used for quality improvement initiatives.

Identifying priorities in methodological research using ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data: report from an international consortium.

BACKGROUND: Health administrative data are frequently used for health services and population health research. Comparative research using these data has been facilitated by the use of a standard system for coding diagnoses, the International Classification of Diseases (ICD). Research using the data must deal with data quality and validity limitations which arise because the data are not created for research purposes. This paper presents a list of high-priority methodological areas for researchers using health administrative data. METHODS: A group of researchers and users of health administrative data from Canada, the United States, Switzerland, Australia, China and the United Kingdom came together in June 2005 in Banff, Canada to discuss and identify high-priority methodological research areas. The generation of ideas for research focussed not only on matters relating to the use of administrative data in health services and population health research, but also on the challenges created in transitioning from ICD-9 to ICD-10. After the brain-storming session, voting took place to rank-order the suggested projects. Participants were asked to rate the importance of each project from 1 (low priority) to 10 (high priority). Average ranks were computed to prioritise the projects. RESULTS: Thirteen potential areas of research were identified, some of which represented preparatory work rather than research per se. The three most highly ranked priorities were the documentation of data fields in each country's hospital administrative data (average score 8.4), the translation of patient safety indicators from ICD-9 to ICD-10 (average score 8.0), and the development and validation of algorithms to verify the logic and internal consistency of coding in hospital abstract data (average score 7.0). CONCLUSION: The group discussions resulted in a list of expert views on critical international priorities for future methodological research relating to health administrative data. The consortium's members welcome contacts from investigators involved in research using health administrative data, especially in cross-jurisdictional collaborative studies or in studies that illustrate the application of ICD-10.

Perspectives of orthopaedic surgeons on patients' appropriateness for total joint arthroplasty: a qualitative study.

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: As total joint arthroplasty (TJA) rates rise, there is need to ensure appropriate use. Our objective was to elucidate surgeons' perspectives on appropriateness for TJA. METHODS: Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted in a sample of orthopaedic surgeons that perform TJA in three Canadian Provinces. Surgeons were asked to discuss their criteria for TJA appropriateness for osteoarthritis; potential value of a decision-support tool to select appropriate candidates; and the role of other stakeholders in assessing appropriateness. RESULTS: Of 17 surgeons approached for participation, 14 completed interviews (12 males; 7 aged <50 years; 5 academic; 8 in urban practices). Surgeons agreed that pain and pain impact on patients' quality of life and function were the key criteria to assess appropriateness for TJA, but that these concepts were difficult to assess and not always congruent with structural changes on joint radiography. Some used a wider range of criteria, including their assessments of patient expectations, ability to cope and readiness for surgery. While patient age was not identified as a criterion itself, surgeons did acknowledge that appropriateness criteria may differ for younger versus older patients. Most agreed that a decision-support tool would help ensure that all elements of appropriateness are assessed in a standardized manner, albeit the ultimate decision to offer surgery must be left to the discretion of surgeons, within the context of the doctor-patient relationship. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons recognized the need for a tool to support decision making for TJA, particularly in the context of increasing surgical demand in younger patients with less severe arthritis. The work to develop and test such a decision-support tool is underway.

Appropriateness for Total Joint Replacement: Perspectives of Decision-Makers.

BACKGROUND: Improving access to total joint replacement (TJR) has been a priority. Without robust mechanisms to ensure appropriateness, these procedures may be overused, incurring substantial costs. In that context, decision-makers are particularly concerned with the appropriateness of TJR. OBJECTIVE: While our previous research focused on the appropriateness of TJR from clinical and patient perspectives, this study is aimed at understanding decision-makers' perspectives. METHODS: Using a semi-structured guide, we interviewed a convenience sample of decision-makers in four Canadian provinces (Alberta, Manitoba, Nova Scotia and Quebec) between February and March 2013. For the purposes of this study, a decision-maker was defined as a manager, institutional leader or policy maker. RESULTS: Fifteen interviews were conducted with decision-makers at ministry (n = 3), regional (n = 6) and institutional levels (n = 8). Decision-makers see themselves as having a key role in the appropriateness discourse, that of optimizing resource allocation and efficient delivery of services for TJR, to improve population outcomes. CONCLUSION: The decision-makers' view of appropriateness recognizes the importance of the clinical view, but it offers a very different input into the appropriateness discourse, more closely aligned with appropriateness of setting, which refers to cost-effectiveness considerations.

Non-clinical factors associated with variation in cataract surgery waiting times in Manitoba.

Cataract surgery is the highest-volume surgical procedure in Canada, with over 200,000 performed annually, mostly (85%) on persons aged 65 or older. Concerns have been raised about wait times to access this procedure. This study explores the relationship between waiting times for cataract surgery in Manitoba and a variety of characteristics, including age, sex, socio-economic status, region of residence, health status, surgeon, and surgeon's caseload. The study included 6114 individuals who had first-eye cataract surgery between November 1, 1998, and March 31, 2000, in Winnipeg, MB. Significant predictors of variation in wait times were age, sex, having a hospitalization while waiting, and surgeon. The model explained 32.5 per cent of the variance in wait times; specific surgeon independently explained 29.5 per cent of the variance. Median waiting times varied widely by surgeon, ranging from 61 to 399 days. Differences in surgeons' expected wait times should be available to patients and referring clinicians.

Use of acute care hospitals by long-stay patients: who, how much, and why?

The effects of long-term hospitalizations can be severe, especially among older adults. In Manitoba, between fiscal years 1991/1992 and 1999/2000, 40 per cent of acute care hospital days were used by the 5 per cent of patients who had long stays, defined as stays of more than 30 days. These proportions were remarkably stable, despite major changes in the bed supply. Approximately two-thirds of long-stay patients were aged 75 or older. Medical record review for a small sample of long-stay medical patients aged 75 or older revealed that 42 per cent of the days spent in hospital were spent either awaiting transfer to another level of care (home care, nursing home, or chronic care), or were due to in-hospital factors, such as awaiting consults, tests, or treatments. Hospital information systems and early discharge planning may help to alleviate lengthy discharge delays and result in better care for these patients.

Estimating nursing home bed demand: 20-year projection from administrative data and stakeholder input.

We describe methods to project the requirement for nursing home beds in Manitoba until 2020. Three methods were developed: Trend, Recent Use, and Combined. The first two methods yielded widely divergent projections, differing by 3,400 beds. Stakeholder feedback and theoretical analysis suggested the third (Combined) method, the arithmetic mean of the first two. Model testing found the Combined method to be the most accurate. The projections have been used by RHAs for their planning activities.

Perspectives of Canadian Stakeholders on Criteria for Appropriateness for Total Joint Arthroplasty in Patients With Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: As rates of total joint arthroplasty (TJA) for osteoarthritis (OA) rise, there is a need to ensure appropriate use. We undertook this study to develop criteria for appropriate use of TJA. METHODS: In prior work, we used qualitative methods to separately assess OA patients' and arthroplasty surgeons' perceptions regarding appropriateness of patient candidates for TJA. The current study reviewed the appropriateness themes that emerged from each group, and a series of statements were developed to reflect each unique theme or criterion. A group of arthroplasty surgeons then indicated their level of agreement with each statement using electronic voting. Where ≤70% agreed or disagreed, the criterion was discussed and revised, and revoting occurred. In standardized telephone interviews, OA patient focus group participants indicated their level of agreement with each revised criterion. RESULTS: Qualitative research in 58 OA patients and 14 arthroplasty surgeons identified 11 appropriateness criteria. Member-checking in 15 surgeons (including 5 who had participated in the qualitative study) resulted in agreement on 6 revised criteria. These included evidence of arthritis on joint examination, patient-reported symptoms negatively impacting quality of life, an adequate trial of appropriate nonsurgical treatment, realistic patient expectations of surgery, mental and physical readiness of patient for surgery, and patient-surgeon agreement that potential benefits exceed risks. Thirty-six of the original 58 OA patient focus group participants (62.1%) participated in the member-check interviews and endorsed all 6 criteria. CONCLUSION: Patients and surgeons jointly endorsed 6 criteria for assessment of TJA appropriateness in OA patients. Prospective validation of these criteria (assessed preoperatively) as predictive of postoperative patient-reported outcomes is under way and will inform development of a surgeon-patient decision-support tool for assessment of TJA appropriateness.

Long stay patients in Winnipeg acute care hospitals.

Risk factors for long-stays (more than 30 days) in Winnipeg hospitals were identified, including sociodemographic, illness, and system characteristics. The largest determinant of length of stay was discharge destination; discharge to a nursing home increased length of stay by 173% and 89% for medical and surgical patients, respectively. Hospital of stay also made a big difference for patients discharged to nursing homes. Only 13% of long-stay patients were discharged to a nursing home; 52% were discharged home. Other factors which were associated with an extended length of stay included, hospitalization for stroke, cognitive impairment, rehabilitation therapy, PEG tube insertion, and inhospital fall.