Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Europace ; 19(9): 1579-1584, 2017 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28934410

RESUMO

The aim of this European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) survey was to evaluate clinical practice regarding cardio-oncologic patients, with special focus on patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) planned for anticancer radiotherapy (RT), among members of the EHRA electrophysiology research network. Of the 36 responding centres, 89% managed patients who were diagnosed or treated oncologically, and this diagnosis affected 1-5% of cardiovascular patients in majority of centres (57%). The main side effects of anticancer therapy in patients treated by cardiologists were thromboembolic complications and left ventricular dysfunction (both reported as 'frequent' by 43% of the centres). The main agents associated with complications were anthracyclines, RT, and monoclonal antibodies. Echocardiography was the most common method of screening for cardiovascular complications (93%), and 10% of the centres did not routinely screen for treatment-induced cardiotoxicity. Opinions on the safe radiation dose, methods of device shielding, and risk calculation prior to RT in CIED patients differed among centres. Precaution measures in high-risk CIED patients were very heterogeneous among centres. Our survey has shown that the awareness of cardiac consequences of anticancer therapy is high, despite relatively low proportion of patients treated oncologically among all cardiovascular patients. There is a consensus of which screening methods should be used for cardiotoxicity of anticancer treatment, but the apprehension of screening necessity is low. Methods of risk assessment and safety measures in CIED patients undergoing RT are very heterogeneous among the European centres, underscoring the need for standardization of the approach to cardio-oncologic patients.


Assuntos
Estimulação Cardíaca Artificial , Cardiologia/tendências , Cardioversão Elétrica/instrumentação , Cardiopatias/terapia , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Marca-Passo Artificial , Radioterapia (Especialidade)/tendências , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Estimulação Cardíaca Artificial/efeitos adversos , Estimulação Cardíaca Artificial/mortalidade , Morte Súbita Cardíaca/etiologia , Morte Súbita Cardíaca/prevenção & controle , Desfibriladores Implantáveis , Remoção de Dispositivo , Cardioversão Elétrica/efeitos adversos , Cardioversão Elétrica/mortalidade , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Cardiopatias/diagnóstico , Cardiopatias/mortalidade , Cardiopatias/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Desenho de Prótese , Falha de Prótese , Doses de Radiação , Exposição à Radiação/efeitos adversos , Radioterapia/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA