Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Lancet ; 392(10160): 2171-2179, 2018 11 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30322724

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Preterm delivery during pregnancy (<37 weeks' gestation) is a leading cause of perinatal mortality and morbidity. Treating bacterial vaginosis during pregnancy can reduce poor outcomes, such as preterm birth. We aimed to investigate whether treatment of bacterial vaginosis decreases late miscarriages or spontaneous very preterm birth. METHODS: PREMEVA was a double-blind randomised controlled trial done in 40 French centres. Women aged 18 years or older with bacterial vaginosis and low-risk pregnancy were eligible for inclusion and were randomly assigned (2:1) to three parallel groups: single-course or triple-course 300 mg clindamycin twice-daily for 4 days, or placebo. Women with high-risk pregnancy outcomes were eligible for inclusion in a high-risk subtrial and were randomly assigned (1:1) to either single-course or triple-course clindamycin. The primary outcome was a composite of late miscarriage (16-21 weeks) or spontaneous very preterm birth (22-32 weeks), which we assessed in all patients with delivery data (modified intention to treat). Adverse events were systematically reported. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00642980. FINDINGS: Between April 1, 2006, and June 30, 2011, we screened 84 530 pregnant women before 14 weeks' gestation. 5630 had bacterial vaginosis, of whom 3105 were randomly assigned to groups in the low-risk trial (n=943 to receive single-course clindamycin, n=968 to receive triple-course clindamycin, and n=958 to receive placebo) or high-risk subtrial (n=122 to receive single-course clindamycin and n=114 to receive triple-course clindamycin). In 2869 low-risk pregnancies, the primary outcome occurred in 22 (1·2%) of 1904 participants receiving clindamycin and 10 (1·0%) of 956 participants receiving placebo (relative risk [RR] 1·10, 95% CI 0·53-2·32; p=0·82). In 236 high-risk pregnancies, the primary outcome occurred in 5 (4·4%) participants in the triple-course clindamycin group and 8 (6·0%) participants in the single-course clindamycin group (RR 0·67, 95% CI 0·23-2·00; p=0·47). In the low-risk trial, adverse events were more common in the clindamycin groups than in the placebo group (58 [3·0%] of 1904 vs 12 [1·3%] of 956; p=0·0035). The most commonly reported adverse event was diarrhoea (30 [1·6%] in the clindamycin groups vs 4 [0·4%] in the placebo group; p=0·0071); abdominal pain was also observed in the clindamycin groups (9 [0·6%] participants) versus none in the placebo group (p=0·034). No severe adverse event was reported in any group. Adverse fetal and neonatal outcomes did not differ significantly between groups in the high-risk subtrial. INTERPRETATION: Systematic screening and subsequent treatment for bacterial vaginosis in women with low-risk pregnancies shows no evidence of risk reduction of late miscarriage or spontaneous very preterm birth. Use of antibiotics to prevent preterm delivery in this patient population should be reconsidered. FUNDING: French Ministry of Health.


Assuntos
Aborto Espontâneo/prevenção & controle , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Clindamicina/uso terapêutico , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/tratamento farmacológico , Nascimento Prematuro/prevenção & controle , Vaginose Bacteriana/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez
2.
BMC Cancer ; 18(1): 139, 2018 02 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29409462

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: While the incidence of esophageal and gastric cancers is increasing, the prognosis of these cancers remains bleak. Endoscopy and surgery are the standard treatments for localized tumors, but multimodal treatments, associated chemotherapy, targeted therapies, immunotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery are needed for the vast majority of patients who present with locally advanced or metastatic disease at diagnosis. Although survival has improved, most patients still present with advanced disease at diagnosis. In addition, most patients exhibit a poor or incomplete response to treatment, experience early recurrence and have an impaired quality of life. Compared with several other cancers, the therapeutic approach is not personalized, and research is much less developed. It is, therefore, urgent to hasten the development of research protocols, and consequently, develop a large, ambitious and innovative tool through which future scientific questions may be answered. This research must be patient-related so that rapid feedback to the bedside is achieved and should aim to identify clinical-, biological- and tumor-related factors that are associated with treatment resistance. Finally, this research should also seek to explain epidemiological and social facets of disease behavior. METHODS: The prospective FREGAT database, established by the French National Cancer Institute, is focused on adult patients with carcinomas of the esophagus and stomach and on whatever might be the tumor stage or therapeutic strategy. The database includes epidemiological, clinical, and tumor characteristics data as well as follow-up, human and social sciences quality of life data, along with a tumor and serum bank. DISCUSSION: This innovative method of research will allow for the banking of millions of data for the development of excellent basic, translational and clinical research programs for esophageal and gastric cancer. This will ultimately improve general knowledge of these diseases, therapeutic strategies and patient survival. This database was initially developed in France on a nationwide basis, but currently, the database is available for worldwide contributions with respect to the input of patient data or the request for data for scientific projects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The FREGAT database has a dedicated website ( www.fregat-database.org ) and is registered on the Clinicaltrials.gov site, number NCT 02526095 , since August 8, 2015.


Assuntos
Bancos de Espécimes Biológicos , Bases de Dados Factuais , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Terapia Combinada , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Feminino , França , Humanos , Internet , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Adulto Jovem
3.
Ann Pathol ; 37(6): 457-466, 2017 Dec.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29196094

RESUMO

Even though esogastric cancers are estimated at 1.5 million new cases worldwide with an expected 2.11 million new cases by 2025, prognosis remains poor and research is unsatisfactory compared to other cancers. There is an urgent need to intensify research via innovative and ambitious programs to improve patient's survival and quality of life. Incidence of esogastric cancers is particularly high in France, and the creation of a national clinicobiological database prospectively collecting epidemiological, human and social, clinical, pathological, biological data, sustained by biobanks of blood and tissues, is a critical point to improve research and care for these cancers considering all determinants of the disease with a more integrated approach. FREGAT clinicobiological database, funded and labeled by the French NCI in 2012, gathers the vast majority of university hospitals and cancer centers in France. This research relies on preexisting networks ensuring its efficacy and quality. Beyond significant increase of inclusions opened since January 2015, the establishment of public multiprivate industrial partnerships and creation of numerous French and European scientific projects, make FREGAT a decisive tool for research on esogastric cancers.


Assuntos
Bases de Dados Factuais , Neoplasias Esofágicas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/epidemiologia , Bancos de Espécimes Biológicos/organização & administração , Coleta de Dados , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Estudos Prospectivos , Manejo de Espécimes , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA