RESUMO
SignificanceAn enduring mystery of development is how its timing is controlled, particularly for development after birth, where timing is highly flexible and depends on environmental conditions, such as food availability and diet. We followed timing of cell- and organism-level events in individual Caenorhabditis elegans larvae developing from hatching to adulthood, uncovering widespread variations in event timing, both between isogenic individuals in the same environment and when changing conditions and genotypes. However, in almost all cases, we found that events occurred at the same time, when time was rescaled by the duration of development measured in each individual. This observation of "temporal scaling" poses strong constraints on models to explain timing of larval development.
Assuntos
Proteínas de Caenorhabditis elegans , Caenorhabditis elegans , Relógios Circadianos , Fatores de Transcrição , Animais , Caenorhabditis elegans/genética , Caenorhabditis elegans/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Proteínas de Caenorhabditis elegans/genética , Proteínas de Caenorhabditis elegans/fisiologia , Regulação da Expressão Gênica no Desenvolvimento , Larva , Fatores de Transcrição/genética , Fatores de Transcrição/fisiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Liver biopsy is the standard in diagnosing liver diseases. Yet, it provides little space to perform comprehensive immune profiling of the liver. Hence, we explored whether fine needle aspirates (FNAs) could be used to elucidate the hepatic immunity in children. METHODS: We enrolled 74 children undergoing diagnostic (nâ=â17) or protocol biopsy (nâ=â57) following liver transplantation (LT). Matched blood and FNAs were obtained. Additionally, explant liver tissue was collected from children (nâ=â14) undergoing LT. Immune cells were isolated from peripheral blood, FNAs and explanted livers. Immune-phenotypical profiling was done by flow cytometry. RESULTS: Biopsied patients (58% female) were at a median age of 46âmonths (interquartile range [IQR]: 12-118) and LT patients (71% female) were 48âmonths (IQR: 21-134, Pâ=â0.78) old. CD69+, a hallmark of tissue-resident immune cells was expressed in 1.3% of CD3+ T cells from blood being higher in FNA (20%) and tissue (49%, Pâ<â0.001). CD4+ T-cell frequencies in tissue (13%) and FNAs (20%) were lower compared to blood (35%, Pâ<â0.001) whereas CD8+ T cells in tissue (33.5%) and FNA (32%) were higher than in blood (25%, Pâ<â0.01). Mucosal associated invariant T cells were enriched in liver tissue (8.8%) and in the FNA (4.4%) compared to blood (1.7%, Pâ<â0.001). Whereas the percentage of total Tregs (CD4+CD25+FOXP3+CD127low/-) decreased, the proportion of activated Tregs (CD4+CD45RA-FOXP3high) increased in FNA and explant. Breg (CD19+CD20+CD24highCD38high) frequencies were similar in all groups. CONCLUSION: FNA is a practical method to sample the liver immune system collecting even small cell subsets such as regulatory T/B cells.