Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Rehabil ; 35(6): 829-839, 2021 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33305619

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of a multi-centre randomised controlled trial to compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of early patient-directed rehabilitation versus standard rehabilitation following surgical repair of the rotator cuff of the shoulder. DESIGN: Two-arm, multi-centre pilot and feasibility randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Five National Health Service hospitals in England. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (n = 73) with non-traumatic rotator cuff tears scheduled for repair were recruited and randomly allocated remotely prior to surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Early patient-directed rehabilitation (n = 37); advised to remove their sling as soon as able and move as symptoms allow. Standard rehabilitation (n = 36); sling immobilisation for four weeks. MEASURES: (1) Randomisation of 20% or more eligible patients. (2) Difference in time out of sling of 40% or more between groups. (3) Follow-up greater than 70%. RESULTS: 73/185 (39%) potentially eligible patients were randomised. Twenty participants were withdrawn, 11 due to not receiving rotator cuff repair. The between-group difference in proportions of participants who exceeded the cut-off of 222.6 hours out of the sling was 50% (80% CI = 29%, 72%), with the early patient-directed rehabilitation group reporting greater time out of sling. 52/73 (71%) and 52/53 (98%) participants were followed-up at 12 weeks when withdrawals were included and excluded respectively. Eighteen full-thickness re-tears were reported (early patient-directed rehabilitation = 7, standard rehabilitation = 11). Five serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: A main randomised controlled trial is feasible but would require allocation of participants following surgery to counter the issue of withdrawal due to not receiving surgery.


Assuntos
Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/métodos , Lesões do Manguito Rotador/reabilitação , Idoso , Inglaterra , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/efeitos adversos , Manguito Rotador/cirurgia
2.
Trials ; 20(1): 328, 2019 Jun 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31171031

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Shoulder pain is a highly prevalent complaint and disorders of the rotator cuff, including tears, are thought to be the most common cause. The number of operations repair the torn rotator cuff has risen significantly in recent years. While surgical techniques have progressed, becoming less invasive and more secure, rehabilitation programmes have remained largely like those initially developed when surgical techniques were less advanced and more invasive. Uncertainty remains in relation to the length of post-surgical immobilisation and the amount of early load permitted at the repair site. In the context of this uncertainty, current practice is to follow a generally cautious approach, including long periods of immobilisation in a sling and avoidance of early active rehabilitation. Systematic review evidence suggests early mobilisation might be beneficial but further high-quality studies are required to evaluate this. METHODS/DESIGN: RaCeR is a two-arm, multi-centre pilot and feasibility randomised controlled trial with nested qualitative interviews. A total of 76 patients with non-traumatic rotator cuff tears who are scheduled to have a surgical repair will be recruited from up to five UK NHS hospitals and randomly allocated to either early patient-directed rehabilitation or standard rehabilitation that incorporates sling immobilisation. RaCeR will assess the feasibility of a future, substantive, multi-centre randomised controlled trial to test the hypothesis that, compared to standard rehabilitation incorporating sling immobilisation, early patient-directed rehabilitation is both more clinically effective and more cost-effective. In addition, a sample of patients and clinicians will be interviewed to understand the acceptability of the interventions and the barriers and enablers to adherence to the interventions. DISCUSSION: Research to date suggests that there is the possibility of reducing the patient burden associated with post-operative immobilisation following surgery to repair the torn rotator cuff and improve clinical outcomes. There is a clear need for a high-quality, adequately powered, randomised trial to better inform clinical practice. Prior to a large-scale trial, we first need to undertake a pilot and feasibility trial to address current uncertainties about recruitment, retention and barriers to adherence to the interventions, particularly in relation to whether patients will be willing to begin moving their arm early after their operation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN Registry, 18357968 . Registered on 10 August 2018.


Assuntos
Terapia por Exercício , Imobilização/métodos , Lesões do Manguito Rotador/reabilitação , Manguito Rotador/cirurgia , Dor de Ombro/reabilitação , Terapia por Exercício/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Humanos , Imobilização/efeitos adversos , Imobilização/instrumentação , Entrevistas como Assunto , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Dispositivos de Fixação Ortopédica , Projetos Piloto , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Manguito Rotador/fisiopatologia , Lesões do Manguito Rotador/diagnóstico , Lesões do Manguito Rotador/fisiopatologia , Dor de Ombro/diagnóstico , Dor de Ombro/fisiopatologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Reino Unido
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA