Genetic screening for novel Drosophila mutants with discrepancies in iron metabolism.

Ferritin, a symmetrical 24-subunit heteropolymer composed of heavy and light chains, is the primary iron-storage molecule in bacteria, plants and animals. We used a genetically engineered strain of the model organism Drosophila melanogaster which expresses a GFP (green fluorescent protein)-tagged ferritin 1 heavy chain homologue from its native chromosomal locus and incorporated it into endogenous functional ferritin, enabling in vivo visualization of the protein and permitting easy assessment of ferritin status following environmental or genetic perturbations. Random mutagenesis was induced, and individual mutagenized chromosomes were recovered by classic crossing schemes involving phenotypical markers and balancer chromosomes. In wild-type larvae, ferritin is predominantly localized in the brain, in regions of the intestine, in wreath cells and in pericardial cells. A pilot genetic screen revealed a mutant fruitfly strain expressing GFP-ferritin in the anal pads, a pair of organs located ventrally in the posterior end of the fruitfly larva, possibly involved in ion absorption and osmoregulation, which are normally devoid of ferritin. Our continuing genetic screen could reveal transcription factors involved in ferritin regulation and novel proteins important in iron metabolism, hopefully with conserved functions in evolution.

Polymerase epsilon is required to maintain replicative senescence.

Replicative senescence is a permanent cell cycle arrest in response to extensive telomere shortening. To understand the mechanisms behind a permanent arrest, we screened for factors affecting replicative senescence in budding yeast lacking telomere elongation pathways. Intriguingly, we found that DNA polymerase epsilon (Pol ε) acts synergistically with Exo1 nuclease to maintain replicative senescence. In contrast, the Pol ε-associated checkpoint and replication protein Mrc1 facilitates escape from senescence. To understand this paradox, in which DNA-synthesizing factors cooperate with DNA-degrading factors to maintain arrest, whereas a checkpoint protein opposes arrest, we analyzed the dynamics of double- and single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) at chromosome ends during senescence. We found evidence for cycles of DNA resection, followed by resynthesis. We propose that resection of the shortest telomere, activating a Rad24(Rad17)-dependent checkpoint pathway, alternates in time with an Mrc1-regulated Pol ε resynthesis of a short, double-stranded chromosome end, which in turn activates a Rad9(53BP1)-dependent checkpoint pathway. Therefore, instead of one type of DNA damage, different types (ssDNA and a double-strand break-like structure) alternate in a "vicious circle," each activating a different checkpoint sensor. Every time resection and resynthesis switches, a fresh signal initiates, thus preventing checkpoint adaptation and ensuring the permanent character of senescence.