RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between workload and pregnancy outcomes among US surgical faculty and trainees. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Despite the increased risk of pregnancy associated complications among surgeons, most US institutions do not have formalized support to help sustain a healthy pregnancy in surgeons. METHODS: An anonymous self-administered Qualtrics survey was distributed electronically to US surgeons across all surgical specialties. Female surgical trainees/faculty with current or previous pregnancy were invited to participate. Data pertaining to demographics, workload, and pregnancy outcomes were collected for each individual pregnancy resulting in live birth. Multivariate analysis was used to assess for workload and outcomes, controlling for age, race, gravidity, and use of assisted reproductive technology. A significance level of 0.0056 was used for each outcome (Bonferroni multiple-testing adjustment 0.05/9). RESULTS: 817 surgeons experiencing 1348 pregnancies resulting in live birth were included. The mean (SD) age at first live birth was 32(4). The most prevalent major and neonatal complications included preeclampsia/gestational hypertension (n=196, 14.5%) and preterm delivery (n=179, 12.8%), respectively. Most institutions did not have a policy regarding workload modification (n=1189, 88.5%). Most surgeons did not modify their workload (n=862, 63.9%). When looking at individual workload metrics, feeling overworked during the last week of pregnancy correlated with risk of major complication (P=0.0001), preeclampsia/gestational hypertension (P=0.0003), and intra/post-partum complication (P=0.0001). Association with unplanned cesarean section (P=0.0096) and preterm delivery (P=0.0036) reached nominal significance. CONCLUSIONS: Most surgeons do not modify their workload during pregnancy, potentially contributing to feeling overworked and peri-partum complications. There is an urgent need for a cultural shift and institutional policies to safeguard the health and wellbeing of pregnant surgeons.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Subtotal laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SUB) is an alternative to total laparoscopic cholecystectomy (TOT) when the critical view of safety (CVS) cannot be achieved. Little is known about the clinical factors and postoperative outcomes associated with SUB. The objective was to determine predictive factors and outcomes of SUB as compared to TOT. METHODS: Clinical data from patients admitted from our emergency department to the acute care surgery service who underwent SUB or TOT by an acute care surgery surgeon for acute biliary disease (2017-2019) were reviewed. Wilcoxon rank-sum and Fisher's exact tests were used. RESULTS: 355 patients underwent cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis; 28 were SUB (7.9%). SUB patients were more likely to be older (57 versus 43 y; P = 0.015), male (60.7% versus 39.3%; P < 0.001), have a history of cirrhosis or liver disease (14.3% versus 2.1%; P = 0.007), and have a higher Charlson-Comorbidity Index (1 versus 0, P = 0.041). SUB had greater leukocytosis (14.6 versus 10.9; P < 0.001), higher total bilirubin (0.9 versus 0.6; P = 0.021), and a higher Tokyo grade (2 versus 1; P < 0.001), and had operative findings including gallbladder decompression (82.1% versus 23.2%; P < 0.001) and inability to achieve the CVS (78.6% versus 3.4%; P < 0.001). SUB patients had an increased length of stay (4 versus 2 d; P < 0.001) and more 1-y readmissions. No major vascular injuries occurred in either group with one biliary injury in the TOT group. CONCLUSIONS: SUB patients present with more significant markers of biliary disease and have more complicated intraoperative and postoperative courses. However, the lack of biliary or vascular injuries suggests that SUB may represent a safe alternative when the CVS cannot be achieved.
Assuntos
Colecistectomia Laparoscópica , Colecistite Aguda , Doenças da Vesícula Biliar , Lesões do Sistema Vascular , Humanos , Masculino , Vesícula Biliar , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/cirurgia , Colecistectomia/efeitos adversos , Colecistite Aguda/cirurgia , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica/efeitos adversos , Doenças da Vesícula Biliar/cirurgia , Doença AgudaRESUMO
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) defines the social determinants of health (SDOH) as "the conditions in the environments where people are born, live, learn, work, play, worship, and age that affect a range of health, functioning, and quality-of-life outcomes and risks," which includes economic stability, access to quality health care, and physical environment. There is increasing evidence that SDOH have an impact in shaping a patient's access and recovery from surgery. This review evaluates the role surgeons play in reducing these disparities.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: National and international guidelines support early cholecystectomy after mild gallstone pancreatitis but a recent nationwide study suggested these recommendations are not universally followed. Our study sought to quantify the national utilization of same hospitalization cholecystectomy versus non-operative management (NOM) and its association with pancreatitis recurrence, readmissions, and costs after mild gallstone pancreatitis (GP). METHODS: Adult patients admitted with mild GP were identified from the Nationwide Readmission Database 2010-2015. Primary outcomes included the rate of cholecystectomy during the index admission as well as pancreatitis recurrence and readmission at 30 and 180 days (30d, 180d) comparing NOM to same hospitalization cholecystectomy. Mortality upon readmission, total length of stay (LOS), and total costs (combined index-readmission hospital costs) were also explored. Cox proportional hazards regression and generalized linear models controlled for patient/hospital confounders. RESULTS: Among the 65,067 patients identified, 30% underwent cholecystectomy. The NOM cohort was older (58 vs. 50 years), had more comorbidities (Charlson index > 2, 23.5% vs. 11.5%), fewer female patients (56.7% vs. 67%) and less discharge-to-home (84.9% vs. 94.4%) (all p < 0.001). NOM was associated with increase in recurrence and unplanned readmissions at 30d [Hazard Ratio 3.53 (95% CI 2.92-4.27), 2.41 (2.11-2.74), respectively], and 180d [4.27 (3.65-4.98), 2.78 (2.54-3.04), respectively], as well as increased mortality during 180d readmission 1.88 (1.06-3.35). This approach was also associated with significant increase in LOS [predicted mean difference 2.79 days (95% CI 2.46-3.12)] and total costs [$2507.89 ($1714.4-$3301.4)]. CONCLUSIONS: In the USA, most patients presenting with mild GP do not undergo same hospitalization cholecystectomy. This strategy results in higher recurrent pancreatitis, mortality during readmission, and an additional $4.85 M/year in hospital costs nationwide. These data support same hospitalization cholecystectomy as the gold standard for mild GP.
Assuntos
Cálculos Biliares , Pancreatite , Adulto , Colecistectomia , Feminino , Cálculos Biliares/complicações , Cálculos Biliares/cirurgia , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Pancreatite/complicações , Pancreatite/terapia , Readmissão do Paciente , Recidiva , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Tumor biopsy is often essential for diagnosis and management of intraabdominal neoplasms found in children. Open surgical biopsy is the traditional approach used to obtain an adequate tissue sample to guide further therapy, but image-guided percutaneous core-needle biopsy is being used more often due to concerns about the morbidity of open biopsy. We used a national database to evaluate the morbidity associated with open intraabdominal tumor biopsy. METHODS: We identified all patients undergoing laparotomy with tumor biopsy in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project-Pediatric (NSQIP-P) database from 2012 to 2018 and measured the frequency of complications in the 30 days postoperatively. We tested associations between patient characteristics and outcomes to identify risk factors for complications. RESULTS: We identified 454 patients undergoing laparotomy for biopsy of an intraabdominal neoplasm. Median postoperative hospital stay was 7 days (IQR 4-12) and operative time was 117 min (IQR 84-172). The overall complication rate was 12.1%, with post-operative infection (6%) and bleeding (4.2%) being the most common complications. Several patient characteristics were associated with bleeding, but the only significant association on multivariable analysis was underlying hematologic disorder. CONCLUSION: Open abdominal surgery for pediatric intraabdominal tumor biopsy is accompanied by significant morbidity. Postoperative infection was the most common complication, which can delay initiation of further therapy, especially chemotherapy. These findings support the need to prospectively compare percutaneous image-guided core-needle biopsy to open biopsy as a way to minimize risk and optimize outcomes for this vulnerable population.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Abdominais , Neoplasias Abdominais/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Abdominais/cirurgia , Criança , Humanos , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem , Laparotomia , Tempo de Internação , Morbidade , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a genetic disorder that causes skeletal fragility. For the most fragile infants and young children with OI, intravenous (IV) bisphosphonate administration is essential, but IV access attempts often cause fractures. Port-a-caths help prevent these events, but some surgeons are hesitant to insert these devices in these infants due to lack of data on their safety. METHODS: Retrospective study of pediatric patients with OI who underwent port-a-cath placement from 1999 to 2018; incidence of complications such as infection and thrombosis and need for reoperation or replacement are described. RESULTS: Port-a-caths were placed in 17 patients with OI (median age, 8 mos [5-23 mos]; median weight, 5.8 kg [3.96-9.08 kg]) and remained in place for a median of 53.5 mos (10-127 mos). One port-a-cath was replaced because of thrombosis. Two port-a-caths were removed because of malfunction, one for skin erosion, and one for infection. In these five cases, replacement was not needed because patients could safely tolerate IV access. Two patients have their port-a-cath in place and the remaining ten patients had theirs removed electively as it was no longer needed. CONCLUSION: Port-a-cath placement in pediatric patients with OI is safe and efficacious for durable central access, enabling reliable IV bisphosphonate delivery and reducing iatrogenic trauma.
Assuntos
Osteogênese Imperfeita , Trombose , Dispositivos de Acesso Vascular , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Lactente , Infusões Intravenosas , Osteogênese Imperfeita/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Simulation-based education can augment residents' skills and knowledge. We assessed the effectiveness of a simulation-based course for surgery interns designed to improve their comfort, knowledge, and ability to manage common surgical critical care (SCC) conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For 2 y, all first year residents (n = 31) in general surgery, urology, interventional radiology, and the integrated plastics, vascular, and cardiothoracic surgery training programs at our institution participated in a simulation-based course emphasizing evidence-based management of SCC conditions. Precourse and postcourse surveys and multiple-choice tests, as well as summative simulation tests, assessed interns' comfort, knowledge, and ability to manage SCC conditions. Changes in these measures were assessed with Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank tests. Factors associated with summative performance were determined by linear regression. RESULTS: The course consisted of four simulation-based teaching sessions in year 1 and six in year 2. The course taught seven of the 18 core SCC conditions in the Surgical Council on Resident Education general surgery curriculum in year 1 and 10 in year 2. Interns' self-reported comfort, knowledge, and ability to manage each condition taught in the course increased (P < 0.02). Their knowledge of each condition, as assessed by written tests, also increased (P < 0.02). Their summative simulation test performance correlated with the number of course sessions attended (P < 0.03) and status as general surgery residents (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A simulation-based SCC training course for surgery interns that emphasizes evidence-based management of SCC conditions improves interns' comfort, knowledge, and ability to manage these conditions.
Assuntos
Cuidados Críticos , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/educação , Cirurgia Geral/educação , Internato e Residência/métodos , Treinamento por Simulação , Competência Clínica/estatística & dados numéricos , Currículo , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Internato e Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Autorrelato/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Growing teratoma syndrome is a rare condition defined by the presence of enlarging metastatic lesions on serial imaging that arise after or during systemic chemotherapy for nonseminomatous germ cell tumors. Lesions commonly occur in the retroperitoneum, mediastinum, or lung and are notoriously unresponsive to conventional chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: In this study, we present a dynamic case of a 26-year-old male, who had undergone surgical resection and systemic bleomycin treatment for a metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumor, and later developed recurrent masses in his posterior mediastinum seen on surveillance imaging. Tumor markers remained normal. These lesions were resected via a right robot-assisted thoracoscopic approach with the da Vinci Xi®. RESULTS: The operation was completed successfully with an unremarkable postoperative hospital course. The robotic-assisted right thoracoscopic approach allowed for a minimally invasive dissection with good visualization and minimal morbidity when compared to previous cases of surgically resected mediastinal teratomas. Final pathology demonstrated mature teratomatous elements within a setting of inflammation and necrosis. CONCLUSIONS: Robot-assisted thoracoscopic management of metastatic mediastinal lesions in the setting of this rare condition is safe and feasible.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Mediastino/secundário , Neoplasias do Mediastino/cirurgia , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/secundário , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Neoplasias Testiculares/secundário , Neoplasias Testiculares/cirurgia , Toracoscopia/métodos , Adulto , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Humanos , Excisão de Linfonodo , Masculino , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/patologia , Orquiectomia , Neoplasias Testiculares/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Testiculares/patologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Surgical workflow assessments offer insight regarding procedure variability. We utilised an objective method to evaluate workflow during robotic proctectomy (RP). METHODS: We annotated 31 RPs and used Spearman's correlation to measure the correlation of step time and step visit frequency with console time (CT) and total operative time (TOT). RESULTS: Strong correlations were seen with CT and step times for inferior mesenteric vein dissection and ligation (ρ = 0.60, ρ = 0.60), lateral-to-medial splenic flexure mobilisation (SFM) (ρ = 0.63), left rectal dissection (ρ = 0.64) and mesorectal division (ρ = 0.71). CT correlated strongly with medial-to-lateral (ρ = 0.75) and supracolic SFM visit frequency (ρ = 0.65). TOT correlated strongly with initial exposure time (ρ = 0.60), and medial-to-lateral (ρ = 0.67) and supracolic SFM visit frequency (ρ = 0.65). CONCLUSION: This study correlates surgical steps with CT and TOT through standardised annotation, providing an objective approach to quantify workflow.
Assuntos
Protectomia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Humanos , Fluxo de Trabalho , Dissecação , Duração da CirurgiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is gaining traction as a first-line approach to repair congenital anomalies. This study aims to evaluate outcomes for neonates undergoing open versus MIS repairs for esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF). METHODS: In this retrospective study, neonates undergoing EA/TEF repair from 2013 to 2020 were identified using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric database. Proportions of operative approach (open vs. MIS) over time were analyzed. A propensity score-matched analysis using preoperative characteristics was performed and outcomes were compared including composite morbidity and reintervention rates (overall, major [thoracoscopy, thoracotomy], and minor [chest/feeding tube placement, endoscopy]) between operative approaches. Pearson's chi-square or Fisher's exact tests were used as appropriate. RESULTS: We identified 1738 neonates who underwent EA/TEF repair. MIS utilization increased over time. Pre-match, neonates undergoing open repair were more likely to be premature, lower weight, ventilator dependent, and have cardiac risk factors with higher severity. Post-match, the groups were similar and included 340 neonates per group. MIS repair was associated with longer median operative time (209 vs. 174 min, p < 0.001) and increased overall post-operative intervention rates (7.6% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.01). There were no differences in composite morbidity (24.4% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.86) outside of reintervention. CONCLUSION: MIS approach for neonates with EA/TEF appears to be associated with a higher rate of reinterventions. Further studies evaluating MIS approaches for the repair of EA/TEF are needed to better define short- and long-term outcomes. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective comparative study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Our group investigates objective performance indicators (OPIs) to analyze robotic colorectal surgery. Analyses of OPI data are difficult in dual-console procedures (DCPs) as there is currently no reliable, efficient, or scalable technique to assign console-specific OPIs during a DCP. We developed and validated a novel metric to assign tasks to appropriate surgeons during DCPs. METHODS: A colorectal surgeon and fellow reviewed 21 unedited, dual-console proctectomy videos with no information to identify the operating surgeons. The reviewers watched a small number of random tasks and assigned "attending" or "trainee" to each task. Based on this sampling, the remainder of task assignments for each procedure was extrapolated. In parallel, we applied our newly developed OPI, ratio of economy of motion (rEOM), to assign consoles. Results from the 2 methods were compared. RESULTS: A total of 1811 individual surgical tasks were recorded during 21 proctectomy videos. A median of 6.5 random tasks (137 total) were reviewed during each video, and the remainder of task assignments were extrapolated based on the 7.6% of tasks audited. The task assignment agreement was 91.2% for video review vs rEOM, with rEOM providing ground truth. It took 2.5 hours to manually review video and assign tasks. Ratio of economy of motion task assignment was immediately available based on OPI recordings and automated calculation. DISCUSSION: We developed and validated rEOM as an accurate, efficient, and scalable OPI to assign individual surgical tasks to appropriate surgeons during DCPs. This new resource will be useful to everyone involved in OPI research across all surgical specialties.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório , Protectomia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Robótica , Cirurgiões , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Competência ClínicaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Reintubation is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The reintubation rate in surgical ICUs (SICUs) is â¼10% nationally but was 17.0% in our SICU. The objective of this study was to determine if the reintubation rate could be reduced with a protocol for extubation assessment and post-extubation care consisting of standardized extubation criteria and targeted interventions for patients at high risk for reintubation. METHODS: Standardized extubation criteria for all SICU patients were identified via literature review and best-practice guidelines. High reintubation risk criteria were identified (age ≥ 65 years, chronic cardiopulmonary disease, ≥ 4 days intubated, emergency intubation, and fluid balance ≥ 5 liters) through a literature review and 13-month retrospective review of reintubations in our institution's SICU. Patients meeting at least one criterion putting them at higher risk for reintubation received interventions including post-extubation high-flow nasal cannula for 24 hours and algorithm-guided respiratory therapy. RESULTS: During the 12-month period following protocol implementation, 36 of 402 extubations resulted in reintubations (9.0% vs. 17.0% preintervention, p < 0.001). Among all extubations, 305 (75.9%) were identified as high risk. Among reintubated patients, 34 (94.4%) met high-risk criteria. The mortality rate for reintubated patients was 40.0%, compared to 3.3% in those not reintubated (p < 0.001). The high-risk screening tool had a negative predictive value of 98%. CONCLUSION: A multifaceted and pragmatic extubation and post-extubation care protocol significantly reduced one SICU's reintubation rate. This protocol can be easily implemented in any SICU to improve patient outcomes following extubation.
Assuntos
Extubação , Intubação Intratraqueal , Idoso , Extubação/efeitos adversos , Extubação/normas , Cânula , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Intubação Intratraqueal/efeitos adversos , Intubação Intratraqueal/normas , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Ultrasound (US) for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis is often nondiagnostic, and additional imaging is required. A standardized approach may reduce unnecessary imaging. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all patients who had imaging for appendicitis in our emergency department in 2017 and evaluated patient characteristics associated with nondiagnostic US. Using these results, we developed a pediatric appendicitis score (PAS)-based imaging pathway and compared imaging trends prepathway and postpathway implementation. Results: A total of 971 patients received imaging for suspected appendicitis prepathway in 2017. Female sex, obesity, and low/intermediate PAS were significantly associated with nondiagnostic US, but not magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (P < 0.0001). Nearly one-third of patients received multiple imaging studies (US followed by MRI/computed tomography). As low/intermediate PAS was most strongly associated with a nondiagnostic US on multivariate analysis, we developed a PAS-based imaging stewardship pathway to eliminate imaging in low-PAS patients and reduce the number of patients with an intermediate PAS who received multiple imaging studies by obtaining an MRI as the first-line study. After implementation, only 22 low-PAS patients received imaging (compared with 238 preimplementation), and the proportion of intermediate-PAS patients receiving multiple imaging studies decreased from 31.4% to 13% (P < 0.0001). The cost of imaging per 100 patients increased from $24,255 to $31,082. Conclusion: A PAS-based imaging stewardship pathway reduces unnecessary imaging for suspected appendicitis.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing esophagectomy often receive jejunostomy tubes (j-tubes) for nutritional supplementation. We hypothesized that j-tubes are associated with increased post-esophagectomy readmissions. STUDY DESIGN: We identified esophagectomies for malignancy with (EWJ) or without (EWOJ) j-tubes using the 2010-2015 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Outcomes include readmission, inpatient mortality, and complications. Outcomes were compared before and after propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: Of 22,429 patients undergoing esophagectomy, 16,829 (75.0%) received j-tubes. Patients were similar in age and gender but EWJ were more likely to receive chemotherapy (24.2% vs. 15.1%, p < 0.01). EWJ was associated with decreased 180-day inpatient mortality (HR 0.72 [0.52-0.99]) but not with higher readmissions at 30- (15.2% vs. 14.0%, p = 0.16; HR 0.9 [0.77-1.05]) or 180 days (25.2% vs. 24.3%, p = 0.37; HR 0.94 [0.79-1.10]) or increased complications (p = 0.37). These results were confirmed in the PSM cohort. CONCLUSION: J-tubes placed in the setting of esophagectomy do not increase inpatient readmissions or mortality.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Esofagectomia , Jejunostomia/instrumentação , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is controversy over certain aspects of post-appendectomy care for children with uncomplicated appendicitis. Some institutions have embraced the practice of same-day discharge after appendectomy, while others are hesitant due to concerns about increased readmissions or emergency department (ED) visits. Similarly, some surgeons have transitioned to treating gangrenous appendicitis with a single perioperative dose, while others are concerned about increased risk of infection in this population. METHODS: We developed a pathway for the management of patients undergoing appendectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis which included same-day discharge and elimination of postoperative antibiotics for patients with gangrenous appendicitis. We compared outcomes for children treated at our institution before and after implementation of the protocol. RESULTS: We identified 575 patients undergoing appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis (307 pre- and 268 post-protocol). We observed a significant decrease in postoperative length-of stay (10.6 to 2.6â¯h, pâ¯<â¯0.0001). There were no increases in postoperative complications, such as superficial (2.6% vs 1.1%, pâ¯=â¯0.19) or organ-space surgical-site infection (1.6% vs 0.4%, pâ¯=â¯0.14), percutaneous drain placement (1.3% vs 0%, pâ¯=â¯0.06), postoperative ED visits (5.5% vs 5.2%, pâ¯=â¯0.87) or readmission (3.3% vs 1.5%, pâ¯=â¯0.17). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that incorporating same-day discharge for simple appendicitis and eliminating postoperative antibiotics for children with gangrenous appendicitis does not increase complication rates. Implementation of similar pathways across institutions has the potential to significantly reduce resource utilization for children undergoing appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective comparative study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Assuntos
Apendicite , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Apendicectomia , Apendicite/complicações , Apendicite/tratamento farmacológico , Apendicite/cirurgia , Criança , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Alta do Paciente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/tratamento farmacológico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Children requiring gastrostomy tubes (GT) have high resource utilization. In addition, wide variation exists in the decision to perform concurrent fundoplication, which can increase the morbidity of enteral access surgery. We implemented a hospital-wide standardized pathway for GT placement. METHODS: The standardized pathway included mandatory preoperative nasogastric feeding tube (FT) trial, identification of FT medical home, and standardized postoperative order set, including feeding regimen and parent education. An algorithm to determine whether concurrent fundoplication was indicated was also created. We identified children referred for GT placement from 2015 to 2018 and compared concurrent fundoplication rates and outcomes pre- and postimplementation. RESULTS: We identified 332 patients who were referred for GT. Of these, 15 avoided placement. Concurrent fundoplication decreased postpathway (48% vs 22%, pâ¯<â¯0.0001). After adjusting for reflux and cardiac disease, prepathway patients were 3.5 times more likely to undergo concurrent fundoplication. ED visits (46% vs 27%, pâ¯=â¯0.001) and postoperative LOS (median (IQR) 10â¯days (5-36) to 5.5â¯days (1-19), pâ¯=â¯0.0002) decreased. CONCLUSIONS: A standardized pathway for GT placement prevented unnecessary GT placement and fundoplication with reduction in postoperative LOS and ED visits. This approach can significantly reduce resource utilization while improving outcomes. TYPE OF STUDY: Prognosis study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.
Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde/normas , Intubação Gastrointestinal/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Desnecessários/estatística & dados numéricos , Criança , Procedimentos Clínicos/normas , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Fundoplicatura/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Morbidity and mortality after laparoscopic bariatric surgery have decreased steadily during the past 2 decades. National data on the rates at which these patients may require return to the hospital beyond 30 days are lacking. We aimed to determine the national burden and causes of readmission after the 3 most common bariatric procedures in the United States. METHODS: All adult patients with morbid obesity (>18 years old) who underwent a laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, or laparoscopic gastric bypass between 2010 and 2015 were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes from the Nationwide Readmission Database. The Nationwide Readmission Database permits longitudinal tracking of patients between hospital admissions and allows for nationally weighted estimates. The primary outcome was 180-day readmission; secondary outcomes included causes, mortality, time to readmission, costs, and procedures during readmission. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine factors associated with increased 180-day readmission after adjusting for differences in patient and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: Records from 228,043 patients were identified, of whom 10.1%, 36.1%, and 53.9% underwent laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, and laparoscopic gastric bypass, respectively. The overall 180-day readmission rate was 10.8% (laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding 8.3%, LGS 7.8% and laparoscopic gastric bypass 13.2%). Readmission analysis showed that 64.5% were directly relates directly to the index procedure, 31.2% were readmitted to a different hospital, the median time to readmission was 28 days (interquartile ratio 9-77), 23.9% had a gastrointestinal procedure, and 0.48% died within the 180-day readmissions. Factors independently associated with increased readmission were the following: greater preoperative comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥2, odds ratio 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-1.44); either Medicare status (1.84 [1.72-1.97]) or Medicaid status (1.60 [1.48-1.73]) relative to private insurance; moderate (1.09 [1.03-1.15]) or major (1.33 [1.13-1.56]) severity of illness relative to minor Nationwide Readmission Database-provided severity of illness; nonresident of state where they were admitted initially (1.49 [1.31-1.69]); discharge to a health care system other than home (1.70 [1.46-1.97]); short-term hospital 1.70 [1.46-1.97]); admission to private hospital (1.11 [1.01-1.22]) relative to nonprofit hospital; prolonged duration of initial hospital stay (1.81 [1.70-1.92]); and a serious adverse event occurring during the index admission (1.20 [1.02-1.42]). Patients who were readmitted had an incremental mean difference of $15,781 (95% confidence interval, $15,168-$16,394.4; P < .001) in total costs. CONCLUSION: Readmissions after bariatric surgery continue to occur even 6 months after discharge. Most of these readmissions were related directly to the index procedure. Almost a fourth of those patients who were readmitted d required a procedure and almost a third presented to a different hospital than the hiatal of their initial operation. These readmissions carry a substantial burden for the health care system and may impair quality of life for patients. Strategies targeted to prevent readmissions beyond the traditional 30-day benchmark are warranted in this population.
Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica/efeitos adversos , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Adulto , Cirurgia Bariátrica/economia , Cirurgia Bariátrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade Mórbida/diagnóstico , Obesidade Mórbida/economia , Readmissão do Paciente/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Reoperação/economia , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Some controversy surrounds the postoperative feeding regimen utilized in patients who undergo esophagectomy. Variation in practices during the perioperative period exists including the type of nutrition started, the delivery route, and its timing. Adequate nutrition is essential for this patient population as these patients often present with weight loss and have altered eating patterns after surgery, which can affect their ability to regain or maintain weight. Methods of feeding after an esophagectomy include total parenteral nutrition, nasoduodenal/nasojejunal tube feeding, jejunostomy tube feeding, and oral feeding. Recent evidence suggests that early oral feeding is associated with shorter LOS, faster return of bowel function, and improved quality of life. Enhanced recovery pathways after surgery pathways after esophagectomy with a component of early oral feeding also seem to be safe, feasible, and cost-effective, albeit with limited data. However, data on anastomotic leaks is mixed, and some studies suggest that the incidence of leaks may be higher with early oral feeding. This risk of anastomotic leak with early feeding may be heavily modulated by surgical approach. No definitive data is currently available to definitively answer this question, and further studies should look at how these early feeding regimens vary by surgical technique. This review aims to discuss the existing literature on the optimal route and timing of feeding after esophagectomy.
Assuntos
Fístula Anastomótica/prevenção & controle , Nutrição Enteral/métodos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Esofagectomia/efeitos adversos , Nutrição Parenteral/métodos , Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Anastomose Cirúrgica/métodos , Anastomose Cirúrgica/reabilitação , Fístula Anastomótica/epidemiologia , Fístula Anastomótica/etiologia , Caquexia/epidemiologia , Caquexia/etiologia , Caquexia/prevenção & controle , Recuperação Pós-Cirúrgica Melhorada , Nutrição Enteral/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/complicações , Esofagectomia/métodos , Esofagectomia/reabilitação , Humanos , Incidência , Intubação Gastrointestinal/efeitos adversos , Intubação Gastrointestinal/métodos , Jejunostomia/efeitos adversos , Jejunostomia/métodos , Nutrição Parenteral/efeitos adversos , Qualidade de Vida , Padrão de Cuidado , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Necrotizing enterocolitis is the leading case of gastrointestinal-related morbidity in premature infants. Necrotizing enterocolitis totalis is an aggressive form of necrotizing enterocolitis, which has traditionally been managed with comfort care. Recent advances in management of short bowel syndrome have resulted in some reported long-term survival. METHODS: Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, studies that reported outcomes in children with necrotizing enterocolitis totalis were identified. The definition of necrotizing enterocolitis totalis was captured along with length of follow-up, patient demographics, and outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 766 articles were screened, of which 166 were selected for full article review. Of these, 32 articles included data on 414 patients with necrotizing enterocolitis totalis. In the majority of studies (52%), necrotizing enterocolitis totalis was not defined. Aggressive surgical therapy (defined as bowel resection or fecal diversion) was undertaken in 32 patients (7.7%), with a mortality rate of 68.8%. In contrast, nonaggressive surgical therapy was undertaken in 382 patients (92.3%), and the mortality in these patients was 95%. Long-term outcomes for necrotizing enterocolitis totalis survivors, such as length of time on parenteral nutrition, progression to liver and/or small bowel transplant, and quality of life, were not reported. CONCLUSION: We found that there is no accepted definition of necrotizing enterocolitis totalis. Aggressive surgical therapy is rarely pursued, which likely drives the overall high mortality rate. This study underscores the importance of standardizing the definition of necrotizing enterocolitis totalis and capturing short and long-term outcomes prospectively. With more aggressive surgical therapy, more infants are likely to survive this abdominal catastrophe, which was once thought to be uniformly fatal.