Healthcare Economics of a Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pop-Up Vaccination Center.

Introduction: Creation of pop-up vaccination sites at trusted community locations has been encouraged to address vaccine hesitancy and provide equitable access to COVID-19 vaccination in minority communities. This study sought to study the healthcare economics of a community-based COVID-19 pop-up vaccination center in terms of the following: costs associated with operating the vaccination center, analysis of billing data from patients who received the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine, and costs of hospitalization for COVID-19 which may be avoided with widespread vaccination. Methods: The pop-up vaccination center was located in Port Jefferson Station, NY, USA. Costs associated with operation of the COVID-19 pop-up vaccination center were quantified, itemized, and tabulated. Current Procedural Technology codes were used to identify patients who received the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine. Billing data were quantified for the cohort as well as per each patient to receive the vaccine. Costs associated with provision of urgent care, emergency, and hospital services to patients with COVID-19 were obtained. Results: The total cost to operate the vaccination center was $25,880. The vaccination center administered the initial dose of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine to N=251 patients between March and May, 2021. The standard hospital costs for patients admitted to the medical ICU due to COVID-19 ranged from $8,913 to $190,714, per patient. Conclusion: Since the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine series is effective in preventing hospitalization for 93% of patients, this community-based vaccination center's administration of the vaccine series to 240 patients meant aversion of hospitalization due to COVID-19 related morbidity for 223 patients. Therefore, the true impact of this vaccination center, measured in averted hospital costs, ranges from $1,987,599 to $42,529,222.

Efficacy and cost comparisons of bronchodilatator administration between metered dose inhalers with disposable spacers and nebulizers for acute asthma treatment.

BACKGROUND: Despite demonstration of equivalent efficacy of beta agonist delivery using a metered dose inhaler (MDI) with spacer vs. nebulizer in asthma patients, use of a nebulizer remains standard practice. OBJECTIVES: We hypothesize that beta agonist delivery with a MDI/disposable spacer combination is an effective and low-cost alternative to nebulizer delivery for acute asthma in an inner-city population. METHODS: This study was a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial with 60 acute asthma adult patients in two inner-city emergency departments. Subjects (n = 60) received albuterol with either a MDI/spacer combination or nebulizer. The spacer group (n = 29) received albuterol by MDI/spacer followed by placebo nebulization. The nebulizer group (n = 29) received placebo by MDI/spacer followed by albuterol nebulization. Peak flows, symptom scores, and need for rescue bronchodilatator were monitored. Median values were compared with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. RESULTS: Patients in the two randomized groups had similar baseline characteristics. The severity of asthma exacerbation, median peak flows, and symptom scores were not significantly different between the two groups. The median (interquartile range) improvement in peak flow was 120 (75-180) L/min vs. 120 (80-155) L/min in the spacer and nebulizer groups, respectively (p = 0.56). The median improvement in the symptom score was 7 (5-9) vs. 7 (4-9) in the spacer and nebulizer groups, respectively (p = 0.78). The median cost of treatment per patient was $10.11 ($10.03-$10.28) vs. $18.26 ($9.88-$22.45) in the spacer and nebulizer groups, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: There is no evidence of superiority of nebulizer to MDI/spacer beta agonist delivery for emergency management of acute asthma in the inner-city adult population. MDI/spacer may be a more economical alternative to nebulizer delivery.

Replacing an academic internal medicine residency program with a physician assistant--hospitalist model: a comparative analysis study.

This study describes a comparative analysis of replacing medical residents with physician assistants and hospitalists on patient outcomes in a community hospital. Prospective data during the physician assistants-hospitalists service for 2 years was compared with 2 years of retrospective data of the medical residents model. Outcome measures included mortality, adverse events, readmissions, and patient satisfaction. For physician assistants- hospitalists versus medical residents models, all-cause and case mix index-adjusted mortality was 107/5508 (1.94%) and 0.019 versus 156/5458 (2.85%) and 0.029, respectively (P < or = .001). The adverse event cases were 9 versus 5 ( P = .29), and the readmission rate within 30 days was 64 versus 69 (P = .34). Patient satisfaction was 95% versus 96% (P = .33). Quality of care provided by the physician assistants-hospitalists model was equivalent. All-cause and case mix index- adjusted mortality was significantly lower during the physician assistants-hospitalists period.Although the application of these findings to other institutions requires further study, the authors found no intrinsic barriers that would impede implementation elsewhere.

Utility of the modified ATP III defined metabolic syndrome and severe obesity as predictors of insulin resistance in overweight children and adolescents: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: The rising prevalence of obesity and metabolic syndrome (MetS) has received increased attention since both place individuals at risk for Type II diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Insulin resistance (IR) has been implicated in the pathogenesis of obesity and MetS in both children and adults and is a known independent cardiovascular risk factor. However measures of IR are not routinely performed in children while MetS or severe obesity when present, are considered as clinical markers for IR. OBJECTIVE: The study was undertaken to assess the utility of ATPIII defined metabolic syndrome (MetS) and severe obesity as predictors of insulin resistance (IR) in a group of 576 overweight children and adolescents attending a pediatric obesity clinic in Brooklyn. METHODS: Inclusion criteria were children ages 3-19, and body mass index > 95th percentile for age. MetS was defined using ATP III criteria, modified for age. IR was defined as upper tertile of homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) within 3 age groups (3-8, n = 122; 9-11, n = 164; 12-19, n = 290). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated within age groups for predicting IR using MetS and severe obesity respectively. RESULTS: MetS was present in 45%, 48% and 42% of the respective age groups and significantly predicted IR only in the oldest group (OR = 2.0, 95% CI 1.2, 3.4; p = .006). Sensitivities were <55%; specificities <63% and positive predictive values < or = 42% in all groups. Severe obesity was significantly associated with IR in both the 9-11 (p = .002) and 12-18 (p = .01) groups but positive predictive values were nonetheless < or = 51% for all groups. CONCLUSION: The expression of IR in overweight children and adolescents is heterogeneous and MetS or severe obesity may not be sufficiently sensitive and specific indicators of insulin resistance. In addition to screening for MetS in overweight children markers for IR should be routinely performed. Further research is needed to establish threshold values of insulin measures in overweight children who may be at greater associated risk of adverse outcomes whether or not MetS is present.

Room air entrainment during beta-agonist delivery with heliox.

Studies of the efficacy of heliox in patients with severe asthma have shown mixed results. Among the factors that are responsible for variable outcomes, the failure of heliox delivery systems to prevent room air entrainment (RAE) during beta-agonist delivery is probably the most critical. While keeping the rotameter flow rate (FR) of heliox mixed 70:30 to a nebulizer at 10 L/min, the FR of heliox from a second gas source to a T-connector (TC) was increased during the delivery of the beta-agonist with a conventional T-nebulizer delivery system (TNDS). A negative peak inspiratory flow (pneumotachometer reading) or a helium concentration of < 70% (quadralizer reading) were indicators of RAE. RAE was tested during spontaneous tidal breathing and acute asthma. A rotameter FR of 10 L/m to the nebulizer with no flow from a second gas source to a TC (conventional TNDS) resulted in a significant drop in helium concentration during tidal breathing (46.2%) and acute asthma (27.5%) due to RAE. This degree of helium dilution can negate the beneficial effects of heliox to lung mechanics almost completely. A rotameter FR of 10 L/m each to a nebulizer and a TC resulted in a helium concentration 69.8% during tidal breathing (no RAE), but 49% (significant RAE) during asthma events. A rotameter FR of 15 L/m (pressure regulator setting, 100 lbs per square inch) to a TC, while maintaining a rotameter FR of 10 L/m to a nebulizer prevented RAE during asthma (helium concentration, 69.9%). Conventional TNDS may be used to deliver the beta-agonist with heliox during asthma without RAE.

HIV-related pulmonary hypertension.

With the availability of better treatment and prophylactic regimens for the infectious complications of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), the non-infectious complications are gaining greater attention. HIV-related pulmonary arterial hypertension (HIV-PAH) is one of these. The incidence of HIV-PAH is estimated at 0.5% of HIV-infected individuals. The pathogenesis remains unclear. Patients present with symptoms as diverse as progressive shortness of breath, pedal edema, dry cough, fatigue, syncope, as well as chest pain. Chest X-ray always shows cardiomegaly and prominent pulmonary artery, and evidence of right ventricular hypertrophy can be seen from the electrocardiogram. The pulmonary arterial systolic pressure, diastolic pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance from right heart catheterization are increased. There are a few small studies showing the benefit of prostacyclin analog (epoprostenol and iloprost) and bosentan. The role of antiretrovirals remains controversial, as do those of other agents such as calcium channel blockers and anticoagulants. The prognosis of HIV-PAH is grave. Two thirds of HIV-PAH related mortality is usually secondary to consequences of pulmonary hypertension, with the worst survival noted in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III-IV. The probability of survival in one series was 73%, 60% and 47% at one, two and three years, respectively.

Regular vs ad-lib albuterol for patients hospitalized with acute asthma.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Inhaled, short-acting beta-agonists and systemic corticosteroids form the mainstay of therapy in acute asthma exacerbation. Asthma, however, is an inflammatory disease of the airways, and its underlying pathology is not impacted by short-acting beta-agonists. While the efficacy of ad-lib beta-agonist administration in outpatient management of asthma symptoms is well established, little data exist to support this strategy in patients with acute, severe asthma. We postulate that as long as patients hospitalized with severe asthma exacerbation receive systemic corticosteroids, regular, scheduled administration of short-acting beta-agonists is unnecessary. Similar therapeutic outcomes can be achieved with the ad-lib administration of the short-acting beta-agonists. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Pulmonary floor of a 600-bed municipal hospital. PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-two patients hospitalized for acute asthma. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive either albuterol nebulizations (regular albuterol group) or saline solution nebulizations (ad-lib group) every 4 h with management of breakthrough symptoms with albuterol metered-dose inhaler or nebulizations for both groups. All patients received systemic corticosteroids. Peak expiratory flows, asthma symptoms, and need for rescue bronchodilator were followed up on each patient until discharge. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the length of hospitalization (median length, 48 h for ad-lib group vs 57.5 h for regular albuterol group, p = 0.82), rate of improvement in peak flow, or symptoms between the two groups. Ad-lib beta-agonist use compared to regular albuterol scheduled use resulted in a significant reduction in the total number of albuterol treatments administered (median, 7 treatments vs 19 treatments, p = 0.001) during hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: In the management of asthma exacerbation, ad-lib administration of albuterol is therapeutically as effective as regular, scheduled administration. This method of drug administration also reduces the total dose of beta-agonists received by the hospitalized patient.

Profile of near-fatal asthma in an inner-city hospital.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Patients requiring mechanical ventilation for asthma are at a high risk of similar attacks and death in the future. Early recognition and treatment with systemic corticosteroids (SC) can influence outcome in near-fatal asthma (NFA). We studied the ability of patients to recognize the severity of asthma, implement SC therapy, and seek timely help from a health-care provider (HCP). DESIGN: Retrospective review of patient histories and medical records. SETTING: Medical ICU and inpatient medical ward of an inner-city university hospital. PATIENTS: Asthma patients requiring mechanical ventilation. METHODS: Seventy episodes of NFA requiring endotracheal intubation (intubation group [IG]) and 523 hospital admissions with acute asthma (nonintubation group [NIG]) were analyzed over a 4-year period from January 1997 to September 2000. Prior intubation(s), duration of symptoms, steroid dependence, and knowledge and use of inhaled corticosteroids and SC were noted. Indications for mechanical ventilation, ventilatory parameters using permissive hypercapnia, sedation/paralysis, duration, extubation criteria, complications, and outcome were analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty-nine of 70 patients (41.4%) in the IG had at least one prior episode of NFA requiring mechanical ventilation, compared to 123 of 523 patients (23.5%) in the NIG (p < 0.005). Ten of 70 patients (14.3%) in the IG were steroid dependent, compared to 40 of 523 patients (7.6%) in the NIG (p < 0.05). Forty of 70 patients (57%) in the IG compared to 308 of 523 patients (59%) in the NIG reported noncompliance with prescribed inhaled corticosteroids (not significant). All received aerosolized beta-agonist therapy, but only 11 of 70 patients (15.7%) initiated SC therapy in the IG compared to 145 of 523 patients (27.7%) in the NIG (p < 0.05). Even with symptoms > 48 h, 34 of 43 patients (79%) in the IG did not receive SC. Three patients died and four patients acquired myopathy in the IG. CONCLUSION: History of intubation and steroid dependence were identified as risk factors for future intubation. Our patients with asthma in both the IG and NIG were noncompliant with inhaled corticosteroids. Despite a long duration of symptoms and knowledge of SC, the majority neither implemented self-management with SC nor contacted an HCP. Early initiation of SC (symptoms < 48 h) might have averted intubation in the high-risk group. Most of our patients were extubated successfully in < 48 h. Incidence of barotrauma was very low, probably due to utilization of permissive hypercapnia.

Acute esophageal necrosis and liver pathology, a rare combination.

Acute esophageal necrosis (AEN) or "black esophagus" is a clinical condition found at endoscopy. It is a rare entity the exact etiology of which remains unknown. We describe a case of 'black esophagus', first of its kind, in the setting of liver cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy.

Emergency department as the main source of asthma care.

Many asthma patients use the emergency department (ED) as the sole source of asthma care. This is considered inadequate and poor practice. This prospective study revealed that young age, lack of evening clinic, forgetting to keep the appointment, conflicting priorities of daily life, and easy access to the ED on an as-needed basis for urgent care, medications, and prescriptions, and failure to use inhaled corticosteroids were significant while lack of insurance or access to asthma clinic were not significant factors in exclusive use of the ED. Establishing ED asthma education programs or an after hours asthma clinic may alleviate the practice.

Antidepressant-induced adverse reactions in a patient with hemorrhagic stroke.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of antidepressant-induced adverse drug reactions in a patient with hemorrhagic stroke. CASE SUMMARY: A 56-year-old man developed life-threatening adverse reactions after fluoxetine was added to his previously prescribed regimen of buspirone and olanzapine. One week after starting fluoxetine 60 mg/day, the patient developed syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion and serotonin syndrome concurrently. The patient had experienced a hemorrhagic stroke before the adverse drug reactions occurred. DISCUSSION: A patient with a history of hemorrhagic stroke developed serious adverse drug reactions when fluoxetine was added to his drug therapy. When the combination therapy was stopped, all adverse effects gradually disappeared and laboratory abnormalities were corrected. The likelihood that the adverse reactions were caused by fluoxetine is probable according to the Naranjo probability scale. In addition, a history of stroke may be a risk factor for the development of such reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Today, patients with depression after experiencing a stroke are treated more effectively, but antidepressant-induced adverse drug reactions may be serious. A growing number of patients are treated for post-stroke depression; they require close supervision and careful dosing of antidepressants to prevent full-blown adverse reactions from occurring.