RESUMO
PURPOSE: To access the current scenario of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy training in multiple centers worldwide. METHODS: We created a multiple-choice questionnaire assessing all details of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy training with 41 questions divided into three different categories (responder demography, surgical steps, and responder experience). The questionnaire was created and disseminated using the "Google Docs" platform. All responders had an individual invitation by direct message or Email. We selected urologists who had recently finished a postgraduation urologic robotic surgery training (fellowship) in the last five years. We sent 624 invitations to urologists from 138 centers, from January 10th to April 10th, 2022. The answers were reported as percentages and illustrated in pie charts. RESULTS: The response rate was 58% among all centers invited (138/81), 20% among all individual invitations (122/624 answers). Globally, we gathered responses from 23 countries. Most surgeons were older than 34 years, 71% trained in an academic center, and 64% performed less than ten full RARP cases. Transperitoneal is the most common access, and 63% routinely opens the endopelvic fascia. Almost 90% perform the Rocco's stitch, and 94% perform the anastomosis with barbed sutures. Finally, only 31% of surgeons assisted more than 100 cases before moving to the console, and most surgeons (63.9%) performed less than ten full RARP cases during their training. CONCLUSION: By assessing the robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy training status in 23 countries and 81 centers worldwide, we assessed the trainees' demography, step-by-step surgical technique, training perspectives, and impressions of surgeons who trained in the last five years. This data is crucial for a better understanding the trainee's standpoint, addressing potential deficiencies, and implementing improvements needed in the training process. Our study clearly indicates elements of current training modalities that are prone to major improvement.
Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Robótica , Masculino , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Prostatectomia/métodos , Próstata , Laparoscopia/métodosRESUMO
PURPOSE: To compare two cohorts of patients submitted to robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) with vs without the use of three-dimensional virtual models (3DVMs). METHODS: We screened a prospective consecutive cohort of 152 patients submitted to RAPN with 3DVM and 1264 patients submitted to RAPN without 3DVM between 2019 and 2022. Propensity score matching analysis (PSMA) was applied. Primary endpoint was to evaluate whereas RAPNs with 3DVM were superior in terms of functional outcomes at 12-month. Secondary endopoints were to compare perioperative and oncological outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression analyses (MVA) tested the associations of clinically significant eGFR drop and 3DVMs. Subgroups analysis was performed for PAUDA-risk categories. RESULTS: 100 patients for each group were analyzed after PSMA. RAPN with 3DVM presented a higher rate of selective/no clamping procedure (32% vs 16%, p = 0.03) and a higher enucleation rate (40% vs 29%, p = 0.04). As concern to primary endopoint, 12-month functional preservation performed better within 3DVM group in terms of creatinine serum level (median 1.2 [IQR 1.1-1.4] vs 1.6 [IQR 1.1-1.8], p = 0.03) and eGFR (median 64.6 [IQR 56.2-74.1] vs 52.3 [IQR 49.2-74.1], p = 0.03). However, this result was confirmed only in the PADUA ≥ 10 renal masses. Regarding secondary endpoints, no significative difference emerged between the two cohorts. MVA confirmed 3DVM as a protective factor for clinically significant eGFR drop only in high-risk (PADUA ≥ 10) masses. CONCLUSIONS: RAPN performed with the use of 3DVM assistance resulted in lower incidence of global ischemia and higher rate of enucleations. The positive impact of such technology was found at 12-month only in high-risk renal masses.
Assuntos
Imageamento Tridimensional , Neoplasias Renais , Nefrectomia , Pontuação de Propensão , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Humanos , Nefrectomia/métodos , Masculino , Feminino , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Estudos Prospectivos , Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) may improve prostate cancer (PCa) detection and support multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) readers for better characterization. We evaluated Watson Elementary® (WE®) CAD system results referring to definitive pathological examination in patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in a tertiary referral center. METHODS: Patients treated with RARP between 2020 and 2021 were selected. WE® calculates the Malignancy Attention Index (MAI), starting from the information contained in the mpMRI images. Outcome measures were the capability to predict the presence of PCa, to correctly locate the dominant lesion, to delimit the largest diameter of the dominant lesion, and to predict the extraprostatic extension (EPE). RESULTS: Overall, tumor presence was confirmed in 46 (92%) WE® highly suspicious areas, while it was confirmed in 43 (86%) mpMRI PI-RADS ≥ 4 lesions. The WE® showed a positive agreement with mpMRI of 92%. In 98% of cases, visible tumor at WE® showed that the highly suspicious areas were within the same prostate sector of the dominant tumor nodule at pathology. WE® showed a 2.5 mm median difference of diameter with pathology, compared with a 3.8 mm of mpMRI versus pathology (p = 0.019). In prediction of EPE, WE® and mpMRI showed sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of 0.81 vs 0.71, 0.56 vs 0.60, 0.88 vs 0.85 and 0.42 vs 0.40, respectively. CONCLUSION: The WE® system resulted accurate in the PCa dominant lesion detection, localization and delimitation providing additional information concerning EPE prediction.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata , Robótica , Masculino , Humanos , Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Prostatectomia/métodos , ComputadoresRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship between warm ischemia time (WIT) duration and renal function after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). METHODS: The CLOCK trial is a phase 3 randomized controlled trial comparing on- vs off-clamp RAPN. All patients underwent pre- and postoperative renal scintigraphy. Six-month absolute variation of eGFR (AV-GFR), rate of relative variation in eGFR over 25% (RV-GFR > 25), absolute variation of split renal function (SRF) at scintigraphy (AV-SRF). The relationships WIT/outcomes were assessed by correlation graphs and then modeled by uni- and multivariable regression. RESULTS: 324 patients were included (206 on-clamp, 118 off-clamp RAPN). Correlation graphs showed a threshold on WIT equal to 10 min. The differences in outcome measures between cases with WIT < vs ≥ 10 min were: AV-GFR - 3.7 vs - 7.5 ml/min (p < 0.001); AV-SRF - 1% vs - 3.6% (p < 0.001); RV-GFR > 25 9.3% vs 17.8% (p = 0.008). Multivariable models found that AV-GFR was related to WIT ≥ 10 min (regression coefficient [RC] - 0.52, p = 0.019), age (RC - 0.35, p = 0.001) and baseline eGFR (RC - 0.30, p < 0.001); RV-GFR > 25 to WIT ≥ 10 min (odds ratio [OR] 1.11, p = 0.007) and acute kidney injury defined as > 50% increase in serum creatinine (OR 19.7, p = 0.009); AV-SRF to WIT ≥ 10 min (RC - 0.30, p = 0.018), baseline SRF (RC - 0.76, p < 0.001) and RENAL score (RC - 0.60. p = 0.028). The main limitation was that the CLOCK trial was designed on a different endpoint and therefore the present analysis could be underpowered. CONCLUSIONS: Up to 10 min WIT had no consequences on functional outcomes. Above the 10-min threshold, a statistically significant, but clinically negligible impact was found.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Renais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Robótica , Humanos , Isquemia Quente , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular , Resultado do Tratamento , Nefrectomia , Cintilografia , Radioisótopos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to investigate clinical and surgical factors associated with early catheter replacement in patients treated with Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of patients treated with HoLEP at our Institution by a single surgeon from March 2017 to January 2021 were collected. Preoperative variables, including non-invasive uroflowmetry and abdominal ultrasonography (US), were recorded. Bladder wall modifications (BWM) at preoperative US were defined as the presence of single or multiple bladder diverticula or bladder wall thickening 5 mm. Clinical symptoms were assessed using validated questionnaires. Only events occurred within the first week after catheter removal were considered. RESULTS: Overall, 305 patients were included, of which 46 (15.1%) experienced early catheter replacement. Maintenance of anticoagulants/antiplatelets (AC/AP) therapy at surgery (p=0.001), indwelling urinary catheter (p=0.02) and the presence of BWM (p=0.001) were more frequently reported in patients needing postoperative re-catheterization. Intraoperative complications (p=0.02) and median lasing time (p=0.02) were significantly higher in this group. At univariate analysis, indwelling urinary catheter (p=0.02), BWM (p=0.01), ongoing AC/AP therapy (p=0.01) and intraoperative complications (p=0.01) were significantly associated with early catheter replacement. At multivariate analysis, indwelling urinary catheter (OR: 1.28; p=0.02), BWM (OR: 2.87; p=0.001), and AC/AP therapy (OR: 2.21; p=0.01) were confirmed as independent predictors of catheter replacement. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience the presence of indwelling urinary catheter before surgery, BWM and the maintenance of AC/AP therapy were shown to be independent predictors of early catheter replacement after HoLEP.
Assuntos
Terapia a Laser , Lasers de Estado Sólido , Hiperplasia Prostática , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Hólmio/uso terapêutico , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata/métodos , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicações , Terapia a Laser/métodos , Lasers de Estado Sólido/uso terapêutico , Complicações Intraoperatórias , Catéteres , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: We assessed the efficacy and safety of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in patients with high comorbidity burden. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from patients treated with HoLEP at our academic referral center from March 2017 to January 2021 were prospectively collected. Patients were divided according to their CCI (Charlson Comorbidity Index). Perioperative surgical data and 3-month functional outcomes were collected. RESULTS: Out of 305 patients included, 107 (35.1%) and 198 (64.9%) were classified as CCI ≥ 3 and < 3, respectively. The groups were comparable in terms of baseline prostate size, symptoms severity, post-void residue and Qmax. The amount of energy delivered during HoLEP (141.3 vs. 118.0 KJ, p=0.01) and lasing time (38 vs 31 minutes, p=0.01) were significantly higher in patients with CCI ≥ 3. However, median enucleation, morcellation and overall surgical time were comparable between the two groups (all p>0.05). Intraoperative complications rate (9.3% vs. 9.5%, p=0.77), median time to catheter removal and hospital stay were comparable between the two cohorts. Similarly, early (30 days) and delayed (>30 days) surgical complications rates were not significantly different between the two groups. At 3-month follow up, functional outcomes using validated questionnaires did not differ between the two groups (all p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: HoLEP represents a safe and effective treatment option for BPH also in patients with high comorbidity burden.
Assuntos
Terapia a Laser , Lasers de Estado Sólido , Hiperplasia Prostática , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Próstata/cirurgia , Lasers de Estado Sólido/uso terapêutico , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicações , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Hólmio , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Salvage robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (S-RARP) has gained prominence in recent years for treating patients with cancer recurrence following non-surgical treatments of Prostate Cancer. We conducted a systematic literature review to evaluate the role and outcomes of S-RARP over the past decade. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic review was conducted, encompassing articles published between January 1st, 2013, and June 1st, 2023, on S-RARP outcomes. Articles were screened according to PRISMA guidelines, resulting in 33 selected studies. Data were extracted, including patient demographics, operative times, complications, functional outcomes, and oncological outcomes. RESULTS: Among 1,630 patients from 33 studies, radiotherapy was the most common primary treatment (42%). Operative times ranged from 110 to 303 minutes, with estimated blood loss between 50 to 745 mL. Intraoperative complications occurred in 0 to 9% of cases, while postoperative complications ranged from 0 to 90% (Clavien 1-5). Continence rates varied (from 0 to 100%), and potency rates ranged from 0 to 66.7%. Positive surgical margins were reported up to 65.6%, and biochemical recurrence ranged from 0 to 57%. CONCLUSION: Salvage robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with cancer recurrence after previous prostate cancer treatment is safe and feasible. The literature is based on retrospective studies with inherent limitations describing low rates of intraoperative complications and small blood loss. However, potency and continence rates are largely reduced compared to the primary RARP series, despite the type of the primary treatment. Better-designed studies to assess the long-term outcomes and individually specify each primary therapy impact on the salvage treatment are still needed. Future articles should be more specific and provide more details regarding the previous therapies and S-RARP surgical techniques.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Masculino , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Prostatectomia/métodos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/etiologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: There is currently no consensus regarding the optimal treatment strategy for patients presenting with synchronous bilateral renal masses. The decision to perform bilateral procedures on the same intervention or in staged procedures is debated. The aim of this manuscript is to analyse the outcomes of simultaneous robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) in a series of patients with bilateral renal masses treated at five Italian robotic institutions. METHODS: Data from a prospectively maintained multi-institutional database on patients subjected to simultaneous RAPN between November 2011 and July 2019 were reviewed. RAPNs were performed with da Vinci Si or Xi surgical system by expert robotic surgeons. Baseline demographics and clinical features, peri- and post-operative data were collected. RESULTS: Overall, 27 patients underwent simultaneous bilateral RAPN, and 54 RAPNs were performed without need of conversion; median operative time was 250 minutes, median estimated blood loss was 200 mL. Renal artery clamping was needed for 27 (50%) RAPNs with a median warm ischemia time of 15 minutes and no case of acute kidney injury. Complications were reported in 7 (25.9%) patients, mainly represented by Clavien 2 events (6 blood transfusions). Positive surgical margins were assessed in 2 (3.7%) of the renal cell carcinoma. At the median follow-up of 30 months, recurrence-free survival was 100%. CONCLUSION: Our data showed that, in selected patients and expert hands, simultaneous bilateral RAPNs could be a safe and feasible procedure with promising results for the treatment of bilateral synchronous renal masses.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Renais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Robótica , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Nefrectomia/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Robótica/métodos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether socio-economic disparities exist on access to care, treatment options and outcomes among patients with renal mass amenable of surgical treatment within the universal healthcare system. METHODS: Data of consecutive patients submitted to partial nephrectomy (PN) or radical nephrectomy (RN) at our Institution between 2017 and 2020 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were grouped according to their income level (low, intermediate, and high) based on the Indicator of Equivalent Economic Situation national criterion. Survival analysis was performed. Cox regression models were employed to analyse the impact of socio-economic variables on survival outcomes. RESULTS: One thousand forty-two patients were included (841 PN and 201 RN). Patients at the lowest income level were found more likely symptomatic and with a higher pathological tumour stage in the RN cohort (p > 0.05). The guidelines adherence on surgical indication rate as well as the access to minimally invasive surgery did not differ according to patient's income level in both cohorts (p > 0.05). Survival curves were comparable among the groups. Cox regression analysis showed that none of the included socio-economic variables was associated with survival outcomes in our series. CONCLUSIONS: Universal healthcare system may increase the possibility to ensure egalitarian treatment modalities for patients with renal cancer.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Renais , Assistência de Saúde Universal , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Nefrectomia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical and surgical predictors of urinary tract endometriosis (UTE) relapse. DESIGN: Retrospective single institutional study. SETTING: Italian multidisciplinary referral center for endometriosis. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients affected by UTE and surgically treated between January 2016 and March 2020. INTERVENTION: Surgical excision for UTE. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses were fitted to evaluate clinical and surgical predictors of recurrence. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 105 female age-reproductive patients were enrolled. Median age was 32 years (interquartile range, 24-37). Ureteral involvement was recorded in 53 patients (50.5%), being unilateral and bilateral in 46 patients (43.8%) and 7 patients (6.7%), respectively. Bladder involvement occurred in 52 patients (49.5%). Open surgical approach was performed in 24 cases (22.9%), whereas 30 patients (28.5%) and 51 patients (48.6%) were treated with laparoscopic and robot-assisted approach, respectively. Overall, 53 patients (50.5%) received adjuvant hormonal therapy. At a median follow-up of 39 months (interquartile range, 22-51), 30 patients (28.6%) experienced disease relapse, with 14 recurrences (13.3%) recorded at the level of the urinary tract. At multivariable analysis, age at first surgery <25 years (odds ratio [OR], 1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-1.84; p = .02) and the presence of a concomitant autoimmune disease (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.24-2.17; p = .02) were found as predictors of deep infiltrating endometriosis recurrence, whereas adjuvant postsurgical therapy showed a protective role (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.53-0.98; p = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Young age (<25 years) and the presence of autoimmune diseases were significant predictors for the development of disease recurrence, whereas adjuvant hormonal therapy showed a protective role.
Assuntos
Endometriose , Laparoscopia , Doenças Ureterais , Sistema Urinário , Adulto , Endometriose/complicações , Endometriose/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Doenças Ureterais/prevenção & controle , Doenças Ureterais/cirurgiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic femoral fractures are challenging complications of hip arthroplasty. They are supposed to be a rare complication, but their incidence is rapidly increasing. Surgical treatment aims to achieve early mobilization and avoid the complications of prolonged bed rest. Aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes of surgical treatment comparing two surgical approaches: revision arthroplasty (RA) versus open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). METHODS: Authors retrospectively reviewed a series of 117 patients with total hip arthroplasty treated for periprosthetic femur fractures in the period between January 2013 and March 2018 at a single tertiary referral center. Of these, 70 patients satisfied strict inclusion criteria. Patients were classified according to the Unified Classification System (UCS) and distributed in two groups according to surgical treatment. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Oxford Hip recorded preoperatively and post operatively, Barthel Score, CIRS score (Cumulative illness rating scale), type of fracture and post-operative complications with a minimum follow up of 1 year. RESULTS: Nominal univariate statistical analysis revealed significant differences between the post and pre-operative Oxford Hip Score (Δ Oxford) and the surgical treatment (p = 0.008) and CIRS score (p = 0.048). Moreover, we observed a significant relationship between type of treatment and type of fracture (p = 0.0001). Multivariate analyses revealed that CIRS score was independently associated with Oxford Score improvement after surgery (p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: Data from this case series confirmed that surgical treatment was correlated to type of fracture, according to UCS classification. Patients treated by RA had a better functional outcome than patients treated with ORIF, but these results are strongly influenced from the patients' age, Barthel index and CIRS score. Also, authors found a correlation between functional outcome and comorbidities evaluated by CIRS score. Based on these data we suggest a multimodal approach to these patients, like those used for proximal femoral fractures.
Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril , Fraturas do Fêmur , Fraturas Periprotéticas , Artroplastia de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Fraturas do Fêmur/etiologia , Fraturas do Fêmur/cirurgia , Fêmur/cirurgia , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/efeitos adversos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Humanos , Fraturas Periprotéticas/epidemiologia , Fraturas Periprotéticas/etiologia , Fraturas Periprotéticas/cirurgia , Reoperação/efeitos adversos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is rapidly increasing its role in the nephron-sparing surgery setting (1). The recent introduction of technological advancements is leading more experienced surgeons to approach complex renal mass with a conservative intent (2, 3). In particular, three-dimensional reconstruction and the use of intraoperative ultrasonography are gaining attention as crucial tools to safely and effectively approach complex cases (4, 5). We aimed to video-report the management of highly complex renal mass treated with RAPN, focusing on preoperative surgical planning and intraoperative technical nuances. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 73-year-old male patient was referred to our institution for an incidental detection of a 70 mm diameter, completely endophytic, hilar renal mass (PADUA score 13, RENAL score 11a). Contrast-enhanced CT scan images were processed by M3DICS (Turin, Italy) and used to obtain a 3D virtual model. RAPN was performed by a highly experienced surgeon using Da Vinci Si robotic platform with a three-arm configuration. RESULTS: The overall operative time was 114 min, with a warm ischemia time of 16 min. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were recorded. According to the SIB score, the pure enucleation excision strategy was performed. Histopathological analysis revealed a pT3a low-grade oncocytic kidney tumor with negative surgical margins. with negative surgical margins. At 24-months follow up, no local or systemic recurrence was detected. CONCLUSIONS: Conservative management of complex renal masses is challenging with a highly nuanced decision-making process. In this regard, preoperative 3D models and intraoperative ultrasound (US) guidance play a pivotal role to develop a tailored surgical strategy according to patient' and tumor's characteristics.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Renais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Idoso , Humanos , Imageamento Tridimensional , Neoplasias Renais/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Masculino , Margens de Excisão , Nefrectomia/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , UltrassonografiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Bladder cancer is the ninth most common type of cancer worldwide. In the past, radical cystectomy via open surgery has been considered the gold-standard treatment for muscle invasive bladder cancer. However, in recent years there has been a progressive increase in the use of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy. The aim of the current project is to investigate the surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes of patients with bladder cancer who undergo radical cystectomy comparing three different surgical techniques (robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and open surgery). Pre-, peri- and post-operative factors will be examined, and participants will be followed for a period of up to 24 months to identify risks of mortality, oncological outcomes, hospital readmission, sexual performance, and continence. METHODS: We describe a protocol for an observational, prospective, multicenter, cohort study to assess patients affected by bladder neoplasms undergoing radical cystectomy and urinary diversion. The Italian Radical Cystectomy Registry is an electronic registry to prospectively collect the data of patients undergoing radical cystectomy conducted with any technique (open, laparoscopic, robotic-assisted). Twenty-eight urology departments across Italy will provide data for the study, with the recruitment phase between 1st January 2017-31st October 2020. Information is collected from the patients at the moment of surgical intervention and during follow-up (3, 6, 12, and 24 months after radical cystectomy). Peri-operative variables include surgery time, type of urinary diversion, conversion to open surgery, bleeding, nerve sparing and lymphadenectomy. Follow-up data collection includes histological information (e.g., post-op staging, grading, and tumor histology), short- and long-term outcomes (e.g., mortality, post-op complications, hospital readmission, sexual potency, continence etc). DISCUSSION: The current protocol aims to contribute additional data to the field concerning the short- and long-term outcomes of three different radical cystectomy surgical techniques for patients with bladder cancer, including open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted. This is a comparative-effectiveness trial that takes into account a complex range of factors and decision making by both physicians and patients that affect their choice of surgical technique. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT04228198 . Registered 14th January 2020- Retrospectively registered.
Assuntos
Cistectomia/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados não Aleatórios como Assunto , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Projetos de Pesquisa , Fatores de Risco , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to describe the surgical outcomes of a retrospective series of consecutive patients treated with laparoscopic and robotic approach for adrenal masses in two tertiary referral centers. METHODS: We retrospectively gathered data of 477 patients submitted to adrenalectomy performed at two Institutions from March 2008 to February 2018 by six highly experienced surgeons. We excluded from the analysis 43 patients that had an open approach for tumors or for anesthetic contraindications to minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Patients were selected for surgery after a radiologic and an endocrinology work up. Preoperative, perioperative and postoperative data were recorded. RESULTS: Overall, 477 patients were included in the study. The robotic and the laparoscopic group included 110 and 367 patients, respectively. The preoperative characteristics were similar in both groups except for ASA score with a median (IQR) of 3 and 2 in the robotic and in the laparoscopic group, respectively (p = 0.03). Tumor size of adrenal tumors treated robotically (4, IQR 2.6-6 cm) was significantly larger than those treated laparoscopically (3, IQR 2.3-4.1 cm) (p = 0.01). The intraoperative complication rates were similar between robotic and laparoscopic groups (6.3% and 6%, respectively). The postoperative complication rate was 5.4% for robotic group and similarly 3.5% for laparoscopic adrenalectomy strategy. We analyzed the tumor ≥ 6 cm, with 29 patients in the robotic group and 43 in the laparoscopic one, with an overall complication rate of 19.5%. At multivariable analyses tumor size (OR 1.287; CI 1.128-1.468; p < 0.001) was the only independent predictor of overall complication. CONCLUSION: Adrenal tumors can be safely treated either by robotic or laparoscopic strategy. MIS seems to be feasible also in larger adrenal masses (≥ 6 cm). Tumor size represents the only predictive factors for overall complication.
Assuntos
Adrenalectomia , Internacionalidade , Laparoscopia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Neoplasias das Glândulas Suprarrenais/cirurgia , Adrenalectomia/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/efeitos adversos , Análise Multivariada , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Aim of this study was to evaluate and compare perioperative outcomes of transperitoneal (TP) and retroperitoneal (TR) approaches in a multi-institutional cohort of minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (MI-PN). MATERIAL AND METHODS: All consecutive patients undergone MI-PN for clinical T1 renal tumors at 26 Italian centers (RECORd2 project) between 01/2013 and 12/2016 were evaluated, collecting the pre-, intra-, and postoperative data. The patients were then stratified according to the surgical approach, TP or RP. A 1:1 propensity score (PS) matching was performed to obtain homogeneous cohorts, considering the age, gender, baseline eGFR, surgical indication, clinical diameter, and PADUA score. RESULTS: 1669 patients treated with MI-PN were included in the study, 1256 and 413 undergoing TP and RP, respectively. After 1:1 PS matching according to the surgical access, 413 patients were selected from TP group to be compared with the 413 RP patients. Concerning intraoperative variables, no differences were found between the two groups in terms of surgical approach (lap/robot), extirpative technique (enucleation vs standard PN), hilar clamping, and ischemia time. Conversely, the TP group recorded a shorter median operative time in comparison with the RP group (115 vs 150 min), with a higher occurrence of intraoperative overall, 21 (5.0%) vs 9 (2.1%); p = 0.03, and surgical complications, 18 (4.3%) vs 7 (1.7%); p = 0.04. Concerning postoperative variables, the two groups resulted comparable in terms of complications, positive surgical margins and renal function, even if the RP group recorded a shorter median drainage duration and hospital length of stay (3 vs 2 for both variables), p < 0.0001. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that both TP and RP are feasible approaches when performing MI-PN, irrespectively from tumor location or surgical complexity. Notwithstanding longer operative times, RP seems to have a slighter intraoperative complication rate with earlier postoperative recovery when compared with TP.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Renais , Laparoscopia , Seguimentos , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Nefrectomia , Duração da Cirurgia , Espaço Retroperitoneal/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the size of the penis in flaccidity and in erection of Italian men. A total of 4,685 men living in Italy and who have been visited at the Italian urology operating units were involved in the study between January 2019 and January 2020. Each patient was given details on how to measure their penis (erect length and circumference) in flaccidity and in erection, from the lower base to the distal penile tip. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) flaccid penis length was 9.47 (2.69), mean (SD) flaccid penis circumference was 9.59 (3.08), mean (SD) erect penis length was 16.78 (2.55) and mean (SD) erect penis circumference was 12.03 (3.82). At the linear regression analysis, height was associated with flaccid penis length (ß = 0.04; p-value = .01), and erect penis length was (ß = 0.05; p-value < .01) and erect penis circumference was (ß = 0.06; p-value < .01). Height is proportional to the length of the penis in flaccidity and in erection, and to the circumference in erection. The increase in BMI leads to a reduction in the length of the erect penis, as well as weight gain reduces the length of the flaccid penis.
Assuntos
Ereção Peniana , Pênis , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Análise de RegressãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Aim of the study was to present the surgical techniques and the postoperative outcomes in women treated with robotic excision for deep endometriosis involving the urinary tract. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the prospectively recorded clinical data of women consecutively undergoing minimally invasive treatment for complex endometriosis involving urinary tract in our center between January 2012 and June 2018. All the patients received a preoperative multidisciplinary evaluation with the general surgeon, the gynecologist and the urologist due to the frequent concomitant involvement of bowel and genital system. Patients undergoing robotic surgery were treated with the Si or Xi da Vinci surgical system. RESULTS: A total of 74 consecutive patients were enrolled. Twenty-eight (37.8%) patients underwent conventional laparoscopy and 46 (62.2%) robotic surgery. Only patients treated with robotic approach were considered for the final analyses. Overall, 17 (36.9%) patients were treated with partial cystectomy, 13 (28.3%) with ureteral reimplantation, 10 (21.7%) patients were treated with ureteral lysis, 4 (8.7%) with removal of bladder endometrial node without opening the mucosa layer and 2 (4.3%) with ureteral end-to-end anastomosis. Concomitant involvement of bowel and genital system was registered in 14 (30.4%) and 32 (69.5%) patients, respectively. No conversions to laparotomy were recorded. Overall, 5 (10.9%) patients experienced postoperative complications, of which only one was a major complication (Clavien 3b). At a median follow-up of 31.3 (IQR 17.6-43.3) months, 4 (8.7%) patients experienced disease recurrence at the level of urinary tract. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic excision of urological endometriosis represents a safe and effective treatment option, since a limited rate of surgical complications was recorded even in cases of multi-organ disease.
Assuntos
Endometriose/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Ureter/cirurgia , Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Doenças Urológicas/cirurgia , Adulto , Anastomose Cirúrgica/métodos , Estudos de Coortes , Cistectomia/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of oral supplementation with Serenoa repens (SR) and bovine colostrum (BC) plus tamsulosin (TAM) versus TAM alone over 12 months in men suffering from lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: Between February 2018 and February 2019, men with symptomatic BPH (IPSS ≥10) were prospectively recruited. This prospective, open-label, 12-month study included two different protocols: (1) group A, SR 320 mg/day + BC 30 mg/day + TAM 0.4 mg/day, and (2) group B, TAM 0.4 mg/day only. RESULTS: Overall, 148 patients entered the study, 76 in group A and 72 in group B. At 12 months, the total IPSS had decreased by 5.5 with TAM + SR + BC and by 5.1 with TAM only (p = 0.21). However, when the total IPSS was divided into storage and voiding subscores, at 6 months the storage symptoms had improved significantly more with TAM + SR + BC (-1.6 vs. -0.9 with TAM only, p = 0.02), with the benefit persisting also at the 1-year evaluation (-1.8 vs. -0.8, p = 0.02). Moreover, the improvement in LUTS-related quality of life (QoL) was significantly different between the groups, with a mean decrease in IPSS QoL subscore of -2.5 ± 0.2 for TAM + SR + BC versus -1.8 ± 0.3 for TAM at 6 months (p = 0.04), and of -2.9 ± 0.4 for TAM + SR + BC versus -2.1 ± 0.4 for TAM at 12 months (p = 0.04). Conversely, no significant differences were found in maximal urinary flow rate (p = 0.38), postvoid residual volume (p = 0.12), prostate-specific antigen (p = 0.41), and prostate volume (p = 0.16). CONCLUSION: Combination treatment with SR and BC plus TAM was shown to be more effective than treatment with TAM only in improving IPSS storage and QoL subscores in BPH patients after 6 months and up to 12 months of treatment.
Assuntos
Colostro , Fitoterapia , Extratos Vegetais/administração & dosagem , Hiperplasia Prostática/tratamento farmacológico , Tansulosina/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Animais , Bovinos , Combinação de Medicamentos , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , SerenoaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Evidence that smoking cessation at first diagnosis of nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) reduces the risk of recurrence is lacking. The aim of our prospective study was to analyze the association between patients' changes in smoking habits after diagnosis and recurrence-free survival (RFS). PATIENTS: After transurethral resection of primary NMIBC, patients were classified as "ex-smokers," i.e., those definitively stopping, and as "active smokers," i.e., those continuing or restarting to smoke. Smoking status was reassessed every 3 months during the first year and every 6 months thereafter. Data on patients' demographics, smoking status, tumor characteristics, treatments, and follow-up were collected. Statistical analysis was performed adopting SPSS 15.0.1 and R3.4.2 software. RESULTS: Out of 194 patients, 67 (34.5%) quit smoking after the diagnosis, while 127 (65.5%) did not. The clinical and pathological characteristics were homogeneously distributed. At a median follow-up of 38 months, 106 patients (54.6%) recurred, 33 (49.2%) ex- and 73 (60.3%) active smokers with a 3-year RFS of 42.3 and 50.7%, respectively (p = 0.55). No statistically significant association between recurrence, pathological features of the primary tumor, and patient smoking habits after diagnosis was detected. Results were not statistically influenced by the intensity (cigarette/day) and duration (years) of smoking. In multivariate analysis, cigarette smoking cessation at diagnosis did not significantly reduce tumor recurrence. CONCLUSION: In our prospective study, more than half of our patients recurred at 3 years. In multivariate analysis, smoking cessation did not significantly reduce tumor recurrence. However, the 8.4% reduction in favor of the ex-smokers suggests the need of larger studies with longer follow-ups. Surprisingly, only 35% of smokers definitively quit after diagnosis. The urologists should play a more active role to persuade the patients to stop smoking at first cancer diagnosis.
Assuntos
Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/prevenção & controle , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Idoso , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Invasividade Neoplásica , Estudos Prospectivos , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has put a substantial burden on the Italian healthcare system, resulting in the restructuring of hospitals to care for COVID-19 patients. However, this has likely impacted access to care for patients experiencing other conditions. We aimed to quantify the impact of COVID-19 on access to care for patients with urgent/emergent urological conditions throughout Italy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to 33 urological units in the AGILE consortium, asking clinicians to report on the number of urgent/emergent urological patients seen and/or undergoing surgery over a 3-week period during the peak of the COVID-19 outbreak and a reference week prior to the outbreak. ANOVA and linear regression models were used to quantify these changes. RESULTS: Data from 27 urological centres in Italy showed a decrease from 956 patients/week seen just prior to the outbreak to 291 patients/week seen by the end of the study period. There was a difference in the number of patients with urgent/emergent urological disease seen within/during the different weeks (all p values < 0.05). A significant decrease in the number of patients presenting with haematuria, urinary retention, urinary tract infection, scrotal pain, renal colic, or trauma and urgent/emergent cases that required surgery was reported (all p values < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In Italy, during the COVID-19 outbreak there has been a decrease in patients seeking help for urgent/emergent urological conditions. Restructuring of hospitals and clinics is mandatory to cope with the COVID-19 pandemic; however, the healthcare system should continue to provide adequate levels of care also to patients with other conditions.