RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The risk of stroke after cardiac and carotid surgery is well established. In contrast, stroke risk in association with non-cardiac and non-carotid surgery and its time course are insufficiently known. We investigated the prevalence of recent and planned surgery among patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA), time dependency of stroke risk, stroke etiology, and interruption of antithrombotic medication in association with surgery. METHODS: Data on type and date of surgery and similar interventions within the last year or planned for the next 2 weeks were anonymously collected together with demographic data, vascular risk factors, stroke severity, handicap before stroke and stroke etiology within a state-wide, mandatory, hospital-based acute stroke care quality monitoring project (Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany) for 1 year (2010). RESULTS: Non-carotid and non-cardiothoracic surgery was reported as performed within 1 year before the index event or as planned for the next 2 weeks thereafter in 532 out of 12,120 patients with ischemic stroke/TIA (4.4%). Compared to 91-365 days before stroke/TIA as reference period, risk of cerebral ischemia (per day analysis) was increased for surgery within 61-90 days before ischemia (rate ratio 2.0, 95% CI 1.5-2.8) and continuously increased along shorter intervals between stroke and surgery (31-60 days: rate ratio 3.6, 95% CI 2.9-4.5; 15-30 days: rate ratio 8.2, 95% CI 6.7-10.1; 8-14 days: rate ratio 13.2, 95% CI 10.3-16.8; 4-7 days: rate ratio 16.5, 95% CI 12.2-22.1) peaking at an interval of 1-3 days before ischemia (rate ratio 34.0, 95% CI 26.9-42.8). On the day of surgery, rate ratio was 14.8 (95% CI 7.8-27.9) and for planned surgery it was 2.7 (95% CI 1.8-4.0). Results were similar for first-ever and for recurrent ischemic stroke. Perioperative stroke/TIA was positively associated with atrial fibrillation and cardioembolic stroke etiology, higher mortality, more severe neurological deficits at discharge, and longer hospital stay; and it was inversely associated with microangiopathic etiology and discharge at home. In 34.5% of patients with recent/planned surgery, prior antithrombotic or anticoagulant medication had been interrupted. CONCLUSIONS: Recent or planned surgery imposes a considerable short-term stroke risk particularly by cardioembolism with cessation of medication as an important contributor. Stroke after surgery is associated with poor outcome and high mortality. Better strategies to reduce the burden of perioperative stroke are urgently required.
Assuntos
Isquemia Encefálica/etiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/efeitos adversos , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/etiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Fibrilação Atrial/complicações , Fibrilação Atrial/tratamento farmacológico , Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico , Isquemia Encefálica/mortalidade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/mortalidade , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Fibrinolíticos/administração & dosagem , Alemanha , Humanos , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/diagnóstico , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sistema de Registros , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/mortalidade , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Regional deprivation can increase the risk of illness and adversely affect care outcomes. In this study, we investigated for the German state of Rhineland-Palatinate whether spatial-structural disadvantages are associated with an increased frequency of ischemic stroke and with less favorable care outcomes. METHODS: We compared billing data from DRG statistics (2008-2017) and quality assurance data (2017) for acute ischemic stroke with the German Index of Multiple Deprivation 2010 (GIMD 2010) for the 36 districts (Landkreise) and independent cities (i.e., cities not belonging to a district) in Rhineland-Palatinate using correlation analyses, a Poisson regression analysis, and logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: The age-standardized stroke rates (ASR) ranged from 122 to 209 per 100 000 inhabitants, while the GIMD 2010 ranged from 4.6 to 47.5; the two values were positively correlated (Spearman's ρ = 0.47; 95% confidence interval [0.16; 0.85]). In 2017, mechanical thrombectomies were performed more commonly (5.7%) in the first GIMD 2010 quartile of the regional areas (i.e., in the least deprived areas) than in the remaining quartiles (4.2-4.6%). The intravenous thrombolysis rates showed no differences from one GIMD 2010 quartile to another. Severe neurological deficits (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale ≥ 5) on admission to the hospital were slightly more common in the fourth quartile (i.e., in the most deprived areas), while antiplatelet drugs and statins were somewhat less commonly ordered on discharge in those areas than in the first quartile. CONCLUSION: These findings document a relationship between regional deprivation and the occurrence of acute ischemic stroke. Poorer GIMD 2010 scores were associated with worse care outcomes in a number of variables, but the absolute differences were small.
Assuntos
Isquemia Encefálica , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Humanos , Incidência , Análise de Regressão , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/terapiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Quality monitoring projects are useful tools to improve the quality and to assess temporal trends of stroke care in larger populations. METHODS: In Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany, a statewide, hospital-based, acute stroke care quality monitoring project was started in 2001. Initially, participation was mandatory for all hospitals with dedicated stroke units and from 2006 onward was mandatory for all hospitals. Quality monitoring included a structured data assessment and quality indicators for procedural measures. RESULTS: Between 2001 and 2006, the numbers of patients registered annually (N=6389 vs N=10 610), admission <3 hours after stroke onset (28.2% vs 34.6%), admission via emergency medical systems (38.1% vs 50.3%), and treatment in stroke units (44.3% vs 59.5%) increased significantly (P<0.0001, respectively). In ischemic stroke, use of thrombolytic therapy increased (for patients admitted <3 hours after onset, 6.5% vs 14.1%), whereas therapy with high-dose heparin declined (24.5% vs 6.0%, P<0.0001). Several quality indicators (performance of neuroimaging and Doppler/duplex sonography, neuroimaging <3 hours after admission) showed stable results at a high level; more patients received echocardiography (62.2% vs 74.0%), but fewer patients were rapidly examined by extracranial Doppler/duplex sonography (68.7% vs 62.8%, P<0.0001). Diagnosis and treatment of hypertension and hyperlipidemia, use of aspirin and combined aspirin/dipyridamole, and diagnosis of atrial fibrillation increased (P<0.0001, respectively). Use of oral anticoagulation remained stable at approximately 38% of patients with cardioembolism. CONCLUSIONS: Although these results reflect high standards of acute stroke care and improvements regarding early admission, thrombolytic therapy, and several secondary preventive measures, there is still the potential for further improvement regarding thrombolysis, use of oral anticoagulation and statins, and admission to stroke units, for example.