A Description of Outcomes Experienced by Patients Whose Orders for Peripheral Artery Revascularization Were Reviewed by a Nondenial Prior Authorization Program.

OBJECTIVE: After a nondenial prior authorization program evaluates orders for peripheral artery revascularization (PAR), ordering physicians sometimes withdraw their orders based upon program recommendations. Some patients with withdrawn orders receive PAR if claudication does not resolve. To characterize patient outcomes under this program, we evaluated whether associations existed between the withdrawal of patients' initial PAR orders and the presence of claims for PAR and claims mentioning intermittent claudication (IC) in the following 16 weeks. METHODS: Orders for PAR placed from 1/1/19 to 9/30/19 for patients with Medicare Advantage health plans were extracted from a national healthcare organization's database. Claims data from 0 to 16 weeks following the order were reviewed to determine if patients had downstream PAR claims, or if they had emergency department or hospital claims mentioning IC. Chi-square tests were used to assess the association between order withdrawal and downstream PAR, as well as claims mentioning IC. Multivariate logistic regressions were run to assess the same, controlling for patient age, sex, urbanicity, local median income, state obesity rate, type of PAR, ordering physician specialty, and whether PAR was ordered in a hospital setting. RESULTS: Of 1588 orders meeting inclusion criteria, 71.9% (1038/1444) of authorized orders and 61.1% (88/144) of withdrawn orders were followed by PAR within 16 weeks, a significant difference (P < .01). Relatedly, 69.8% (1008/1444) of authorized orders and 70.8% (102/144) of withdrawn orders were followed by IC claims, an insignificant difference. Multivariate logistic regressions showed patients with withdrawn PAR orders had significantly lower adjusted odds of PAR (OR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.44-0.91), but an insignificant difference in their adjusted odds of IC (OR: 1.10; CI: 0.76-1.64). CONCLUSIONS: Although patients with withdrawn PAR orders were significantly less likely to receive PAR in the subsequent 16 weeks, no association was found between withdrawn PAR orders and subsequent claims mentioning IC.

Healthcare utilization and expenditures for low income children with sickle cell disease.

BACKGROUND: While multiple studies have examined the healthcare burden of sickle cell disease (SCD) in adults, few have specifically focused on healthcare utilization and expenditures in children. The objective of this study was to characterize the healthcare utilization and costs associated with the care of low-income children with SCD in comparison to other children of similar socioeconomic status. PROCEDURE: For the study period, 2004-2007, we conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional descriptive analysis of administrative claims data from a managed care plan exclusively serving low-income children with Medicaid and the State Children's Health Insurance Plan (SCHIP). Patient demographics, continuity of insurance coverage, healthcare utilization, and expenditures were collected for all children enrolled with SCD and the general population within the health plan for comparison. RESULTS: On average, 27% of members with SCD required inpatient hospitalization and 39% utilized emergency care in a given calendar year. Both values were significantly higher than those of the general health plan population (P < 0.0001). Across the study period, 63% of members with SCD averaged one well child check per year and 10% had a minimum of one outpatient visit per year to a hematologist for comprehensive specialty care. CONCLUSIONS: Low-income children with SCD demonstrate significantly higher healthcare utilization for inpatient care, emergency center care, and home health care compared to children with similar socio-demographic characteristics. A substantial proportion of children with SCD may fail to meet minimum guidelines for outpatient primary and hematology comprehensive care.

Prevalence of endoscopic findings of erosive esophagitis in children: a population-based study.

PURPOSE: Symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) occur in 2% to 7% of children. The manifestations of GERD can be limited to symptoms (eg, heartburn, regurgitation) or can be more complicated, such as erosive esophagitis, esophageal strictures, or Barrett esophagus. The prevalence of such GERD complications in children is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of endoscopic findings of erosive esophagitis in children. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All children ages 0 to 17 years, 11 months who underwent upper endoscopy that was recorded in the Pediatric Endoscopic Database System-Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative between 1999 and 2002 were included. Endoscopic reports that were incomplete or that did not include demographic features, indications for endoscopy, or endoscopic findings were excluded. Erosive esophagitis was defined either descriptively or by the Los Angeles classification. Esophageal biopsy was not evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 7188 children who underwent upper endoscopy fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of those, 888 (12.4%) had erosive esophagitis. The median age of children with erosive esophagitis was 12.7 +/- 4.9 years versus 10.0 +/- 5.1 years in those without erosive esophagitis (P

Safety and effectiveness of ketamine as a sedative agent for pediatric GI endoscopy.

BACKGROUND: The ideal sedation for children undergoing GI endoscopy remains elusive. After ketamine was introduced as a sedative agent in our GI procedure suite, improved sedation and reduced complications were observed. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of ketamine as a sedative agent for GI endoscopy in pediatric patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 402 procedures (EGD, colonoscopy) was performed. Sedation-related complications were defined as hypoxia (oxygen saturation <95% by pulse oximetry), agitation, emergence reactions, stridor, laryngospasm, nausea, vomiting, aspiration, and muscle twitching, or any combination thereof. Sedation groups were defined as the following: Group I, midazolam and meperidine (n=192); Group II, midazolam, meperidine, and ketamine (n=82); and Group III, midazolam and ketamine (n=128). RESULTS: Group 1 (midazolam and meperidine) had the highest frequency of complications, most commonly hypoxia. Group 3 (midazolam and ketamine) had the lowest rate of complications (p=0.001) and the highest rate of adequate sedation, although the difference was not significant (p=0.07). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of midazolam and ketamine appears to provide safe and effective sedation for pediatric patients undergoing endoscopy.