Parents' preferences for the organisation of long-term follow-up of childhood cancer survivors.

Parents take an important role in follow-up of young cancer survivors. We aimed to investigate (1) parents' preferences for organisation of follow-up (including content, specialists involved and models of care), and (2) parents' and children's characteristics predicting preference for generalist vs. specialist-led follow-up. We sent a questionnaire to parents of childhood cancer survivors aged 11-17 years. We assessed on a 4-point Likert scale (1-4), parents' preferences for organisation of long-term follow-up. Proposed models were: telephone/questionnaire, general practitioner (GP) (both categorised as generalist for regression analysis); and paediatric oncologist, medical oncologist or multidisciplinary team (MDT) (categorised as specialists). Of 284 contacted parents, 189 responded (67%). Parents welcomed if visits included checking for cancer recurrence (mean = 3.89), late effects screening (mean = 3.79), taking patients seriously (mean = 3.86) and competent staff (mean = 3.85). The preferred specialists were paediatric oncologists (mean = 3.73). Parents valued the paediatric oncologist model of care (mean = 3.49) and the MDT model (mean = 3.14) highest. Parents of children not attending clinic-based follow-up (OR = 2.97, p = .009) and those visiting a generalist (OR = 4.23, p = .007) favoured the generalist-led model. Many parents preferred a clinic-based model of follow-up by paediatric oncologists or a MDT. However, parents also valued the follow-up care model according to which their child is followed up.

[Developmental causes in variability of efficacy and toxicity of analgesics in pediatrics]. / Causes développementales dans la variabilité de l'efficacité et de la toxicité des antalgiques en pédiatrie.

The intensity of pain perception and its sensibility to analgesic drugs is highly variable and unpredictable between individuals. Drug disposition varies during development due to the physiological maturation of enzymatic systems and physiological processes responsible for the absorption, distribution, elimination and effect at the site of action. Many of those developmental variables are not yet clearly defined, but their consideration is important for avoiding potential risks of ineffective or toxic treatment. Implications of those developmental changes for day-to-day clinical practice depend on the age of the child, on the type of drug, on the underlying disease and on the potential co-administration of other chemicals.

[Pediatry]. / Pédiatrie.

During the previous year, several changes occurred in paediatric patient's management. The new PALS recommendations redefine the rhythm and the rate between cardiac massage and ventilation as well as the indications for defibrillation. The choice of the test for Helicobacter Pylori depends on the age of the patient and on the clinical situation. New anti-hypertensive drugs allow to limit the progression of chronic renal disease with hyper-tension and/or proteinuria. The choice between immunoglobulins, steroids, splenectomy and rituximab to treat chronic thrombocytopenic purpura treatment is a therapeutic challenge. Finally, a new approach is presented for diagnosis and treatment of iron overload in chronic hemoglobinopathies.

Safety and pharmacokinetics of temozolomide using a dose-escalation, metronomic schedule in recurrent paediatric brain tumours.

The aims of this study were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity and pharmacokinetics of oral temozolomide administered over 42 d in children with recurrent/refractory brain tumours. Cohorts of 3-6 patients were treated for 42 d, followed by a 7-d rest period for a maximum of 6 cycles. Patients were stratified as heavily pre-treated (HPT) and non-heavily pre-treated (NHPT). Starting doses were 50 mg/m2 (HPT) or 75 mg/m2 (NHPT). Out of 28 patients enrolled, 20 were evaluable for toxicity and 19 for pharmacokinetics. Three patients in the NHPT group developed grade 3/4 haematological toxicity, 2 experienced dose-limiting toxicity (thrombocytopenia) at 100 mg/m2, and 9/20 developed grade 3 lymphopenia. MTD in both strata was 85 mg/m2. Responses were observed in 4 patients: 2 complete responses (CR) in medulloblastoma and supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumours (PNET), and 2 partial responses (PR) in high-grade glioma, respectively. Overall cumulative exposure was at least 1.5 times higher than in the 5-d administration schedule. In conclusion, the recommended dose of temozolomide is 85 mg/m2 x 42 d. Dose-limiting toxicities are thrombocytopenia and lymphopenia. The observed response rate warrants phase II studies.