Maxillary and Mandibular Healing After Facial Allotransplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Facial transplantation has emerged as a viable option in treating devastating facial injuries.Despite the high healing rate of Le Fort III and bilateral sagittal split osteotomies (BSSO) in nontransplant patients, few studies have reported assessment of maxillary and mandibular healing in face transplant patients compared with nontransplant patients. The aim of this study was to examine differences in bone healing in our patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of facial allotransplantation patients at the Cleveland Clinic from December 2008 to inception. Demographics such as age, date of birth, and sex were recorded. Additional variables included procedures, revisions, reoperations, medications, and bone stability and healing. Computed tomography (CT) images assessed the alignment of skeletal components, bony union quality, and stability of fixation. RESULTS: Three patients were included: 2 had Le Fort III segment transplantation, and 1 had transplantation of both a Le Fort III segment and mandibular BSSO. The Le Fort III segment in all patients exhibited mobility and fibrous union at the Le Fort III osteotomy on CT. In contrast, the BSSO healed uneventfully after transplantation and revision surgery, with bony union confirmed by both CT and histology of the fixation area between the donor and recipient mandible bilaterally. No patients with midfacial fibrous union required revision of the nonunion as they were clinically asymptomatic. CONCLUSION: Le Fort osteotomy demonstrates inferior healing in facial transplantation compared with the nontransplant population. In contrast, the successful healing in the mandible is likely owing to the high density of rich cancellous bone.

Factors Influencing the Aesthetic Outcome and Quality of Life After Breast Reconstruction: A Cross-sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: The most important purpose of reconstruction is to increase or restore the patient's quality of life (QOL). The purpose of our study was to evaluate the QOL and aesthetic outcomes of patients after autologous versus implant-based breast reconstruction. METHODS: Patients who underwent breast reconstruction between 2009 and 2011 were included. The Breast-Q, a validated breast reconstruction QOL questionnaire, was used along with postoperative photographs panel analyses using a multiparameter breast-specific aesthetic outcome scale and retrospective evaluation of demographic and treatment data. RESULTS: Of 820 patients, 261 complete questionnaires were evaluated. On the multivariable linear regression, the "satisfaction with breasts" was positively influenced by autologous and bilateral reconstructions, whereas radiation therapy (RTx), the time between the reconstruction and the questionnaire, and the number of surgeries due to complications were negative factors (adjusted R = 0.183; P < 0.001). The same factors influenced the "satisfaction with the outcomes." The mean "overall breast appearance" was also positively influenced by autologous and bilateral reconstructions, and RTx and the total number of surgeries were negative predictive factors (adjusted R = 0.311, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The aesthetic result and QOL after breast reconstruction for breast cancer treatment are positively influenced by the use of autologous tissue and bilaterality. Factors that negatively influenced the aesthetic result and the QOL include use of RTx, a higher number of surgeries needed for the reconstruction, reoperations due to complications, higher body mass index, and a longer time elapsed between reconstruction and the questionnaire.

Axillary reverse mapping and lymphaticovenous bypass: Lymphedema prevention through enhanced lymphatic visualization and restoration of flow.

BACKGROUND: A lymphedema (LE) prevention surgery (LPS) paradigm for patients undergoing axillary lymphadenectomy (ALND) was developed to protect against LE through enhanced lymphatic visualization during axillary reverse mapping (ARM) and refinement in decision making during lymphaticovenous bypass (LVB). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a prospective database was performed evaluating patients with breast cancer who underwent ALND, ARM, and LVB from September 2016 to December 2018. Patient and tumor characteristics, oncologic and reconstructive operative details, complications and LE development were analyzed. RESULTS: LPS was completed in 58 patients with a mean age of 51.7 years. An average of 14 lymph nodes (LN) were removed during ALND. An average of 2.1 blue lymphatic channels were visualized with an average of 1.4 LVBs performed per patient. End to end anastomosis was performed in 37 patients and a multiple lymphatic intussusception technique in 21. Patency was confirmed 96.5% of patients. Adjuvant radiation was administered to 89% of patients. Two patients developed LE with a median follow-up of 11.8 months. CONCLUSION: We report on our experience using a unique LPS technique. Refinements in ARM and a systematic approach to LVB allows for maximal preservation of lymphatic continuity, identification of transected lymphatics, and reestablishment of upper extremity lymphatic drainage pathways.

Complications Following Abdominal-Based Free Flap Breast Reconstruction: Is a 30 days Complication Rate Representative?

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze timing and frequency of complications following free tissue autologous reconstruction in a single tertiary care institution. METHODS: From August 2012 to December 2013, all patients operated on for abdominal-based free flap breast reconstruction at a single institution were included. Complications were identified and risk factors associated with them were analyzed using SPSS software. RESULTS: The total number of patients was 130 with a total of 191 flaps (69 for unilateral and 61 for bilateral reconstructions). Mean surgery time was 570.5 min (±151.24). Fifty-nine of the reconstructed breasts (30.8 %) had early complications. Reoperations due to complications were required in 16 (8.3 %) of the breasts during the first 30 days with seven patients requiring multiple reoperations. Twenty-eight patients required reoperations after 30 days, the most frequent reason being delayed wound healing and abdominal hernia. The most significant complication was a case of disseminated infection with loss of skin coverage of the breasts. Early complications and donor-site complications were higher in active smokers (p = 0.005 and p < 0.001, respectively). Patients with a BMI < 25 had fewer total early complications (p = 0.05), as well as fewer complications on the breast area (p = 0.02). A longer time in the operating room was associated with an increase in late complications (p = 0.018). Bilateral/unilateral operation, immediate/delayed surgery, radiotherapy, age, hypertension, diabetes, and surgery time were not associated with early complications, late complications, or reoperations (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Active smoking was found to be a significant risk factor for early complications, reoperations, and donor-site complications. Patients with a normal BMI had fewer early complications, reoperations at 30 days, and complications on the breast area. As a significant number of complications occurred beyond the standard 30-day reporting period, it is important to consider reoperations during an extended period. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Beauty Is in the Eye of the Beholder: Factors Influencing Disparity in Perceptions of Breast Reconstruction Aesthetic Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes are the primary measurement of breast reconstruction success, but results may be affected by nontechnical factors such as socioemotional determinants. Third-party observers provide an independent assessment of aesthetic outcomes. Factors associated with disparity between patient and observer perceptions of outcomes are not well understood. METHODS: One hundred forty-seven patients underwent breast reconstruction at the authors' institution between 2009 and 2011, completed the BREAST-Q, and had photographs graded by a diverse panel using the Validated Breast Aesthetic Scale. Patient satisfaction with breasts scores that aligned with observer scores were categorized as group 2; patient satisfaction that exceeded observer scores were group 1; and those lower than observer scores were group 3. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS, with values of p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients (19 percent) were categorized as group 1, 93 (63 percent) in group 2, and 26 (18 percent) in group 3. Median overall appearance was highest in group 3 (median, 4.0; interquartile range, 4 to 4) and lowest in group 1 (median, 3.0; interquartile range, 2 to 3) ( p < 0.001). Psychosocial, sexual, and physical well-being were significantly associated with disparity (group 1 or 3 status) ( p < 0.01). Satisfaction with outcomes, nipples, abdomen, and breasts were significantly associated with disparity. Factors not significantly associated with disparity include age, body mass index, autologous or implant-based, adjuvant therapies, and timing of reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Incongruously high patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction aesthetics relative to third-party perception of aesthetic outcomes is associated with high quality-of-life scores. Incongruously low patient satisfaction with breast cosmesis compared with higher third-party perceptions was associated with low quality-of-life scores. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, II.

Skeletal and Dental Outcomes after Facial Allotransplantation: The Cleveland Clinic Experience and Systematic Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Most of the literature surrounding face transplantation focuses on technique, immunology, and psychology. Dental and skeletal outcomes remain persistently underreported. This study critically examined the worldwide face transplant experience to evaluate such outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review of all composite allografts containing midface and/or mandible was performed. Dental and skeletal complications were recorded. Formal imaging and photographs available in the literature were analyzed using skeletal measurements, soft-tissue cephalometrics, and the Angle classification. Outcomes of our face transplant patients, including condylar assessment and airway volume measurements, is also presented. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients received allografts containing midface (n = 7) or mandible (n = 2), whereas 16 contained a double-jaw. All midface-only transplants developed skeletal deformity; 57 percent developed a palatal fistula. Both partial and full arch transplantation patients developed skeletal deformity. Among double-jaw transplants, 69 percent developed palatal fistula or floor-of-mouth dehiscence, 66 percent developed malocclusion, 50 percent developed trismus, and 31 percent required corrective orthognathic surgery. In 40 percent of patients, malocclusion recurred after corrective orthognathic surgery. Forty percent of all patients developed dental cavities or periodontal disease. All of our patients received midface and/or mandible. One patient required corrective orthognathic surgery. Midfacial segments showed clockwise rotation. Airway volumes decreased over time. CONCLUSIONS: Skeletal and dental complications remain extremely common after facial allotransplantation involving either single- or double-jaw composites. Corrective orthognathic surgery and dental extraction is often necessitated. These data will aid face transplant teams during surgical planning and preoperative counseling. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, V.

A Novel Validated Breast Aesthetic Scale.

BACKGROUND: Breast aesthetics impacts patients' quality of life after breast reconstruction, but patients and surgeons frequently disagree on the final aesthetic evaluation. The need for a comprehensive, validated tool to evaluate breast aesthetics independently from the patient motivated this study. METHODS: The 13-item Validated Breast Aesthetic Scale was developed after several internal meetings, and worded to be understood by a nonspecialist. Three items are common for both breasts, with the remaining being side-specific. To test the internal consistency of the scale subitems, postoperative photographs after different breast reconstruction techniques were graded by a six-member panel. To test interrater and intrarater correlation across time, four physicians evaluated the results of abdominally based breast reconstructions following nipple-sparing mastectomies. RESULTS: Graded aesthetic outcomes of 53 patients showed that the Cronbach alpha of the subitems of the scale was 0.926, with no single item that, if excluded, would increase it. Twenty-two patients underwent aesthetic outcomes grading at four different time points. The mean overall appearance was 3.71 ± 0.62. The mean grade for overall nipple appearance was 4.0 ± 0.57. The coefficient alpha of the panel overall aesthetic grade across different time points was 0.957; whereas intragrader reliability for graders 1 through 4 individually showed alpha coefficients of 0.894, 0.9, 0.898, and 0.688, respectively. Similar results were found for the other items of the scale. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed aesthetic scale evaluates different aspects of the breast reconstruction aesthetic result with excellent internal consistency among its subitems. Grading by a gender-balanced, diverse four-member panel using postoperative photographs showed higher reliability and reproducibility compared to single graders.

A retrospective review of submuscular implant-based breast reconstruction: The influence of dermal matrix (ADM) on complications and aesthetic outcomes.

PURPOSE: The use of acellular dermal matrix changed the breast reconstruction algorithm facilitating implant coverage and direct to implant technique. This study aims to evaluate the effect of the ADM surgical complications, breast aesthetics, and patient satisfaction. METHODS: In a tertiary hospital, patients that underwent implant-based breast reconstructions during a three-year period had their charts retrospectively reviewed, received post-operative BreastQ, and had their post-operative photos evaluated by a three-member panel using a multi-parameter breast specific scale (scored 1-5). The complication information was analysed per reconstructed breast while the analysis of aesthetic and patient-reported outcomes was done per patient. RESULTS: A total of 501 patients (990 breasts) were evaluated. In the complication analysis group, 20.3% of the breasts had ADM. Overall complications and major complications were more frequent in the ADM group. During the first 30 postoperative days the most frequent complications were: skin necrosis/delayed wound healing and haematoma, after 30 days was infection, and complications after 1 year being less than 1%. On the outcome analysis group, ADM was used in 21.5% patients, 44% had post-operative photos, and 29% answered the BreastQ. Factors associated with higher appearance score were bilateral reconstruction, prophylactic surgery, and nipple presence. ADM demonstrated no difference in satisfaction with breasts. CONCLUSION: In implant-based breast reconstructions ADM has been shown to increase rate of complications. The use of acellular dermal matrix did not influence the overall appearance or the patient-reported outcome. A good aesthetic outcome is positively influenced by bilateral reconstructions with preservation of the nipple.

Lessons learned reconstructing complex scalp defects using free flaps and a cranioplasty in one stage.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to review our experience in single-stage reconstruction of skull and scalp defects, aiming to highlight pitfalls in our management. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients who had a single-stage cranioplasty and free-tissue transfer at our institution over the last 10 years. Thirteen patients (9 men and 4 women) with an average age of 66.5 years (range, 34-83 years) were identified. Etiology of the defects included malignancy (n = 7), osteoradionecrosis (n = 3), and infection (n = 3). The size of the bony defect averaged 103.1 cm(2) (range, 12-300 cm(2)). Cranioplasty procedures included reconstruction by methylmethacrylate and titanium mesh (n = 10), methylmethacrylate only (n = 1), or mesh only (n = 2). Free flaps used were anterolateral thigh (n = 10), latissimus dorsi (n = 2), or a rectus flap (n = 1). RESULTS: Five patients (38%) developed at least 1 complication. These included 2 anastomotic problems that were successfully salvaged, 5 cases of wound dehiscence, and 1 mortality due to a respiratory event. Four patients developed a recurrence, and 2 patients required flap contouring at a second stage. Two patients had further reconstruction using 1 (1 patient) or 2 (1 patient) additional free flaps. CONCLUSIONS: Given the complexity of these procedures, the high recurrence rate, and the likelihood of complications, methylmethacrylate is contraindicated in 1-stage cranioplasty and soft-tissue reconstruction in high-risk patients. For unfavorable local conditions (eg previous infection, radiotherapy), the surgeon can either postpone the cranioplasty until the soft-tissue reconstruction has healed, or use a nonanatomical titanium mesh alone. The soft-tissue flap should be harvested of larger dimensions than anticipated.

Long-term Effect of Cranioplasty on Overlying Scalp Atrophy.

Scalp thinning over a cranioplasty can lead to complex wound problems, such as extrusion and infection. However, the details of this process remain unknown. The aim of this study was to describe long-term soft-tissue changes over various cranioplasty materials and to examine risk factors associated with accelerated scalp thinning. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients treated with isolated cranioplasty between 2003 and 2015 was conducted. To limit confounders, patients with additional scalp reconstruction or who had a radiologic follow-up for less than 1 year were excluded. Computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging was used to measure scalp thickness in identical locations and on the mirror image side of the scalp at different time points. RESULTS: One hundred one patients treated with autogenous bone (N = 38), polymethylmethacrylate (N = 33), and titanium mesh (N = 30) were identified. Mean skull defect size was 104.6 ± 43.8 cm2. Mean length of follow-up was 5.6 ± 2.6 years. Significant thinning of the scalp occurred over all materials (P < 0.05). This was most notable over the first 2 years after reconstruction. Risk factors included the use of titanium mesh (P < 0.05), use of radiation (P < 0.05), reconstruction in temporal location (P < 0.05), and use of a T-shaped or "question mark" incision (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Thinning of the native scalp occurred over both autogenous and alloplastic materials. This process was more severe and more progressive when titanium mesh was used. In our group of patients without preexisting soft-tissue problems, native scalp atrophy rarely led to implant exposure. Other risk factors for scalp atrophy included radiation, temporal location, and type of surgical exposure.

A Tumor Ultrasound-guided Incision (TUGI) Approach to Nipple-sparing Mastectomy: Balancing Oncologic Safety and Technical Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is a prevalent operation for patients with breast cancer. Indications have been limited to tumors accessible via radial, infra-mammary, or periareolar incisions out of concern for oncologic and technical safety. We study an alternative approach to NSM based on tumor ultrasound-guided incisions (TUGI) and report its oncologic and technical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review examined patients who underwent TUGI NSM between 2013 and 2016. Operative notes, postoperative notes, pathology reports, and postoperative photography were analyzed. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients had mastectomy with reconstruction performed over a 3-year period by the senior authors. Of those, 31 (33%) were NSM and 13 (14%) had the TUGI technique, forming the study group. The median tumor size was 1.5 cm, with a median distance from the nipple areolar complex of 5 cm. Sixty-two percent of the incisions were in the upper quadrants of the breast. Median operative time was 207 minutes. Zero patients had positive margins. One hundred percent of patients underwent immediate tissue expander placement, 46% with acellular dermal matrix. For final reconstruction, 23% had a free flap, 69% implant, and 8% are still pending. Eight percent of patients had wound infection, and 15% of patients had NAC necrosis. No cancer recurrence has been observed at a median follow-up of 17 months. CONCLUSION: TUGI offers a valuable, oncologically sound alternative approach to traditional NSM. The technical results and outcomes support its use in selected patients with breast cancer undergoing NSM.

Watershed Areas in Face Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The maxillary artery has traditionally been considered the main blood supply of the facial skeleton. However, the deep and concealed location makes the harvest of facial allografts based on this artery challenging, giving preference to the facial artery. There is growing evidence that the junction between the hard and soft palate may represent a watershed area in facial artery-based allografts. The aim of this study was to review the occurrence of partial allograft necrosis and modify the available craniofacial techniques, allowing for a reliable harvest of maxillary artery-based facial allografts. METHODS: PubMed/MEDLINE databases were searched for articles presenting allograft perfusion details and the occurrence of partial flap necrosis. Next, 25 fresh cadaver heads were used: eight allografts were harvested by means of a traditional Le Fort III approach, in six the maxillary artery was injected with latex, in three cadaver heads lead oxide gel was injected in the maxillary artery, and eight full facial allografts were harvested through a modified approach. RESULTS: Seven patients developed palatal fistulas or palatal necrosis (41 percent) when allograft was perfused through the facial artery. The traditional Le Fort III approach demonstrated consistent injury to maxillary artery/branches. The modified approach allowed for preservation of the maxillary artery under direct vision. CONCLUSIONS: Current facial transplantation outcomes indicate that facial artery-based allografts containing Le Fort III bony components can experience compromised palate perfusion. The described modified Le Fort III approach allowed safe dissection of the maxillary artery, preserving the arterial blood supply to the facial skeleton. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, V.

Comparison of preoperative quality of life in breast reconstruction, breast aesthetic and non-breast plastic surgery patients: A cross-sectional study.

A breast cancer diagnosis imposes significant emotional and psychological duress. The purpose of this study is to assess the baseline quality of life (QOL) of immediate, delayed, and secondary breast reconstruction patients, comparing these results with QOL in women seeking plastic surgery for cosmetic breast, and non-breast procedures. From 2012 through 2013, immediate (group 1), delayed (group 2), and secondary (Group 3) reconstruction patients, aesthetic breast (group 4) and non-breast plastic surgery patients (group 5) answered Breast-Q questionnaires. Groups 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 answered 141, 12, 23, 72 and 160 preoperative questionnaires respectively. There was no difference (p = NS) in breast satisfaction, psychosocial well-being, physical well-being-chest, and sexual well-being between groups 1 and 5. Group 1 had higher satisfaction with breast (p < 0.01), psychosocial (p < 0.01) and sexual well-being (p < 0.01) when compared to groups 2 and 4. Group 1 had higher satisfaction with breasts (p < 0.01) compared to group 3. Group 4 did not differ in satisfaction with breasts, psychosocial, and sexual well-being, compared to groups 2 and 3. Group 4 had lower scores in all domains, compared to groups 1 and 5 (p < 0.01). No significant difference in QOL was found between groups 2 and 3. Preoperatively, immediate reconstruction patients had similar satisfaction with breasts, psychosocial well-being, and chest physical well-being, compared to non-breast plastic surgery patients. Aesthetic breast surgery patients demonstrate similar low scores in satisfaction with breasts, psychosocial well-being, and sexual well-being to those of patients prior to delayed breast reconstruction, or secondary salvage procedures.

Proximal vascular pedicle preservation for sartorius muscle flap transposition.

BACKGROUND: A variety of muscle flaps have been described to treat complex groin wounds associated with infected and/or exposed femoral vessels or vascular grafts and persistent lymphatic leaks, and for prophylaxis against wound breakdown following inguinal lymphadenectomy. The sartorius muscle flap has several advantages over other muscle flaps: it is immediately adjacent to the groin, it is easy to prepare, and the harvest causes no functional morbidity. Despite these advantages, the flap's reliability has been questioned because of the segmental blood supply to the muscle and the flap's limited arc of rotation. To improve the reliability of the flap, the authors defined the proximal vascular anatomy of the sartorius muscle in 20 human cadavers and assessed the correlation with 20 clinical cases. They describe a technique for the harvest of the sartorius muscle transposition flap that preserves the most proximal pedicle. METHODS: From July of 2000 to January of 2004, 40 sartorius muscles were dissected in 20 human preserved cadavers. During the same time period, 21 sartorius muscle transposition flap procedures were performed in 19 patients for a variety of complex groin wound complications, including infection (n = 10), lymphadenectomy (n = 4), lymphatic leak (n = 3), exposed femoral vessels (n = 3), and high-risk wound (n = 1). The location of the most proximal vascular pedicle with respect to the anterior superior iliac spine was measured in each cadaveric dissection as well as in each clinical case. Outcomes were assessed in the clinical cases with respect to wound healing. RESULTS: The distance between the anterior superior iliac spine and the proximal vessels in the cadaver specimens was 6.6 +/- 1.3 cm (range, 5.0 to 9.5 cm). The distance between the anterior superior iliac spine and the proximal vessels in the clinical patients was 6.2 +/- 0.6 cm (range, 5.5 to 7.5 cm). Patients were followed for an average period of 30 months (range, 5 to 45 months). There were no incidences of partial or total flap necrosis. All wounds healed to completion. CONCLUSIONS: The proximal pedicle of the sartorius muscle is consistently located at 6.5 cm from the anterior superior iliac spine. Preservation of the proximal pedicle during dissection ensures the viability of the sartorius muscle transposition flap for the treatment of complex groin wounds.