Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Idioma
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Huan Jing Ke Xue ; 42(2): 584-594, 2021 Feb 08.
Artigo em Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33742852

RESUMO

Continuous on-line observation of particulate matter and PM2.5 chemical composition was conducted from October 15th to November 7th 2019 in East China. During the observation period, a wide range of dust-related processes took place. According to supplementary urban air quality assessment affected by dust (hereafter referred to as supplementary provisions), the observations were divided into four stages including pre-dust event, dust Ⅰ, dust Ⅱ, and post-dust event. The dust Ⅰ stage represented the processes of transportation and retention, while the dust Ⅱ stage represented processes of backflow from the sea and scavenging. The start time of the studied dust event was October 29th 08:00-09:00 based on the supplementary provisions, dust tracers, and air quality models; however, disagreements existed between these data sources with respect to the finishing time. The supplementary provisions could not effectively distinguish backflow dust from sea, and results from different dust tracers were variable. The WRF-CMAQ model simulated dust variation trends well but overestimated short-term suspended dust and backflow dust. PM10, PM2.5, and trace element concentrations were much higher during dust events than during non-dust periods, with highest daily concentrations of (234.8±125.5), (76.8±22.5), and (17.54±10.5) µg·m-3, respectively, which occurred on October 29th. During the dust event, concentration of crustal elements were remarkably high in PM2.5. At the same time, secondary ions (SO42-, NO3-, and NH4+) contributed less to PM2.5 mass concentrations. Four major crustal elements (Al, Si, Ca, and Fe) accounted for 23.5% and 13.7% of the mass concentration of PM2.5 and secondary ions accounted for 24.3% and 41.9% during dust Ⅰ and dust Ⅱ stages, respectively. Based on PMF source apportionment, Ca abundance, PM2.5/PM10 in dust sources, and the reconstruction of crustal material, dust particulates accounted for 43.4%-50.0% of PM2.5 and backflow dust accounted for 19.2%-24.7% of PM2.5.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA