CNS monoamine levels and motoric behaviors in the hotfoot ataxic mutant.

Mice that were homozygous recessive for the single-gene mutation, hotfoot, showed profound and progressive motor disturbances in an open field after approximately the 4th postnatal week. Studies were undertaken to examine the role of the monoaminergic system in the behavioral and developmental expression of this neurological mutation. Relative to controls, 10-and 30-day-old hotfoot mice demonstrated a significantly attenuated response to the stimulating locomotor effects of amphetamine while adult hotfoot mice were motorically unaffected by amphetamine administration. 30-day-old and adult hotfoot mice also were hypothermic relative to phenotypically normal mice after amphetamine administration. Examination of monoamine levels and turnover revealed that hotfoot mice had significantly greater concentrations of norepinephrine associated with lower turnover in cerebellum and greater levels of serotonin in cerebellum and striatum, relative to phenotypic controls. In addition, mice born and raised by hotfoot dams demonstrated neurochemical alterations regardless of genotype. Both the neurochemical data and the developmental response to the general catecholamine agonist, amphetamine, suggest that the monaminergic neurotransmitter system may be altered as a consequence of the hotfoot mutation.

Nimodipine's interactions with other drugs: II. Diazepam.

Adult Binghamton Heterogeneous (HET) stock mice were administered one of three doses of diazepam (0.1, 2.5, or 5.0 mg/kg) immediately followed by a second injection of either the slow calcium channel blocker, nimodipine (Bay e 9736), or its vehicle. Hypothermic responses and muscular incoordination were measured twenty and sixty minutes later as assessed by changes in rectal temperature and motoric activity on a rotating rod. Nimodipine (5 mg/kg) alone did not significantly affect body temperature or motor coordination. However, when administered in combination with the two highest doses of diazepam, nimodipine significantly potentiated the hypothermic response produced by these doses both twenty minutes and sixty minutes post-injection. Administration of high doses of diazepam (2.5 and 5.0 mg/kg) resulted in significant motor incoordination at both observation periods, but this effect was not potentiated by nimodipine.

Nimodipine's interactions with other drugs: I. Ethanol.

Adult mice (Binghamton Heterogeneous stock) received different doses of ethanol (0.5, 1.0, or 2.0 g/kg) administered alone or in combination with the voltage-sensitive calcium channel antagonist, nimodipine (Bay e 9736). Both 20 and 60 minutes later, sensitivity to ethanol was assessed in terms of rotorod activity and changes in rectal temperatures. Nimodipine (5 mg/kg) alone did not alter rectal temperature or motor coordination, but at both observation periods nimodipine potentiated the hypothermia induced by the highest dose of alcohol (2.0 g/kg) and exaggerated alcohol-induced motor incoordination at all doses. The present set of results indicates that the inhibition of voltage-dependent calcium channels can exaggerate ethanol-induced effects.

The effects of verapamil and ethanol on body temperature and motor coordination.

Male, adult mice of the Binghamton heterogeneous stock received one of two doses of ethanol (1.0 g/kg or 2.0 g/kg in saline) alone or in combination with the calcium (Ca2+) slow channel blocker, verapamil (5.45 mg/kg in 25% v/v ethanol in saline). Hypothermic responses and motor incoordination were assessed in terms of rectal temperatures and rotorod activity both 20 and 60 min after drug administration. Verapamil alone did not affect body temperature, but it potentiated ethanol-induced hypothermia at both post-administration test times. Both verapamil and ethanol impaired muscular coordination and these effects were additive at the two observation periods. Verapamil did not affect ethanol blood levels from 10 to 80 min after administration of the drugs. Since motor impairment was observed when verapamil was administered with only its ethanol vehicle, this suggests a powerful interactive effect between the two drugs.

The influence of prenatal and/or postnatal exposure to lead on behavior of preweanling mice.

Binghamton Heterogeneous (HET) Stock mice received prenatal exposure to either water or a 0.5% lead acetate solution via their biological dam. At birth, litters were cross-fostered so that they were postnatally exposed to either water or lead via their foster dam. Early preweaning measures of square crossing and standups in an open field and time to return to home cage nest showed that the effects of lead on behavior depend on: the developmental stage(s) during which the individual is exposed to the toxin, as well as age and conditions when tested.

The impact of single versus repeated exposure of mice to Toxocara canis.

Infection with T. canis can alter dramatically the brain and behavior of the host. Previous results suggest that if the mammalian host is exposed either simultaneously to lead, or has a history of prior exposure to that toxic substance, the magnitude of the behavioral reaction to T. canis may be modified or even reduced. The present data suggest that the magnitude of both the behavioral and tissue/immune reactions may be less if the organism has multiple, instead of a single exposure, to T. canis. Lead, and perhaps other environmental toxicants may alter neurotropic products of the parasite, the behavior of the parasite, and/or reactivity of the host in the presence of the parasite. Such considerations may help explain, in part, the relative rarity of reported toxocariasis in humans, despite the fact that serological indices suggest that exposure to T. canis may be as high as 7% of the world population.

Effect of pentobarbital and gaseous anesthetics on rats selectively bred for ethanol sensitivity.

Rats have been genetically selected to have a differential hypnotic response to an acute injection of ethanol. These high alcohol sensitive (HAS) and low alcohol sensitive (LAS) rats were used to investigate commonalities of the mechanism of action of several gaseous anesthetics, pentobarbital and ethanol. Similar studies have been carried out extensively with mouse lines also differentially sensitive to ethanol (short- and long-sleep mice). Like the mice, the rats are also differentially sensitive to the two gaseous anesthetics, enflurane and isoflurane. However, in contrast to results with these mice, we find that the HAS and LAS rats are differentially sensitive to halothane and pentobarbital in the same direction as their sensitivity to ethanol. In other studies, the rats also have been found to be differentially sensitive to phenobarbital as are SS and LS mice. These results show that, by the use of these anesthetics in combination with selectively bred rodent lines, many new opportunities for dissecting the molecular mechanisms of anesthetic agents present themselves.

Phenobarbital sensitivity in HAS and LAS rats before and after chronic administration of ethanol.

Rats selectively bred for high alcohol sensitivity (HAS) or low alcohol sensitivity (LAS) were tested for initial sensitivity to hypnotic doses of ethanol and a locomotor-altering dose of phenobarbital. Following 6 weeks of either a pair-fed control or 33% ethanol-derived calorie diet, animals were tested again for tolerance to ethanol and cross-tolerance to phenobarbital. HAS and LAS rats did not differ in baseline open field or Rotarod activity before chronic ethanol treatment. However, HAS rats were more sensitive to 50 mg/ kg phenobarbital relative to LAS rats. Both control- and ethanol-diet rats appeared to be less sensitive to phenobarbital after the 6-week treatment period. Chronic ethanol-exposed HAS and LAS rats demonstrated tolerance to ethanol and cross-tolerance to phenobarbital, and in particular LAS rats were even more active in the open field following phenobarbital relative to controls. In summary, significant differences in response to phenobarbital were observed between HAS and LAS rats. These observations suggest that initial sensitivity and tolerance to ethanol are associated with differences in phenobarbital sensitivity and are influenced by similar genes.

Developmental alterations of ethanol sensitivity in selectively bred high and low alcohol sensitive rats.

Initial sensitivity and acute tolerance to ethanol have been implicated as risk factors in the development of alcoholism in humans. These behaviors were investigated in rats selectively bred for differences in hypnotic sensitivity following their first dose of ethanol in two different experiments. In Experiment 1, developmental profiles of the association between initial sensitivity and acute tolerance induced by a single exposure to ethanol were examined using male and female high, low, and control alcohol sensitive (HAS, LAS, and CAS) rats. Dose-response curves were constructed for duration of the loss of the righting reflex and for blood ethanol concentration (BEC) at the regain of the righting reflex. Animals were tested with a single ethanol dose ranging from 1.5 to 5.0 g/kg at either 15, 25, 40, 70, 120, or 180 days of age (DOA). For each group, acute tolerance to ethanol was estimated by the slope of the regression line using dose of ethanol and mean BEC at regain. In general, all rat lines showed an increase in hypnotic sensitivity to ethanol with age. To a large degree, the lower sensitivity observed in 15 and 25 DOA HAS and LAS rats was associated with an increase in the development of acute ethanol tolerance relative to older rats. Divergence of the LAS and CAS lines was evident by 25 DOA and remained stable with advancing age. However, HAS rats did not differ significantly from CAS rats until 40 DOA, after which the magnitude of the difference continued to increase with age. In Experiment 2, rats were treated with alcohol at 25, 70, or 180 DOA. Rats at 70 or 180 DOA required less ethanol to disrupt their motor coordination on a rotating dowel (rotarod). Blood ethanol levels were determined at the loss and subsequent regain of the ability to negotiate the rotarod. Total duration of inability to negotiate the rotarod also was recorded. HAS rats were less able to remain on a rotarod while under the influence of alcohol relative to LAS and CAS rats regardless of age. However, no evidence of acute tolerance was observed in this experiment and, in fact, there was evidence of reverse tolerance in that all animals had lower BEC values at regain of ability than they did at loss.

Neurotensin levels and receptors in HAS and LAS rat brains: effects of ethanol.

Previous studies of neurotensin (NT) levels and NT receptor densities in specific brain regions of mice selectively bred for differences in sensitivity to ethanol have shown that NTergic processes may mediate some actions of ethanol. In the present study, we have determined the levels of NT and NT receptor densities in specific brain regions of HAS and LAS rats that have been selectively bred for differences in sensitivity to ethanol-induced loss of righting response. Regional differences in NT levels were observed in brains from both HAS and LAS rats and values in hypothalamus, ventral midbrain, and nucleus accumbens from female rats were 25 to 75% higher than levels in corresponding regions from male rats. However, there were no significant line differences in NT-ir levels in corresponding regions from HAS and LAS animals. High-affinity binding (NTH Bmax values), measured by Scatchard analyses, were higher in ventral midbrain from HAS males than from LAS males. NTH receptor densities were higher in HAS males than in HAS females; sex differences were not observed in the LAS line. There were no significant line or sex differences between HAS and LAS in low-affinity (NTL) Bmax values in any brain region. In HAS females, subhypnotic doses of ethanol produced a decrease in NT levels in nucleus accumbens, whereas, hypnotic doses caused an increase in NT levels. Likewise, hypnotic doses elicited increases in NT levels in hypothalamus of female HAS and LAS, but not in ventral midbrain or caudate putamen. These results are consistent with low dose activation of mesolimbic and nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons in which NT is colocalized with dopamine and with high dose inhibition of these pathways.

Ceramide composition of whole brain synaptosomal gangliosides from mice genetically bred for divergent ethanol sensitivities.

A comparison of the two major ceramide molecular species (d18:1-C18:0 and d20:1-C18:0) of synaptosomal gangliosides GM1, GD1a+GT1a, GD1b, GT1b, revealed a difference between the ceramide composition of ethanol-sensitive LS and ethanol-insensitive SS whole brain synaptosomal gangliosides. In all comparisons, the ratio of the two major molecular species, (d18:1-C18:0/d20:1-C18:0) was less for LS than for SS mice.

gamma-Aminobutyric acid-activated chloride channels in rats selectively bred for differential acute sensitivity to alcohol.

Effects of various sedative hypnotic agents on GABA-mediated chloride flux were evaluated in whole brain membrane vesicles (microsacs) prepared from rats selectively bred for high (HAS) and low sensitivity (LAS) to an acute hypnotic dose of alcohol. The HAS rats were more sensitive to the effects of pentobarbital, phenobarbital, flunitrazepam, and ethanol on GABA-mediated chloride flux compared with the LAS rats. No differences between the lines in GABA-stimulated chloride flux were observed. Modulation of 1-[3H]-phenyl-4-butyl-2,6,7-trioxabicyclo(2.2.2)octane ([3H]-TBOB) and [3H]-diazepam binding also was measured. The lines did not differ in inhibition of [3H]-TBOB binding by pentobarbital, phenobarbital, muscimol or picrotoxin. Although the lines displayed almost identical KD and Bmax for [3H]-diazepam binding, the GABA agonist, muscimol, was a more potent stimulator of [3H]-diazepam binding in membranes prepared from HAS rats than from LAS rats. These findings are discussed in light of previous work using other selected lines.

Effect of exogenous GM1 on ethanol sensitivity in selectively bred mouse lines.

Ethanol sensitive long-sleep (LS) and ethanol resistant short-sleep (SS) mice are lines that have been genetically selected for differential central nervous system sensitivities to the hypnotic effect of ethanol. Because they were genetically selected only for differences in sensitivity to ethanol hypnosis, biochemical and physiological differences between them are likely related to their differential ethanol sensitivity. The synaptosomal and whole brain concentration of GM1 ganglioside was previously shown to differ significantly between the lines. Further, GM1 alters membrane responses to ethanol, including a differential effect on LS and SS synaptosomal membrane disordering. Therefore, GM1 was administered intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) with micro-osmotic pumps, to partially bypass the blood-brain barrier and to test its effect on CNS sensitivity to ethanol hypnosis in LS and SS mice. In the first experiment, 3 days' infusion of GM1 (20 micrograms/microliters, 24 microliters/day), saline control and treated LS and SS mice were tested for both regaining of the righting reflex and waking brain ethanol concentration. Incorporation of 3H-GM1 into brain membranes was verified by scintillation spectroscopy. GM1 did not alter ethanol sensitivity or brain ethanol concentration at time of waking in LS mice. Conversely, SS mice treated with GM1 were significantly more sensitive to ethanol hypnosis than saline controls as measured by the time to regain the righting reflex ("sleep time") and waking brain ethanol concentrations. In the second experiment, GM1-treated SS mice were again significantly more sensitive to ethanol hypnosis than saline controls. GM1 incorporation into the contralateral and ipsilateral cerebral hemispheres was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography.

Selective breeding of rats differing in sensitivity to the effects of acute ethanol administration.

Selective breeding of rats for sensitivity to the anesthetic effects of ethanol is being carried out with rats derived from the genetically heterogeneous N/Nih stock. Thirteen generations of within family selection have been achieved with replicate high (HAS), low (LAS) and control alcohol sensitive (CAS) lines. Significant separation between lines on sleep time and blood ethanol concentration (BEC) at awakening following ethanol administration has been achieved. In general, the results obtained so far replicate the findings with short (SS) and long (LS) sleep mice. One exception is that the high alcohol sensitivity rats (HAS) also appear more sensitive to pentobarbital relative to LAS rats. This finding is opposite to that which occurs with SS and LS mice where the low ethanol sensitive SS mice appear more sensitive to pentobarbital than the LS mice.

Chronic ethanol consumption alters effects of ethanol in vitro on brain membrane structure of high alcohol sensitivity and low alcohol sensitivity rats.

In this study, we examined if differences in initial membrane sensitivity to ethanol were associated with development of membrane tolerance to ethanol. High Alcohol Sensitivity (HAS) and Low Alcohol Sensitivity (LAS) rats were administered a 15% ethanol solution in water as the sole source of fluid for 30 days. The amount of ethanol consumed per day did not significantly differ between the HAS and LAS rats. Development of membrane tolerance to in vitro effects of ethanol has been previously reported for bulk membrane fluidity and protein-lipid interaction. Our data expands the understanding of "membrane tolerance" phenomenon to protein distribution and bilayer interdigitation. We also introduce genotype-dependent and genotype-independent properties of the membrane tolerance to ethanol. ethanol treatment produced genotype-dependent and genotype-independent membrane tolerance to ethanol. The in vitro effects of ethanol on synaptic plasma membrane (SPM) protein distribution and lipid bilayer interdigitation were abolished or decreased in the SPM of chronic ethanol-treated HAS rats, as compared with the SPM of HAS control rats (genotype-dependent tolerance). Protein distribution and bilayer interdigitation were not affected by ethanol in vitro in either chronic ethanol-treated or control LAS rats. Genotype-independent tolerance to ethanol in vitro was observed for SPM annular and bulk bilayer fluidity in chronic ethanol-treated HAS and LAS rats. It is concluded that initial sensitivity to ethanol contributes to the development of membrane tolerance to ethanol in HAS and LAS rats.

Responses to cholinergic agonists of rats selectively bred for differential sensitivity to ethanol.

Alcoholics are almost invariably heavy users of tobacco. Both alcoholism and smoking appear to be influenced by genetic factors but it is not known whether the same or different genes regulate the abuse of ethanol and nicotine. Recent studies have demonstrated that the long-sleep (LS) and short-sleep (SS) mouse lines, which were selectively bred for differences in ethanol-induced anesthesia ("sleep-time"), also differ in several effects of nicotine and the muscarinic agonist, oxotremorine. In order to determine whether or not these differences are due to chance, the relative sensitivities of rat lines which were selectively bred for differences in ethanol-induced sleep-time were determined. The high alcohol sensitivity (HAS) rat line was more sensitive to the locomotor and body temperature depressant effects of nicotine than was the low alcohol sensitivity (LAS) rat line. The control line (CAS) was intermediate in sensitivity. The rat lines did not differ in sensitivity to oxotremorine's hypothermia-producing effects. The numbers and affinities of two classes of brain nicotinic receptors were measured in eight brain regions. No differences among the rat lines were detected. These results suggest that ethanol elicits some of its depressant actions via an effect on brain nicotinic systems, but the differences in sensitivity to ethanol and nicotine are probably not due to differences in the number of brain nicotinic receptors. Perhaps this interaction explains the high correlation between alcoholism and smoking in humans.

Surface exposure of synaptosomal gangliosides from long-sleep and short-sleep mice.

A galactose oxidase/NaB[3H]4 technique was used to examine the relative surface exposure of gangliosides from whole brain synaptosomes of long-sleep (LS) and short-sleep (SS) mice. The surface exposure of the monosialoganglioside, GM1, did not differ between the two lines. Surface exposure of the polysialogangliosides GD1a, GD1b, and GT1b, however, was significantly greater in LS synaptosomes than in SS. Hydrolysis of the polysialogangliosides by neuraminidase to the end-product, GM1, at early time periods occurred more rapidly in LS than in SS synaptosomes. Upon exposure to either 250 mM or 50 mM ethanol, LS synaptosomal ganglioside surface exposure was decreased, but that of SS was increased. Pairwise comparisons of the individual ganglioside classes indicated that the decrease in LS synaptosomal ganglioside surface exposure was attributable to decreases in the polysialogangliosides, compared with controls. The ethanol-induced increase in SS synaptosomal ganglioside surface exposure, however, was mainly due to an increased surface exposure of only GD1a. These results suggest that intrinsic differences in the surface exposure of gangliosides and/or the magnitude and direction of ethanol-induced changes in ganglioside surface distribution may reflect biophysical or modulatory mechanisms by which this class of compounds modifies membrane sensitivity to ethanol. These results suggest that further studies should be performed to determine whether gangliosides are factors in genetically determined sensitivity to ethanol.

Initiation of ethanol self-administration by the sucrose-substitution method with HAS and LAS rats.

This study was performed to examine ethanol self-administration in rats bred for different sensitivities to the sedative effects of alcohol [the Colorado High Alcohol Sensitive (HAS) and Low Alcohol Sensitive (LAS) rats]. Four rats from each replicate line of the HAS and LAS rats (n = 16) were obtained from the University of Colorado, and initiation to self-administer ethanol by the sucrose-substitution procedure was attempted. Before the initiation procedure was conducted, home-cage ethanol intake and preference ratio did not differ between LAS and HAS rats. During the initiation procedure, the LAS rats came to self-administer 10% ethanol (v/v) at similar levels as outbred Wistar rats initiated with the same procedure (approximately 0.4 g/kg/session). The HAS rats, however, failed to initiate (approximately 0.08 g/kg/ session after completing the sucrose-substitution procedure) and lever pressing was reduced even more in the HAS rats when the ethanol concentration presented was > 10% (v/v). Three of the eight HAS rats stopped lever pressing completely when the ethanol concentration was raised to 15%. After initiation, home-cage preference ratio differed significantly between the LAS and HAS rats (LAS > HAS, p < 0.03). That the LAS rats did not consume greater amounts of ethanol compared with outbred Long-Evans or Wistar rats is contrary to our hypothesis, based on recent human data suggesting that a lower sensitivity to ethanol could result in increased alcohol intake. The finding that the HAS rats could not be initiated, while selectively bred ethanol nonpreferring rats can, is also contrary to our hypothesis. Further studies related to ethanol self-administration with the HAS line could provide important information related to the genetics of alcohol nonacceptance.