Physician distress when treatments fail. Survey on physician distress when treating persons with drug-resistant epilepsy and knowledge of neuropalliative care.

OBJECTIVE: Drug-resistant epilepsy can be difficult to cure and may pose emotional challenges for epilepsy providers. Neuropalliative care (NPC) can augment quality of life (QOL) in persons with neurological diseases and may add meaningful elements to the treatment repertoire of epilepsy specialists even if seizures continue. However, NPC has not been widely implemented in epilepsy. Our study aimed to determine whether physicians of persons with drug-resistant epilepsy (PWDRE) experience distress when faced with treatment failure (Engel class ≥ 2), either failure of medications-only (PWDREmo) or of both medications and surgery (procedures with curative intent (PWDREms)). Furthermore, we evaluated physician knowledge about and referrals to NPC following treatment failures to help improve patient QOL despite ongoing seizures. METHODS: An anonymous online survey was distributed to US epilepsy physicians through the American Epilepsy Society website and personal email to assess levels of distress experienced when caring for PWDREmo and PWDREms (7-point Likert scale ["1" = "no distress", "7" = "most distress ever felt"]), and knowledge and use of NPC. RESULTS: Eighty-two physicians completed the survey. Most experienced distress when epilepsy treatments failed: 59% felt moderate distress (≥4) with PWDREmo (median "4", mean 3.74, range 1-7), 90% suffered moderate to severe distress (5, 5.17, 1-7) with PWDREms. Distress over PWDREms was significantly greater than distress over PWDREmo (p < 0.0001). Forty-three percent reported confidence in their knowledge about NPC. Only 15% were likely to refer PWDREmo to NPC, while 44% would consider it for PWDREms. CONCLUSION: Among survey responders, physician distress was high when confronted with treatment failures, especially the failure of epilepsy surgery. Fewer than half of responders were likely to refer patients to NPC. Further research is necessary to determine extent, reasons, and effects of physician distress and whether improved understanding of and patient access to NPC would help alleviate physician distress when faced with treatment failures in PWDRE.

Concurrent brain-responsive and vagus nerve stimulation for treatment of drug-resistant focal epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: Clinical trials of a brain-responsive neurostimulator, RNS® System (RNS), excluded patients with a vagus nerve stimulator, VNS® System (VNS). The goal of this study was to evaluate seizure outcomes and safety of concurrent RNS and VNS stimulation in adults with drug-resistant focal-onset seizures. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter chart review was performed on all patients with an active VNS and RNS who were treated for a minimum of 6 months with both systems concurrently. Frequency of disabling seizures at baseline before RNS, at 1 year after RNS placement, and at last follow-up were used to calculate the change in seizure frequency after treatment. Data on adverse events and complications related to each device were collected. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients from 10 epilepsy centers met inclusion criteria. All but one patient received RNS after VNS. The median follow-up time after RNS implantation was 28 months. Analysis of the entire population of patients with active VNS and RNS systems revealed a median reduction in seizure frequency at 1 year post-RNS placement of 43% with a responder rate of 49%, and at last follow-up a 64% median reduction with a 67% responder rate. No negative interactions were reported from the concurrent use of VNS and RNS. Stimulation-related side-effects were reported more frequently in association with VNS (30%) than with RNS (2%). SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings suggest that concurrent treatment with VNS and RNS is safe and that the addition of RNS to VNS can further reduce seizure frequency.

Using a Robotic-Assisted Approach for Stereotactic Laser Ablation Corpus Callosotomy: A Technical Report.

BACKGROUND: Corpus callosotomy for medically intractable epilepsy is an effective ablative procedure traditionally achieved using either standard open craniotomy or with less-invasive approaches. Advances in robotic-assisted stereotactic guidance for neurosurgery can be applied for LITT for corpus callosotomy. CLINICAL PRESENTATIONS: Two patients were included in this study. One was a 25-year-old female patient with extensive bi-hemispheric malformations of cortical development and medically refractory epilepsy, and the other was an 18-year-old male with medically refractory epilepsy and atonic seizures, who underwent a complete corpus callosotomy using robotic-assisted stereotactic guidance for LITT. RESULTS: Both patients underwent successful intended corpus callosotomy with volumetric analysis demonstrating a length disconnection of 74% and a volume disconnection of 55% for patient 1 and a length disconnection of 83% and a volume disconnection of 33% for patient 2. Postoperatively, both patients had clinical reductions in seizure. CONCLUSION: Our experience demonstrates that robotic guidance systems can safely and effectively be adapted for minimally invasive LITT corpus callosotomy.

Epilepsy in Parry-Romberg syndrome and linear scleroderma en coup de sabre: Case series and systematic review including 140 patients.

Parry-Romberg syndrome (PRS) and linear sclerosis en coup de sabre (LScs) are rare, related, autoimmune conditions of focal atrophy and sclerosis of head and face which are associated with the development of focal epilepsy. The scarcity of PRS and LScs cases has made an evidence-based approach to optimal treatment of seizures difficult. Here we present a large systematic review of the literature evaluating 137 cases of PRS or LScs, as well as three new cases with epilepsy that span the spectrum of severity, treatments, and outcomes in these syndromes. Analysis showed that intracranial abnormalities and epileptic foci localized ipsilateral to the external (skin, eye, mouth) manifestations by imaging or EEG in 92% and 80% of cases, respectively. Epilepsy developed before external abnormalities in 19% of cases and after external disease onset in 66% of cases, with decreasing risk the further from the start of external symptoms. We found that over half of individuals affected may achieve seizure freedom with anti-seizure medications (ASMs) alone or in combination with immunomodulatory therapy (IMT), while a smaller number of individuals benefitted from epilepsy surgery. Although analysis of case reports has the risk of bias or omission, this is currently the best source of clinical information on epilepsy in PRS/LScs-spectrum disease. The paucity of higher quality information requires improved case identification and tracking. Toward this effort, all data have been deposited in a Synapse.org database for case collection with the potential for international collaboration.

Would people living with epilepsy benefit from palliative care?

Palliative care (PC) is an approach to the care of persons living with serious illness and their families that focuses on improving quality of life and reducing suffering by addressing complex medical symptoms, psychosocial needs, spiritual well-being, and advance care planning. While PC has traditionally been associated with hospice care for persons with cancer, there is now recognition that PC is relevant to many noncancer diagnoses, including neurologic illness, and at multiple points along the illness journey, not just end of life. Despite the recent growth of the field of neuropalliative care there has been scant attention paid to the relevance of PC principles in epilepsy or the potential for PC approaches to improve outcomes for persons living with epilepsy and their families. We believe this has been a significant oversight and that PC may provide a useful framework for addressing the many sources of suffering facing persons living with epilepsy, for engaging patients and families in challenging conversations, and to focus efforts to improve models of care for this population. In this manuscript we review areas of significant unmet needs where a PC approach may improve patient and family-centered outcomes, including complex symptom management, goals of care, advance care planning, psychosocial support for patient and family and spiritual well-being. When relevant we highlight areas where epilepsy patients may have unique PC needs compared to other patient populations and conclude with suggestions for future research, clinical, and educational efforts.

Real-world experience with direct brain-responsive neurostimulation for focal onset seizures.

OBJECTIVE: The RNS System is a direct brain-responsive neurostimulation system that is US Food and Drug Administration-approved for adults with medically intractable focal onset seizures based on safety and effectiveness data from controlled clinical trials. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the real-world safety and effectiveness of the RNS System. METHODS: Eight comprehensive epilepsy centers conducted a chart review of patients treated with the RNS System for at least 1 year, in accordance with the indication for use. Data included device-related serious adverse events and the median percent change in disabling seizure frequency from baseline at years 1, 2, and 3 of treatment and at the most recent follow-up. RESULTS: One hundred fifty patients met the criteria for analysis. The median reduction in seizures was 67% (interquartile range [IQR] = 33%-93%, n = 149) at 1 year, 75% (IQR = 50%-94%, n = 93) at 2 years, 82% (IQR = 50%-96%, n = 38) at ≥3 years, and 74% (IQR = 50%-96%, n = 150) at last follow-up (mean = 2.3 years). Thirty-five percent of patients had a ≥90% seizure frequency reduction, and 18% of patients reported being clinically seizure-free at last follow-up. Seizure frequency reductions were similar regardless of patient age, age at epilepsy onset, duration of epilepsy, seizure onset in mesial temporal or neocortical foci, magnetic resonance imaging findings, prior intracranial monitoring, prior epilepsy surgery, or prior vagus nerve stimulation treatment. The infection rate per procedure was 2.9% (6/150 patients); five of the six patients had an implant site infection, and one had osteomyelitis. Lead revisions were required in 2.7% (4/150), and 2.0% (3/150) of patients had a subdural hemorrhage, none of which had long-lasting neurological consequences. SIGNIFICANCE: In this real-world experience, safety was similar and clinical seizure outcomes exceeded those of the prospective clinical trials, corroborating effectiveness of this therapy and suggesting that clinical experience has informed more effective programming.

Mesial temporal resection following long-term ambulatory intracranial EEG monitoring with a direct brain-responsive neurostimulation system.

OBJECTIVE: To describe seizure outcomes in patients with medically refractory epilepsy who had evidence of bilateral mesial temporal lobe (MTL) seizure onsets and underwent MTL resection based on chronic ambulatory intracranial EEG (ICEEG) data from a direct brain-responsive neurostimulator (RNS) system. METHODS: We retrospectively identified all patients at 17 epilepsy centers with MTL epilepsy who were treated with the RNS System using bilateral MTL leads, and in whom an MTL resection was subsequently performed. Presumed lateralization based on routine presurgical approaches was compared to lateralization determined by RNS System chronic ambulatory ICEEG recordings. The primary outcome was frequency of disabling seizures at last 3-month follow-up after MTL resection compared to seizure frequency 3 months before MTL resection. RESULTS: We identified 157 patients treated with the RNS System with bilateral MTL leads due to presumed bitemporal epilepsy. Twenty-five patients (16%) subsequently had an MTL resection informed by chronic ambulatory ICEEG (mean = 42 months ICEEG); follow-up was available for 24 patients. After MTL resection, the median reduction in disabling seizures at last follow-up was 100% (mean: 94%; range: 50%-100%). Nine patients (38%) had exclusively unilateral electrographic seizures recorded by chronic ambulatory ICEEG and all were seizure-free at last follow-up after MTL resection; eight of nine continued RNS System treatment. Fifteen patients (62%) had bilateral MTL electrographic seizures, had an MTL resection on the more active side, continued RNS System treatment, and achieved a median clinical seizure reduction of 100% (mean: 90%; range: 50%-100%) at last follow-up, with eight of fifteen seizure-free. For those with more than 1 year of follow-up (N = 21), 15 patients (71%) were seizure-free during the most recent year, including all eight patients with unilateral onsets and 7 of 13 patients (54%) with bilateral onsets. SIGNIFICANCE: Chronic ambulatory ICEEG data provide information about lateralization of MTL seizures and can identify additional patients who may benefit from MTL resection.

Seizure outcome with responsive neurostimulation (RNS) comparing strip versus depth leads.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare seizure outcomes and complication rates in patients treated with only responsive neurostimulation (RNS) strip leads with those treated with only RNS depth leads. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using the institutional epilepsy surgery database. Included was any patient implanted with the RNS system between August 2015 and May 2018 with either two depth (2D) or two strip (2S) leads connected to the device and at least 6 months follow-up. Excluded were those with a combination of active depth and strip leads. Data extracted from the charts comprised demographic information, duration of epilepsy, presence of a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesion, prior resective surgery, clinically disabling seizures at baseline and follow-up, prior invasive monitoring, location (mesial temporal or neocortical) and number of seizure foci, unilateral or bilateral RNS lead placement, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Of 48 screened patients, 34 met study inclusion criteria. Of these, 15 were treated with 2D leads and 19 with 2S leads. Groups 2D and 2S were comparable with respect to age at onset, duration of epilepsy, baseline seizure frequency, and exposure time to RNS. After adjustment for patient age and duration of epilepsy, seizure frequency in 2S patients was noted to be decreased by 83% (p = 0.046), while it was reduced by 51% (p = 0.080) in 2D patients. The complication rate was not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: In our small retrospective population, patients with RNS strip leads experienced a significantly greater seizure reduction than patients with RNS depth leads, without a difference in complication rate.

RNS modifications to eliminate stimulation-triggered signs or symptoms (STS): Case series and practical guide.

Responsive neurostimulation (RNS) for intractable epilepsy involves placement of electrodes onto or into the brain that detect seizure activity and then deliver a current to abort a seizure before it spreads. Successful RNS treatment can deliver hundreds of stimulations per day, which are generally unnoticeable to patients. Uncommonly, RNS electrodes may result in stimulation of brain regions or peripheral structures that causes uncomfortable sensory or motor effects, a phenomenon we refer to as stimulation-triggered signs or symptoms (STS). Occurrence of STS may limit the ability to use RNS to full capacity to reduce seizures. In this case series, we describe STS in six out of 58 (10.3%) RNS patients at our institution. To eliminate or minimize STS, we developed a protocol for modification of RNS parameters. Modifying RNS stimulation was associated with reduced STS in all six patients, five had adjustment of stimulation settings, one of lead position. Five out of six patients were able to undergo further optimization of RNS for improved seizure control after reduction of symptoms. One patient had recurrent STS that prevented further increase of RNS stimulation current. This study may help other medical teams in identifying and reducing STS in patients with epilepsy receiving RNS devices.

Responsive neurostimulation for refractory epilepsy in the pediatric population: A single-center experience.

Drug-resistant focal epilepsy (DRFE) in children can impair cognition and behavior, and lead to premature death. Increased pediatric epilepsy surgery numbers reflect the improvements in seizure control and long-term developmental outcomes. Yet, many children with DRFE are not candidates for surgical resection due to overlap of the seizure network with eloquent cortex or multiple seizure-onset zones, making surgery dangerous or ineffective. In adults, responsive neurostimulation (RNS System) therapy is safe and effective treatment for DRFE with one or two seizure foci, especially when the seizure focus is in eloquent cortex. We present six pediatric patients with DRFE who underwent RNS implantation. Our outcomes demonstrate safety, decreased clinical seizure frequency, as well as improved functional status and quality of life. Changes in the clinical seizure semiology and frequency occurred in conjunction with adjustments to the stimulation parameters, supporting the efficacy of responsive neuromodulation in children.

Curative and palliative MRI-guided laser ablation for drug-resistant epilepsy.

Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder occurring in 3% of the US adult population. It is characterised by seizures resulting from aberrant hypersynchronous neural activity. Approximately one-third of newly diagnosed epilepsy cases fail to become seizure-free in response to antiseizure drugs. Optimal seizure control, in cases of drug-resistant epilepsy, often requires neurosurgical intervention targeting seizure foci, such as the temporal lobe. Advances in minimally invasive ablative surgical approaches have led to the development of MRI-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT). For refractory epilepsy, this surgical intervention offers many advantages over traditional approaches, including real-time lesion monitoring, reduced morbidity, and in some reports increased preservation of cognitive and language processes. We review the use of LITT for epileptic indications in the context of its application as a curative (seizure freedom) or palliative (seizure reduction) measure for both lesional and non-lesional forms of epilepsy. Furthermore, we address the use of LITT for a variety of extratemporal lobe epilepsies. Finally, we describe clinical outcomes, limitations and future applications of LITT for epilepsy.

Optic Radiation Tractography and Visual Field Deficits in Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy for Amygdalohippocampectomy in Patients with Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) has become an alternative to open-resective surgery for refractory mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE). Occurrence of visual field defects (VFDs) following open surgery for MTLE is reported at 52-100%. We examined the rate of VFDs following LITT for amygdalohippocampectomy (AHE) and correlated the occurrence of VFDs with damage to the optic radiations, assessed by diffusion tensor tractography (DTI). METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 5 patients who underwent LITT-AHE for medically refractory MTLE. We examined the association between VFDs and optic radiation damage by correlating postprocedural visual field testing with qualitative assessment of optic radiation fiber tracts. RESULTS: Postoperative assessments showed that 4 patients had normal visual field testing, and 1 had a right superior quadrantanopsia (20%). We performed 3-dimensional reconstruction of the optic radiation, laser probe trajectory, and ablation volume. Damage to Meyer's loop was determined consistent with the VFD. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term follow-up in our series suggests that laser ablation AHE may be associated with a lower rate of VFD than has been reported for open AHE. Our results suggest that incorporating optic radiation mapping through DTI may preoperatively help to minimize the risk of VFD following laser ablation AHE.

Feasibility study of microburst VNS therapy in drug-resistant focal and generalized epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) at low frequencies (≤30 Hz) has been an established treatment for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) for over 25 years. OBJECTIVE: To examine the initial safety and efficacy performance of an investigational, high-frequency (≥250 Hz) VNS paradigm herein called "Microburst VNS" (µVNS). µVNS consists of short, high-frequency bursts of electrical pulses believed to preferentially modulate certain brain regions. METHODS: Thirty-three (33) participants were enrolled into an exploratory feasibility study, 21 with focal-onset seizures and 12 with generalized-onset seizures. Participants were titrated to a personalized target dose of µVNS using an investigational fMRI protocol. Participants were then followed for up to 12 months, with visits every 3 months, and monitored for side-effects at all time points. This study was registered as NCT03446664 on February 27th, 2018. RESULTS: The device was well-tolerated. Reported adverse events were consistent with typical low frequency VNS outcomes and tended to diminish in severity over time, including dysphonia, cough, dyspnea, and implant site pain. After 12 months of µVNS, the mean seizure frequency reduction for all seizures was 61.3% (median reduction: 70.4%; 90% CI of median: 48.9%-83.3%). The 12-month responder rate (≥50% reduction) was 63.3% (90% CI: 46.7%-77.9%) and the super-responder rate (≥80% reduction) was 40% (90% CI: 25.0%-56.6%). Participants with focal-onset seizures appeared to benefit similarly to participants with generalized-onset seizures (mean reduction in seizures at 12 months: 62.6% focal [n = 19], versus 59.0% generalized [n = 11]). CONCLUSION: Overall, µVNS appears to be safe and potentially a promising therapeutic alternative to traditional VNS. It merits further investigation in randomized controlled trials which will help determine the impact of investigational variables and which patients are most suitable for this novel therapy.

Trends in the Utilization of Surgical Modalities for the Treatment of Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Comprehensive 10-Year Analysis Using the National Inpatient Sample.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Epilepsy is considered one of the most prevalent and severe chronic neurological disorders worldwide. Our study aims to analyze the national trends in different treatment modalities for individuals with drug-resistant epilepsy and investigate the outcomes associated with these procedural trends in the United States. METHODS: Using the National Inpatient Sample database from 2010 to 2020, patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy who underwent laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT), open surgical resection, vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), or responsive neurostimulation (RNS) were identified. Trend analysis was performed using piecewise joinpoint regression. Propensity score matching was used to compare outcomes between 10 years prepandemic before 2020 and the first peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: This study analyzed a total of 33 969 patients with a diagnosis of drug-resistant epilepsy, with 3343 patients receiving surgical resection (78%), VNS (8.21%), RNS (8%), and LITT (6%). Between 2010 and 2020, there was an increase in the use of invasive electroencephalography monitoring for seizure zone localization (P = .003). There was an increase in the use of LITT and RNS (P < .001), while the use of surgical resection and VNS decreased over time (P < .001). Most of these patients (89%) were treated during the pre-COVID pandemic era (2010-2019), while a minority (11%) underwent treatment during the COVID pandemic (2020). After propensity score matching, the rate of pulmonary complications, postprocedural hematoma formation, and mortality were slightly higher during the pandemic compared with the prepandemic period (P = .045, P = .033, and P = .026, respectively). CONCLUSION: This study indicates a relative decrease in the use of surgical resections, as a treatment for drug-resistant focal epilepsy. By contrast, newer, minimally invasive surgical approaches including LITT and RNS showed gradual increases in usage.

Combined VNS-RNS Neuromodulation for Epilepsy.

SUMMARY: The vagus nerve stimulator (VNS) and responsive nerve stimulator (RNS) are nonpharmacological devices approved for drug-resistant epilepsy. Vagus nerve stimulator was removed before placing an RNS in clinical trials. Two cases of bilateral mesial temporal epilepsy treated concurrently with VNS and bilateral mesial temporal RNS devices were reported. In each case, the VNS device was turned off temporarily, which allowed for a direct comparison of RNS recordings and efficacy with and without simultaneous VNS stimulation. Temporary VNS cessation lead to increased clinical and electrocorticographic seizures despite continued anti-seizure drugs and RNS stimulation. In one case, VNS eliminated seizures from one epileptogenic area, whereas VNS and RNS were required to treat seizures from the contralateral mesial temporal structure. In another case, VNS effectively decreased seizure spread to the symptomatogenic zone. These cases demonstrate synergistic neuromodulation with concurrent use of VNS and RNS in intractable bitemporal epilepsy.

EEG and video-EEG seizure monitoring has limited utility in patients with hypothalamic hamartoma and epilepsy.

PURPOSE: Hypothalamic hamartomas (HHs) are a malformation of the ventral hypothalamus and tuber cinereum, associated with gelastic seizures and epilepsy. We sought to determine the spectrum of electroencephalography (EEG) abnormalities in a large cohort of HH patients. METHODS: Data was collected for HH patients undergoing evaluation between 2003 and 2007. Data included seizure history, prior treatment, and results of diagnostic studies. After informed consent, data were entered into a database. KEY FINDINGS: We reviewed 133 HH patients. Mean age at time of data analysis was 15.7 years (59.4% male). Most patients had gelastic (77%) and/or complex partial seizures (58%). Records for 102 EEG studies on 73 patients were reviewed. Interictal epileptiform abnormalities were seen in 77%, localizing predominately to the temporal and frontal regions. Records for 104 video-EEG (VEEG) studies on 65 patients were reviewed. Of 584 gelastic seizures (GS) captured, no ictal EEG change was noted in 438 (75%). Of GS with localizing features, 89% suggested onset from the temporal and/or frontal regions. There were 160 complex partial seizures (CPS). For those with localizing features, 100% localized to the temporal and/or frontal head regions. EEG and VEEG findings correlated with the side of HH attachment. VEEG did not influence outcome. SIGNIFICANCE: EEG features in HH patients are diverse. The majority of gelastic seizures fail to demonstrate change in the EEG. The lack of EEG changes with many clinical seizures, and the false localization seen in those events with an ictal change suggest the utility of EEG is limited in the evaluation of these patients.

Seizure Detection Devices: Five New Things.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to review seizure detection devices (SDDs) and their mechanisms of action and efficacy and to reflect on potential improvements for future devices. RECENT FINDINGS: There are 5 main categories of SDDs, these include EEG, heart rate detection (HR), electrodermal activity (EDA), motion detection, and EMG. These devices can be used in combination or in isolation to detect seizures. These devices are high in their sensitivity for convulsive seizures but are low in specificity because of a tendency to detect artifact. Overall, they perform poorly in identifying nonconvulsive seizures. SUMMARY: SDDs are currently most useful in detecting convulsive seizures and thereby might help against sudden unexpected death in epilepsy, although they have a high false positive rate. These devices are much less adept at detecting more clinically subtle seizures.

Electrographic seizure monitoring with a novel, wireless, single-channel EEG sensor.

OBJECTIVE: Recording seizures using personal seizure diaries can be challenging during everyday life and many seizures are missed or mis-reported. People living with epilepsy could benefit by having a more accurate and objective wearable EEG system for counting seizures that can be used outside of the hospital. The objective of this study was to (1) determine which seizure types can be electrographically recorded from the scalp below the hairline, (2) determine epileptologists' ability to identify electrographic seizures from single-channels extracted from full-montage wired-EEG, and (3) determine epileptologists' ability to identify electrographic seizures from Epilog, a wireless single-channel EEG sensor. METHODS: Epilog sensors were worn concurrently during epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) monitoring. During standard-of-care review, epileptologists were asked if the electrographic portion of the seizure was visible on single channels of wired electrodes at locations proximal to Epilog sensors, and if focal-onset, which electrode was closest to the focus. From these locations, single channels of EEG extracted from wired full-montage EEG and the proximal Epilog sensor were presented to 3 blinded epileptologists along with markers for when known seizures occurred (taken from the standard-of-care review). Control segments at inter-ictal times were included as control. The epileptologists were asked whether a seizure event was visible in the single channel EEG record at or near the marker. RESULTS: A total of 75 seizures were recorded from 22 of 40 adults that wore Epilog during their visit to the EMU. Epileptologists were able to visualize known seizure activity on at least one of the wired electrodes proximal to Epilog sensors for all seizure events. Epileptologists accurately identified seizures in 71% of Epilog recordings and 84% of single-channel wired recordings and were 92% accurate identifying seizures with Epilog when those seizures ended in a clinical convulsion compared to those that did not (>55%). CONCLUSIONS: Epileptologists are able to visualize seizure activity on single-channels of EEG at locations where Epilog sensors are easily placed on the scalp below hairline. Manual review of seizure annotations can be done quickly and accurately (>70% TP and >98% PPV) on single-channel EEG data. Reviewing single-channel EEG is more accurate than what has been reported in the literature on self-reporting seizures in seizure diaries, the current standard of care for seizure counting outside of the EMU. SIGNIFICANCE: Wearable EEG will be important for seizure monitoring outside of the hospital. Epileptologists can accurately identify seizures in single-channel EEG, better than patient self-reporting in diaries based on the literature. Automated or semi-automated seizure detection on single channels of EEG could be used in the future to objectively count seizures to complement the standard of care outside of the EMU without the overt burden upon epileptologist review.

Stimulation Mapping Using Stereoelectroencephalography: Current and Future Directions.

Electrical stimulation mapping (ESM) using stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is an essential component in the workup of surgical epilepsy. Since the initial application of ESM in the mid-1960s, it remains unparalleled in defining eloquent brain areas and delimiting seizure foci for the purposes of surgical planning. Here, we briefly review the current state of SEEG stimulation, with a focus on the techniques used for identifying the epileptogenic zone and eloquent cortex. We also summarize clinical data on the efficacy of SEEG stimulation in surgical outcomes and functional mapping. Finally, we briefly highlight future applications of SEEG ESM, including novel functional mapping approaches, identifying rare seizure semiologies, neurophysiologic investigations for understanding cognitive function, and its role in SEEG-guided radiofrequency thermal coagulation.

The impact of cannabis use on intracarotid amobarbital testing.

Chronic cannabis use impacts memory functioning, even while users are not acutely intoxicated. The impact of cannabis use on Wada or intracarotid amobarbital testing (IAT) has not previously been described. We reviewed cannabis consumption in epilepsy patients undergoing IAT during pre-surgical work-up. Of 58 patients reviewed, 16 patients (28%) indicated regular use. During IAT, five regular cannabis users with suspected temporal lobe epilepsy exhibited poor memory while testing their presumptively healthy temporal lobe (i.e., the side opposite that targeted for epilepsy surgery), indicating the potential for an amnestic syndrome post-operatively. It was suspected that the pattern of IAT results for these patients was attributable to the deleterious impact of cannabis use on cognition. Thus, three of the five underwent repeat IAT after a period of enforced abstinence. On repeat IAT, each of the three patients exhibited improved memory performance while testing their healthy temporal lobe, suggesting that the healthy temporal lobe of each mediated sufficient memory ability to allow for epilepsy surgery. These findings raised concerns that frequent cannabis use may alter IAT results, leading to incorrect assessments regarding potential post-operative cognitive deficits, and led to a mandate at our institution that patients must stop cannabis use before IAT.