RESUMO
About 5% of the patients with metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRC) present microsatellite instability (MSI)/deficient mismatch repair system (dMMR). While metastasectomy is known to improve overall and progression-free survival in mCRC, specific results in selected patients with dMMR/MSI mCRC are lacking. Our study aimed to describe metastasectomy results, characterize histological response and evaluate pathological complete response (pCR) rate in patients with dMMR/MSI mCRC. We retrospectively reviewed data from all consecutive patients with dMMR/MSI mCRC who underwent surgical metastasectomy between January 2010 and June 2021 in 17 French centers. Primary outcome was to assess the pCR rate defined by tumor regression grade (TRG) 0. Secondary endpoints included relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), and explored TRG as predictive factor for RFS and OS. Among the 88 patients operated, 109 metastasectomies were performed in 81 patients after neoadjuvant treatment [chemotherapy ± targeted therapy (CTT): 69, 85.2%; immunotherapy (ICI): 12, 14.8%], and pCR was achieved in 13 (16.1%) patients. Among the latter, pCR rate were 10.2% in the patients having received CTT (N = 7) and 50.0% in the patients treated with ICI (N = 6). Radiological response did not predict TRG. With a median follow-up of 57.9 (IQR 34.2-81.6) months, median RFS was 20.2 (15.4-not reached) months, median OS was not reached. Major pathological responses (TRG0 + TRG1) were significantly associated with longer RFS (HR 0.12, 95% CI 0.03-0.55; P = .006). The pCR rate of 16.1% achieved with neoadjuvant treatment in patients with dMMR/MSI mCRC is consistent with previously reported rates in pMMR/MSS mCRC. Immunotherapy showed better pCR rate than chemotherapy ± targeted therapy. Further prospective trials are needed to validate immunotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment in resectable/potentially resectable dMMR/MSI mCRC and identify predictive factors for pCR.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo , Neoplasias Colorretais , Neoplasias Retais , Humanos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Neoplasias do Colo/patologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Neoplasias Retais/tratamento farmacológico , Reparo de Erro de Pareamento de DNA/genética , Instabilidade de MicrossatélitesRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To assess the specific results of delayed coloanal anastomosis (DCAA) in light of its 2 main indications. BACKGROUND: DCAA can be proposed either immediately after a low anterior resection (primary DCAA) or after the failure of a primary pelvic surgery as a salvage procedure (salvage DCAA). METHODS: All patients who underwent DCAA intervention at 30 GRECCAR-affiliated hospitals between 2010 and 2021 were retrospectively included. RESULTS: Five hundred sixty-four patients (male: 63%; median age: 62 years; interquartile range: 53-69) underwent a DCAA: 66% for primary DCAA and 34% for salvage DCAA. Overall morbidity, major morbidity, and mortality were 57%, 30%, and 1.1%, respectively, without any significant differences between primary DCAA and salvage DCAA ( P = 0.933; P = 0.238, and P = 0.410, respectively). Anastomotic leakage was more frequent after salvage DCAA (23%) than after primary DCAA (15%), ( P = 0.016).Fifty-five patients (10%) developed necrosis of the intra-abdominal colon. In multivariate analysis, intra-abdominal colon necrosis was significantly associated with male sex [odds ratio (OR) = 2.67 95% CI: 1.22-6.49; P = 0.020], body mass index >25 (OR = 2.78 95% CI: 1.37-6.00; P = 0.006), and peripheral artery disease (OR = 4.68 95% CI: 1.12-19.1; P = 0.030). The occurrence of this complication was similar between primary DCAA (11%) and salvage DCAA (8%), ( P = 0.289).Preservation of bowel continuity was reached 3 years after DCAA in 74% of the cohort (primary DCAA: 77% vs salvage DCAA: 68%, P = 0.031). Among patients with a DCAA mannered without diverting stoma, 75% (301/403) have never required a stoma at the last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: DCAA makes it possible to definitively avoid a stoma in 75% of patients when mannered initially without a stoma and to save bowel continuity in 68% of the patients in the setting of failure of primary pelvic surgery.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Multimodal treatment for patients with peritoneal metastases (PM) from colorectal cancer (CRC), including perioperative chemotherapy (CT) plus complete resection, is associated with prolonged survival. The oncologic impact of therapeutic delays is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the survival impact of delaying surgery and CT. METHODS: Medical records from the national BIG RENAPE network database of patients with complete cytoreductive (CC0-1) surgery of synchronous PM from CRC who received at least one neoadjuvant CT cycle plus one adjuvant CT cycle were retrospectively reviewed. The optimal interval between the end of neoadjuvant CT to surgery, surgery to adjuvant CT, and total interval without systemic CT were estimated using Contal and O'Quigley's method plus restricted cubic spline methods. RESULTS: From 2007 to 2019, 227 patients were identified. After a median follow-up of 45.7 months, the median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was 47.6 and 10.9 months, respectively. The best cut-off period was 42 days in the preoperative interval, no cut-off period was optimal in the postoperative interval, and the best cut-off period in the total interval without CT was 102 days. In multivariate analysis, age, biologic agent use, high peritoneal cancer index, primary T4 or N2 staging, and delay to surgery of more than 42 days (median OS 63 vs. 32.9 months; p = 0.032) were significantly associated with worse OS. Preoperative delay of surgery was also significantly associated with PFS, but only in univariate analysis. CONCLUSION: In selected patients undergoing complete resection plus perioperative CT, a period of more than 6 weeks from completion of neoadjuvant CT to cytoreductive surgery was independently associated with worse OS.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais , Neoplasias Peritoneais , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Neoplasias Peritoneais/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Peritônio/patologia , Terapia Combinada , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução , Taxa de Sobrevida , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
AIM: The long-term urological sequelae after iatrogenic ureteral injury (IUI) during colorectal surgery are not clearly known. The aims of this work were to report the incidence of IUI and to analyse the long-term consequences of urological late complications and their impact on oncological results of IUI occurring during colorectal surgery through a French multicentric experience (GRECCAR group). METHOD: All the patients who presented with IUI during colorectal surgery between 2010 and 2019 were retrospectively included. Patients with ureteral involvement needing en bloc resection, delayed ureteral stricture or noncolorectal surgery were not considered. RESULTS: A total of 202 patients (93 men, mean age 63 ± 14 years) were identified in 29 centres, corresponding to 0.32% of colorectal surgeries (n = 63 562). Index colorectal surgery was mainly oncological (n = 130, 64%). IUI was diagnosed postoperatively in 112 patients (55%) after a mean delay of 11 ± 9 days. Intraoperative diagnosis of IUI was significantly associated with shorter length of stay (21 ± 22 days vs. 34 ± 22 days, p < 0.0001), lower rates of postoperative hydronephrosis (2% vs. 10%, p = 0.04), anastomotic complication (7% vs. 22.5%, p = 0.002) and thromboembolic event (0% vs. 6%, p = 0.02) than postoperative diagnosis of IUI. Delayed chemotherapy because of IUI was reported in 27% of patients. At the end of the follow-up [3 ± 2.6 years (1 month-13 years)], 72 patients presented with urological sequalae (36%). Six patients (3%) required a nephrectomy. CONCLUSION: IUI during colorectal surgery has few consequences for the patients if recognized early. Long-term urological sequelae can occur in a third of patients. IUI may affect oncological outcomes in colorectal surgery by delaying adjuvant chemotherapy, especially when the ureteral injury is not diagnosed peroperatively.
Assuntos
Traumatismos Abdominais , Cirurgia Colorretal , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório , Ureter , Masculino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Estudos Retrospectivos , Cirurgia Colorretal/efeitos adversos , Ureter/cirurgia , Ureter/lesões , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/efeitos adversos , Traumatismos Abdominais/etiologia , Doença Iatrogênica/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: This retrospective multicenter cohort study compared the feasibility and safety of oxaliplatin-based pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC-Ox) with or without intraoperative intravenous 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (L). METHODS: Our study included consecutive patients with histologically proven unresectable and isolated colorectal peritoneal metastases (cPM) treated with PIPAC-Ox in seven tertiary referral centers between January 2015 and April 2020. Toxicity events and oncological outcomes (histological response, progression-free survival, and overall survival) were compared between patients who received intraoperative intravenous 5-FU/L (PIPAC-Ox + 5-FU/L group) and patients who did not (PIPAC-Ox group). RESULTS: In total, 101 patients (263 procedures) were included in the PIPAC-Ox group and 30 patients (80 procedures) were included in the PIPAC-Ox + 5-FU/L group. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 grade 2 or higher adverse events occurred in 48 of 101 (47.5%) patients in the PIPAC-Ox group and in 13 of 30 (43.3%) patients in the PIPAC-Ox + 5-FU/L group (p = 0.73). The complete histological response rates according to the peritoneal regression grading score were 27% for the PIPAC-Ox + 5-FU/L group and 18% for the PIPAC-Ox group (p = 0.74). No statistically significant differences were observed in overall or progression-free survival between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The safety and feasibility of PIPAC-Ox + 5-FU/L appears to be similar to the safety and feasibility of PIPAC-Ox alone in patients with unresectable cPM. Oncological outcomes must be evaluated in larger studies.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais , Neoplasias Peritoneais , Aerossóis , Estudos de Coortes , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Estudos de Viabilidade , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Leucovorina/uso terapêutico , Oxaliplatina , Neoplasias Peritoneais/secundárioRESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study aims to identify prognostic factors and define the best extent of surgery for optimizing treatment of local recurrence (LR) following colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: An institutional database of consecutive patients who underwent radical resection (R0/R1) of LR following CRC was analyzed prospectively from 2010 to 2021 at one tertiary cancer center. RESULTS: In this study, 75 patients were included with LR following CRC and analyzed. Patients were categorized as compartmental resections (CompRe) (n = 47) if all adjacent organs were systematically removed, with or without tumor involvement, or noncompartmental resections (NoCompRe) (n = 28) if only contiguously involved organs were resected. NoCompRe were mainly related to contact between major vessels or bone and the tumor, with only 8/19 (42.1%) resections. Five-year overall survival and locoregional-free survival were 37.5% and 38.8% respectively. Local control was better in the CompRe than the NocompRe group (61.4% vs. 11%; p < 0.01). CompRe (hazard ratio: 2.34 [1.16-4.68]; p = 0.017) and absence of peritoneal metastasis (3.05 [1.03-9.02]; p = 0.044) were the two factors associated with decreased abdominal recurrences in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Complete compartmental surgery is safe and improves local control. Optimal LR resection needs to remove all contiguous organs, with or without tumor involvement.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Humanos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Prognóstico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
AIM: To determine the safety of performing an anastomosis after rectal cancer (RC) resection in patients with a previously treated prostate cancer (PC). METHODS: Patients with a previously treated PC who underwent rectal resection from 2008 to 2018 were retrospectively included. Outcomes were compared between patients who underwent rectal resection with anastomosis (restorative surgery, RS+ group) and those with a definitive stoma (RS- group). In the RS+ group, anastomotic leak (AL) rates were assessed according to the type of reconstruction. RESULTS: A total of 126 patients underwent rectal surgery for mid-low RC after a previous PC treated by radiotherapy (RT) and/or radical prostatectomy. Overall, 80 patients (63%) underwent a RS and 46 patients (37%) underwent rectal surgery with a definitive stoma. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of intraoperative data, except for the type of resection with more multivisceral resection in the RS- group (p < 0.01). In the RS+group, a diverting stoma was performed in 74% of cases. No difference between the two groups in terms of overall morbidity was found. In the RS+group (n = 80), 17 patients (21%) experienced AL. Of these, none was observed when delayed coloanal anastomosis was performed (p = 0.16). Long-term permanent stoma in the RS+ group was 16% (n = 13). CONCLUSION: Restorative surgery after resection for RC in patients with a previous history of RT and/or radical prostatectomy for PC is safe without additional morbidity. In selected patients for restorative surgery, performing delayed coloanal anastomosis may represent a promising option.
Assuntos
Protectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata , Neoplasias Retais , Canal Anal/cirurgia , Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Fístula Anastomótica/etiologia , Fístula Anastomótica/cirurgia , Colo/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Protectomia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Neoplasias Retais/etiologia , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To perform a retrospective root-cause analysis of postoperative death after CRS and HIPEC procedures. BACKGROUND: The combination of CRS and HIPEC is an effective therapeutic strategy to treat peritoneal surface malignancies, however it is associated with significant postoperative mortality. METHODS: All patients treated with a combination of CRS and HIPEC between January 2009 and December 2018 in 22 French centers and died in the hospital, were retrospectively analyzed. Perioperative data of the 101 patients were collected by a local senior surgeon with a sole junior surgeon. Three independent experts investigated the typical root cause of death and provided conclusions on whether postoperative death was preventable (PREV group) or not (NON-PREV group). A typical root cause of preventable postoperative death was classified on a cause-and-effect diagram. RESULTS: Of the 5562 CRS+HIPEC procedures performed, 101 in-hospital deaths (1.8%) were identified, of which a total of 18 patients of 70âyears old and above and 20 patients with ASA score of 3. Etiology of peritoneal disease was mainly colorectal. A total of 54 patients (53%) were classified in the PREV group and 47 patients (47%) in the NON-PREV group. The results of the study show that in the PREV group, WHO performance status 1-2 was more frequent and the Median Peritoneal Cancer Index was higher compared with those of the NON-PREV group. The cause of death in the PREV group was classified as: (i) preoperatively for debatable indication (59%), (ii) intraoperatively (30%) and (iii) postoperatively in 17 patients (31%). A multifactorial cause of death was found in 11 patients (20%). CONCLUSION: More than half of the postoperative deaths after combined CRS and HIPEC may be preventable, mainly by following guidelines regarding preoperative selection of the patients and adequate intraoperative decisions.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução/mortalidade , Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica/mortalidade , Neoplasias Peritoneais/terapia , Análise de Causa Fundamental/métodos , Idoso , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Peritoneais/mortalidade , Período Pós-Operatório , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendênciasRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, cancer patients have been regarded as having a high risk of severe events if they are infected with SARS-CoV-2, particularly those under medical or surgical treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the posttreatment risk of infection by SARS-CoV-2 in a population of patients operated on for colorectal cancer 3 months before the COVID-19 outbreak and who after hospitalization returned to an environment where the virus was circulating. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This French, multicenter cohort study included consecutive patients undergoing elective surgery for colorectal cancer between January 1 and March 31, 2020, at 19 GRECCAR hospitals. The outcome was the rate of COVID-19 infection in this group of patients who were followed until June 15, 2020. RESULTS: This study included 448 patients, 262 male (58.5%) and 186 female (41.5%), who underwent surgery for colon cancer (n = 290, 64.7%), rectal cancer (n = 155, 34.6%), or anal cancer (n = 3, 0.7%). The median age was 68 years (19-95). Comorbidities were present in nearly half of the patients, 52% were at least overweight, and the median BMI was 25 (12-42). At the end of the study, 448 were alive. Six patients (1.3%) developed COVID-19 infection; among them, 3 were hospitalized in the conventional ward, and none of them died. CONCLUSION: The results are reassuring, with only a 1.3% infection rate and no deaths related to COVID-19. We believe that we can operate on colorectal cancer patients without additional mortality from COVID-19, applying all measures aimed at reducing the risk of infection.
Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Comorbidade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Período Pós-Operatório , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Adulto JovemRESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of an observational cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To determine if the perceived overall limitation of neuropathic pain on activities (NP limitation) covaries in 26 specific life activities in people with SCI, taking into account the severity of injury. SETTING: Community-based in Canada. METHODS: Secondary analysis of a cohort (N = 1481) was performed using questionnaires to rate NP frequency and limitation on activities as well as participation in 26 life activities. Relative risks (RR) analyses using Poisson regression were used to examine the data. RESULTS: Most participants (N = 1158; 78%) reported living with NP (from once a year to every day). When NP limitation was described as "not at all" or "very little" (N = 394; 34%), there was no statistically significant RR (p > 0.0019), suggesting no additional risk of not participating "as much as wanted" in any of activities compared to participants with no NP. When NP limitation was described as "to some extent" (N = 411; 35%), a significantly higher risk was observed for 5 of the 26 activities (1.34 < RR < 1.62), and for 23 activities with a large range (1.24 < RR < 3.20) when NP limitation was rated as "to a great extent or more" (N = 353; 31%). CONCLUSION: The variation of RR observed across the 26 activities suggests that the NP limitation may not be general but rather related to specific activity characteristics, which should be taken into account when evaluating NP limitations with a specific focus on the life activities being affected.
Assuntos
Neuralgia , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal , Canadá/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Neuralgia/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
We previously demonstrated that HLA-E/ß2m overexpression by tumor cells in colorectal cancers is associated with an unfavorable prognosis. However, the expression of its specific receptor CD94/NKG2 by intraepithelial tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, their exact phenotype and function, as well as the relation with the molecular status of colorectal cancer and prognosis remain unknown. Based on a retrospective cohort of 234 colorectal cancer patients, we assessed the expression of HLA-E, ß2m, CD94, CD8, and NKp46 by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarray. The expression profile of HLA-E/ß2m on tumor cells and the density of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were correlated to the clinicopathological and molecular features (Microsatellite status, BRAF and RAS mutations). Then, from the primary tumors of 27 prospective colorectal cancers, we characterized by multiparameter flow cytometry the nature (T and/or NK cells) and the co-expression of the inhibitory NKG2A or activating NKG2C chain of ex vivo isolated CD94+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Their biological function was determined using an in vitro redirected cytolytic activity assay. Our results showed that HLA-E/ß2m was preferentially overexpressed in microsatellite instable tumors compared with microsatellite stable ones (45% vs. 19%, respectively, p = 0.0001), irrespective of the RAS or BRAF mutational status. However, HLA-E/ß2m+ colorectal cancers were significantly enriched in CD94+ intraepithelial tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in microsatellite instable as well as in microsatellite stable tumors. Those CD94+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes mostly corresponded to CD8+ αß T cells, and to a lesser extent to NK cells, and mainly co-expressed a functional inhibitory NKG2A chain. Finally, a high number of CD94+ intraepithelial tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in close contact with tumor cells was independently associated with a worse overall survival. In conclusion, these findings strongly suggest that HLA-E/ß2m-CD94/NKG2A represents a new druggable inhibitory immune checkpoint, preferentially expressed in microsatellite instable tumors, but also in a subgroup of microsatellite stable tumors, leading to a new opportunity in colorectal cancer immunotherapies.
Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/análise , Linfócitos T CD8-Positivos/imunologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/imunologia , Antígenos de Histocompatibilidade Classe I/análise , Linfócitos do Interstício Tumoral/imunologia , Subfamília C de Receptores Semelhantes a Lectina de Células NK/análise , Subfamília D de Receptores Semelhantes a Lectina de Células NK/análise , Microglobulina beta-2/análise , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Animais , Biomarcadores Tumorais/antagonistas & inibidores , Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Linfócitos T CD8-Positivos/efeitos dos fármacos , Linfócitos T CD8-Positivos/patologia , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Técnicas de Cocultura , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico , Imuno-Histoquímica , Linfócitos do Interstício Tumoral/efeitos dos fármacos , Linfócitos do Interstício Tumoral/patologia , Masculino , Camundongos , Instabilidade de Microssatélites , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia de Alvo Molecular , Subfamília C de Receptores Semelhantes a Lectina de Células NK/antagonistas & inibidores , Subfamília D de Receptores Semelhantes a Lectina de Células NK/antagonistas & inibidores , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise Serial de Tecidos , Adulto Jovem , Antígenos HLA-ERESUMO
BACKGROUND: There are few data on lymphatic spread concomitant to local recurrence (LR) of colorectal cancer (CRC). The objectives of this study were to determine variables associated with lymphatic spread, to analyze the distribution of LN+, and understand the underlying mechanisms. METHODS: A total of 76 patients underwent resection of LR of CRC between January 2007 and December 2018 at Institut cancérologique de l'Ouest and were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Twenty-five (32.9%) patients had lymph node (LN) involvement with LR. Lymphatics from the mesocolon-rectum and aorto-iliac compartments were involved in 21%, 20.3% and 18.1%, 20.3% for pelvic and retroperitoneal LRs, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the only predictive factor for LN invasion (LN+) was a primary positive LN status (odds ratio, 5.3; P = .007). Despite a trend toward a worse median overall survival in the LN+ group, the difference was not significant in comparison with the LN- group (46 vs. 57 months; P = 0.31) or with the LN- plus LN not assessed groups (46 months vs not reached; P = .07). CONCLUSIONS: LN invasion with LR from CRC is a frequent occurrence without significant impact on survival. The only predictive factor is a primary positive nodal status.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Cirurgia Colorretal/métodos , Linfonodos/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Linfonodos/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aims of this multi-institutional study were to assess the feasibility of iterative cytoreductive surgery (iCRS)/hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, iCRS in colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis (CRPC), evaluate survival, recurrence, morbidity and mortality outcomes, and identify prognostic factors for overall survival. METHODS: Patients with CRPC that underwent an iCRS, with or without intraperitoneal chemotherapy, from June 1993 to July 2016 at 13 institutions were retrospectively analyzed from prospectively maintained databases. RESULTS: The study comprised of 231 patients, including 126 females (54.5%) with a mean age at iCRS of 51.3 years. The iterative high-grade (3/4) morbidity and mortality rates were 23.4% and 1.7%, respectively. The median recurrence-free survival was 15.0 and 10.1 months after initial and iCRS, respectively. The median and 5-year survivals were 49.1 months and 43% and 26.4 months and 26% from the initial and iCRS, respectively. Independent negative predictors of survival from the initial CRS included peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) > 20 ( P = 0.02) and lymph node positivity ( P = 0.04), and from iCRS, PCI > 10 ( P = 0.03 for PCI 11-20; P < 0.001 for PCI > 20), high-grade complications ( P = 0.012), and incomplete cytoreduction ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: iCRS can provide long-term survival benefits to highly selected colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis patients with comparable mortality and morbidity rates to the initial CRS procedure. Careful patient selection is necessary to improve overall outcomes.
Assuntos
Quimioterapia do Câncer por Perfusão Regional/mortalidade , Neoplasias Colorretais/mortalidade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução/mortalidade , Hipertermia Induzida/mortalidade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/mortalidade , Neoplasias Peritoneais/mortalidade , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/terapia , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Neoplasias Peritoneais/patologia , Neoplasias Peritoneais/terapia , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE: Ovarian cancer is the most common deadly cancer of gynecologic origin. Patients often are diagnosed at advanced stage with peritoneal metastasis. There are many rare histologies of ovarian cancer; some have outcomes worse than serous ovarian cancer. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) can be considered for patients with recurrence. This study was designed to assess the impact of CRS and HIPEC on survival of patient with peritoneal metastasis from rare ovarian malignancy. METHODS: A prospective, multicentric, international database was retrospectively searched to identify all patients with rare ovarian tumor (mucinous, clear cells, endometrioid, small cell hypercalcemic, and other) and peritoneal metastasis who underwent CRS and HIPEC through the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) and BIG-RENAPE working group. The postoperative complications, long-term results, and principal prognostic factors were analyzed. RESULTS: The analysis included 210 patients with a median follow-up of 43.5 months. Median overall survival (OS) was 69.3 months, and the 5-year OS was 57.7%. For mucinous tumors, median OS and DFS were not reached at 5 years. For granulosa tumors, median overall survival was not reached at 5 years, and median DFS was 34.6 months. Teratoma or germinal tumor showed median overall survival and DFS that were not reached at 5 years. Differences in OS were not statistically significant between histologies (p = 0.383), whereas differences in DFS were (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CRS and HIPEC may increases long-term survival in selected patients with peritoneal metastasis from rare ovarian tumors especially in mucinous, granulosa, or teratoma histological subtypes.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Endometrioide/terapia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução , Tumor de Células da Granulosa/terapia , Hipertermia Induzida , Neoplasias Císticas, Mucinosas e Serosas/terapia , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/terapia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Neoplasias Peritoneais/terapia , Teratoma/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma Endometrioide/secundário , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução/efeitos adversos , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Seguimentos , Tumor de Células da Granulosa/secundário , Humanos , Metástase Linfática , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Císticas, Mucinosas e Serosas/secundário , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/secundário , Neoplasias Peritoneais/secundário , Doenças Raras/patologia , Doenças Raras/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Teratoma/secundário , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients with ypN0 rectal cancer who have received preoperative chemoradiotherapy can be divided into those who initially were node negative and those whose positive nodes have been sterilized by preoperative therapy. The long-term prognosis for ypN0 patients with sterilized lymph nodes (LNS) is unknown. This study aimed to assess the prognostic value of LNS after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for patients with ypN0 rectal cancer. METHODS: From January 2007 to March 2014, 206 patients with ypN0 tumors of the mid or lower rectum treated by chemoradiotherapy and radical surgery were enrolled in the study. Of these 206 patients, 49 had ypN0 tumors with LNS (LNS+ group), and 157 had ypN0 tumors without LNS (LNS- group). The patients in both groups were comparable in terms of tumor characteristics, type of chemoradiotherapy, type of surgery, R0 resection rate, and postoperative complication rate. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 40.5 ± 27 months. The 1- and 3-year OS rates in the LNS+ group were respectively 100 and 95.5% versus 99.4 and 91.6% in the LNS- group (P = 0.549). The 1- and 3-year DFS rates in the LNS+ group were respectively 100 and 94.2% versus 94.7 and 87.1% in the LNS- group (P = 0.117). The multivariate analysis showed that the presence of LNS did not affect OS (P = 0.918) or DFS (P = 0.209). CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis is excellent for patients with ypN0 rectal cancer who have LNS after preoperative chemoradiotherapy. The presence of LNS in ypN0 rectal cancer patients after chemoradiotherapy should not be considered a factor for a poor prognosis.
Assuntos
Linfonodos/patologia , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Neoplasias Retais/terapia , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Quimiorradioterapia Adjuvante , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Neoplasia Residual , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Questionnaires evaluating hearing impairment are available in English but there is a need for French standardised questionnaires for researchers as well as for audiologists and other clinicians. The objective of this study is to describe the translation and validation of four questionnaires that assess different aspects of hearing impairment and handicap among elders with hearing loss, by comparing the main score and psychometric evaluation of original and French-Canadian (FC) versions of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale II (WHO-DAS II), the Screening Test for Hearing Problems (STHP), the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) and the Measure of Audiologic Rehabilitation Self-Efficacy for Hearing Aids (MARS-HA). DESIGN: Vallerand method: translation and back-translation by two translators, revision by a committee of experts and pre-tested with five bilingual older participants. STUDY SAMPLE: Participants (n = 29) were 65 years of age or older including 21 with hearing aids. RESULTS: The psychometric properties (internal consistency, temporal stability after four weeks) indicate good reliability for most of the translated questionnaires and their subscales, especially the WHO-DAS II. CONCLUSIONS: The translations in FC of two hearing loss and two hearing aid questionnaires were validated. It is recommended to pursue the demonstration for temporal stability for the STHP.
Assuntos
Avaliação da Deficiência , Transtornos da Audição/diagnóstico , Audição , Inquéritos e Questionários , Tradução , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Correção de Deficiência Auditiva/instrumentação , Feminino , Auxiliares de Audição , Transtornos da Audição/fisiopatologia , Transtornos da Audição/psicologia , Transtornos da Audição/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoas com Deficiência Auditiva/psicologia , Pessoas com Deficiência Auditiva/reabilitação , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Psicometria , Quebeque , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
PURPOSE: This study evaluated the role of surgical debulking in improving pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP)-related symptoms if complete cytoreductive surgery (CCRS) of huge PMP is unachievable. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of a prospective database of all patients in our tertiary care center treated for PMP between 1992 and 2014. All cases of surgical debulking in patients scheduled for CCRS that proved unachievable during the operation were selected for the present study. RESULTS: Among the 338 patients operated on for PMP, 39 (11.5 %) had undergone surgical debulking because CCRS was unachievable. All of these patients were symptomatic before surgery, and the median PCI was 32 (5-39). More than 80 % of the disease burden was resected in 23 patients (59 %). Mortality and major morbidity rates were 2.5 and 23 %, respectively. After debulking surgery, symptoms gradually subsided over a median time of 23 months and 50 % of the patients no longer experienced PMP-related symptoms after a median follow-up of 24.5 months. After a median follow-up of 46.4 months (range 3-120), median overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survival times were 55.5 and 20 months, respectively. Five-year OS and PFS rates were 46 and 11 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive debulking surgery in case of unachievable CCRS for huge PMP can offer prolonged relief of PMP-related symptoms and long-term survival, in experienced centers that are able to be sufficiently aggressive to resect the major part of the disease, and conservative enough to achieve low mortality and good quality of life.
Assuntos
Neoplasias/terapia , Neoplasias Peritoneais/cirurgia , Pseudomixoma Peritoneal/cirurgia , Qualidade de Vida , Adulto , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Terapia Combinada , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Hipertermia Induzida , Injeções Intraperitoneais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias/patologia , Neoplasias Peritoneais/secundário , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Pseudomixoma Peritoneal/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
PURPOSE: To analyze and compare survival in patients operated for colorectal liver metastases (LM) with that in patients optimally resected for peritoneal metastases (PM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study concerns 287 patients with LM and 119 patients with PM treated with surgery plus chemotherapy between 1993 and 2009, excluding patients presenting both LM and PM. RESULTS: Mortality (respectively, 2.7% and 4.2%), morbidity (respectively, 11% and 17%), and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates (respectively, 38.5% and 36.5%) were not statistically different between the LM group and the PM group. Multivariate analysis showed that the extent of the disease was the main prognostic factor, which led us to divide the population into 5 subgroups. The best 5-year OS rate (72.4%) was obtained in patients with minimal peritoneal disease [peritoneal cancer index (PCI) ≤5]. OS was similar for the patients with less than 10 LM and those with a PCI between 6 and 15 (respectively, 39.4% and 38.7%). Five-year OS was lower in patients with more than 10 LM (18.1%), and dramatically low for patients with a PCI > 15 (11.8%). CONCLUSIONS: This study underlines the prognostic impact of the tumor burden in metastatic colorectal disease. In selected patients, similar survival rates can be obtained after optimal treatment of LM and PM. As the role of optimal surgical resection of LM is widely accepted, our results confirm that an optimal attitude should also be adopted to treat PM with a PCI < 16, particularly in patients with very low PCI (<5) where survival could be better than LM.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundário , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Peritoneais/secundário , Neoplasias Peritoneais/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Hepatectomia/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Peritoneais/mortalidade , Prognóstico , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The main prognostic factors after complete cytoreductive surgery (CCRS) of colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) followed by intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) are completeness of the resection and extent of the disease. This study aimed to determine a threshold value above which CCRS plus IPC may not offer survival benefit compared with systemic chemotherapy. METHODS: Between March 2000 and May 2010, 180 patients underwent surgery for PC from colorectal cancer with intended performance of CCRS plus IPC. RESULTS: Among the 180 patients, CCRS plus IPC could be performed for 139 patients (curative group, 77 %), whereas it could not be performed for 41 patients (palliative group, 23 %). The two groups were comparable in terms of age, gender, primary tumor characteristics, and pre- and postoperative systemic chemotherapy. The mean peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was lower in the curative group (11 ± 7) than in the palliative group (23 ± 7) (p < 0.0001). After a median follow-up period of 60 months (range 47-74 months), the 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was 52 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 43-61 %] in the curative group compared with 7 % (95 % CI 2-25 %) in the palliative group. Comparison of the survivals for each PCI (ranging from 5 to 36) shows that OS did not differ significantly between the two groups of patients when the PCI was higher than 17 (hazard ratio 0.64; range 0.38-1.09). CONCLUSION: This study confirmed the major prognostic impact of PC extent. When the PCI exceeds 17 in PC of colorectal origin, CCRS plus IPC does not seem to offer any survival benefit.