Survey Research: Do All RN Types Have the Same Perceptions Regarding Professional Nursing Governance?

OBJECTIVE: Researchers examined professional nursing governance perception differences by RN type (clinical, manager, and other RNs), and nurse-related outcome associations. BACKGROUND: Shared governance is associated with improved nurse-related outcomes. Understanding differences in RN types regarding shared governance perceptions is important and not well studied. METHODS: Mean Index of Professional Nursing Governance (IPNG) scores from 3 hospitals' 502 RNs were used to evaluate associations by RN type and unit-based nurse-related outcomes. Descriptive and inferential statistical methods were used. RESULTS: Shared governance was the predominant finding (overall score and 4 of 6 subscale scores) with no significant differences by RN type. Traditional governance was scored for 1 subscale (control over personnel), which was not significant. There were no significant differences in the IPNG score associations with outcomes data by RN type. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical nurses, managers, and other RN types perceived their governance as shared, without significant difference in the nurses' perceptions based on role.

Evaluating the Outcomes of a Web-Based Stress Management Program for Nurses and Nursing Assistants.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this quality improvement project was to determine the utilization, satisfaction, and effect of a web-based stress management program for nurses and nursing assistants (NAs). METHODS: This quality improvement project provided BREATHE, a web-based stress management program that consisted of six modules that describe, identify, and help nurses manage stress for 31 nurses and NAs working on a subacute rehabilitation unit at a mid-Atlantic community hospital. MEASUREMENTS: The number of login attempts and time spent on the program were included, as were the nurse stress scale (NSS), a 34-item validated instrument that captures seven dimensions of stress, and a seven-item satisfaction survey given at the end of the modules. RESULTS: Nurses utilized and were satisfied with the evidence-based program BREATHE and reported significant improvement in NSS scores. LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION: Findings suggest that BREATHE was effective at reducing the NSS score among nurses and NAs. The web-based nature of the program allowed nurses to engage in it at times most convenient for them, which added to the program's acceptability and overall satisfaction.

Assessing knowledge, attitudes and beliefs of nurses about LGBTQ older adults using a documentary video.

BACKGROUND: Statistics reveal that lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) older adults experience health disparities and barriers to accessing healthcare because of discrimination and fear of disclosing sexual orientation. Nurses receive limited education on LGBTQ health issues and even less information specifically about LGBTQ older adults. This study exposed novice nurses to the documentary, Gen Silent, which details LGBTQ older adult experiences. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to increase participants' understanding of LGBTQ older adult health disparities and experiences. DESIGN: A one-group, pre-/post-test design was conducted to test the effect of the documentary on knowledge and attitudes about LGBTQ older adult issues. SETTINGS: The project was set in five academic and community-based hospitals located in the mid-Atlantic region. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 379 nurses attending a nurse residency program participated in the study. METHODS: A questionnaire including a 16-item standardized scale and an open-ended question asking how participants would change their practice was administered before and immediately after the intervention. We assessed change in pre- and post-test knowledge scores using Wilcoxon Sign Rank test and summarized themes of the open-ended question. RESULTS: Findings revealed statistically significant increases in 9 of the 16 items on the scale showing an increase of knowledge and inclusive attitude. Answers to the open-ended question revealed that most participants would ask patients for preferred pronouns and take steps to increase their own understanding of LGBTQ patients and their needs. CONCLUSION: This research supports the use of a documentary as an intervention to facilitate education related to LGBTQ older adults. Further research is needed exposing healthcare professionals of varied experience in diverse healthcare settings to LGBTQ education.

An academic and regional nurse research collaborative: Implications for nursing research.

INTRODUCTION: A diverse group of nurses and research Network Coordinators formed a collaboration to advance nursing research within Johns Hopkins Clinical Research Network, a partnership of academic and community hospitals in the mid-Atlantic region. The purpose of the Nurse Research Collaborative (NRC) is to provide mentoring, mutual growth, and assist the health care organizations to fulfill nursing research requirements. BACKGROUND: We created a multiinstitutional nursing research organization with diversity of member participants and health care facilities. The NRC structure allowed nonacademic facilities to engage in a variety of nursing research projects. This allows for increases in study sample sizes of diverse populations to support and expand nursing research. The NRC is modeled after a physician clinical research network with an aligned mission, vision, goals, and strategic priorities across member organizations. MAIN IDEAS: To strengthen multiinstitutional nursing research capability, the NRC developed an infrastructure of leadership, regular meetings, and formal educational presentations. The NRC completed three research studies, facilitating the Institutional Review Board application process, reviewing documents and contracts, providing individual institutional support, and coordinating site leader functions. CONCLUSION: A research collaboration of nurses, across multiple hospitals provides efficiencies and expertise not otherwise available in every organization.

The Impact of Case Management on Reducing Readmission for Patients Diagnosed With Heart Failure and Diabetes.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To determine the impact of integrated case management services versus treatment as usual (TAU) for patients diagnosed with diabetes and concomitant heart failure. PRIMARY SETTING: This medical chart review was conducted at a single-site facility. The retrospective study design can be implemented at other facilities with a similar landscape. METHODS: A retrospective, descriptive, comparative analysis of integrated case management services compared with TAU from a medical chart review of 68 patients from September 1, 2015, through July 31, 2017. A medical chart review was conducted to generate the study sample for data collection and analysis. The data were organized, cleaned, and prepared and then analyzed. The data were analyzed using SPSS and verified with SAS and R. Applied were descriptive statistics and statistical tests-t test, χ test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Logistic Regression. RESULTS: For the integrated case management group, there were 18.4% who readmitted whereas 81.6% did not. For the TAU group, there were 52.6% who readmitted and 47.4% who did not. The association between readmission and case management was χ (1, n = 68) = 6.372, p = .012. NURSING IMPLICATIONS: Integrated case management services were statistically significant in reducing readmission for the sample. Demographics tested in this study were not significant predictors for readmission. Extending length of stay for patients who are not medically ready for discharge should be considered because there is a cost difference, as there is evidence of readmission reduction. Policy and procedural amendments can be obtained from this study.