Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 15 de 15
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Oral Dis ; 23(3): 387-394, 2017 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27998016

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Oral candidiasis (OC) is a potential oral complication in Sjögren's syndrome (SS). Some studies indicate that the low stimulated salivary flow and not low unstimulated salivary flow is associated with OC in SS, while others report that the underlying autoimmune disorders contribute to OC, based solely on correlation coefficients. Given the conflicting and limited existing evidence, we purposed to ascertain the role of both salivary gland dysfunction (hyposalivation based on unstimulated and stimulated flow rates) and autoimmunity (SS, other autoimmune disorders) in OC among those with SS, other salivary gland dysfunction, and non-salivary gland dysfunction controls (NSGD). METHODS: A nested case-control study was designed within a larger NIH/NIDCR cohort. Descriptive analyses, nonparametric tests, comparative analyses, and multivariate logistic regression analyses were undertaken. RESULTS: Data on 1526 subjects (701 SS, 247 ISS, 355 Sicca, and 223 NSGD) were obtained from the source cohort of 2046 and analyzed for this study. The median whole unstimulated salivary flow rate (WUS, ml 15 min-1 ) was lower in SS (0.8, interquartile range (IQR) 1.8) compared to ISS (5.5, IQR: 5.2, P < 0.001) and NSGD (3.8, IQR: 3.8, P < 0.001) but comparable with that of Sicca (1.0, IQR: 1.5, P = 0.777) participants. The median total stimulated salivary flow rate (TSS, ml 15 min-1 ) was lowest in SS (7.0, IQR: 12.4, P < 0.001) compared to other groups. Of the 45 OC cases in this cohort, 71.1% (n = 32) were from the SS group. The prevalence of OC was highest in the SS group (4.6%, P = 0.008). SS group had twice the risk of OC than NSGD (OR = 2.2, 95%CI: 1.1-4.2, P = 0.02) and Sicca (OR = 2.2, 95% CI: 1.0-4.8, P = 0.03), adjusting for confounders; hyposalivation [WUS (OR = 5.1, 95%CI: 2.5-10.4, P < 0.001), TSS (OR = 1.9, 95%CI: 1.0-3.5, P = 0.04)], history of other autoimmune disorders (OR = 4.4, 95%CI: 1.7-11.3, P = 0.002), medications for extraglandular manifestations (OR = 2.3, 95%CI: 1.1-4.9, P = 0.03), and diabetes mellitus (4.2, 95%CI: 1.2-15.2, P = 0.02) were independent predictors of OC; females had a lower risk than males (OR = 0.29, 95%CI: 0.13-0.67, P = 0.004). Age, race, anti-SSA/SSB autoantibodies, focus score, other medications, anxiety, fatigue, cigarette smoking, alcohol, and caffeine use were not associated with oral candidiasis. CONCLUSION: Salivary gland dysfunction (hyposalivation with WUS being a stronger predictor than TSS) and autoimmunity (SS, other autoimmune disorders, medications, i.e., DMARDS) are both independent predictors of OC. Diabetes mellitus is an independent predictor of OC among those with salivary gland dysfunction. Our findings suggest that these independent predictors should be considered in the prevention and management of OC in this population.


Assuntos
Candidíase Bucal/epidemiologia , Candidíase Bucal/fisiopatologia , Saliva , Síndrome de Sjogren/epidemiologia , Síndrome de Sjogren/fisiopatologia , Xerostomia/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doenças Autoimunes/epidemiologia , Autoimunidade , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Xerostomia/fisiopatologia , Adulto Jovem
2.
JDR Clin Trans Res ; 8(2): 178-187, 2023 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35369790

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The American Dental Association (ADA) defines evidence-based dentistry (EBD) as "an approach to oral healthcare that requires the judicious integration of systematic assessments of clinically relevant scientific evidence, relating to the oral and medical condition and history, with the dentist's clinical expertise and the patient's treatment needs and preferences." Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are statements that include recommendations intended to optimize patient care that are informed by a systematic review of evidence and an assessment of the benefits and harms of alternative care options. Therefore, ADA CPGs are the most rigorous examples of EBD to inform clinical practice. CPGs should be of the highest level of quality to ensure the appropriateness and timeliness of clinical recommendations. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to measure the methodological rigor and transparency of the ADA CPGs. METHODS: Each ADA CPG was appraised by 4 independent assessors using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument. Quantitative quality scores were obtained for 6 domains and overall quality. In addition, assessors provided a qualitative analysis by providing comments for each item and an appraisal of the full recommendation. RESULTS: A quality score of 75% was used as the threshold for high-quality guidelines. Using this metric, 6 of the current 10 current ADA CPGs were considered to be of high quality, 1 was slightly below the quality threshold, and 3 were considered marginal. Even among those evaluated to be high quality in overall assessment, certain domains did not reach the quality threshold of 75%. CONCLUSION: Overall, the ADA CPGs collectively provide high-quality guidance for the clinician. While the AGREE appraisal guidelines have been used in CPG development since 2016, there is still room for improvement in certain domains (i.e., stakeholder involvement, rigor of development, applicability, and editorial independence). KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER STATEMENT: The results of this study summarize the methodological rigor and transparency of the 10 current ADA clinical practice guidelines. Since adoption of AGREE standards (2016), CPGs have been uniformly of high quality. The quality of older CPGs was somewhat lower but overall deemed acceptable. Thus, ADA CPGs may be used with confidence to inform practitioners of treatment options supported by rigorous evidence-based dentistry standards. However, there is still room for improvement in methodological quality.


Assuntos
American Dental Association , Instalações de Saúde , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Conhecimento , Processos Mentais
3.
4.
J Dent Res ; 98(11): 1219-1226, 2019 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31369716

RESUMO

The US prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is 30.6% and increasing. NAFLD shares some risk factors with periodontitis and dental caries. We explored the association between NAFLD and several oral conditions among US adults, using data from the cross-sectional, nationally representative National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 1988 to 1994. NAFLD was assessed with ultrasonography (USON), the screening gold standard not available in the more recent NHANES, and the noninvasive Fibrosis Score (FS), Fatty Liver Index (FLI), and US Fatty Liver Index (US-FLI) as other screening alternatives. There were 5,421 eligible dentate adults aged 21 to 74 y with complete relevant data, with transferrin levels ≤50%, without hepatitis B or C, who were not heavy drinkers. Multivariable models were developed to examine the independent effects of moderate-severe periodontitis, untreated dental caries, caries experience, and tooth loss (<20 teeth) on NAFLD while controlling for clinical, biological, and sociodemographic factors. Weighted estimates for odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were calculated with logistic regression. Between 17% and 24% of adults had NAFLD depending on the classification criteria. In adjusted models, as compared with those with better oral health, adults with <20 teeth were more likely to have NAFLD depending on the measure (USON: OR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.11 to 2.02; FS: OR = 4.36, 95% CI = 3.47 to 5.49; FLI: OR = 1.99, 95% CI = 1.52 to 2.59; US-FLI: OR = 2.32, 95% CI = 1.79 to 3.01). People with moderate-severe periodontitis were more likely to have NAFLD (USON: OR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.06 to 2.24; FS: OR = 3.10, 95% CI = 2.31 to 4.17; FLI: OR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.13 to 2.28; US-FLI: OR = 2.21, 95% CI = 1.64 to 2.98). People with any untreated caries were more likely to have NAFLD (USON: OR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.20 to 1.90; FLI: OR = 1.80, 95% CI = 1.33 to 2.44). NAFLD was associated with tooth loss, periodontitis, and, for some NAFLD measures, untreated dental caries but not overall caries experience after controlling for several key sociodemographic and behavioral factors. Results suggest that further evaluation is needed to better understand this health-oral health interrelationship and potential opportunities for medical-dental integration.


Assuntos
Cárie Dentária/epidemiologia , Hepatopatia Gordurosa não Alcoólica/epidemiologia , Periodontite/epidemiologia , Perda de Dente/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Prevalência , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
5.
J Public Health Dent ; 68(4): 218-26, 2008.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18248340

RESUMO

The 2003-04 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) was a collaborative effort involving 28 federal funding partners with the National Center for Health Statistics. The collaborators for the 2003-04 NHANES oral health component included the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research and the National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Oral Health. Oral health data are available on 8272 persons aged 2 years or older. This report provides an overview of the 2003-04 oral health component including content descriptions and procedures for oral health assessments conducted for the first time in a national survey in the United States. These assessments include posterior functional contacts, tooth wear, and oral health-related quality of life. This report also provides evaluations of data quality in terms of examiner reliability statistics (percent agreements, kappas, and correlation coefficients) for various NHANES 2003-04 oral health examination components and analytical recommendations for producing 6-year estimates using the previous two NHANES data collection components (1999-2000 and 2001-02).


Assuntos
Inquéritos de Saúde Bucal , Doenças da Boca/epidemiologia , Saúde Bucal , Projetos de Pesquisa/normas , Doenças Dentárias/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Projetos de Pesquisa Epidemiológica , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Controle de Qualidade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
6.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol ; 35(2): 140-51, 2007 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17331155

RESUMO

The Oral Health Component of the 1999-2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) is a collaborative effort between the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR), the National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Oral Health (NCCDPHP/DOH), and the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). The current NHANES is designed as a continuous survey with data released on a 2-year cycle to represent the civilian, non-institutionalized population of the US. Oral health data are currently available for 8082 and 9010 persons aged > or =2 years who participated in the 1999-2000 and 2001-2002 NHANES, respectively. This article provides background information on previous national examination surveys with oral health content. It also provides general analytical considerations, oral health content information, and evaluations of data quality in terms of examiner reliability statistics (percent agreements, kappa, and correlation coefficients) for the 1999-2002 NHANES Oral Health Component.


Assuntos
Projetos de Pesquisa Epidemiológica , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Saúde Bucal , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
7.
J Dent Res ; 101(7): 739-741, 2022 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35612281
8.
J Dent Res ; 95(7): 814-21, 2016 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26994107

RESUMO

Methamphetamine (MA) users are assumed to have a high burden of tooth decay. Less clear is how the distribution and severity of dental caries in MA users differ from the general population. Using a covariate-balancing propensity score strategy, we investigated the differential effects of MA use on dental caries by comparing the patterns of decayed, missing, and filled teeth in a community sample of 571 MA users with a subset of 2,755 demographically similar control individuals selected from a National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) cohort. Recruited over a 2-y period with a stratified sampling protocol, the MA users underwent comprehensive dental examinations by 3 trained and calibrated dentists using NHANES protocols. Propensity scores were estimated with logistic regression based on background characteristics, and a subset of closely matched subjects was stratified into quintiles for comparisons. MA users were twice as likely to have untreated caries (odds ratio [OR] = 2.08; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.55 to 2.78) and 4 times more likely to have caries experience (OR = 4.06; 95% CI: 2.24 to 7.34) than the control group of NHANES participants. Additionally, MA users were twice as likely to have 2 more decayed, missing, or filled teeth (OR = 2.08; 95% CI: 1.29 to 2.79) than the NHANES participants. The differential involvement of the teeth surfaces in MA users was quite distinctive, with carious surface involvement being highest for the maxillary central incisors, followed by maxillary posterior premolars and molars. Users injecting MA had significantly higher rates of tooth decay compared with noninjectors (P = 0.04). Although MA users experienced decayed and missing dental surfaces more frequently than NHANES participants, NHANES participants had more restored surfaces, especially on molars. The high rates and distinctive patterns of dental caries observed could be used 1) to alert dentists to covert MA use in their patients and 2) as the basis for comprehensive management strategies.


Assuntos
Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Anfetaminas/complicações , Metanfetamina , Doenças Estomatognáticas/etiologia , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Índice CPO , Cárie Dentária/epidemiologia , Cárie Dentária/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Pontuação de Propensão , Doenças Estomatognáticas/epidemiologia
9.
Occup Environ Med ; 62(6): 368-75, 2005 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15901883

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Mercury amalgam dental restorations have been used by dentists since the mid 19th century and issues on safety continue to be periodically debated within the scientific and public health communities. Previous studies have reported a positive association between urine mercury levels and the number of dental amalgams, but this relation has never been described in a nationally representative sample in the United States. AIMS AND METHODS: Using household interview, dietary interview, dental examination, and laboratory data from the 1999-2000 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), the association between mercury concentrations and dental restorations was examined in US women of reproductive age. RESULTS: In women of childbearing age, approximately 13% of all posterior dental surfaces were restored with amalgams and the average urinary mercury level in women was low (1.34 microg/l). It is estimated that an increase of 1.8 microg/l in the log transformed values for mercury in urine would occur for each 10 dental surfaces restored with amalgam. CONCLUSIONS: Although the findings do not address the important issues of adverse health effects at low thresholds of mercury exposure, they do provide important reference data that should contribute significantly to the ongoing scientific and public health policy debate on the use of dental amalgams in the USA.


Assuntos
Amálgama Dentário/farmacocinética , Restauração Dentária Permanente , Mercúrio/urina , Adolescente , Adulto , Restauração Dentária Permanente/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Mercúrio/sangue , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fumar/urina
10.
J Dent Res ; 92(11): 1041-7, 2013 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24065636

RESUMO

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of self-reported measures in predicting periodontitis in a representative US adult population, based on 2009-2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data. Self-reported gum health and treatment history, loose teeth, bone loss around teeth, tooth not looking right, and use of dental floss and mouthwash were obtained during in-home interviews and validated against full-mouth clinically assessed periodontitis in 3,743 US adults 30 years and older. All self-reported measures (> 95% item response rates) were associated with periodontitis, and bivariate correlations between responses to these questions were weak, indicating low redundancy. In multivariable logistic regression modeling, the combined effects of demographic measures and responses to 5 self-reported questions in predicting periodontitis of mild or greater severity were 85% sensitive and 58% specific and produced an 'area under the receiver operator characteristic curve' (AUROCC) of 0.81. Four questions were 95% sensitive and 30% specific, with an AUROCC of 0.82 in predicting prevalence of clinical attachment loss ≥ 3 mm at one or more sites. In conclusion, self-reported measures performed well in predicting periodontitis in US adults. Where preferred clinically based surveillance is unattainable, locally adapted variations of these self-reported measures may be a promising alternative for surveillance of periodontitis.


Assuntos
Periodontite/epidemiologia , Autorrelato , Adulto , Perda do Osso Alveolar/epidemiologia , Área Sob a Curva , Dispositivos para o Cuidado Bucal Domiciliar/estatística & dados numéricos , Escolaridade , Estética Dentária , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Previsões , Doenças da Gengiva/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Antissépticos Bucais/uso terapêutico , Inquéritos Nutricionais/estatística & dados numéricos , Perda da Inserção Periodontal/epidemiologia , Bolsa Periodontal/epidemiologia , Vigilância da População , Pobreza/estatística & dados numéricos , Prevalência , Curva ROC , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Fumar/epidemiologia , Perda de Dente/epidemiologia , Mobilidade Dentária/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
12.
J Dent Res ; 91(10): 914-20, 2012 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22935673

RESUMO

This study estimated the prevalence, severity, and extent of periodontitis in the adult U.S. population, with data from the 2009 and 2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) cycle. Estimates were derived from a sample of 3,742 adults aged 30 years and older, of the civilian non-institutionalized population, having 1 or more natural teeth. Attachment loss (AL) and probing depth (PD) were measured at 6 sites per tooth on all teeth (except the third molars). Over 47% of the sample, representing 64.7 million adults, had periodontitis, distributed as 8.7%, 30.0%, and 8.5% with mild, moderate, and severe periodontitis, respectively. For adults aged 65 years and older, 64% had either moderate or severe periodontitis. Eighty-six and 40.9% had 1 or more teeth with AL ≥ 3 mm and PD ≥ 4 mm, respectively. With respect to extent of disease, 56% and 18% of the adult population had 5% or more periodontal sites with ≥ 3 mm AL and ≥ 4 mm PD, respectively. Periodontitis was highest in men, Mexican Americans, adults with less than a high school education, adults below 100% Federal Poverty Levels (FPL), and current smokers. This survey has provided direct evidence for a high burden of periodontitis in the adult U.S. population.


Assuntos
Periodontite/epidemiologia , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Inquéritos de Saúde Bucal , Etnicidade , Feminino , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gravidade do Paciente , Prevalência , Vigilância em Saúde Pública/métodos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
13.
J Dent Res ; 89(11): 1208-13, 2010 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20858782

RESUMO

This study evaluates the accuracy of periodontitis prevalence determined by the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) partial-mouth periodontal examination protocols. True periodontitis prevalence was determined in a new convenience sample of 454 adults ≥ 35 years old, by a full-mouth "gold standard" periodontal examination. This actual prevalence was compared with prevalence resulting from analysis of the data according to the protocols of NHANES III and NHANES 2001-2004, respectively. Both NHANES protocols substantially underestimated the prevalence of periodontitis by 50% or more, depending on the periodontitis case definition used, and thus performed below threshold levels for moderate-to-high levels of validity for surveillance. Adding measurements from lingual or interproximal sites to the NHANES 2001-2004 protocol did not improve the accuracy sufficiently to reach acceptable sensitivity thresholds. These findings suggest that NHANES protocols produce high levels of misclassification of periodontitis cases and thus have low validity for surveillance and research.


Assuntos
Inquéritos Nutricionais , Periodontite/epidemiologia , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , District of Columbia/epidemiologia , Feminino , Retração Gengival/epidemiologia , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Maryland/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Perda da Inserção Periodontal/epidemiologia , Índice Periodontal , Bolsa Periodontal/epidemiologia , Periodontite/classificação , Vigilância da População , Prevalência , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Fumar/epidemiologia , Perda de Dente/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Saúde da População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricos , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos
15.
Gut ; 54(6): 759-63, 2005 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15888779

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is a common cancer worldwide and has a very high mortality rate. Squamous dysplasia is the precursor lesion for OSCC and it can be seen during routine endoscopy with Lugol's iodine staining. We aimed to examine the risk factors for squamous dysplasia and determine if a risk model could be constructed which would be useful in selecting apparently healthy subjects for endoscopic screening in a high risk population in Linzhou, People's Republic of China. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In this cross sectional study, 724 adult volunteers aged 40-65 years were enrolled. All subjects completed a questionnaire regarding potential environmental exposures, received physical and dental examinations, and underwent upper endoscopy with Lugol's iodine staining and biopsy. Subjects were categorised as having or not having histologically proven squamous dysplasia/early cancer. Risk factors for dysplasia were examined using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. The utility of the final multivariate model as a screening tool was assessed using a receiver operating characteristics curve. RESULTS: We found that 230 of 720 subjects (32%) with complete data had prevalent squamous dysplasia. In the final multivariate model, more household members (odds ratio (OR) 1.12/member (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.99, 1.25)), a family history of cancer (OR 1.57 (95% CI 1.13-2.18)), higher systolic blood pressure OR 1.11/10 mm Hg (95% CI 1.03-1.19)), heating the home without a chimney (OR 2.22 (95% CI 1.27-3.86)), and having lost more but not all of your teeth (OR 1.91 for 12-31 teeth lost (95% CI 1.17-3.15)) were associated with higher odds of having dysplasia. Higher household income (OR 0.96/100 RMB (95% CI 0.91-1.00)) was associated with a lower odds of having dysplasia. Although we found several statistically significant associations, the final model had little ability to accurately predict dysplasia status, with maximum simultaneous sensitivity and specificity values of 57% and 54%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We found that risk factors for dysplasia were similar to those previously identified as risk factors for OSCC in this population. The final model did a poor job of identifying subjects who had squamous dysplasia. Other methods will need to be developed to triage individuals to endoscopy in this high risk population.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Esôfago/patologia , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Biópsia/métodos , Estudos Transversais , Esofagoscopia/métodos , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Razão de Chances , Exame Físico , Fatores de Risco , Perda de Dente/etiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA