Differential effects of adult attachment in cognitive-behavioural and psychodynamic therapy in social anxiety disorder: A comparison between a self-rating and an observer rating.

Different measures of attachment are usually weakly correlated. In a subsample of an RCT comparing short-term cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) and psychodynamic therapy (PDT), we examined the association between attachment and outcome using two attachment measures. The sample comprises 148 patients with social anxiety disorder who were treated in the SOPHO-NET trial. Pretreatment attachment was assessed using the Adult Attachment Prototype Rating (AAPR) and the Bielefeld Questionnaire of Client Expectations (BQCE). Regression models were used to predict the therapeutic alliance (HAQ) at session 8, the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) at the end of therapy and a 6-month follow-up. Attachment groups (secure, avoidant, and ambivalent) classified with the AAPR and the BQCE were not significantly correlated (Cohen's κ = 0.08). Only the BQCE was associated with the HAQ indicating avoidantly attached patients showing lower HAQ scores than securely attached (Cohen's d = 0.722). Regarding the AAPR, we found an interaction effect of treatment and attachment related to the post-treatment LSAS scores. Post hoc tests revealed that securely attached patients in CBT had lower scores than securely attached in PDT (d = 0.922) and, on a trend level, avoidantly attached in CBT (d = 0.782). We conclude that attachment-outcome associations are affected by the applied measure. The identified differential effects suggest that psychotherapists should adapt the interventions on the attachment of their patients.

[Negative Indicators in the Psychotherapeutic Process: Frequency and Relationship with Attachment Characteristics and Treatment Outcome among Patients with Social Anxiety Disorder]. / Negative Indikatoren im psychotherapeutischen Prozess: Häufigkeit und Zusammenhang mit Bindungsmerkmalen und Therapieerfolg bei Patienten mit sozialer Angststörung.

Within the SOPHO-Net-Project, mainly focusing on a randomized-controlled trial comparing short term cognitive and psychodynamic psychotherapy for social anxiety disorder, a subsample consisting of 88 patients from 3 of the 5 study sites was investigated to examine the relationship between outcome, initial attachment characteristics and negative indicators during the process. These negative indicators were assessed with the Vanderbilt Negative Indicators Scale which was applied to an early (3rd), a middle (9th) as well as a late therapy (22nd) session. The study shows that negative indicators as a whole were relatively rare with a higher frequency within the psychodynamic therapies for which a relationship between negative indicators and outcome could be found. Contrary to expectation, initial attachment characteristics were not related to negative indicators.

[Resource-focused treatment for unipolar depression: a randomized controlled psychotherapy study]. / Ressourcenorientierte Akutbehandlung unipolarer Depressionen: Eine randomisierte kontrollierte Psychotherapiestudie.

BACKGROUND: Resource activation is considered to be a central mechanism in psychotherapeutic change. However, it is widely unknown whether a special focus on resource activation is associated with higher efficacy in cognitive behavioural therapy. METHOD: 52 patients with unipolar depression took part in a randomized controlled study comparing cognitive behavioural therapy plus resource activation (RFCBT) with cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) alone. RESULTS: Overall, treatment effects were comparable to published research. In both treatment groups patients equally improved on cognitive, emotional and interpersonal outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: A combined treatment approach of cognitive behavioural therapy and resource activation was shown to be an effective treatment of unipolar depression. Yet, compared to a standard CBT-treatment an additional focus on resource was not associated with higher efficacy.

Social anxiety as a potential mediator of the association between attachment and depression.

OBJECTIVE: The study represents a conceptual replication of the study by Eng et al. (2001) in a sample of adult patients diagnosed with social anxiety disorder as primary diagnosis. METHODS: Two different attachment questionnaires (Bielefeld Questionnaire of Client Expectations (BQCE) and Experiences in Close Relationships (ECR-RD)) were applied to examine whether the effect of attachment on depression (measured by the BDI) is mediated by social anxiety (measured by the LSAS) in a cross-sectional study. RESULTS: The data confirms such a mediation. The effect of attachment measured with the BQCE on depression was completely mediated, whereas the effect of both scales of the ECR-RD (attachment related avoidance and anxiety) on depression was only partially mediated by social anxiety disorder. CONCLUSION: The study supports the association of attachment, social anxiety, and depressive symptoms and the need to consider different perspectives on attachment.