RESUMO
In this short paper, a critical analysis of the Neutrosophic, Pythagorean and some other novel fuzzy sets theories foundations is provided, taking into account that they actively used for the solution of the decision-making problems. The shortcomings of these theories are exposed. It is stated that the independence hypothesis, which is a cornerstone of the Neutrosophic sets theory, is not in line with common sense and therefore leads to the paradoxical results in the asymptotic limits of this theory. It is shown that the Pythagorean sets theory possesses questionable foundations, the sense of which cannot be explained reasonably. Moreover, this theory does not completely solve the declared problem. Similarly, important methodological problems of other analyzed theories are revealed. To solve the interior problems of the Atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy sets and to improve upon them, this being the reason most of the criticized novel sets theories were developed, an alternative approach based on extension of the intuitionistic fuzzy sets in the framework of the Dempster-Shafer theory is proposed. No propositions concerned with the improvement of the Cubic sets theory and Single-Valued Neutrosophic Offset theory were made, as their applicability was shown to be very dubious. In order to stimulate discussion, many statements are deliberately formulated in a hardline form.
RESUMO
The paper presents the generalization of the almost forty years of experience in the field of setting and solving the multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) problems in various branches of a human activity under different types of uncertainties that inevitably accompany such problems. Based only on the pragmatic intentions, the authors avoid the detailed descriptions of the known methods for the decision-making, while instead focusing on the most frequently used mathematical tools and methodologies in the decision-making practice. Therefore, the paper may be classified as a special kind of illustrative review of the mathematical tools that are focused on applications and are the most used in the solutions of MCDM problems. As an illustrative example, a complete user-friendly computer implementation of such tools and methodology is presented with application to the simple "buying a cat" problem, which, however, possesses all the attributes of the hierarchical fuzzy MCDM task.
RESUMO
In this paper, first we show that the variance used in the Markowitz's mean-variance model for the portfolio selection with its numerous modifications often does not properly present the risk of portfolio. Therefore, we propose another treating of portfolio risk as the measure of possibility to earn unacceptable low profits of portfolio and a simple mathematical formalization of this measure. In a similar way, we treat the criterion of portfolio's return maximization as the measure of possibility to get a maximal profit. As the result, we formulate the portfolio selection problem as a bicriteria optimization task. Then, we study the properties of the developed approach using critical examples of portfolios with interval and fuzzy valued returns. The α-cuts representation of fuzzy returns was used. To validate the proposed method, we compare the results we got using it with those obtained with the use of fuzzy versions of seven widely reputed methods for portfolio selection. As in our approach we deal with the bicriteria task, the three most popular methods for local criteria aggregation are compared using the known example of fuzzy portfolio consist of five assets. It is shown that the results we got using our approach to the interval and fuzzy portfolio selection reflect better the essence of this task than those obtained by widely reputed traditional methods for portfolio selection in the fuzzy setting.