Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 59
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 37(1): 221-229, 2022 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34694440

RESUMO

PURPOSE: There are  scarce data describing the outcomes of hospitalized patients admitted with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) stratified by race. In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated the difference in outcomes between adult white and black patients hospitalized with a principal diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease. METHODS: Data were obtained from the 2016 and 2017 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Our primary outcome was inpatient mortality while the secondary outcomes were hospital length of stay (LOS), total hospital charges (THC), red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, diagnosis of bowel perforation, and severe sepsis with septic shock. We conducted the analysis using STATA software. We used propensity-matched multivariate regression analysis to adjust for potential confounders. RESULTS: Among 71 million hospital hospitalizations, we found 177,574 hospitalizations with a principal diagnosis of IBD, with 24,635 (13.9%) for black patients, 124,899 (70.3%) for white patients, and 28,040 (15.8%) were for others. There was no significant difference in inpatient mortality for black vs white patients. Among secondary outcomes, white compared to black patients had increased odds of having a diagnosis of bowel perforation when admitted with a diagnosis of IBD while there was no difference in the odds of developing septic shock. White patients admitted with a diagnosis of UC were also found to have increased total LOS and THC. CONCLUSION: White patients hospitalized with a principal diagnosis of IBD had no difference in inpatient mortality or septic shock but had worse outcomes such as increased odds of bowel perforation compared to black patients.


Assuntos
Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , Hospitalização , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Fatores Raciais , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 45(7): 866-873, 2022 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35633309

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease are considered independent risk factors for developing atrial fibrillation (AF). Percutaneous occlusion of left atrial appendage (LAAC) using WATCHMAN device is a widely accepted alternative to anticoagulation therapy to prevent ischemic stroke in AF in patients who are not candidates for anticoagulation. There is limited data regarding the utilization and periprocedural safety of this intervention in patients with CKD/ESRD. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all hospitalizations from 2016 to 2017 with (ICD-10) procedure diagnosis code of LAA closure using WATCHMAN procedure with and without a secondary diagnosis of CKD/ESRD in acute-care hospitals across the United States using the national inpatient sample. Demographic variables (gender, race, income, hospital characteristics, medical comorbidities) were collected and compared. The primary outcomes were inpatient mortality, hospital length, and cost of stay. RESULTS: There were over 71 million discharges included in the combined 2016 and 2017 NIS database. Sixteen thousand five hundred five hospitalizations were for adult patients with a procedure code for LAA closure via watchman procedure. Of 16,505 patients, 3245 (19.66%) had CKD and ESRD. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality, length, and cost of stay in patients with and without CKD/ESRD. There were no statistically significant differences in periprocedural cerebrovascular accidents in both groups. CONCLUSION: Patients with and without ESRD/CKD who undergo LAA occlusion with Watchman have similar procedure related, in-hospital mortality, and complications.


Assuntos
Apêndice Atrial , Fibrilação Atrial , Falência Renal Crônica , Insuficiência Renal Crônica , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Adulto , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Apêndice Atrial/cirurgia , Fibrilação Atrial/complicações , Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilação Atrial/cirurgia , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/complicações , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/complicações , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controle , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
J Clin Rheumatol ; 28(1): e13-e17, 2022 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32925445

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to compare the outcomes of patients primarily admitted for ischemic stroke with and without a secondary diagnosis of RA. METHODS: Data were abstracted from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2016 and 2017 database. The NIS was searched for hospitalizations for adult patients with ischemic stroke as principal diagnosis with and without RA as secondary diagnosis using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes. The primary outcome was inpatient mortality. Hospital length of stay (LOS), total hospital charges, odds of receiving tissue plasminogen activator, and mechanical thrombectomy were secondary outcomes of interest. Multivariate logistic and linear regression analyses were used accordingly to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: There were more than 71 million discharges included in the combined 2016 and 2017 NIS database. Of 525,570 patients with ischemic stroke, 8670 (1.7%) had RA. Hospitalizations for ischemic stroke with RA had less inpatient mortality (4.7% vs. 5.5%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.85; p = 0.001), shorter LOS (5.1 vs 5.7 days, p < 0.0001), lower mean total hospital charges ($61,626 vs. $70,345, p < 0.0001), and less odds of undergoing mechanical thrombectomy (3.9% vs. 5.1%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.72; p < 0.0001) compared with those without RA. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalizations for ischemic stroke with RA had less inpatient mortality, shorter LOS, lower total hospital charges, and less likelihood of undergoing mechanical thrombectomy compared with those without RA. However, the odds of receiving tissue plasminogen activator were similar between both groups. Further studies to understand its mechanism would be helpful.


Assuntos
Artrite Reumatoide , Isquemia Encefálica , AVC Isquêmico , Adulto , Artrite Reumatoide/complicações , Artrite Reumatoide/diagnóstico , Artrite Reumatoide/epidemiologia , Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico , Isquemia Encefálica/epidemiologia , Isquemia Encefálica/terapia , Hospitalização , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , AVC Isquêmico/diagnóstico , AVC Isquêmico/epidemiologia , AVC Isquêmico/terapia , Ativador de Plasminogênio Tecidual
4.
J Clin Rheumatol ; 28(1): e171-e174, 2022 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33337810

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a rare potentially fatal multisystem inflammatory condition that is often triggered by an underlying medical condition. Epidemiologic data of HLH in adults with rheumatologic diseases are limited. The aim of our study was to characterize HLH hospitalizations in the US adult population with a special focus on patients with concomitant rheumatologic diseases. METHODS: We conducted a medical records review of hospitalizations in the United States during 2016 and 2017 with a diagnosis of HLH. Hospitalizations were selected from the National Inpatient Sample. International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes were used to identify rheumatologic diseases. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (ORadj) for the association of HLH and rheumatologic diseases. RESULTS: Seven hundred fifty hospitalizations had a principal billing diagnosis of HLH. The median age of our study population was 47.5 years, and males made up 55% of the population. Overall mortality was 17%, and the median length of stay was 12 days. Twenty-five percent of the HLH cases had a concomitant rheumatologic diagnosis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with nephritis (ORadj, 5.7), SLE without nephritis (ORadj, 9.2), adult-onset Still disease (ORadj, 338.9), and ankylosing spondylitis (ORadj, 10.7) were significantly associated with HLH. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis represents the largest sample to date to assess HLH hospitalizations. Our study showed that SLE, adult-onset Still disease, and ankylosing spondylitis were strongly associated with HLH.


Assuntos
Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico , Linfo-Histiocitose Hemofagocítica , Doença de Still de Início Tardio , Adulto , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Linfo-Histiocitose Hemofagocítica/diagnóstico , Linfo-Histiocitose Hemofagocítica/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doença de Still de Início Tardio/complicações , Doença de Still de Início Tardio/diagnóstico , Doença de Still de Início Tardio/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
5.
J Clin Rheumatol ; 28(2): e433-e439, 2022 03 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34262001

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Dermatomyositis (DM) and polymyositis (PM) are systemic autoimmune diseases that have been associated with high in-hospital mortality (IHM). The aim of this study was to use the National Inpatient Sample (NIS), a large US population database, to determine the reasons for hospitalization and IHM in patients with DM and PM. METHODS: We conducted a medical records review of adult DM/PM hospitalizations in 2016 and 2017 in acute care hospitals across the United States using the NIS. The reasons for IHM and reasons for hospitalization were divided into 19 broad categories based on their principal International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10) diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 27,140 hospitalizations carried either a principal or secondary ICD-10 code for DM or PM. The main reasons for hospitalization were rheumatologic (22%, n = 6085), cardiovascular (15%, n = 3945), infectious (13%, n = 3515), respiratory (12%, n = 3170), and gastrointestinal, (8%, n = 2150). A total of 3.5% of all patients experienced IHM. Infectious (34%, n = 325), respiratory (23%, n = 215), and cardiovascular (15%, n = 140) diagnoses were the most common reasons for IHM. Sepsis ICD-10 A41.9 was the most frequent specific principal diagnosis for both hospitalizations and IHM. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis demonstrated that in the NIS the most common reasons for hospitalization in patients with DM/PM were rheumatologic diagnoses. However, IHM in these patients was most frequently from infectious diagnoses, highlighting the need for increased attention to infectious complications in these patients.


Assuntos
Dermatomiosite , Polimiosite , Adulto , Dermatomiosite/diagnóstico , Dermatomiosite/epidemiologia , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitalização , Humanos , Polimiosite/diagnóstico , Polimiosite/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
6.
J Clin Rheumatol ; 28(1): e110-e117, 2022 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33264253

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the outcomes of patients primarily admitted for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with and without systemic sclerosis (SSc). The primary outcome was odds of inpatient mortality. Hospital length of stay, total hospital charges, rates of cardiovascular procedures, and treatments were secondary outcomes of interest. METHODS: Data were abstracted from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2016 and 2017 Database. The NIS was searched for hospitalizations for adult patients with ACS (ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI], non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [NSTEMI], and unstable angina) as principal diagnosis with and without SSc as secondary diagnosis using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes. Multivariate logistic and linear regression analysis was used accordingly to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: There were more than 71 million discharges included in the combined 2016 and 2017 NIS database. There were 1,319,464 hospitalizations for adult patients with a principal International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision code for ACS. There were 1155 (0.09%) of these hospitalizations that had SSc. The adjusted odds ratios for inpatient mortality for ACS, STEMI, and NSTEMI hospitalizations with coexisting SSc compared with those without SSc were 2.02 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19-3.43; p = 0.009), 2.47 (95% CI, 1.05-5.79; p = 0.038), and 2.19 (95% CI, 1.14-4.23; p = 0.019), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Acute coronary syndrome hospitalizations with SSc have increased inpatient mortality compared with those without SSc. ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and NSTEMI hospitalizations with SSc have increased inpatient mortality compared with STEMI and NSTEMI hospitalizations without SSc, respectively. Acute coronary syndrome hospitalizations with SSc have similar hospital length of stay, total hospital charges, rates of revascularization strategies (percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass surgery, and thrombolytics), and other interventions (such as percutaneous external assist device and intra-aortic balloon pump) compared with those without SSc.


Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda , Escleroderma Sistêmico , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/diagnóstico , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/epidemiologia , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/terapia , Adulto , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitalização , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Escleroderma Sistêmico/diagnóstico , Escleroderma Sistêmico/epidemiologia , Escleroderma Sistêmico/terapia , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
J Clin Rheumatol ; 28(2): e467-e472, 2022 03 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34176884

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to describe the rates and characteristics of nonelective 30-day readmission among adult patients hospitalized for acute gout and to assess predictors of readmission. METHODS: We analyzed the 2017 Nationwide Readmission Database. Gout hospitalizations were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification code. Hospitalizations for adult patients were included. We excluded planned or elective readmissions. We utilized χ2 tests to compare baseline characteristics between readmissions and index hospitalizations. We used multivariate Cox regression to identify independent predictors of readmissions. RESULTS: A total of 11,727 index adult hospitalizations with acute gout listed as the principal diagnosis were discharged alive and included. One thousand five hundred ninety-four (13.6%) readmissions occurred within 30 days. Acute gout was the most common reason for readmission. Readmissions had higher inpatient mortality (2.4% vs 0.1%, p < 0.0001), greater mean age (68.1 vs 67.0 years, p = 0.021), and longer hospital length of stay (5.9 vs 3.8 days, p < 0.0001) compared with index hospitalizations. Charlson Comorbidity Index scores of ≥2 (score 2: adjusted hazards ratio [AHR], 1.67; p = 0.001; score ≥3: AHR, 2.08; p < 0.0001), APR-DRG (All Patients Refined Diagnosis Related Groups) severity levels ≥2 (level 2: AHR, 1.43; p = 0.044; level 3: AHR, 1.83; p = 0.002; level 4: AHR, 2.38; p = 0.002), admission to metropolitan hospital (AHR, 1.83; p = 0.012), atrial fibrillation (AHR, 1.31; p = 0.004), and anemia (AHR, 1.30; p = 0.001) were significantly associated with 30-day readmissions. CONCLUSIONS: Acute gout readmissions were associated with worse outcomes compared with index hospitalizations. Charlson Comorbidity Index scores ≥2, APR-DRG severity levels ≥2, admission to metropolitan hospital, atrial fibrillation, and anemia were significant predictors of readmission.


Assuntos
Gota , Readmissão do Paciente , Adulto , Idoso , Bases de Dados Factuais , Gota/diagnóstico , Gota/epidemiologia , Gota/terapia , Hospitalização , Hospitais , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
8.
Dermatol Ther ; 34(1): e14401, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33040473

RESUMO

Bleomycin is a useful treatment option for recalcitrant verrucae. Several different methods of bleomycin delivery have been described, including intralesional injection, intralesional injection combined with laser, microneedling, multiple puncture and adhesive tape. We reviewed the literature to evaluate the various methods of bleomycin administration to treat warts, including the different doses, instruments and procedures used. Intralesional injection (cure rate ranged from 67.8% to 99.23%) and topical bleomycin with multipuncture or microneedling methods (63.6% to 100%) were found to be effective in the treatment of warts. Overall, pain is significantly less with microneedling and multipuncture techniques compared with intralesional injection. Bleomycin injection combined with pulsed dye laser, electroporation, or by other methods, such as, microneedle patches or adhesive tape do not seem to be more beneficial than bleomycin administered by intralesional injection, multipuncture or microneedling techniques.


Assuntos
Lasers de Corante , Verrugas , Administração Cutânea , Bleomicina/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Injeções Intralesionais , Verrugas/tratamento farmacológico
9.
J Clin Rheumatol ; 27(8): e477-e481, 2021 Dec 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32947436

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients primarily admitted for atrial fibrillation (AFib) with and without a secondary diagnosis of systemic sclerosis (SSc). The primary outcome was inpatient mortality. Hospital length of stay (LOS), total hospital charges, odds of undergoing ablation, and electrical cardioversion were secondary outcomes of interest. METHODS: Data were abstracted from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2016 and 2017 Database. The NIS was searched for adult hospitalizations with AFib as principal diagnosis with and without SSc as secondary diagnosis using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Multivariate logistic and linear regression analysis was used accordingly to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: There were over 71 million discharges included in the combined 2016 and 2017 NIS database. Of 821,630 AFib hospitalizations, 750 (0.09%) had SSc. The adjusted odds ratio for inpatient mortality for AFib with coexisting SSc compared with without coexisting SSc was 3.3 (95% confidence interval, 1.27-8.52; p = 0.014). Atrial fibrillation with coexisting SSc hospitalizations had similar LOS (4.2 vs 3.4 days; p = 0.767), mean total hospital charges ($40,809 vs $39,158; p = 0.266), odds of undergoing ablation (2.7% vs 4.2%; p = 0.461), and electrical cardioversion (12.0% vs 17.5%; p = 0.316) compared with without coexisting SSc. CONCLUSIONS: Patients admitted primarily for AFib with a secondary diagnosis of SSc have more than 3 times the odds of inpatient death compared with those without coexisting SSc. Hospital LOS, total hospital charges, likelihood of undergoing ablation, and electrical cardioversion were similar in both groups.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial , Escleroderma Sistêmico , Adulto , Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilação Atrial/epidemiologia , Fibrilação Atrial/terapia , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitalização , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Escleroderma Sistêmico/complicações , Escleroderma Sistêmico/diagnóstico , Escleroderma Sistêmico/epidemiologia
10.
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J ; 21(6): 344-348, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34153477

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Using National Inpatient Database (NIS), comparison of clinical outcomes for patients primarily admitted for atrial fibrillation/flutter with and without a secondary diagnosis of amyloidosis was done. Inpatient mortality was the primary outcome and hospital length of stay (LOS), mean total hospital charges, odds of undergoing cardiac ablation, pharmacologic cardioversion, having a secondary discharge diagnosis of heart block, cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest were secondary outcomes. METHODS: NIS database of 2016, 2017 was used for only adult hospitalizations with atrial fibrillation/flutter as principal diagnosis with and without amyloidosis as secondary diagnosis using ICD-10 codes. Multivariate logistic with linear regression analysis was used to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: 932,054 hospitalizations were for adult patients with a principal discharge diagnosis of atrial fibrillation/flutter. 830 (0.09%) of these hospitalizations had amyloidosis. Atrial fibrillation/flutter hospitalizations with co-existing amyloidosis have higher inpatient mortality (4.22% vs 0.88%, AOR: 3.92, 95% CI 1.81-8.51, p = 0.001) and likelihood of having a secondary discharge diagnosis of cardiac arrest (2.40% vs 0.51%, AOR: 4.80, 95% CI 1.89-12.20, p = 0.001) compared to those without amyloidosis. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalizations of atrial fibrillation/flutter with co-existing amyloidosis have higher inpatient mortality and odds of having a secondary discharge diagnosis of cardiac arrest compared to those without amyloidosis. However, LOS, total hospital charges, likelihood of undergoing cardiac ablation, pharmacologic cardioversion, having a secondary discharge diagnosis of heart block and cardiogenic shock were similar between both groups.

15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38482087

RESUMO

Background: Coronavirus-19, primarily a respiratory virus, affects multiple organs and can lead to exacerbation of autoimmune or systemic conditions. Patients with autoimmune diseases, rheumatoid arthritis particularly, are susceptible to infection and complications from COVID-19. RA has become well-associated with COVID-19 infections, but large-scale studies evaluating outcomes among this vulnerable group are limited. Methods: For the retrospective analysis, we used the National Inpatient Sample database to compare COVID-19 patients with and without RA. A total of 1,050,040 adult hospitalizations were included in the study between January 1 to December 31, 2020: COVID-19 with RA (n = 21,545; 2.1%) and COVID-19 without RA (n = 1,028,495; 97.9%). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included mechanical ventilation requirement, vasopressor use, cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock, acute kidney injury, acute kidney injury requiring hemodialysis, gastrostomy, tracheostomy, length of stay, health care utilization costs, and disposition. A secondary analysis evaluating in-hospital mortality and mechanical ventilation with respect to age was conducted. Results: COVID-19 patients with RA had significantly increased in-hospital mortality compared to COVID-19 patients without RA (12.9% vs 11.1%, adjusted OR [aOR]: 1.2 [95% CI 1.1-1.3], p < 0.001). This cohort also had significantly increased rates of mechanical ventilation, pressor use, and cardiogenic shock. Conclusions: Given limited large evidence regarding COVID-19 with respect to RA, future research should be focused on this topic to improve outcomes for this subset of patients.

16.
J Scleroderma Relat Disord ; 9(1): 16-22, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38333522

RESUMO

Objective: COVID-19, a respiratory infection caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, can cause varying degrees of illness ranging from mild respiratory illness to severe respiratory failure. Systemic sclerosis is a chronic autoimmune disease, with an increased prevalence of infections as compared to the general population. In this study, we compare the clinical outcomes and resource utilization for COVID-19 hospitalizations in patients with and without systemic sclerosis. Methods: We used the National Inpatient Sample database, 2020, to study the characteristics, morbidity, mortality, cost, and resource utilization among primary COVID-19 hospitalizations with and without systemic sclerosis. Results: There were 1,050,040 patients aged ⩾ 18 years with a diagnosis of COVID-19. Of these, 775 (0.07%) patients had a secondary diagnosis of systemic sclerosis. Although there was no statistically significant difference regarding individual outcomes; in-hospital mortality, vasopressor use, cardiac arrest, acute kidney injury, and disposition to facility were numerically higher in hospitalizations with systemic sclerosis. The composite endpoint of major adverse events was higher in the systemic sclerosis cohort (adjusted odds ratio 1.52, 95% confidence interval: 1.06-2.17, p = 0.022). Conclusion: COVID-19 patients with systemic sclerosis had worse outcomes (i.e. higher composite endpoint of major adverse events) than those without systemic sclerosis. Further studies are needed to establish a better understanding of the relationship between COVID-19 and systemic sclerosis.

17.
Cureus ; 15(2): e35121, 2023 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36945258

RESUMO

Background There is scarcity of national level data on the reasons for Emergency Department (ED) presentation among patients with Giant cell arteritis (GCA) in the United States. This study aims to outline the most common reasons for ED presentation among these patients, and the baseline characteristics and outcomes of ED visits principally for GCA.  Materials and methods We obtained data from the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) 2018 database. Each ED visit in the NEDS has a principal diagnosis (the main reason for the visit) and can have up to 34 other secondary diagnoses. We searched for ED visits for patients aged ≥50 with any diagnosis of GCA using ICD-10 codes. The most common principal discharge diagnoses were divided into organ systems, and specific principal discharge diagnoses were recorded for ED visits among patients with GCA in descending order of frequency. We then outlined baseline characteristics and outcomes of ED visits with a principal diagnosis of GCA. Results There were 20,886 ED visits for patients with GCA in 2018. Infections, as well as rheumatologic and cardiovascular disease were the most common reasons for ED presentation, and GCA was the most common specific principal discharge diagnosis for ED visits. There were 3888 ED visits with a principal diagnosis of GCA. These patients were predominantly elderly females, admitted, Medicare insured, with minimal comorbidity burden, and presented to metropolitan teaching hospitals in the south. Conclusion GCA patients are most likely to present to the ED due to their underlying GCA. Infections and CV are also common reasons for presentation to the ED.

18.
J Affect Disord ; 331: 145-148, 2023 06 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36958489

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is a scarcity of national United States (U.S.) data on emergency department (ED) utilization among patients with psychiatric disorders (PD). This study aims to determine the most common reasons for ED visits among patients with PD, and baseline characteristics of patients who present to the ED due to PD. METHODS: We obtained data from the Nationwide Emergency department Sample (NEDS), the largest all-payer ED database in U.S. Each ED visit in NEDS 2018, can have only 1 "principal" diagnosis, which is the main reason for the visit and up to 34 "secondary" diagnoses. We abstracted data for all ED visits with "any" diagnosis of a PD, using the ICD-10 code "F". We highlighted the 10 most common "principal" diagnoses based on organ-system involved, and most specific "principal" diagnoses for all ED visits by patients with "any" diagnosis of PD. We then highlighted baseline characteristics of ED visits with a "principal" diagnosis of PD. RESULTS: A total of 38.4 million ED visits for patients with PD, among these, 5,911,984 had PD as the principal diagnosis. Patients who presented principally due to PD were more likely to come from lower income household. Mental disorders and injuries and poisoning were the most common principal diagnosis by organ system categories for patients with PD. LIMITATIONS: Possibility of coding errors and absence of date on race. CONCLUSIONS: Anxiety disorder, alcohol intoxication and major depressive disorder (MDD) were the most common specific psychiatric "principal" diagnosis for ED presentation among patients with PD.


Assuntos
Intoxicação Alcoólica , Transtorno Depressivo Maior , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/diagnóstico , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/epidemiologia , Hospitalização , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Transtornos de Ansiedade/diagnóstico , Transtornos de Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
19.
J Affect Disord ; 333: 177-180, 2023 07 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37086795

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: National population data are scarce on readmission following hospitalization for severe major depressive disorder (SMDD) in the United States (U.S.). We aim to describe the rates, characteristics, and reasons for readmissions for adults hospitalized for SMDD in the U.S. METHODS: We analyzed the 2018 Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD). We included index hospitalizations for all adult patients (≥18 years) with a "principal" diagnosis of SMDD using (ICD)-10 codes. We excluded elective readmissions. Chi-square tests were used to compare baseline characteristics between readmissions and index hospitalizations. The 10 most common reasons for readmission were highlighted. RESULTS: A total of 236,284, 185,737, 120,218, and 21,645 index hospitalizations with a principal diagnosis of SMDD discharged alive, were included in the 30-, 90-180- and 330-day readmission analysis. Among these, 27,443 (11.6 %), 36,844 (19.8 %), 32,269 (26.8 %) and 7915 (36.6 %) were readmitted within 30, 90, 180 and 330 days, respectively. 90-day readmissions were older, had more males, greater hospital costs, fewer patients with private insurance, higher comorbidity burden, more patients from lower-income households, present to metropolitan hospitals, and leave against medical advice compared to index admissions. LIMITATIONS: Limitations of our study include possible coding errors, lack of data on race/ethnicity, age of disease onset, duration of illness, medication use, and adherence. CONCLUSIONS: About 1 in 3 patients admitted for SMDD are readmitted within 11 months. Readmissions constitute a significant economic burden and differ from index admissions. SMDD and other psychiatric disorders are common reasons for readmission. Interventions to reduce readmissions are needed.


Assuntos
Transtorno Depressivo Maior , Readmissão do Paciente , Adulto , Masculino , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/epidemiologia , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/terapia , Hospitalização , Custos Hospitalares , Comorbidade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
20.
Gastroenterology Res ; 16(5): 262-269, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37937227

RESUMO

Background: There is no uniformity in the available literature concerning the effects of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) viral illness on people with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Methods: We conducted an analysis using the 2020 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database to compare the outcomes of COVID-19 hospitalized patients with and without IBD. Results: Of 1,050,040 patients admitted with COVID-19, 5,750 (0.5%) also had IBD. The group with COVID-19 and IBD had higher percentages of females and White individuals and a greater prevalence of chronic lung disease, peripheral vascular disease, and liver disease. However, after accounting for confounding variables, there was no significant difference in mortality rates, length of hospital stays, or hospitalization costs between the two groups. Conclusion: According to our findings, the presence of IBD does not appear to elevate the risk of COVID-19 complications.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA