Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Exp Allergy ; 53(1): 10-24, 2023 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36222329

RESUMO

Peanut allergy (PA) is a common, burdensome childhood disease that in most patients continues into adulthood and has historically been untreatable. However, peanut oral immunotherapy (POIT) is increasingly being incorporated into allergy practices, using both the first FDA-approved product, PTAH (previously AR101; Palforzia™, Aimmune Therapeutics), as well as store-bought peanut products. POIT in preschoolers continues to gain more acceptance as evidence accrues that it is a safe and feasible approach that may have distinct advantages. There are many new therapeutic interventions currently under study with a variety of different approaches and potential mechanisms. With respect to other forms of immunotherapy, none are currently approved, but the epicutaneous approach is the most well-studied and others are being actively investigated, including sublingual, subcutaneous, and intralymphatic. Biologics are gaining evidence both as adjunctive treatments to POIT and as monotherapy. Omalizumab is the most widely studied biologic for PA but others also have potential. Looking ahead to a future therapeutic landscape of choice, allergists will need to understand each patient's goal of treatment through shared decision-making and fully evaluate the risks, benefits, and alternatives of each new therapy.


Assuntos
Hipersensibilidade a Amendoim , Humanos , Criança , Hipersensibilidade a Amendoim/terapia , Dessensibilização Imunológica/métodos , Alérgenos , Administração Sublingual , Administração Oral , Arachis
2.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr ; 75(4): 485-490, 2022 10 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35797567

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To compare presenting symptoms, comorbidities, disease, and treatment characteristics of a black pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) group to a non-black pediatric EoE group. METHODS: A retrospective chart review consisting of pediatric patients diagnosed with EoE between the years of 2010 and 2018 at a single urban pediatric hospital system comprising 143 black pediatric patients compared with 142 non-black pediatric patients with similar distribution of age and sex. RESULTS: Both groups were majority male, and the median age of diagnosis between the black and non-black group was 5.1 and 6.7 years old, respectively. Comorbidities more commonly seen in the black group included food allergies, atopic dermatitis, asthma, and allergic rhinitis. Black patients were more likely to present with failure to thrive (FTT)/poor growth, whereas non-black patients were more likely to present with abdominal pain. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in achieving remission using current therapies. The black group had higher rates of nonadherence to medical therapies. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study to date comparing a black versus non-black pediatric EoE population. The black population had more atopic comorbidities and FTT at presentation and had significantly more issues with nonadherence. This new knowledge describing EoE in a minority population will hopefully improve awareness, diagnosis, and management of EoE in this population.


Assuntos
Esofagite Eosinofílica , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar , Rinite Alérgica , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Esofagite Eosinofílica/diagnóstico , Esofagite Eosinofílica/epidemiologia , Esofagite Eosinofílica/terapia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/complicações , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA