Immunologic and therapeutic evaluation of a synthetic peptide vaccine for the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma.

The cloning of the genes encoding cancer antigens has opened new possibilities for the treatment of patients with cancer. In this study, immunodominant peptides from the gp100 melanoma-associated antigen were identified, and a synthetic peptide, designed to increase binding to HLA-A2 molecules, was used as a cancer vaccine to treat patients with metastatic melanoma. On the basis of immunologic assays, 91% of patients could be successfully immunized with this synthetic peptide, and 13 of 31 patients (42%) receiving the peptide vaccine plus IL-2 had objective cancer responses, and four additional patients had mixed or minor responses. Synthetic peptide vaccines based on the genes encoding cancer antigens hold promise for the development of novel cancer immunotherapies.

Treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma with autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and interleukin 2.

BACKGROUND: Studies of human tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) derived from patients with a variety of histologic types of cancer have demonstrated that cellular immune reactions against established malignancy exist in humans. PURPOSE: We report the results of using autologous TILs plus high-dose bolus interleukin 2 (IL-2), with or without the concomitant administration of cyclophosphamide, in the treatment of 86 consecutive patients with metastatic melanoma. METHODS: From May 1987 through December 1992, 86 patients (38 female and 48 male) with metastatic melanoma were treated (145 courses) with autologous TILs plus high-dose intravenous bolus IL-2 (720,000 IU/kg every 8 hours). TILs plus IL-2 were administered in two cycles separated by approximately 2 weeks. Two treatment cycles constituted one treatment course. Patients received a maximum of 15 doses of IL-2 per cycle given every 8 hours until grade 3 or 4 toxicity was reached that could not easily be reversed by standard supportive measures. All patients received concomitant medications to abrogate some of the side effects of IL-2 administration: acetaminophen (650 mg every 4 hours), indomethacin (50 mg every 8 hours), and ranitidine (150 mg every 12 hours). Fifty-seven of the 86 patients received a single intravenous dose of 25 mg/kg cyclophosphamide approximately 36 hours before receiving the first intravenous infusion of TILs plus IL-2. Six weeks after treatment, all known sites of disease were evaluated. RESULTS: The overall objective response rate in these patients was 34% and was similar in patients receiving TILs and IL-2 alone (31%) or in conjunction with cyclophosphamide (35%). There was no significant difference in the objective response rate in patients whose therapy with high-dose IL-2 had failed (32%) compared with patients not previously treated with IL-2 (34%). The frequency of response to treatment was greater in those patients who were treated with TILs from younger cultures (P = .0001), TILs with shorter doubling times (P = .03), and TILs that exhibited higher lysis against autologous tumor targets (P = .0008). Patients who received TILs generated from subcutaneous tumor deposits had higher response rates (49%) compared with those receiving TILs from lymph nodes (17%; P = .006). There was one treatment-related death due to respiratory insufficiency. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with TILs and IL-2 with or without cyclophosphamide can result in objective responses in about one third of patients with metastatic melanoma. The side effects of treatment are transient in most patients, and this treatment can be safely administered. These results illustrate the potential value of immune lymphocytes for the treatment of patients with melanoma.

Immunizing patients with metastatic melanoma using recombinant adenoviruses encoding MART-1 or gp100 melanoma antigens.

BACKGROUND: The characterization of the genes encoding melanoma-associated antigens MART-1 or gp100, recognized by T cells, has opened new possibilities for the development of immunization strategies for patients with metastatic melanoma. With the use of recombinant adenoviruses expressing either MART-1 or gp100 to immunize patients with metastatic melanoma, we evaluated the safety, immunologic, and potential therapeutic aspects of these immunizations. METHODS: In phase I studies, 54 patients received escalating doses (between 10(7) and 10(11) plaque-forming units) of recombinant adenovirus encoding either MART-1 or gp100 melanoma antigen administered either alone or followed by the administration of interleukin 2 (IL-2). The immunologic impact of these immunizations on the development of cellular and antibody reactivity was assayed. RESULTS: Recombinant adenoviruses expressing MART-1 or gp100 were safely administered. One of 16 patients with metastatic melanoma receiving the recombinant adenovirus MART-1 alone experienced a complete response. Other patients achieved objective responses, but they had received IL-2 along with an adenovirus, and their responses could be attributed to the cytokine. Immunologic assays showed no consistent immunization to the MART-1 or gp100 transgenes expressed by the recombinant adenoviruses. High levels of neutralizing antibody were found in the pretreatment sera of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: High doses of recombinant adenoviruses could be safely administered to cancer patients. High levels of neutralizing antibody present in patients' sera prior to treatment may have impaired the ability of these viruses to immunize patients against melanoma antigens.

Renal dysfunction associated with the administration of high-dose interleukin-2 in 199 consecutive patients with metastatic melanoma or renal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To describe the incidence and management of renal dysfunction associated with the use of high-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) (as is currently approved) in the treatment of cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred ninety-nine consecutive patients with metastatic renal carcinoma or melanoma were treated with intravenous bolus infusions of IL-2 alone (720,000 IU/kg) every 8 hours. RESULTS: Patients received 310 courses (589 cycles) of therapy and most experienced oliguria, hypotension, and weight gain; 13% of cycles were discontinued due to increased serum creatinine levels. Creatinine values (mean pretherapy, 1.2 mg/dL) increased during therapy and peaked (mean, 2.7 mg/dL) approximately 1 day after discontinuation of the second cycle of IL-2. Off therapy, toxicities reversed promptly and creatinine values returned to baseline. Higher peak creatinine values occurred in patients with renal carcinoma (v melanoma), older patients, males (v females), and those who had undergone prior nephrectomy. These same patient subsets received fewer doses of IL-2, but clinical responses were not associated with creatinine values or number of IL-2 doses administered. Urinalyses showed the appearance of protein, bilirubin, RBCs, WBCs, and granular casts during therapy, which cleared completely on follow-up evaluation. CONCLUSION: High-dose IL-2 can be safely administered to cancer patients. The associated renal dysfunction is transient and without evidence of intrinsic long-term renal damage. Practical guidelines for patient management have been identified.

Prospective randomized trial of the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma using chemotherapy with cisplatin, dacarbazine, and tamoxifen alone or in combination with interleukin-2 and interferon alfa-2b.

PURPOSE: The combination of chemotherapy with immunotherapeutic agents such as interleukin-2 and interferon alfa-2b has been reported to provide improved treatment results in patients with metastatic melanoma, compared with the use of chemotherapy alone. We have performed a prospective randomized trial in patients with metastatic melanoma, comparing treatment with chemotherapy to treatment with chemoimmunotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred two patients with metastatic melanoma were prospectively randomized to receive chemotherapy composed of tamoxifen, cisplatin, and dacarbazine or this same chemotherapy followed by interferon alfa-2b and interleukin-2. Objective responses, survival, and toxicity in the two groups were evaluated at a median potential follow-up of 42 months. RESULTS: In 52 patients randomized to receive chemotherapy, there were 14 objective responses (27%), including four complete responses. In 50 patients randomized to receive chemoimmunotherapy, there were 22 objective responses (44%) (P2 = .071), including three complete responses. In both treatment groups, the duration of partial responses was often short, and there was a trend toward a survival advantage for patients receiving chemotherapy alone (P2 = .052; median survival of 15.8 months compared with 10.7 months). Treatment-related toxicities were greater in patients receiving chemoimmunotherapy. CONCLUSION: With the treatment regimens used in this study, the addition of immunotherapy to combination chemotherapy increased toxicity but did not increase survival. The use of combination chemoimmunotherapy regimens is not recommended in the absence of well-designed, prospective, randomized protocols showing the benefit of this treatment strategy.

The hematologic toxicity of interleukin-2 in patients with metastatic melanoma and renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: High dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) has been found to produce durable antitumor responses in some patients, benefiting most greatly those patients with melanoma and renal cell carcinoma. In this paper, the hematologic toxicity and changes resulting from high dose IL-2 alone administered by intravenous bolus are discussed. METHODS: One hundred ninety-nine consecutive patients treated with high dose IL-2 alone from January 1, 1988 to December 31, 1992 were included in this study. All patients had a diagnosis of metastatic melanoma or metastatic renal cell carcinoma and were treated at the National Cancer Institute (Bethesda, MD). RESULTS: Anemia, requiring erythrocyte transfusions, occurred in 14% of all treatment courses, with a median of two units of erythrocytes transfused. Severe leukopenia ( < 1,000 leukocytes/mm3) was rare (1.5% of all patients) and was not associated with any infectious complications. Severe thrombocytopenia ( < 30,000 platelets/mm3) occurred in 2.2% of all treatment cycles, with two patients experiencing a grade 3 hemorrhage, defined as gross blood loss, and one patient experiencing a grade 4 hemorrhage, defined as a debilitating blood loss. Defects in the coagulation pathway were common: abnormal partial thromboplastin time and prothrombin time values occurred in 64% and 25% of the treatment cycles, respectively. In addition, a mean clearance of 93% of lymphocytes from the peripheral blood was observed within 24 hours after initiating IL-2 therapy. This was followed by rebound lymphocytosis to a mean of 198% of baseline on posttreatment Day 4. There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: During IL-2 therapy, adverse sequelae of anemia, thrombocytopenia, coagulopathy, and leukopenia were usually mild, transient and rarely limited therapy. A profound decrease in lymphocytes in the peripheral circulation occurred within 24 hours after initiating therapy, with a rebound occurring after stopping IL-2. No specific hematologic parameter was associated significantly with a patient's increased probability of responding to therapy.

Treatment of 283 consecutive patients with metastatic melanoma or renal cell cancer using high-dose bolus interleukin 2.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of treatment using high-dose bolus interleukin 2 (IL-2) in patients with metastatic melanoma or renal cell cancer. DESIGN AND SETTING: Consecutive series of all patients treated with high-dose IL-2 in the Surgery Branch of the National Cancer Institute from September 1985 through December 1992. PATIENTS: Two hundred eighty-three patients with metastatic melanoma or metastatic renal cell cancer who had failed standard treatment for their cancers. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received IL-2 at a dose of 720,000 IU/kg intravenously every 8 hours for a maximum of 15 doses per cycle. Two cycles constituted a treatment course, and patients with stable or responding disease received additional treatment courses. A total of 447 courses of treatment were administered. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Regression of measurable tumor, durability of response to treatment, and survival. RESULTS: Nine patients (7%) with metastatic melanoma achieved complete regression of all disease and 14 patients (10%) had partial regression. Ten patients (7%) with metastatic renal cell cancer experienced complete regression and 20 patients (13%) had partial regression. Of the 19 patients with complete regression, 15 have remained in complete remission from 7 to 91 months after treatment. Three treatment-related deaths (1.1%) occurred early in this series, but as experience with the administration of this IL-2 regimen increased, no treatment-related deaths occurred in 214 patients treated during the last 5 years of the study. CONCLUSION: Biologic therapy with IL-2 can cause significant antitumor effects in patients with advanced metastatic melanoma or renal cell cancer. Because IL-2 does not have a direct effect on cancer cells but rather mediates its antitumor activity by altering host immune reactions, these data represent the best available evidence that immunologic therapy for cancer can be effective in selected patients.

Impact of cytokine administration on the generation of antitumor reactivity in patients with metastatic melanoma receiving a peptide vaccine.

Patients with metastatic melanoma were immunized with an immunodominant peptide derived from the gp100 melanoma-melanocyte differentiation Ag that was modified to increase binding to HLA-A+0201. A total of 10 of 11 patients who received the g209-2M peptide alone developed precursors reactive with the native g209 peptide, compared with only 5 of 16 patients who received g209-2M peptide plus IL-2 (p2 = 0.005). Peptide reactivity closely correlated with the recognition of HLA-A+0201 melanoma cells (p < 0. 001). The decrease in immune reactivity when peptide was administered with IL-2 appeared specific for the immunizing peptide, since reactivity to an influenza peptide resulting from prior exposure was not affected. Preexisting antitumor precursors did not decrease when peptide plus IL-2 was administered. The administration of GM-CSF or IL-12 also resulted in a decrease in circulating precursors compared with the administration of peptide alone, though not as great a decrease as that seen with IL-2. Immunization with peptide plus IL-2 did, however, appear to have clinical impact since 6 of the 16 patients (38%) that received peptide plus IL-2 had objective cancer regressions. It thus appeared possible that immunization with peptide plus IL-2 resulted in sequestering or apoptotic destruction of newly activated immune cells at the tumor site. These represent the first detailed studies of the impact of immunization with tumor peptides in conjunction with a variety of cytokines in patients with metastatic cancer.