Is mammographic density a marker of breast cancer phenotypes?

PURPOSE: To investigate the association between mammographic density (MD) phenotypes and both clinicopathologic features of breast cancer (BC) and tumor location. METHODS: MD was measured for 297 BC-affected females using qualitative (visual method) and quantitative (fully automated area-based method) approaches. Radiologists' description, visible external markers, and surgical scar were used to establish the location of tumors. Binary logistic regression models were used to assess the association between MD phenotypes and BC clinicopathologic features. RESULTS: Categorical and numerical MD measures showed no association with clinicopathologic features of BC (p > 0.05). Participants with higher BI-RADS scores [(51-75% glandular) and (> 75% glandular)] (p < 0.001), and percent density (PD) categories [PD (21-49%) and PD ≥ 50%] (p = 0.01) were more likely to have tumors emanating from dense areas. Additionally, tumors were commonly found in dense regions of the breast among patients with higher medians of PD (p = 0.001), dense area (DA) (p = 0.02), and lower medians of non-dense area (NDA) (p < 0.001). Adjusted logistic regression models showed that high BI-RADS density (> 75% glandular) has an almost fivefold increased odds of tumors developing within dense areas (OR 4.99, 95% CI 0.93-25.9; p = 0.05. PD (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1-1.03, p = 0.002) and NDA (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.991-0.997, p < 0.001) had very small effect on tumor location. Compared to tumors within non-dense areas, tumors in dense areas tended to exhibit human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (p = 0.05) and carcinoma in situ (p = 0.01) characteristics. CONCLUSION: MD shows no significant association with clinicopathologic features of BC. However, BC was more likely to originate from dense tissue, with tumors in dense regions having human epidermal growth receptor 2 positive and carcinoma in situ characteristics.

Carotid Intima-Media Thickness and Carotid Plaque: A Pilot Study of Risk Factors in an Indigenous Nigerian Population.

BACKGROUND: Risk factors for carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and carotid plaque (CP) differ by ethnicity; however, this is not well understood in some ethnic populations. This work examines the risk factors for cIMT and CP in an indigenous Nigerian population. METHODS: We assessed cIMT and CP in 122 participants and then performed biochemical analysis: fasting blood glucose (FBG), hemoglobin A1c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglyceride (TG), and total cholesterol (TC). The clinical history and anthropometric characteristics of participants were recorded. Linear models were used to assess the factors associated with cIMT and CP, and stepwise multivariate regression analyses were conducted to assess the predictors of cIMT and CP. RESULTS: The cIMT thickness varied from .5 mm to 1.3 mm. Family history of heart disease (FHHDx), physical activity, FBG, HDL-C, TG, TC, body mass index (BMI), systolic pressure, and waist circumference were significantly associated with cIMT (P ≤ .01). High systolic (ß = .008) and diastolic (ß = .17) pressure, FHHDx (ß = .24), age (ß = .004), physical activity (ß = -.09), and waist circumference (ß = -.017) significantly predicted 85% of the variation in cIMT (P < .001 for all). Family history of hypertension (FHH), LDL-C, and high blood pressure were significantly associated with CP (P ≤ .05). The significant predictors of CP were FHH (ß = .145, P = .03), smoking (ß = .167, P = .01), HDL-C (ß = .283, P < .001), weight (ß = .150, P = .04), and BMI (ß = .183, P = .01), explaining most of the 43.2% variation in CP. CONCLUSIONS: Some of the risk factors differ from those of other ethnicities, suggesting a need for population-specific approach to risk assessment and early detection of subclinical disease.

Diagnostic reference levels for common computed tomography (CT) examinations: results from the first Nigerian nationwide dose survey.

PURPOSE: To explore doses from common adult computed tomography (CT) examinations and propose national diagnostic reference levels (nDRLs) for Nigeria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the Nnamdi Azikiwe University and University Teaching Hospital Institutional Review Boards (IRB: NAUTH/CS/66/Vol8/84) and involved dose surveys of adult CT examinations across the six geographical regions of Nigeria and Abuja from January 2016 to August 2017. Dose data of adult head, chest and abdomen/pelvis CT examinations were extracted from patient folders. The median, 75th and 25th percentile CT dose index volume (CTDIvol) and dose-length-product (DLP) were computed for each of these procedures. Effective doses (E) for these examinations were estimated using the k conversion factor as described in the ICRP publication 103 (EDLP = k × DLP). RESULTS: The proposed 75th percentile CTDIvol for head, chest, and abdomen/pelvis are 61 mGy, 17 mGy, and 20 mGy, respectively. The corresponding DLPs are 1310 mGy.cm, 735 mGy.cm, and 1486 mGy.cm respectively. The effective doses were 2.75 mSv (head), 10.29 mSv (chest), and 22.29 mSv (abdomen/pelvis). CONCLUSION: Findings demonstrate wide dose variations within and across centres in Nigeria. The results also show CTDIvol comparable to international standards, but considerably higher DLP and effective doses.

Assessment of Interradiologist Agreement Regarding Mammographic Breast Density Classification Using the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS Atlas.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study was to assess interradiologist agreement regarding mammographic breast density assessment performed using the rating scale outlined in the fifth edition of the BI-RADS atlas of the American College of Radiology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Breast density assessments of 1000 cases were conducted by five radiologists from the same institution who together had recently undergone retraining in mammographic breast density classification based on the fifth edition of BI-RADS. The readers assigned breast density grades (A-D) on the basis of the BI-RADS classification scheme. Repeat assessment of 100 cases was performed by all readers 1 month after the initial assessment. A weighted kappa was used to calculate intrareader and interreader agreement. RESULTS: Intrareader agreement ranged from a kappa value of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.77-0.93) to 0.89 (95% CI, 0.81-0.95) on a four-category scale (categories A-D) and from 0.89 (95% CI, 0.86-0.92) to 0.94 (95% CI, 0.89-0.97) on a two-category scale (category A-B vs category C-D). Interreader agreement ranged from substantial (κ = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.73-0.78) to almost perfect (κ = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.86-0.89) on a four-category scale, and the overall weighted kappa value was substantial (0.79; 95% CI, 0.78-0.83). Interreader agreement on a two-category scale ranged from a kappa value of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.83-0.86) to 0.91 (95% CI, 0.90-0.92), and the overall weighted kappa was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.87-0.89). CONCLUSION: Overall, with regard to mammographic breast density classification, radiologists had substantial interreader agreement when a four-category scale was used and almost perfect interreader agreement when a dichotomous scale was used.

An Evaluation of Performance Characteristics of Primary Display Devices.

The aim of this study was to complete a full evaluation of the new EIZO RX850 liquid crystal display and compare it to two currently used medical displays in Australia (EIZO GS510 and Barco MDCG 5121). The American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Group 18 Quality Control test pattern was used to assess the performance of three high-resolution primary medical displays: EIZO RX850, EIZO GS510, and Barco MDCG 5121. A Konica Minolta spectroradiometer (CS-2000) was used to assess luminance response, non-uniformity, veiling glare, and color uniformity. Qualitative evaluation of noise was also performed. Seven breast lesions were displayed on each monitor and photographed with a calibrated 5.5-MP Olympus E-1 digital SLR camera. ImageJ software was used to sample pixel information from each lesion and surrounding background to calculate their conspicuity index on each of the displays. All monitor fulfilled all AAPM acceptance criteria. The performance characteristics for EIZO RX850, Barco MDCG 5121, and EIZO GS510 respectively were as follows: maximum luminance (490, 500.5, and 413 cd/m(2)), minimum luminance (0.724, 1.170, and 0.92 cd/m(2)), contrast ratio (675:1, 428:1, 449:1), just-noticeable difference index (635, 622, 609), non-uniformity (20, 5.92, and 8.5 %), veiling glare (GR = 2465.6, 720.4, 1249.8), and color uniformity (Δu'v' = +0.003, +0.002, +0.002). All monitors demonstrated low noise levels. The conspicuity index (χ) of the lesions was slightly higher in the EIZO RX850 display. All medical displays fulfilled AAPM performance criteria, and performance characteristics of EIZO RX850 are equal to or better than those of the Barco MDCG 5121 and EIZO GS510 displays.

Operator eye doses during computed tomography fluoroscopic lung biopsy.

The aim of this work was to examine the peak entrance surface air kerma (peak ESAK) to the eyes during CT fluoroscopy lung biopsy, and the impact of lead glasses, exposure parameters, head rotation, and height on peak ESAK to the eyes. Two phantoms simulating the patient and radiologist were used, and 108 exposures were made using a 16-slice Toshiba Alexion CT scanner (Toshiba Medical Systems, Nasu, Japan). ESAK to the phantom radiologist's right eye was measured using an Unfors Xi dosimeter (RaySafe, Billdal, Sweden) with and without lead glasses at two kilovoltages (120 kVp and 135 kVp) and three milliampere settings (10 mA, 20 mA, and 30 mA. A paired t test was used to compare peak ESAK to the eye at different angles, heights, and kVp and mA with and without lead glasses. Peak ESAK was higher without compared to with lead glasses (p ⩽ 0.001). The peak ESAK to the eyes increased as the phantom radiologist rotated toward the gantry without lead glasses, from 2.42 µGy at 120° to 10.54 µGy at 30° (p = 0.001). No significant difference was noted in peak ESAK with change in phantom radiologist height (p > 0.05). An increase from 120 kVp to 135 kVp resulted in 23% and 26% increases in peak ESAK with and without lead glasses respectively (p = 0.001). An increase of tube current from 10 mA to 20 mA almost doubled peak ESAK (p = 0.005). Findings demonstrate that lead glasses reduce ESAK to the eyes, and that increased kVp, mA, and eye rotation to the gantry increase ESAK to the eyes.

X-ray imaging of multiple adjacent regions in paediatric patients: Potential utility for diagnosis and patient management.

BACKGROUND: In emergency presentations, it is not uncommon for patients to present with imaging requests of multiple body regions to detect concurrent injury. While current literature explores diagnostic efficacy of adjacent imaging for forearm fractures, there is limited research on its effectiveness across all extremities. This paper explores the diagnostic yield of X-ray adjacent imaging of the upper and lower limb in paediatric patients. METHODS: A retrospective audit was performed using information available on radiology request forms from paediatric patients (age <18 years) that had multiple X-rays of adjacent body regions over six months at two hospitals. The main or first X-ray was referred to as initial imaging, while all subsequent X-rays of adjacent regions was considered secondary imaging. Clinical history and radiologists' findings were collected, categorised, and analysed using Chi square. RESULTS: There were 661 X-rays performed across 277 patients. Initial imaging was significantly more likely to detect injuries or abnormalities (35 %) than X-rays of adjacent regions (1.6 %), with 94 % of all abnormalities detected on initial imaging overall (χ2(3) = 241.247, p < 0.001). X-ray request forms with no clinical symptoms were significantly more likely to have no findings detected (χ2(3) = 53.493, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: X-ray imaging of a body region adjacent to an injury has low diagnostic yield, suggesting the need for interventions to reduce unnecessary adjacent X-ray imaging. Clinical history information was often limited and concurrent injuries were low.

See something, say something: the coroner's perspective.

The communicating safely policy, publicised by the catchphrase See Something, Say Something was released by the Medical Radiation Practice Board of Australia in 2019. It was developed to support medical radiation practitioners (MRPs) upholding the obligation to communicate urgent or unexpected findings in a timely manner, when identified on medical images. Prior to this policy being part of the professional capabilities, several untimely deaths occurred-the majority of whose causal factors could have been mitigated if imaging findings were urgently communicated by MRPs. This commentary summarises three coronial inquests that involved MRPs, discusses how these coronial findings are reflected in the communicating safely policy and provides some recommendations for the profession to ensure this policy is enacted in clinical practice.

Test-set results can predict participants' development in breast-screen cancer detection: An observational cohort study.

Background and Aim: Test-sets are standardized assessments used to evaluate reader performance in breast screening. Understanding how test-set results affect real-world performance can help refine their use as a quality improvement tool. The aim of this study is to explore if mammographic test-set results could identify breast-screening readers who improved their cancer detection in association with test-set training. Methods: Test-set results of 41 participants were linked to their annual cancer detection rate change in two periods oriented around their first test-set participation year. Correlation tests and a multiple linear regression model investigated the relationship between each metric in the test-set results and the change in detection rates. Additionally, participants were divided based on their improvement status between the two periods, and Mann-Whitney U test was used to determine if the subgroups differed in their test-set metrics. Results: Test-set records indicated multiple significant correlations with the change in breast cancer detection rate: a moderate positive correlation with sensitivity (0.688, p < 0.001), a moderate negative correlation with specificity (-0.528, p < 0.001), and a low to moderate positive correlation with lesion sensitivity (0.469, p = 0.002), and the number of years screen-reading mammograms (0.365, p = 0.02). In addition, the overall regression was statistically significant (F (2,38) = 18.456 p < 0.001), with an R² of 0.493 (adjusted R² = 0.466) based on sensitivity (F = 27.132, p < 0.001) and specificity (F = 9.78, p = 0.003). Subgrouping the cohort based on the change in cancer detection indicated that the improved group is significantly higher in sensitivity (p < 0.001) and lesion sensitivity (p = 0.02) but lower in specificity (p = 0.003). Conclusion: Sensitivity and specificity are the strongest test-set performance measures to predict the change in breast cancer detection in real-world breast screening settings following test-set participation.

Association between Family History of Breast Cancer and Breast Density in Saudi Premenopausal Women Participating in Mammography Screening.

BACKGROUND: Mammographic density and family history of breast cancer (FHBC) are well-established independent factors affecting breast cancer risk; however, the association between these two risk factors in premenopausal-screened women remains unclear. The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between mammographic density and FHBC among Saudi premenopausal-screened women. METHODS: A total of 446 eligible participants were included in the study. Mammographic density was assessed qualitatively using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS 4th edition). Logistic regression models were built to investigate the relationship between mammographic density and FHBC. RESULTS: Women with a family history of breast cancer demonstrated an 87% greater chance of having dense tissue than women without a family history of breast cancer (95% CI: 1.14-3.08; p = 0.01). Having a positive family history for breast cancer in mothers was significantly associated with dense tissue (adjusted odds ratio (OR): 5.6; 95% CI: 1.3-24.1; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Dense breast tissue in Saudi premenopausal women undergoing screening may be linked to FHBC. If this conclusion is replicated in larger studies, then breast cancer risk prediction models must carefully consider these breast cancer risk factors.

Clinical history and incidental abnormality detection in endodontic cone beam computed tomography.

Purpose: To assess the effect of clinical history on incidental abnormality detection, false positive (FP) marks, and diagnostic confidence in endodontic cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging. Approach: A reader performance study using a free-response, factorial study design was undertaken, which accounted for changes in the independent variables: native case type, native case severity, reader type, and reading modality. Twenty-three readers interpreted 26 cases (18 diseased and 8 non-diseased) twice, once with and once without access to clinical history. Each case had at least one incidental abnormality that was not a native endodontic finding. Lesion localization (LL), non-localizations (FPs), and diagnostic confidence (rating 2, 3, or 4: lowest, middle, and highest, respectively) of incidental abnormalities were analyzed. Results: Clinical history increased the detection of incidental abnormalities in non-diseased subtle cases (76 versus 59, p=0.04). Reader experience and monthly CBCT reading volume did not affect incidental abnormality detection. FPs were neither affected by clinical history nor reader characteristics. The highest confidence rating was most often used in each case type when clinical history was available. For this rating, history had significantly greater LLs in subtle diseased (53 versus 41, p=0.03) and non-diseased images (53 versus 33, p=0.02). Conclusions: Clinical history improved the detection of incidental endodontic abnormalities in non-diseased subtle CBCT images and did not affect the number of FP marks. Reader confidence in correctly identified abnormalities was higher with clinical history when disease and non-disease were subtle but was not associated with an improvement in diagnostic performance.

Determinants of an integrated cervical cancer screening services in primary healthcare: sharing lessons from Kisumu, Kenya.

Background: The successful integration of cervical cancer screening service (CCASS) into primary healthcare's routine services depends on locality-specific and context-based service determinants. Objective: This paper aims to identify the abovementioned determinants and discusses how health administrators can manage their influence on CCASS delivery at the primary healthcare level. Methods: We conducted in-depth face-to-face interviews using a structured questionnaire with CCASS nurse providers and managers in four randomly selected primary health facilities. Information on the method(s) of screening utilised, the challenges faced, and the changes observed in CCASS provision were collected. Service managers were asked how they managed unplanned CCASS disruption, factors influencing CCASS replication, and aftercare support to cancer-affected women. Nurse providers were interviewed on the management of CCASS awareness and critical changes required to sustain CCASS service effectiveness. We used a constant interactive and inductive approach for data analysis. Results: Nine thematic categories of CCASS determinants were identified: 'cultural', 'socioeconomic', 'individual', 'health system', 'evidence-based operations', 'outcome-based resourcing', 'workflow improvement and standardisation', 'inclusive partner's management', 'utilisation'. These determinants were grouped into three domains: 'conceptual', 'outcomes', and 'growth' domains, to correspond to clusters of determinants that are likely to influence the CCASS lifecycle in its formative, continuous delivery or productivity, and reproductive phases. Conclusions: The findings show that sustaining an efficient integrated CCASS delivery at the PHC level requires phase-appropriate continuous adaptive improvements of service determinants within that locality. Results: Nine thematic categories of CCASS determinants were identified: 'cultural', 'socioeconomic', 'individual', 'health system', 'evidence-based operations', 'outcome-based resourcing', 'workflow improvement and standardisation', 'inclusive partner's management', 'utilisation'. These determinants were grouped into three domains: 'conceptual', 'outcomes', and 'growth' domains, to correspond to clusters of determinants that are likely to influence the CCASS lifecycle in its formative, continuous delivery or productivity, and reproductive phases. Conclusions: The findings show that sustaining an efficient integrated CCASS delivery at the PHC level requires phase-appropriate continuous adaptive improvements of service determinants within that locality.

Periapical Radiography versus Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Endodontic Disease Detection: A Free-response, Factorial Study.

AIM: To assess and compare reader performance in interpreting digital periapical (PA) radiography and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in endodontic disease detection, using a free-response, factorial model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A reader performance study of 2 image test sets was undertaken using a factorial, free-response design, accounting for the independent variables: case type, case severity, reader type, and imaging modality. Twenty-two readers interpreted 60 PA and 60 CBCT images divided into 5 categories: diseased-subtle, diseased-moderate, diseased-obvious, nondiseased-subtle, and nondiseased-obvious. Lesion localization fraction, specificity, false positive (FP) marks, and the weighted alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic figure of merit were calculated. RESULTS: CBCT had greater specificity than PA in the obvious nondiseased cases (P = .01) and no significant difference in the subtle nondiseased category. Weighted alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic values were higher for PA than CBCT in the subtle diseased (P = .02) and moderate diseased (P = .01) groups with no significant difference between in the obvious diseased groups. CBCT had higher mean FPs than PA (P < .05) in subtle diseased cases. Mean lesion localization fraction in the moderate diseased group was higher in PA than CBCT (P = .003). No relationships were found between clinical experience and all diagnostic performance measures, except for in the obvious diseased CBCT group, where increasing experience was associated mean FP marks (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Reader performance in the detection of endodontic disease is better with PA radiography than CBCT. Clinical experience does not impact upon the accuracy of interpretation of both PA radiography and CBCT.

Do Reader Characteristics Affect Diagnostic Efficacy in Screening Mammography? A Systematic Review.

To examine reader characteristics associated with diagnostic efficacy in the interpretation of screening mammograms. A systematic search of the literature was conducted using databases such as Cochrane, Scopus, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and PubMed. Search terms were combined with "AND" or "OR" and included: "Radiologist's characteristics AND performance"; "radiologist experience AND screening mammography"; "annual volume read AND diagnostic efficacy"; "screening mammography performance OR diagnostic efficacy". Studies were included if they assessed reader performance in screening mammography interpretation, breast readers, used a reference standard to assess the performance, and were published in the English language. Twenty-eight studies were reviewed. Increasing reader's age was associated with lower false positive rates. No association was found between gender and performance. Half of the studies showed no association between years of reading mammograms and performance. Most studies showed that high reading volume was more likely to be associated with increased sensitivity, cancer detection rates (CDR), lower recall rate, and lower false positive rates. Inconsistent associations were found between fellowship training in breast imaging and reader performance. Specialization in breast imaging was associated with better CDR, sensitivity, and specificity. Limited studies were available to establish the association between performance and factors such as time spent in breast imaging (n = 2), screening focus (n = 1), formal rotation in mammography (n = 1), owner of practice (n = 1), and practice type (n = 1). No individual characteristics is associated with versatility in diagnostic efficacy, albeit reading volume and specialization in breast imaging appear to be associated with with increased sensitivity and CDR without significantly affecting other performance metrics.

Exposure index in digital radiography: initial results of awareness and knowledge from Nigerian digital radiography practices.

INTRODUCTION: Exposure Index (EI) is incorporated into Digital Radiography (DR) systems to indicate incorrect exposure to enable matching exposure to the desired speed class of operation. However, knowledge of the utilization of EI by radiographers in a low-income country has not been investigated. METHODS: A pre-tested questionnaire designed using Google forms, with open and close-ended questions was shared online with radiographers working with DR systems in public and private health facilities in some cities located in southern Nigeria. The 32-item questionnaire had two parts: Part A focused on socio-demographic characteristics and Part B focused on the respondents' awareness and knowledge of EI in DR systems. A 5-point Likert scale with 5 test items was used to assess the respondents' knowledge of EI. Statistical analyses were conducted using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21.0. The probability value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: About 8.3% of the respondents had good knowledge of EI in DR systems in spite of the awareness level of 24.7%. The absence of the EI concept in DR curriculum for undergraduates, the lack of EI software in DR systems, and equipment training by the vendor engineers were reasons for the low level of knowledge of EI in DR systems. CONCLUSION: There is low awareness and knowledge of EI by radiographers in this study, which suggests the need to maximize the benefits of EI concepts by ensuring its integration into clinical radiography practice and curriculum for undergraduates program, to improve knowledge, awareness, and practice in DR.

Reliability of radiologists' first impression when interpreting a screening mammogram.

Previous studies showed that radiologists can detect the gist of an abnormality in a mammogram based on a half-second image presentation through global processing of screening mammograms. This study investigated the intra- and inter-observer reliability of the radiologists' initial impressions about the abnormality (or "gist signal"). It also examined if a subset of radiologists produced more reliable and accurate gist signals. Thirty-nine radiologists provided their initial impressions on two separate occasions, viewing each mammogram for half a second each time. The intra-class correlation (ICC) values showed poor to moderate intra-reader reliability. Only 13 radiologists had an ICC of 0.6 or above, which is considered the minimum standard for reliability, and only three radiologists had an ICC exceeding 0.7. The median value for the weighted Cohen's Kappa was 0.478 (interquartile range = 0.419-0.555). The Mann-Whitney U-test showed that the "Gist Experts", defined as those who outperformed others, had significantly higher ICC values (p = 0.002) and weighted Cohen's Kappa scores (p = 0.026). However, even for these experts, the intra-radiologist agreements were not strong, as an ICC of at least 0.75 indicates good reliability and the signal from none of the readers reached this level of reliability as determined by ICC values. The inter-reader reliability of the gist signal was poor, with an ICC score of 0.31 (CI = 0.26-0.37). The Fleiss Kappa score of 0.106 (CI = 0.105-0.106), indicating only slight inter-reader agreement, confirms the findings from the ICC analysis. The intra- and inter-reader reliability analysis showed that the radiologists' initial impressions are not reliable signals. In particular, the absence of an abnormal gist does not reliably signal a normal case, so radiologists should keep searching. This highlights the importance of "discovery scanning," or coarse screening to detect potential targets before ending the visual search.

The Effect of Clinical History on Diagnostic Imaging Interpretation - A Systematic Review.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To provide updated information on the effect of clinical history on diagnostic image interpretation and to provide study methodology and design recommendations for future studies assessing the effect of clinical history on diagnostic image performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search of Medline, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases was conducted from database inception to July 21, 2020. Studies comparing diagnostic imaging performance with and without clinical history, using observers reading images under both conditions that used an independent reference standard were included. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria, with 15 showing clinical history improved diagnostic performance. One study reported a decrease in diagnostic performance with clinical history and the remaining six studies found no significant change in performance. Two studies used the free response paradigm with both reporting clinical history increased location sensitivity, decreased specificity and had no overall change in diagnostic performance. The disease spectrum of included cases was largely unreported and a balanced reading design was not used in 19 studies. CONCLUSION: Most published studies found that clinical history improved diagnostic performance. More recent studies accounting for abnormality location and multiple abnormalities showed an increase in false positives and no significant change in overall diagnostic performance with clinical history.

Are chest X-rays valuable for patients presenting to emergency departments with acute abdominal pain?

BACKGROUND: Emergency department patients presenting with acute abdominal pain are often prescribed a chest X-ray; however, the value of chest X-rays in acute abdominal pain is poorly understood. The aim of this study was to assess the value of chest X-rays in acute abdominal pain. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 944 chest X-rays performed for acute abdominal pain was conducted. Patient clinical information, radiology reports, and findings of other diagnostic investigations were also collected. MedCal® software was used to calculate diagnostic performance of chest X-rays. A Chi-Square test was used to assess the association between positive chest X-ray findings and both age and gender. RESULTS: Of the 944 chest X-rays identified as satisfying inclusion factors, only 10 cases (approximately 1%) demonstrated pathology that was likely to be the cause of the abdominal pain. Further analysis demonstrated the following performance metrics at 95%CI: sensitivity (12.8; 8.78-17.72); specificity (100; 98.4-100); positive predictive value (100%); negative predictive value (52.76; 51.54-53.98); accuracy (55.82; 51.17-60.40). CONCLUSION: Chest X-ray has limited sensitivity and diagnostic value in patients presenting to the emergency department with abdominal pain and does not appear to be a useful diagnostic investigation for abdominal pain.

Breast cancer detection across dense and non-dense breasts: Markers of diagnostic confidence and efficacy.

BACKGROUND: The impact of radiologists' characteristics has become a major focus of recent research. However, the markers of diagnostic efficacy and confidence in dense and non-dense breasts are poorly understood. PURPOSE: This study aims to assess the relationship between radiologists' characteristics and diagnostic performance across dense and non-dense breasts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiologists specialising in breast imaging (n = 128) who had 0.5-40 (13±10.6) years of experience reading mammograms were recruited. Participants independently interpreted a test set containing 60 digital mammograms (40 normal and 20 abnormal) with similarly distributed breast densities. Diagnostic performance measures were analysed via Jamovi software (version 1.6.22). RESULTS: In dense breasts, breast-imaging fellowship completion significantly improved specificity (p = 0.004), location sensitivity (p = 0.01) and the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (p = 0.03). Only participation in BreastScreen reading significantly improved all performance metrics: specificity (p = 0.04), sensitivity (p = 0.005), location sensitivity (p < 0.001) and AUC (p < 0.001). Reading > 100 mammograms weekly significantly improved sensitivity (p = 0.03), location sensitivity (p = 0.001), and AUC (p = 0.03).In non-dense breasts, breast fellowship completion significantly improved sensitivity (p = 0.02), location sensitivity (p = 0.04) and AUC (p = 0.002). Participation in BreastScreen reading and reading > 100 mammograms weekly significantly improved only sensitivity (p = 0.002 and p = 0.003, respectively) and location sensitivity (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Participating in screening programs, breast fellowships and reading > 100 mammograms weekly are important indicators of the diagnostic performance of radiologists across dense and non-dense breasts. In dense breasts, optimal performance resulted from participation in a breast screening program.

Reducing Unnecessary Biopsies Using Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Ultrasound in Dense and Nondense Breasts.

Aim: To compare digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and ultrasound in women recalled for assessment after a positive screening mammogram and assess the potential for each of these tools to reduce unnecessary biopsies. Methods: This data linkage study included 538 women recalled for assessment from January 2017 to December 2019. The association between the recalled mammographic abnormalities and breast density was analysed using the chi-square independence test. Relative risks and the number of recalled cases requiring DBT and ultrasound assessment to prevent one unnecessary biopsy were compared using the McNemar test. Results: Breast density significantly influenced recall decisions (p < 0.001). Ultrasound showed greater potential to decrease unnecessary biopsies than DBT: in entirely fatty (21% vs. 5%; p = 0.04); scattered fibroglandular (23% vs. 10%; p = 0.003); heterogeneously dense (34% vs. 7%; p < 0.001) and extremely dense (39% vs. 9%; p < 0.001) breasts. The number of benign cases needing assessment to prevent one unnecessary biopsy was significantly lower with ultrasound than DBT in heterogeneously dense (1.8 vs. 7; p < 0.001) and extremely dense (1.9 vs. 5.1; p = 0.03) breasts. Conclusion: Women with dense breasts are more likely to be recalled for assessment and have a false-positive biopsy. Women with dense breasts benefit more from ultrasound assessment than from DBT.