RESUMO
Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) of the breast is a rare neoplasm. We report two observations occurring in female patients, 54 and 65 years old, who consulted for a mastodynia. Clinical examination showed limited painful breast nodules. On ultrasound and mammography they are well-limited bulky mass without microcalcifications. Diagnosis was based on final histopathological exam completed by immunohistochemistry or after slides review. The two patients were treated by mammectomy plus adjuvant radiotherapy and remain alive in remission with a follow-up of 29 and 36 months.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Carcinoma Adenoide Cístico , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Mama/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Carcinoma Adenoide Cístico/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Adenoide Cístico/radioterapia , Carcinoma Adenoide Cístico/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Excisão de Linfonodo , Mamografia , Mastectomia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Exame Físico , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/métodos , Prognóstico , Radioterapia Adjuvante , Doenças Raras , Resultado do Tratamento , Tunísia , Ultrassonografia MamáriaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The evaluation of first-line intensive combination therapy in small cell carcinoma of the ovary (SCCO). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Debulking surgery; four to six cycles of chemotherapy with cisplatin (P) 80 mg/m(2) day 1, adriamycin (A) 40 mg/m(2) day 1, vepeside (V) 75 mg/m(2)/day days 1-3, cyclophosphamide (EP) 300 mg/m(2)/day days 1-3, every 3 weeks and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with, in case of a complete remission, high-dose chemotherapy with carboplatin, vepeside, cyclophosphamide and stem-cell support. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients (median age 25 years); International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage: five I, four IIC, 17 IIIC-IV and one unknown. Twenty patients underwent complete surgery. Eight patients progressed under chemotherapy. Among 18 patients in complete response (CR), 10 received high-dose chemotherapy (CT) (three stem-cell collection failures, two protocol violations, two disease progression and one refusal). The main grade 3-4 toxic effects were hematologic. There were eight relapses among the 18 CR, four of which were pelvic alone. Among the 27 patients, 13 died and 10 patients are in CR1, three in CR2. The median follow-up is 37 months (8-166) and the median duration of the 18 CR is 30 months (5-111). Overall survival at 1 and 3 years is 58% [confidence interval (CI) 40% to 75%] and 49% (CI 30% to 67%). CONCLUSIONS: Initial dose-intensive therapy achieves interesting overall survival in SCCO.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Hipercalcemia/complicações , Neoplasias Ovarianas/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Carcinoma de Células Pequenas/complicações , Criança , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Ovarianas/complicações , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide owing to its advanced-stage at the time of diagnosis. The majority of patients will require a second-line therapy after progression during first-line treatment. While treatment for NSCLC with EGFR mutation or EML4/ALK fusion, target therapy is the favored second-line therapy if not already used in first-line therapy, NSCLC with EGFR wild-type remains an unmet need and many oncologists favor cytotoxic therapy. Recently, a better understanding of lung cancer biology, with a better selection of patients based on histology, molecular biology and the identification of potential target antigens in the immune system have significantly improved patient outcome. This article will provide an update on different treatment options available for patients with EGFR wild-type advanced NSCLC who relapse after first-line therapy, which includes essentially ramucirumab, vandetanib, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab and considerations that may allow clinicians to a better choice of agent for second-line therapy.