Emergency holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP): a novel approach in the management of refractory hematuria for patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH): a single-institution experience.

INTRODUCTION: Refractory hematuria secondary to prostatic disease typically resolves with conservative management; however, this condition may require hospitalization with extensive measures to control life-threatening bleeding. The aim of this study was to report our experience using holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) as an emergency treatment in this clinical setting. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients that presented to the emergency department with refractory hematuria of prostatic origin from October 2017 to September 2021, for whom hospitalization and conservative management failed to control bleeding. All emergency HoLEP procedures were performed by a single surgeon. Preoperative and intraoperative parameters, as well as perioperative outcomes, were collected and analyzed. Postoperative outcomes included duration of foley catheterization, length of postoperative hospital stay, and hospital readmissions. RESULTS: A total of 40 emergency HoLEP procedures were performed. Our cohort had a median prostate volume of 110.5 cc and a median resected weight of 81 g. Twenty-seven patients (67.5%) were on anticoagulant or antiplatelet medications on admission. The urethral catheter was removed within 1 day in 95% of patients with a successful trial of void (TOV). Moreover, 92.5% of patients were discharged home within 24 h of their procedure. Two patients (5%) experienced clot retention within one-week post-discharge with a 2.5% overall readmission rate. All postoperative parameters, including International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), maximum flow rate (Qmax), and post-void residual volume (PVR), showed significant improvement at 1 year follow up. CONCLUSION: Our experience demonstrates that emergency HoLEP is an effective treatment option for patients with refractory hematuria of prostatic origin. Further studies are warranted to consolidate our results.

Transverse Lumbotomy for Open Partial/Radical Nephrectomy: How I Do It.

INTRODUCTION: Conventional open surgical techniques allow proper surgical management for renal malignancies but have their intrinsic drawbacks. The aim of this paper is to present our technique in minimal renal exposure while avoiding the intrinsic complications of conventional techniques. METHODS: We described our technique, which can be easily understood and replicated by urologists performing open kidney surgery. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients had this technique done safely over the last 4 years, and 3 patients had this exposure changed into intraperitoneal extended wound for very large upper pole tumours. The median operating time was 70 min. No single patient required intraoperative blood transfusion. Median warm ischemic time was 9 min. CONCLUSION: Transverse lumbotomy is a safe reproducible technique that allows proper kidney exposure through a relatively smaller wound and avoiding unnecessary auxiliary techniques as rib resection, pleural tear management, and intraperitoneal exposure.

The ex vivo and in vivo Characteristics of New DrillCutTM Prostate Morcellator after Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: A Pilot Study.

INTRODUCTION: The DrillCutTM morcellator is marketed for its fast and highly efficient removal of prostatic tissue and a higher level of patient safety. However, a paucity of publications has looked into its actual efficacy and safety. The aim of our study was to evaluate its ex vivo and in vivo efficiency and to compare its results with other devices presented in the literature. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective pilot study on patients who underwent holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) from 2017 to 2018 using the Top-Down technique. Enucleated adenomas were morcellated using the DrillCutTM morcellator. We collected both preoperative and operative data. Operative data included the enucleated adenoma weight and operative time. Various morcellator parameters were collected including morcellation time and efficiency. We recorded the encountered complications and device malfunction. Ex vivo characteristics were evaluated in terms of morcellation speed and aspiration power. RESULTS: Sixty consecutive patients with a median age of 72.8 years were included. The enucleated adenoma was retrieved in 12.5 min (4-58). The median resected prostatic weight was 90 g (44-242). The DrillCutTM efficiency was calculated as 6.46 g/min (2.7-15). Only one patient had a simple bladder mucosal injury. Device malfunction was encountered in 4 patients (6.6%) due to blockage of the morcellator blades. The ex vivo aspiration speed was 52 s/L, while the morcellation power was 14 g/2 min. CONCLUSION: Our results showed that the DrillCut morcellator was effective and safe in managing our patients post-HoLEP. The DrillCutTM has better ex vivo morcellation power but modest aspiration speed in comparison to other morcellators.

Pyelocystostomy for treatment of recurrent nephrolithiasis and ureteropelvic junction obstruction in a pelvic kidney.

Patients with pelvic kidneys are at an increased risk of developing ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) and nephrolithiasis with limited endourologic options. A 54-year-old man with a left pelvic kidney, recurrent nephrolithiasis, and 12 previous ureteroscopies presented with left UPJO and lower pole calyceal stones. After two failed ureteroscopic attempts, an open pyelolithotomy and pyelocystostomy were performed. After 30 months, he continues to be asymptomatic without recurrence of nephrolithiasis. This constitutes the fifth such reported case. Therefore, pyelocystotomy is a good option for patients with pelvic kidneys, UPJO and recurrent nephrolithiasis refractory to endourologic procedures.

Holmium:YAG transurethral incision versus laser photoselective vaporization for benign prostatic hyperplasia in a small prostate.

PURPOSE: We assess the perioperative, short-term and long-term functional outcomes of treating bladder outlet obstruction secondary to a small prostate by 1 of 2 laser techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review using a prospectively maintained database was performed of patients treated for bladder outlet obstruction secondary to a prostate smaller than 40 ml. Patients who were treated with GreenLight™ photoselective vaporization of the prostate or holmium laser transurethral incision of the prostate were included in the study. RESULTS: From January 2002 through December 2010, 191 cases of 1,682 laser prostate surgeries were described. GreenLight photoselective vaporization of the prostate was performed in 144 (75.4%) cases and holmium laser transurethral incision of the prostate was performed in 47 (24.6%) cases. A significantly shorter mean operating time, hospital stay and catheter duration were observed in the holmium laser transurethral incision of the prostate group (30.3 ± 16 minutes, 0.8 ± 0.8 days and 1.3 ± 1.9 days, respectively) than in the photoselective vaporization of the prostate group (45.8 ± 22 minutes, 0.3 ± 0.4 days and 0.4 ± 0.6 days, respectively, p <0.05). At 1 and 5 years after photoselective vaporization of the prostate there were reductions in mean International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life score and residual urine with improvement in mean maximal flow rate of 57.7% and 62.8%, 58.3% and 57.2%, 65.4% and 73%, and 127.6% and 167.1%, respectively. At 1 and 5 years after holmium laser transurethral incision of the prostate there were reductions in mean International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life score and residual urine with improvement of mean maximal flow rate of 55.3% and 52.8%, 49.2% and 49%, 45% and 78.1%, and 67.4% and 35.4%, respectively. Subjective and objective urine flow parameters were comparable at different followup points. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of early and late complications (p >0.05). Reoperation rates were 10.4% and 6.4% in the photoselective vaporization of the prostate and holmium laser transurethral incision of the prostate groups, respectively (p >0.05). The mean estimated cost per holmium laser transurethral incision of the prostate procedure was significantly lower than per photoselective vaporization of the prostate procedure (509.34CAD vs 1,765.92CAD, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Holmium laser transurethral incision of the prostate and GreenLight photoselective vaporization of the prostate seem to be equally effective, safe and durable surgical treatment options for small prostates even in high risk patients.

Safety and clinical outcomes of GreenLight laser prostatectomy in octogenarians.

INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the impact of age on perioperative morbidity and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing GreenLight laser prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of prospectively collected data from individuals who underwent GreenLight laser prostatectomy from May 2018 to July 2022. Patient demographics and outcome measures were recorded, including indications for the procedure and American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) scores. All patients had postoperative followup visits at one, three, six, and 12 months. Our evaluation included the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS ), quality of life (QoL) assessment, maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), postvoid residual volume (PVR), and catheter-free status. RESULTS: One-hundred-sixty-eight males who underwent GreenLight laser prostatectomy were included. The non-octogenarian group consisted of 111 patients and the octogenarian group comprised 57 individuals. Based on ASA scores, most octogenarians were deemed high-risk (ASA III: 91.2%), while over half of non-octogenarians were lower-risk (ASA II: 53.2%) (p<0.001). Intraoperative parameters, including operative time, vaporization time, lasing time, and energy did not differ significantly between groups. There was no difference in the proportion of intraoperative complications between non-octogenarians and octogenarians (0.9% vs. 3.5%). Postoperative complications were not statistically significant between the two groups (p=0.608). There was also no observed difference in the proportion of patients requiring readmission (p=0.226) or retreatment (p=1.0). CONCLUSIONS: GreenLight laser prostatectomy is a safe and effective treatment for BPH regardless of age. It provides similar surgical and functional outcomes as younger men while maintaining the QoL of octogenarians.

Does intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin for bladder cancer protect from COVID-19?

INTRODUCTION: The study aimed to correlate the history of intravesical BCG as well as infantile BCG immunization with the incidence and severity of COVID-19 infection. METHODS: Retrospective data collection of patients with high-risk non muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) from two Canadian centers. Data collection included a history of BCG instillation, infantile immunization, and the development of COVID-19 infection. Admission and/ or mortality because of COVID-19 was reported. RESULTS: We could include data from 348 patients: including 188 and 160 patients from Ontario and British Columbia respectively. COVID-19 affected 15% of these patients. Intravesical BCG was used in 44% of these patients. Intravesical BCG and/or infantile BCG immunization did not correlate with the incidence of COVID-19 infection. CONCLUSIONS: Previous intravesical BCG and/ or a history of infantile BCG vaccination were not more/ less frequent in patients who had COVID-19 infection.

Safety and efficacy of ambulatory tubeless mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of 10-25-mm renal calculi: A retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of ambulatory mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) in a totally tubeless exit (without a nephrostomy tube or an internal stent) and tubeless exit (without a nephrostomy tube but with an internal stent) for the treatment of renal calculi 10-25 mm in size. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent mini-PCNL at our institution between September 2018 and September 2022. The study included a cohort of 95 patients diagnosed with renal calculi measuring 10-25 mm. All patients underwent a computed tomography (CT) renal colic scan preoperatively, on postoperative day one (POD 1), and at three-month followup. Patient demographics and outcome parameters were recorded, including stone characteristics, operative time, hospital stay, stone-free rate (SFR), complication rates, and subsequent emergency room (ER) visits. Patients were considered stone-free if they had no fragments or residual fragments measuring <4 mm. RESULTS: The median maximum stone diameter was 16 mm (10-25 mm). Twenty-nine patients (30.5%) had multiple renal calculi. The median operative time was 64 (38-135) minutes. Eighty-six patients (90.5%) underwent a totally tubeless procedure, without a nephrostomy tube or an internal stent. All patients were discharged home on the same operative day with a median hospitalization time of six hours. Seven (7.4%) postoperative ER visits were recorded, and two (2.1%) led to hospital readmission. The frequency of grade I, II, and III Clavien-Dindo complications were 18 (18.9%), one (1.1%), and one (1.1%), respectively. The SFR on POD 1 and three-month followup was 73.7% and 92.6%, respectively. None of the patients in the study required retreatment. CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory tubeless mini-PCNL is a safe and effective treatment option for 10-25 mm renal stones. Experienced institutions can safely adopt ambulatory mini-PCNL as a treatment option without an increased risk of postoperative complications, ER visits, or hospital readmissions.

Efficacy and durability of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in the management of acute and chronic urinary retention: A retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Our study aimed to assess the efficacy and durability of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in managing acute urinary retention (AUR), neurogenic chronic urinary retention (NCUR), and non-neurogenic chronic urinary retention (NNCUR). We also sought to compare outcomes in patients with preoperative urinary retention (UR) to those without. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis using prospectively gathered data from men who underwent HoLEP at our institution between October 2017 and July 2022. Patient demographics and outcome measures were recorded, including indications for the procedure, median urinary volume drained, or median postvoid residual urine volume (PVR) before catheterization or HoLEP. Chronic urinary retention (CUR) was defined as PVR >300 mL in males able to void and initial catheter drainage >1000 mL in males unable to void, in the absence of pain. NCUR and NNCUR were differentiated based on the presence of any significant illness or injury with a neurologic impact on the bladder. All patients had postoperative followup visits at one, three, six, and 12 months. Our evaluation included the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality-of-life (QoL) assessment, maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), PVR, and catheter-free status. RESULTS: Three hundred sixty-eight males who underwent HoLEP were included in our study. The UR group consisted of 189 patients (70 AUR, 42 NCUR, and 77 NNCUR), and the lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) group was comprised of 179 individuals. There were no statistically significant differences between the NCUR and NNCUR subgroups regarding demographics and outcomes. At 12 months postoperative, the AUR group had a higher catheter-free rate than the CUR group (p=0.04), and other outcome variables were comparable between the two cohorts. The UR group had a significantly lower QoL score at one month (p=0.01) and a significantly lower IPSS score at one and 12 months (p=0.034 and p=0.018, respectively) than the LUTS cohort. During all followup visits, the UR group had a significantly higher PVR than the LUTS cohort. The successful first trial of void (TOV) rate for the UR and LUTS groups was 81% and 83.2%, respectively. At 12 months postoperative, the catheter-free rate for the UR and LUTS cohorts was 96.3% and 99.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: HoLEP is an effective and durable treatment for UR with a high catheter-free rate and comparable outcomes when performed to manage LUTS.

Efficacy of GreenLight laser prostatectomy in urinary retention.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and durability of GreenLight laser prostatectomy for the management of acute urinary retention (AUR) and chronic urinary retention (CUR) and to determine outcomes compared to patients without preoperative urinary retention (UR). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of prospectively collected data from individuals who underwent GreenLight laser prostatectomy at our institution from May 2018 to July 2022. Patient demographics and outcome measures were recorded, including indications for the procedure, median urinary volume drained, or median postvoid residual urine volume (PVR) before catheterization or GreenLight laser prostatectomy. CUR was defined as PVR >300 mL in males able to void and initial catheter drainage >1000 mL in males unable to void in the absence of pain. All patients had postoperative followup visits at one, three, six, and 12 months. Our evaluation included the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality-of-life (QoL) assessment, maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), PVR, and catheter-free status. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-eight males who underwent GreenLight laser prostatectomy were included in our study. The UR group consisted of 88 patients (50 AUR and 38 CUR), and the lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) group was comprised of 80 individuals. There were no statistically significant differences between the AUR and CUR subgroups regarding demographics. The UR group had a significantly higher age and a significantly higher postoperative catheterization time compared to the LUTS cohort. The CUR subgroup had a significantly higher PVR at one, three, and six months compared to the AUR subgroup, although other outcome measures were similar between the two cohorts. During three- and six-month followup visits, the UR group had a significantly higher PVR than the LUTS cohort. At 12 months postoperative, the LUTS group had a higher catheter-free rate than the UR group (p=0.001). The successful first trial of void (TOV) rate for the UR and LUTS groups were 83% and 80%, respectively. At 12-month followup, the catheter-free rate for the UR and LUTS cohorts was 87.5% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: GreenLight laser prostatectomy is an effective and durable treatment for UR, with a high catheter-free rate and comparable outcomes when performed to manage LUTS.

An analysis of benign prostatic hyperplasia surgical treatment reimbursement trends across Canada: Examining provincial changes over the recent decade with comparison to cost of living changes.

INTRODUCTION: A variety of procedures for the endoscopic surgical treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) refractory to medical therapy have existed for decades. The present study examines trends in surgeon compensation for these treatments within Canada. METHODS: The physician fee schedule for BPH surgery across 10 Canadian provinces for the years 2010 and 2023 were obtained. A descriptive study examining first, the provincial reimbursement for transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) and laser ablative/enucleation surgery; second, the difference in TURP reimbursement between 2010 and 2023; and third, the annual change in TURP reimbursement juxtaposed with the annual change in the provincial Consumer Price Index (CPI) and annual salary for the working population aged 35-44. RESULTS: Seven of 10 Canadian provinces reimburse laser BPH surgery equally to TURP. The average provincial TURP reimbursement is $545, ranging from $451 in Ontario to $688 in Saskatchewan. Since 2010, TURP reimbursement has varied by province from a 0% net change in Ontario to an increase of 21% in Nova Scotia. Reimbursement for TURP has increased at a slower pace than the local CPI, and for half of the provinces at a slower pace than the annual salary for people aged 35-44. CONCLUSIONS: The compensation model for endoscopic BPH surgery does not have a unified structure in Canada that is consistent across provinces, nor does it keep up with inflation, possibly impacting future recruitment, increasing geographic disparities, and most importantly, limiting the adoption of new BPH therapies.

Timing of Urinary Catheter Removal After Urethroplasty: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: To synthesize existing evidence to evaluate the outcomes of different urinary catheter removal timing (early vs late) after urethroplasty. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from inception to August 7, 2022. Articles were initially screened by title, abstract, and subsequently by a full paper review before being included in the final analysis. All comparative studies that assessed the association between urethral catheterization duration and frequency of extravasation and recurrence rate in patients who underwent urethroplasty were included in the analysis. Exclusion criteria were case reports, case series, letters to editors, and non-English studies. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: Of the 439 relevant records in the literature databases, 5 studies involving 634 patients were included. In all 5 studies, the extravasation rate was not significantly different between the early and late catheter removal groups. Among the 3 studies that reported recurrence rates, the recurrence rate was low, with no statistically significant difference between the early and late catheter removal groups. Wound and urinary tract infections were among the most common complications, with a higher rate in patients with late catheter removal. CONCLUSION: Early catheter removal following urethroplasty does not increase the rate of extravasation or recurrence during long-term follow-up. The existing evidence can serve as the foundation for additional research with a larger sample size.

Impact of breath-hold technique on incidence of cardiac events in adjuvant left breast cancer irradiation.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to compare the incidence of cardiac events and to identify its predictors in left breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy using breath-hold technique (DIBH) versus free breathing technique (FB). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multi-center study of two arms; the free breathing arm included 208 patients who were treated with traditional radiotherapy treatment technique, while DIBH arm included 224 patients who were treated with breath-hold technique using The Varian Real-time Position Management (RPM). We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of the patients from January 2010 to December 2017. RESULTS: The mean dose to the heart and left anterior descending artery were significantly lower in the DIBH arm (2.10 ± 0.39 and 6.16 ± 0.18 Gy) compared with (4.29 ± 0.60 Gy and 12.69 ± 0.93 Gy, respectively) in the FB arm. The incidence of cardiac events was higher in the FB arm than in the DIBH arm, but it was not statically significant. Our analysis revealed that age, diabetes, hypertension, smoking, mean LAD dose, and heart mean dose were significant prognostic factors for the occurrence of cardiac events in the breath-hold arm. Hypertension, smoking, as well as heart mean dose were independent risk factors for the occurrence of cardiac events. CONCLUSION: Use of the DIBH technique resulted in a significant reduction in doses to the heart, LAD and lesser cardiac events incidence compared to free breathing.

Endophytic to total tumour volume ratio: An added variable to patients with T1b/T2 renal tumours undergoing partial nephrectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Partial nephrectomy is the standard of care to patients with small renal masses. It is still encouraged to larger tumours whenever feasible. The aim of this study is to look for the endophytic to total tumour volume ratio as an added variable to study the complexity of partial nephrectomy to patients with T1b/ T2 renal tumours. METHODS: Retrospective data collection of patients that had partial nephrectomy for T1b/T2 renal tumours by a single surgeon was done. Radiological re-assessment for the CT images to measure the endophytic to total tumour volume ratio was done. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 63 years. The study included 25 males and 11 females. All cases were managed by open surgery using retroperitoneal transverse lateral lumbotomy and warm ischemia was used in all patients. The mean tumour volume was 74 cc, the mean endophytic tumour volume was 29 cc. The mean percentage of endophytic to total tumour volume was 42%. CONCLUSIONS: Partial nephrectomy is safe for most of the patients with good performance status, having large renal masses. More complex surgery can be predicted in patients with endophytic to total tumour volume greater than 42%.

Top-down holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) versus traditional HoLEP for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH): 1-year outcomes of a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The top-down holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) technique recently emerged as a safe and effective modification of traditional HoLEP. In our randomized controlled trial, we compared intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of traditional and top-down HoLEP for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in patients with a prostate size ≥80 g. METHODS: One-hundred patients with BPH and a prostate volume ≥80 cc participated in this prospective randomized controlled trial. Outcome measures were collected and compared, including IPSS, QoL, flow rate, PVR, IIEF-15, PSA, and TRUS prostate volume changes. Perioperative complications were also recorded. All patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in preoperative baseline characteristics between the two surgical groups. The median prostate volume for the traditional and top-down HoLEP groups was 107 and 102 cc, respectively. The operative parameters and postoperative outcomes were comparable for both cohorts. The median enucleation time for traditional HoLEP was 60 min, which was not significantly longer than that of top-down HoLEP (52 min) (p = 0.07). At 3 months follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference in transient stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in the traditional HoLEP (4.1%) versus the top-down HoLEP group (2.2%), (p = 0.61). There were no significant differences in functional and sexual outcomes between the two groups at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: The HoLEP procedure significantly improves patients' urinary functional outcomes and has comparable postoperative outcomes regardless of the technique utilized.

Thulium Fiber Laser vs Pulse-Modulated Holmium MOSES Laser in Flexible Ureteroscopy for the Management of Kidney Stones: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.

Introduction and Objective: The study's primary objective was to compare the laser efficiency and clinical outcomes of two widely used systems, the holmium MOSES laser and the thulium fiber laser (TFL), in managing kidney stones. The secondary outcomes were to evaluate the impact of stone composition on laser efficacy. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent flexible ureteroscopy (f-URS) for solitary renal calculi between December 2020 and August 2022 at our institution and had a 3-month postoperative CT scan. Patient demographics and stone parameters were recorded, including stone site, size, volume, and density. Intraoperative data were collected and analyzed, including total operative time, ureteroscopy time, lasing time, technique, total energy delivered, and stone composition. All patients underwent a CT scan at 3 months follow-up. We recorded the presence of residual stones and the percentage of stone volume reduction. Ablation efficiency was calculated by dividing the energy utilized (J) by the stone volume (mm3). The ablation speed was calculated by dividing the stone volume (mm3) by the lasing time (seconds). Patients with a stone size <4 mm were deemed stone-free. Results: The MOSES and TFL groups comprised 62 and 49 patients, respectively. There were no significant differences between groups for baseline patient demographics or stone characteristics. The two modalities had comparable total energy, laser time, efficacy, and ablation speeds. No differences were detected in stone-free rates or complications between both groups. When dealing with calcium phosphate stones, we observed that the lasing time was significantly shorter with MOSES than TFL (7.95 vs 10.85 minutes, respectively [p = 0.01]). Conclusions: MOSES and TFL laser systems had comparable efficacy for lithotripsy of renal calculi during f-URS; however, calcium phosphate stones had a longer lasing time with TFL. REB Number: 100210.

Same-day trial of void and discharge following standard vs. MOSESTM holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: A single-center experience.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to compare perioperative and postoperative outcomes and to assess the safety and feasibility of same-day trial of void (TOV) in patients who underwent standard holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) vs. MOSESTM HoLEP (MoLEP). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of prospectively collected data of patients that underwent HoLEP (100 W) or MoLEP (120 W) with same-day catheter removal three hours postoperatively at our institution from August 2018 to September 2021. Patient demographics, intraoperative parameters, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Data were compared as means with standard deviation and medians with interquartile range (IQR) or numbers and percentages. Continuous and categorical variables were assessed using the Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-squared test, respectively. Predictors of shorter enucleation time and failed same-day TOV were investigated. RESULTS: Of the 90 patients included, 28 underwent HoLEP while 62 had MoLEP. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of the successful TOV (23 [82%] vs. 58 [93.5%], p=0.1) and readmission rate (3 [10.7%] vs. 1 [1.6%], p=0.08); however, the MoLEP group had a significantly shorter mean enucleation time (p<0.001), mean hemostasis time (p<0.001), mean morcellation time (p=0.003), and lower mean energy used (p<0.001). On the logistic regression model, MoLEP (odds ratio [OR] 0.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.007-0.19, p<0.001), lower preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.01-1.55, p=0.03), and smaller prostate size (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02-1.09, p<0.001) were independent predictors of shorter enucleation time. History of preoperative retention was the only significant factor associated with a failed same-day TOV (p=0.04). There was no difference in intraoperative or postoperative complication rates or postoperative functional outcomes between the two technologies. CONCLUSIONS: Same-day TOV and discharge are feasible following standard HoLEP and MoLEP, with comparable outcomes; however, the use of MOSESTM technology offered better enucleation efficiency with excellent hemostatic potential. Preoperative retention was the only predictor of failed same-day TOV.

History of infantile BCG immunization did not predict lamina propria invasion and/or high-grade in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of infantile BCG vaccination history in predicting stage and grade of tumours in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from patients from a single center who were diagnosed with new NMIBC and underwent transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) between 2017 and 2022. We assessed BCG immunization status with various demographics and comorbidities, as well as tumour recurrence, progression, stage, and grade. RESULTS: A total of 188 patients met the inclusion criteria for our study. The mean age of patients at the time of diagnosis was significantly lower in those that had been immunized with BCG (71 ± 9) than those who had not (77 ± 10) (p < 0.0001). History of BCG immunization did not correlate with sex, history of diabetes mellitus (DM), prior history of intravesical BCG treatment, and tumour recurrence, progression, stage, and grade. CONCLUSIONS: History of infantile BCG vaccination did not correlate with the depth of invasion and/or the grade in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Patients that received infantile BCG vaccination were significantly younger at the time of diagnosis of NMIBC.

Holmium Laser Xpeeda Vaporization vs GreenLight XPS Vaporization of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Obstruction: 1-Year Results from a Randomized Controlled Clinical Study.

Introduction and Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of Holmium Laser Xpeeda Vaporization and GreenLight XPS Vaporization of the prostate in patients with prostate size ≤80 g. Methods: Ninety-two men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate size ≤80 g scheduled for laser prostatectomy were included in this prospective randomized trial. Outcome measures were collected and compared, including International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), flow rate, postvoid residual urine volume (PVR), International Index of Erectile Dysfunction (IIEF)-15, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), transrectal ultrasound prostate volume, and catheterization time. Perioperative complications were also recorded. Patients were offered a trial of void (TOV) 3 hours after their procedures. All patients were followed-up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Results: There were no significant differences in preoperative baseline data between the two surgical groups. Operative parameters and postoperative outcomes were comparable. Effective same-day TOV was noted in 73.1% and 72.7% of the Xpeeda and GreenLight XPS patients, respectively (p = 0.98). All patients were discharged home within 24 hours of their surgeries. The laser energy and postoperative complications were significantly lower in the Xpeeda group (p = 0.002 and p = 0.026, respectively). At 3 months, the PSA levels significantly dropped in both groups (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in functional and sexual outcomes between the two groups at 12 months. Conclusions: Holmium Laser Xpeeda Vaporization and GreenLight XPS Vaporization are safe and effective in the treatment of BPH. Same-day discharge with early TOV is a feasible option. Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT04386941.

Can we predict the outcome of 532 nm laser photoselective vaporization of the prostate? Time to event analysis.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the safety, efficacy and predictability of the long-term outcome of GreenLight™ (532 nm laser) photoselective vaporization of the prostate to treat patients with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a longitudinal study of patients who underwent GreenLight (532 nm laser) photoselective vaporization of the prostate at our center between June 2002 and November 2011. All patient data were prospectively maintained in the prostate unit database. Two types of laser equipment were used, including the KTP in 91 cases (31.6%) and the GreenLight HPS™ in 197 (68.4%). RESULTS: Larger glands were treated with HPS and KTP photoselective vaporization (mean ± SD volume 45.6 ± 22.5 and 39.6 ± 15.2 ml, respectively, p <0.05). After photoselective vaporization with the KTP laser, we noted a 59.1% and 61.8% decrease in the International Prostate Symptom Score, and a 140.7% and 118.4% improvement in the maximal urine flow rate at 1 and 5 years, respectively. Similarly, after prostate vaporization with the HPS we observed a 65.1% and 62.1% decrease in the International Prostate Symptom Score, and a 123.1% and 107.3% improvement in the maximal urine flow rate at 1 and 4 years, respectively. At a mean of 40.5 months (range 3 to 114) of followup reoperation was indicated in 7.6% of cases. The overall rates of bladder neck contracture, de novo urethral stricture and residual/recurrent adenoma were 3.4% (10 cases), 2.1% (6) and 2.1% (6) with no statistically significant difference between vaporization with the KTP and HPS lasers. Most adverse events occurred during year 1 postoperatively. More bladder neck contractures developed after vaporization was done in smaller glands (p <0.05). More cases with residual prostatic adenoma had a prostate volume of 50 ml or greater vs less than 50 ml (4 of 71 or 5.6% vs 2 of 207 or 0.96%). CONCLUSIONS: GreenLight (532 nm laser) photoselective vaporization of the prostate seems to be safe and effective for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. A long lasting, successful outcome is predictable. With careful surveillance during year 1 postoperatively and early intervention for adverse events, a sustainable functional outcome could be achieved without re-treatment.