Quality-of-life evaluation for patients submitted to nasal endoscopic surgery for resection of pituitary tumours.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the pre- and post-operative quality-of-life of patients submitted to the resection of pituitary adenoma via endoscopic transsphenoidal. METHODS: This was a prospective study on patients submitted to endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery with the harvest of a nasoseptal flap who responded to the questionnaires FV-36 and SNOT-22 in the pre-operative and in months 1, 3 and 6 following the surgical procedure. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients submitted to pituitary adenoma resection surgery via endoscopic transsphenoidal with a nasoseptal flap were recruited. In all of the physical and mental domains (SF-36) evaluated, there was an improvement in the long-term evaluation (6 months), compared to the pre-operative, as well as in the site-specific evaluation (SNOT-22). CONCLUSION: The global and site-specific questionnaires in the 6th post-operative month follow-up presented an important improvement in all the physical and mental domains evaluated, as well as in nasal function in the perception of the patients submitted to pituitary adenoma resection via endoscopic transsphenoidal, demonstrating the safety and efficiency of the procedure.

Evaluation of olfactory function in patients undergoing endoscopic skull base surgery with nasoseptal flap.

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic transnasal access to the skull base, both for treatment and reconstruction, can cause olfactory morbidity. Knowing the main consequences of this intervention is essential to have objective criteria for decision-making regarding the appropriate surgical technique. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to determine the impact on olfactory function of the endonasal endoscopic access to the skull base with the creation of the nasoseptal flap. METHODS: A prospective research was carried out in which 22 patients who underwent endoscopic transnasal surgery at the skull base, with the creation of a nasoseptal flap. The Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center test was applied before and at the 1st, 3rd and 6th postoperative months. RESULTS: The results showed that only in the first month of follow-up the mean patient classification was statistically worse than at the other evaluation moments (p<0.05), but there was no mean difference in the Connecticut score classification between the other moments (p>0.05); that is, patients showed worsening in the 1st month and returned to the preoperative mean after the 3rd month of follow-up. CONCLUSION: The present study showed that the postoperative decrease in olfaction is transient, since the patient's sense of smell returns to pre-surgical values in the 3rd postoperative month.

Relationship Between the Bilateral Removal of the Middle Nasal Turbinate and the Olfactory Function in Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of endonasal endoscopic access to the skull base on the olfaction sense, involving the harvest of a nasoseptal flap, with the removal of the middle nasal turbinate. METHODS: A study was performed on a prospective cohort of 50 patients who underwent transnasal endoscopic surgery of the anterior skull base, with the harvest of a nasoseptal and reverse flap. The patients were divided into 2 groups: partial unilateral removal of the middle nasal turbinate and bilateral removal. Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center tests were administered before surgery and in months 1, 3, and 6 after surgery. RESULTS: There was no difference in the olfactory sense, when comparing the partial removal of the middle nasal turbinate and the bilateral removal, as well as when comparing the side without the middle nasal turbinate and the side with this structure preserved. There was a worsening in olfaction (P < 0.001) in months 1 and 3 after surgery, returning to baseline in month 6 (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral removal of the middle nasal turbinate, compared with unilateral resection, showed no impact on the olfactory function 6 months after surgery. In both groups, there was a transitory decrease in the first month, but this normalized by the sixth postoperative month.

Closure of Skull Base Defects after Endonasal Endoscopic Resection of Planum Sphenoidale and Tuberculum Sellae Meningiomas.

BACKGROUND: The expanded endoscopic endonasal transplanum transtuberculum approach allows tumor removal by minimally invasive procedures. A large dural and bone defect is created during the surgical procedure, increasing the risk of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to describe a surgical technique and complications observed in patients undergoing endonasal resection of planum sphenoidale and/or tuberculum sellae meningiomas. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of patients with planum sphenoidale and/or tuberculum sellae meningiomas after expanded endoscopic endonasal resection between June 2013 and August 2018, in which autologous grafts, fascia lata inlay, and nasoseptal flap onlay were used for closure of skull base defects. RESULTS: Ten patients were included in the analysis. No cases of postoperative CSF leakages or meningitis were reported, whereas two patients evolved with postoperative infectious complications (fungal ball in right frontal sinus and brain abscess). The skull base defect created for resection measured, on average, 3.58 cm2. CONCLUSION: Our experience suggests that closure of skull base defects using combined fascia lata inlay and nasoseptal flap onlay is effective for preventing postoperative CSF leakage in resection of planum sphenoidale and/or tuberculum sellae meningiomas, and offers high reproducibility due to its low cost.

Evaluation of olfactory function in patients undergoing endoscopic skull base surgery with nasoseptal flap / Avaliação da função olfatória nos pacientes submetidos à cirurgia endoscópica da base do crânio com realização de retalho nasosseptal

Abstract Introduction Endoscopic transnasal access to the skull base, both for treatment and reconstruction, can cause olfactory morbidity. Knowing the main consequences of this intervention is essential to have objective criteria for decision-making regarding the appropriate surgical technique. Objectives The aim of this study is to determine the impact on olfactory function of the endonasal endoscopic access to the skull base with the creation of the nasoseptal flap. Methods A prospective research was carried out in which 22 patients who underwent endoscopic transnasal surgery at the skull base, with the creation of a nasoseptal flap. The Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center test was applied before and at the 1st, 3rd and 6th postoperative months. Results The results showed that only in the first month of follow-up the mean patient classification was statistically worse than at the other evaluation moments (p < 0.05), but there was no mean difference in the Connecticut score classification between the other moments (p > 0.05); that is, patients showed worsening in the 1st month and returned to the preoperative mean after the 3rd month of follow-up. Conclusion The present study showed that the postoperative decrease in olfaction is transient, since the patient's sense of smell returns to pre-surgical values in the 3rd postoperative month.

Resumo Introdução O acesso transnasal endoscópico à base do crânio, tanto no tratamento quanto na reconstrução, pode ocasionar morbidade olfatória. Conhecer as principais consequências dessa intervenção é fundamental para se dispor de elementos objetivos para a decisão da técnica cirúrgica adequada. Objetivo Determinar o impacto na função olfatória do acesso endoscópico endonasal à base do crânio com confecção do retalho nasosseptal. Método Foi feita pesquisa prospectiva na qual foram incluídos 22 pacientes submetidos à cirurgia endoscópica transnasal à base do crânio com confecção de retalho nasosseptal. Foi aplicado o teste Connecticut chemosensory clinical research center antes e após o 1°, 3° e 6° meses da cirurgia. Resultados Os resultados evidenciaram que apenas no 1° mês de seguimento a classificação média dos pacientes foi estatisticamente pior do que nos demais momentos de avaliação (p < 0,05), mas entre os demais momentos não houve diferença média na classificação do escore de Connecticut (p >0,05), ou seja, os pacientes pioraram no 1° mês e voltaram à média pré-operatória a partir do 3° mês de seguimento. Conclusão No presente estudo, demonstramos que a diminuição do olfato pós-operatória é transitória, já que, no 3° mês depois da cirurgia, o olfato do paciente retorna aos valores pré-cirúrgicos.