Apixaban compared to heparin/vitamin K antagonist in patients with atrial fibrillation scheduled for cardioversion: the EMANATE trial.

Aim: The primary objective was to compare apixaban to heparin/vitamin K antagonist (VKA) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and ≤48 h anticoagulation prior to randomization undergoing cardioversion. Methods: One thousand five hundred patients were randomized. The apixaban dose of 5 mg b.i.d. was reduced to 2.5 mg b.i.d. in patients with two of the following: age ≥ 80 years, weight ≤ 60 kg, or serum creatinine ≥ 133 µmol/L. To expedite cardioversion, at the discretion of the investigator, imaging and/or a loading dose of 10 mg (down-titrated to 5 mg) was allowed. The endpoints for efficacy were stroke, systemic embolism (SE), and death. The endpoints for safety were major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding. Results: There were 1038 active and 300 spontaneous cardioversions; 162 patients were not cardioverted. Imaging was performed in 855 patients, and 342 received a loading dose of apixaban. Comparing apixaban to heparin/VKA in the full analysis set, there were 0/753 vs. 6/747 strokes [relative risk (RR) 0; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0-0.64; nominal P = 0.015], no SE, and 2 vs. 1 deaths (RR 1.98; 95% CI 0.19-54.00; nominal P > 0.999). In the safety population, there were 3/735 vs. 6/721 major (RR 0.49; 95% CI 0.10-2.07; nominal P = 0.338) and 11 vs. 13 CRNM bleeding events (RR 0.83; 95% CI 0.34-1.89; nominal P = 0.685). On imaging, 60/61 with thrombi continued randomized treatment; all (61) were without outcome events. Conclusions: Rates of strokes, systemic emboli, deaths, and bleeds were low for both apixaban and heparin/VKA treated AF patients undergoing cardioversion. Clinical Trials.gov number: NCT02100228.

Long-term intersession variability for single-breath diffusing capacity.

BACKGROUND: Characterizing long-term diffusing capacity (DL(CO)) variability is important in assessing quality control for DL(CO) equipment and patient management. Long-term DL(CO) variability has not been reported. OBJECTIVES: It was the aim of this study to characterize long-term variability of DL(CO) in a cohort of biocontrols and to compare different methods of selecting a target value. METHODS: Longitudinal DL(CO) monitoring of biocontrols was performed as part of the inhaled insulin development program; 288 biocontrols were tested twice monthly for up to 5 years using a standardized technique. Variability, expressed either as percent change or DL(CO) units, was assessed using three different target values. RESULTS: The 90th percentile for mean intersession change in DL(CO) was between 10.9 and 15.8% (2.6-4.1 units) depending on the target value. Variability was lowest when the mean of all DL(CO) tests was used as the target value and highest when the baseline DL(CO) was used. The average of the first six DL(CO) tests provided an accurate estimate of the mean DL(CO) value. Using this target, the 90th percentile for mean intersession change was 12.3% and 3.0 units. Variability was stable over time and there were no meaningful associations between variability and demographic factors. CONCLUSIONS: DL(CO) biocontrol deviations >12% or >3.0 units, from the average of the first six tests, indicate that the instrument is not within quality control limits and should be carefully evaluated before further patient testing.

Efficacy and Safety of Inhaled Human Insulin (Exu hera®) Compared to Subcutaneous Insulin in Children Ages 6 to 11 Years with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: Results of a 3-Month, Randomized, Parallel Trial.

AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of Exubera® (EXU) with subcutaneous (SC) insulin in children, ages 6-11 years, with type 1 diabetes mellitus. DESIGN AND METHODS: 121 children were randomized to receive EXU or SC insulin, plus intermediate/ long-acting insulin for 12 weeks. Change in HbA1c was the primary efficacy endpoint. RESULTS: Decreases from baseline HbA1c were comparable between treatment groups ( difference between adjusted mean decrease from baseline [EXU - SC insulin], -0.23 [95% CI, -0.49, 0.03]). Differences between groups on pulmonary function tests were small and not significant. Mild to moderate cough occurred in 24.6% of EXU versus 6.8% of SC insulin patients. The risk for hypoglycemia was comparable between EXU and SC insulin (relative risk 0.88 [95% CI, 0.71, 1.11]). Increased insulin antibodies with EXU were not associated with clinical findings. CONCLUSION: The efficacy and safety profiles shown in this study are the foundation for further investigation of EXU in this population.

Intersession variability in single-breath diffusing capacity in diabetics without overt lung disease.

RATIONALE: American Thoracic Society guidelines state that a 10% or greater intersession change in diffusing capacity of the lung (DL(CO)) should be considered clinically significant. However, little is known about the short-term intersession variability in DL(CO) in untrained subjects or how variability is affected by rigorous external quality control. OBJECTIVES: To characterize the intersession variability of DL(CO) and the effect of different quality control methods in untrained individuals without significant lung disease. METHODS: Data were pooled from the comparator arms of 14 preregistration trials of inhaled insulin that included nonsmoking diabetic patients without significant lung disease. A total of 699 participants performed repeated DL(CO) measurements using a highly standardized technique. A total of 948 participants performed repeated measurements using routine clinical testing. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The mean intersession absolute change in DL(CO) using the highly standardized method was 1.45 ml/minute/mm Hg (5.64%) compared with 2.49 ml/minute/mm Hg (9.52%) in the routine testing group (P < 0.0001 for both absolute and percent difference). The variability in absolute intersession change in DL(CO) increased with increasing baseline DL(CO) values, whereas the absolute percentage of intersession change was stable across baseline values. Depending on the method, 15.5 to 35.5% of participants had an intersession change of 10% or greater. A 20% or greater threshold would reduce this percentage of patients to 1 to 10%. CONCLUSIONS: Intersession variability in DL(CO) measurement is dependent on the method of testing used and baseline DL(CO). Using a more liberal threshold to define meaningful intersession change may reduce the misclassification of normal variation as abnormal change.

Efficacy and safety of inhaled human insulin (Exubera) compared to subcutaneous insulin in children ages 6 to 11 years with type 1 diabetes mellitus: results of a 3-month, randomized, parallel trial.

AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of Exubera (EXU) with subcutaneous (SC) insulin in children, ages 6-11 years, with type 1 diabetes mellitus. DESIGN AND METHODS: 121 children were randomized to receive EXU or SC insulin, plus intermediate/long-acting insulin for 12 weeks. Change in HbA1c was the primary efficacy endpoint. RESULTS: Decreases from baseline HbA1c were comparable between treatment groups (difference between adjusted mean decrease from baseline [EXU-SC insulin], -0.23 [95% CI, -0.49, 0.03]). Differences between groups on pulmonary function tests were small and not significant. Mild to moderate cough occurred in 24.6% of EXU versus 6.8% of SC insulin patients. The risk for hypoglycemia was comparable between EXU and SC insulin (relative risk 0.88 [95% CI, 0.71, 1.11]). Increased insulin antibodies with EXU were not associated with clinical findings. CONCLUSION: The efficacy and safety profiles shown in this study are the foundation for further investigation of EXU in this population.

Desvenlafaxine Versus Placebo in the Treatment of Children and Adolescents with Major Depressive Disorder.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety of desvenlafaxine versus placebo in the treatment of children and adolescents with major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: Outpatient children (7-11 years) and adolescents (12-17 years) who met DSM-IV-TR criteria for MDD and had screening and baseline Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R) total scores >40 were randomly assigned to 8 weeks of treatment with placebo, low exposure desvenlafaxine (20, 30, or 35 mg/day based on baseline weight), or higher exposure desvenlafaxine (25, 35, or 50 mg/day based on baseline weight). The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline in CDRS-R total score at week 8, analyzed using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures. Secondary efficacy assessments included Clinical Global Impressions-Severity and Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scales. Safety assessments included adverse events and the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale. RESULTS: The safety population included 363 patients (children, n = 109; adolescents, n = 254). No statistical separation from placebo was observed for either desvenlafaxine group for CDRS-R total score or for any secondary efficacy endpoint. At week 8, adjusted mean (standard error) changes from baseline in CDRS-R total score for the desvenlafaxine low exposure, desvenlafaxine high exposure, and placebo groups were -23.7 (1.1), -24.4 (1.1), and -22.9 (1.1), respectively. The incidence of adverse events was similar among groups. CONCLUSION: Low and high exposure desvenlafaxine groups did not demonstrate efficacy for the treatment of MDD in children and adolescents in this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Desvenlafaxine (20-50 mg/day) was generally safe and well tolerated with no new safety signals identified in pediatric patients with MDD in this study.

Desvenlafaxine Versus Placebo in a Fluoxetine-Referenced Study of Children and Adolescents with Major Depressive Disorder.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety of desvenlafaxine (25-50 mg/d) compared with placebo in children and adolescents with major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: Outpatient children (7-11 years) and adolescents (12-17 years) who met DSM-IV-TR criteria for MDD and had screening and baseline Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R) total scores >40 were randomly assigned to 8-week treatment with placebo, desvenlafaxine (25, 35, or 50 mg/d based on baseline weight), or fluoxetine (20 mg/d). The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline in CDRS-R total score at week 8, analyzed using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures. Secondary efficacy endpoints included week 8 Clinical Global Impressions-Severity, Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I), and response (CGI-I ≤ 2). Safety assessments included adverse events, physical and vital sign measurements, laboratory evaluations, electrocardiogram, and the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale. RESULTS: The safety population included 339 patients (children, n = 130; adolescents, n = 209). The primary endpoint, change from baseline in CDRS-R total score at week 8, did not statistically separate from placebo, for either desvenlafaxine (adjusted mean [standard error] change, -22.6 [1.17]) or fluoxetine (-24.8 [1.17]; placebo, -23.1 [1.18]). Week 8 CGI-I response rates were significantly greater for fluoxetine (78.2%; p = 0.017) than for placebo (62.6%); desvenlafaxine (68.7%) did not differ from placebo. Other secondary outcomes were consistent with those obtained with CDRS-R. Rates of treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable among treatment groups (desvenlafaxine, 60.0%; placebo, 70.5%; and fluoxetine, 64.3%). CONCLUSION: Desvenlafaxine did not demonstrate efficacy for treating MDD in children and adolescents in this trial. Because neither desvenlafaxine nor the reference medication, fluoxetine, demonstrated a statistically significant difference from placebo on the primary endpoint, this was considered a failed trial and no efficacy conclusions can be drawn. Desvenlafaxine 25-50 mg/d was generally safe and well tolerated in children and adolescents in this study.

Instrument accuracy and reproducibility in measurements of pulmonary function.

BACKGROUND: The objective of the study was to quantify the accuracy and reproducibility of five commercially available pulmonary function test (PFT) instruments (Collins CPL [Ferraris Respiratory; Louisville, CO]; Morgan Transflow Test PFT System [Morgan Scientific; Haverhill, MA]; SensorMedics Vmax 22D [VIASYS Healthcare; Yorba Linda, CA]; Jaeger USA Masterscreen Diffusion TP [VIASYS Healthcare]; and Medical Graphics Profiler DX System [Medical Graphics Corp; St. Paul, MN]) that are associated with spirometry and the measurement of pulmonary diffusing capacity. METHODS: In a multifactor, single-center, repeated-measures, full factorial 90-day study, a pulmonary waveform generator and a single-breath simulator of diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (Dlco) were used to perform simulations of FVC and Dlco maneuvers. Accuracy was assessed as the difference between the observed and simulated values. Reproducibility was determined as the coefficient of variation of all measurements made during the study. RESULTS: All instruments demonstrated a high degree of accuracy in the measurement of FVC and FEV(1). Overall, the accuracies associated with the measurement of peak flow, forced expiratory flow, mid-expiratory phase, and diffusing capacity were generally lower and more variable among the instruments tested. The coefficients of variation of Dlco measurements over 90 days were higher than those observed for spirometry. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the feasibility of assessing the accuracy and reproducibility of modern PFT instruments using simulation testing. Our results provide an assessment of the component of PFT accuracy and reproducibility that is due to instrumentation alone.

Sources of long-term variability in measurements of lung function: implications for interpretation and clinical trial design.

BACKGROUND: The objective of the study was to characterize the biological and technical components of variability associated with longitudinal measurements of FEV(1) and carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (Dlco). Variability was apportioned to subject and instrument for five commercially available pulmonary function testing (PFT) systems: Collins CPL (Ferraris Respiratory; Louisville, CO); Morgan Transflow Test PFT System (Morgan Scientific; Haverhill, MA); SensorMedics Vmax 22D (VIASYS Healthcare; Yorba Linda, CA); Jaeger USA Masterscreen Diffusion TP (VIASYS Healthcare; Yorba Linda, CA); and Medical Graphics Profiler DX System (Medical Graphics Corporation; St. Paul, MN). METHODS: This was a randomized, replicated cross-over, single-center methodology study in 11 healthy subjects aged 20 to 65 years. Spirometry and Dlco measurements were performed at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Repetitive simulations of FEV(1) and Dlco were performed on the same instruments on four occasions over a 90-day period using a spirometry waveform generator and a Dlco simulator. RESULTS: The coefficient of variation associated with repetitive measurements of FEV(1) or Dlco in subjects was consistently larger than that associated with repetitive simulated waveforms across the five instruments. Instrumentation accounted for 13 to 58% of the total FEV(1) and 36 to 70% of the total Dlco variability observed in subjects. Sample size estimates of hypothetical studies designed to detect treatment group differences of 0.050 L in FEV(1) and 0.5 mL/min/mm Hg in Dlco varied as much as four times depending on the instrument utilized. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide a semiquantitative assessment of the biological and technical components of PFT variability in a highly standardized setting. They illustrate how instrument choice and test variability can impact sample size determinations in clinical studies that use FEV(1) and Dlco as end points.

Standardization of the single-breath diffusing capacity in a multicenter clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Standardization of the measurement of single-breath diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) is difficult to implement in multicenter trials as differences in equipment, training, and performance guidelines have led to high variability between and within centers. The safety assessment of inhalable insulin required the standardization of measurement of single-breath DLCO in multicenter clinical trials to optimize test precision. METHODS: This was an open-label, 24-week, parallel-group, outpatient study of inhaled human insulin in participants with type 1 diabetes who were randomly assigned to receive treatment with daily premeal inhaled or subcutaneous (SC) insulin for 12 weeks, followed by SC insulin for 12 weeks. Monitoring of single-breath DLCO using standardized methodology was performed. Standardization included uniform instrumentation, centrally trained study coordinators, and centralized data monitoring and review of quality control. Sites received feedback within 24 h for any tests of unacceptable quality with recommendations for improvement. RESULTS: A total of 226 study participants at 33 sites completed 11,335 DLCO efforts during 4,797 test sessions; 3,607 (75.2%) and 4,581 (95.5%) of all testing sessions yielded two American Thoracic Society-acceptable efforts that varied by < 1 and 2 mL/min/mm Hg, respectively. Only 65 sessions produced one or fewer acceptable efforts. The root mean square intrasubject coefficient of variation in DLCO at the end of the comparative dosing phase was 6.01%. CONCLUSIONS: The standardized methodology employed in this study demonstrates the feasibility of collecting high-quality single-breath DLCO data in the setting of a multicenter clinical trial with reliability that is comparable to spirometry.

Efficacy and safety of CP-945,598, a selective cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist, on weight loss and maintenance.

Three double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-parallel-group, multicenter phase 3 trials were conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of CP-945,598 for weight loss and weight-loss maintenance. Two trials were designed to be 2 years in duration (in obese and overweight patients) and one as a 1-year study (in obese and overweight patients with type 2 diabetes). However, the 2-year trials and the CP-945,598 development program were terminated before completion due to changing regulatory perspectives of CB1 receptor-related drugs. In total, 1,253 and 2,536 participants in the two 2-year multinational and North American studies were randomized to 10-mg CP-945,598 (n = 360; 718); 20-mg CP-945,598 (n = 534, 1,084) and placebo (n = 359, 734), respectively; and 975 participants were randomized to 10-mg CP-945,598 (n = 318); 20-mg CP-945,598 (n = 320); and placebo (n = 337) in the 1-year multinational diabetes trial. Baseline demographics were similar between treatment groups within each trial. One year of treatment with CP-945,598 resulted in a dose-related mean percentage reduction from baseline body-weight in all trials. A significant proportion of all participants also achieved 5% and 10% weight loss after 1 year. In participants with mainly well-controlled type 2 diabetes, the combination of lifestyle and CP-945,598 induced substantial improvements in glycemic control. The most frequent adverse events (AEs) for CP-945,598 were: diarrhea, nausea, nasopharyngitis, and headache. Self-reported experiences of anxiety and suicidal thoughts were higher with CP-945,598 than placebo, as were the incidence of depression and depressed mood. However, the reported increases in psychiatric symptoms were not consistently dose dependent.