A population-based assessment of primary care visits during adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: We used administrative health data to explore the impact of primary care physician (pcp) visits on acute-care service utilization by women receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer (ebc). METHODS: Our population-based retrospective cohort study examined pcp visits and acute-care use [defined as an emergency room (er) visit or hospitalization] by women diagnosed with ebc between 2007 and 2009 and treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify the effect of pcp visits on the likelihood of experiencing an acute-care visit. RESULTS: Patients receiving chemotherapy visited a pcp significantly more frequently than they had before their diagnosis [relative risk (rr): 1.48; 95% confidence interval (ci): 1.44 to 1.53; p < 0.001] and significantly more frequently than control subjects without cancer (rr: 1.51; 95% ci: 1.46 to 1.57; p < 0.001). More than one third of pcp visits by chemotherapy patients were related to breast cancer or chemotherapy-related side effects. In adjusted multivariate analyses, the likelihood of experiencing an er visit or hospitalization increased in the days immediately after a pcp visit (rr: 1.92; 95% ci: 1.76 to 2.10; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: During chemotherapy treatment, patients visited their pcp more frequently than control subjects did, and they visited for reasons related to their breast cancer or to chemotherapy-related side effects. Visits to a pcp by patients receiving chemotherapy were associated with an increased frequency of er visits or hospitalizations in the days immediately after the pcp visit. Those results suggest an opportunity to institute measures for early detection and intervention in chemotherapy side effects.

Control of cardiovascular risk factors among adult cancer survivors: a population-based survey.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer survivors, with the risk increasing significantly with the presence of multiple cardiac risk factors (RF). The proportion of cancer survivors at elevated risk of CVD on the basis of multiple RF is unknown. METHODS: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES 1999-2006) was used to examine the proportion of cancer survivors with multiple RF (≥2RF) and those at high cardiac risk (≥4 RF) compared with matched controls. RF (hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, weight, exercise, smoking) were defined according to AHA/ACC. RESULTS: A total of 1,227 cancer survivors and 4,782 controls were identified. The majority of both cancer survivors and controls had multiple RF (91.5 vs. 89.9%) with a substantial proportion at high cardiac risk (35.2 vs. 32.6%). Compared to controls, survivors were more likely to be smokers (34.5 vs. 25.7%, p = 0.001), but less likely be overweight (67.2 vs. 72.0%, p = 0.02). There was no significant difference in the proportion with hypertension (30.6 vs. 30.8%), hypercholesterolemia (52.4 vs. 54.7%) or low exercise (75.6 vs. 73.0%). Among survivors, only age was associated with RF; with older survivors significantly more likely to have poor control than younger survivors (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of multiple RF was similar but suboptimal among cancer survivors and controls. Cardiac RF control, particularly among older survivors, is an important area of focus for improvement in survivorship care.